Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Keeping your premium stipend

CJ Christensen
Secondlife chilled GURU
Join date: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 122
06-01-2006 07:43
From: someone

its the individual business's that have to change to fit in the world not the world to change to fit in with the business.


ADAPT.
Rasah Tigereye
"Buckaneer American"
Join date: 30 Nov 2003
Posts: 783
06-01-2006 07:49
From: CJ Christensen
ADAPT.



Land tier? Constant. Exchange rate? Can't be controlled. Prices? Have to be set at minimums to cover expenses. ADAPT? Seems something sellers and players will have to deal with.
Troy Vogel
Marginal Prof. of ZOMG!
Join date: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 478
06-01-2006 09:18
Honestly, the last time I actually spent my stipend in world was 6 months ago.

Many other shop keepers will tell you the same. For me the stipend does not exist anyway because the moment I am paid my stipend, I pay right back to LL for classifieds. Most advertisements less than 500 lindens in my kind of business do not even show up at a decent point in the list.

So really from my point of view, how is my stipend increasing the linden dollars in the economy since LL is not spending the lindens they receive.

Troy
_____________________
Yumi Murakami
DoIt!AttachTheEarOfACat!
Join date: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 6,860
06-01-2006 10:28
From: Rasah Tigereye
But... but... but... $L... $USD... Aren't most land owners, especially island owners, tied to the L/USD exchange rate since they depend on their $L sales to help with the tier? I thought the whole economy of SecondLife depended on exchanges between users and LindenLab for land, and in turn between players and content developers for $L to pay for that land?


I also had that perception. But in some general experience I've had, although this does happen a lot, it's not the be-all-end-all. There are at least a reasonable number of content creators who set their tier according to what they're prepared to pay IRL and just use the L$ they earn to buy other people's content. I was going to say "smaller" content creators but that's not quite true - I believe at least one such person owns an island, and many of them share island ownership. Most of them, also, are not "bad" content creators (some are :) ), they just create content for vertical markets.

From: someone
So, if someone has $100, that money is only $100 if they were in their own little world completely apart from everything and everyone else, but they exist in the whole of the SL economy, where $100 is loosing its value.


The L$100 is only losing its value if currency value is propagated into SL as price changes, and most of the people described above have no real interest in doing that. That's probably why there's such a huge argument starting about it on some of the other forums - if a market is dominated by creators who don't cash out, then they can't count on other creators in the same market raising their prices too, meaning that they'll lose out in terms of what they can buy from markets where creators do cash out and thus can raise their prices.

From: someone

I mean, how is what they are saying any different from, say, a German in the 1930s saying that their 100 Deutchmarks are still worth the same to them, and will always be the same to them, especially since they earn and spend their Deutchmarks within Germany, while everyone else's prices increase due to its huge decline in value, with their 100 Deutchmakrs eventually being worth almost nothing?


Because Germany couldn't function as a closed system - there's some things it will have to import/export. SL could function as a closed system - it would just mean that content creators would be limited to being of the type described above, who pays their tier themselves and then uses earned L$ to boost their experience. Yes, SL would not work as well, it would be much smaller and would lack a lot of quality content, but it wouldn't collapse completely like a RL country would.
CJ Christensen
Secondlife chilled GURU
Join date: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 122
06-07-2006 04:26
and then it died down... as the lindex stabalised and people could carry on drooling over their exploitation of lindex hype posting!

-- (
1 2 3