Over 2,000,000 L$ at 300!!!!!
|
Shaun Altman
Fund Manager
Join date: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 1,011
|
03-23-2006 14:18
From: Red Mars Absolutely! I'll bring the tar and feathers!!! Someone bring the rope and torches!! It actually ISN'T such a bad idea to identify the people entering limit orders (which, sadly, is currently the only way to sell). I think that if you're going to essentially quote the value of the L$, you should be known. I'm currently debating whether to slide this feature into the next generation of my stock trading platform. So far I think it's a good idea, and the feedback I've received has been positive.
|
Static Sprocket
Registered User
Join date: 10 Feb 2006
Posts: 157
|
03-23-2006 14:18
From: Eboni Khan I have always had my payouts from the Lindex in a few hours. Not everyone is that lucky :: /139/ae/95193/1.html
|
Areth Gall
Registered User
Join date: 9 Jan 2006
Posts: 40
|
03-23-2006 14:19
From: Introvert Petunia I don't doubt your statement about the referral payments (or that some Linden said that somewhere), but if true perhaps they should consider taking down the page that describes them which is coincidentally the first link on right side of the What is Second Life? page. Ah. Point made. But the Lindens still make more USD than they give out in Linden Conversions, although not by much. My apologies though, as I did forget about this fact.
|
eltee Statosky
Luskie
Join date: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 1,258
|
03-23-2006 14:51
I'd say it would make more sense to limit yer ability to 'manipulate' things... if you want YOUR MONEY to sell *NOW* you can set it *one $L* over the current price... honestly.. supporting any 'greater' undervaluation on a single sale, than that one $L, is prety much just asking for people to make mistakes (like the whole 2700 fiasco) or attempt to manipulate the market by tricking OTHER people into selling low, (like the guy who keeps seeding L$300 every other day, and found a *BIG* 'winner' last night when someone without looking posted 2+ mil right after he did it.
Because thats what happened.. same person who has done it for about 2 months, every other day, got 'lucky' and immediately following his little 5k spit at 300, someone SLAMMED 2 mil ontop of it, probably without even looking, just pickin the default price, and going from there
(as an alternative, it could be set to default to the 'better for the seller' of 'average' and 'current best'.. aka if the daily average was 270 but someone put a blip at 300 *RIGHT* before someone else clicked in, it might suggest 270 as the current suggested sell price... if the 'average' was at 290 but it had been bought down to 275, it would suggest 275)
I mean honestly what happened is some joker 'lost' about 6 cents by sellin his $L a little higher, and he lost *EVERYONE ELSE* who sold last night, about a total of $450... that shouldn't be acceptable, should it?
_____________________
wash, rinse, repeat
|
Shaun Altman
Fund Manager
Join date: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 1,011
|
03-23-2006 15:15
From: eltee Statosky I'd say it would make more sense to limit yer ability to 'manipulate' things... if you want YOUR MONEY to sell *NOW* you can set it *one $L* over the current price... honestly.. supporting any 'greater' undervaluation on a single sale, than that one $L, is prety much just asking for people to make mistakes (like the whole 2700 fiasco) or attempt to manipulate the market by tricking OTHER people into selling low, (like the guy who keeps seeding L$300 every other day, and found a *BIG* 'winner' last night when someone without looking posted 2+ mil right after he did it.
Because thats what happened.. same person who has done it for about 2 months, every other day, got 'lucky' and immediately following his little 5k spit at 300, someone SLAMMED 2 mil ontop of it, probably without even looking, just pickin the default price, and going from there
(as an alternative, it could be set to default to the 'better for the seller' of 'average' and 'current best'.. aka if the daily average was 270 but someone put a blip at 300 *RIGHT* before someone else clicked in, it might suggest 270 as the current suggested sell price... if the 'average' was at 290 but it had been bought down to 275, it would suggest 275)
I mean honestly what happened is some joker 'lost' about 6 cents by sellin his $L a little higher, and he lost *EVERYONE ELSE* who sold last night, about a total of $450... that shouldn't be acceptable, should it? It would make more sense to just do what works, and simply implement a realistic 2 sided market model. This is more of a classified ad than a market. If there were buy orders we wouldn't see any of this junk. Why should LL re-invent the wheel, and at the same time rig the market, when they can just do what works?
|
Jon Rolland
Registered User
Join date: 3 Oct 2005
Posts: 705
|
03-23-2006 16:04
From: Elde Eponym If LL used part of the premium each month to purchase $L to pay the stipends with, then yes - stipends would be paid for as part of the premium.
But that's not what is happening - the premium stipend, like the basic stipend, is money newly printed each week. The premium stipend does not come from the market, it comes from outside. Thus the economic effects of the premium stipend are equivalent to that of the basic stipend. And i suppose if I paid a musician for a concert they would have to buy that concert from someone else in order for me to have paid for the concert? ROFL! Regardless of the impact on the game economy Jonas and every other premium member PAID for their stipends. They gave someone cash in exchange for goods and services recieved. They paid for it. geez Are you RBD's alt?
|
Jonas Pierterson
Dark Harlequin
Join date: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 3,660
|
cute, but wrong
03-23-2006 16:14
From: someone Elde: If LL used part of the premium each month to purchase $L to pay the stipends with, then yes - stipends would be paid for as part of the premium. Wrong. I pay LL, they give me a stipend. Thats called a transaction, and the source of the stipend's funds do not matter in its terms. It boils down to this: I pay premium fees. Linden Labs pays me a weekly stipend in L$. Bought and paid for.
_____________________
Good freebies here and here I must protest. I am not a merry man! - Warf, ST: TNG, episode: Qpid You killed my father. Prepare to die. - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride You killed My father. Your a-- is mine! - Hellboy
|
Shaun Altman
Fund Manager
Join date: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 1,011
|
03-23-2006 16:40
From: Jonas Pierterson Wrong. I pay LL, they give me a stipend. Thats called a transaction, and the source of the stipend's funds do not matter in its terms. It boils down to this:
I pay premium fees.
Linden Labs pays me a weekly stipend in L$.
Bought and paid for. 
|
eltee Statosky
Luskie
Join date: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 1,258
|
03-23-2006 17:43
From: Shaun Altman It would make more sense to just do what works, and simply implement a realistic 2 sided market model. This is more of a classified ad than a market. If there were buy orders we wouldn't see any of this junk.
Why should LL re-invent the wheel, and at the same time rig the market, when they can just do what works? i don't think creating an unstable permanently falling economy works, unless yer of course 'short selling' the $L for fun and profit, or running some kind of interest based scam
_____________________
wash, rinse, repeat
|
Nargus Asturias
Registered User
Join date: 16 Sep 2005
Posts: 499
|
03-23-2006 18:06
From: Red Mars So wait .. let me get this straight. You believe that their are people intentionally selling $L at this price to somehow make money... so you want to stop it because ... YOU aren't making money off it too?
Did I get that right? Did I miss anything?
You want the $L to be sold in a manner that makes you money, but if someone else is making money in such a way that you can't, then that's bad. They're manipulating the market in their favor and that's BAD, so you want to manipulate the market in your favor so that's GOOD.
Mmmm ok. I think I understand now. Yes, I'm making money off it, I'm planning to get a land soon and I need USD money reserve. But I won't try to manipulate the market and getting profit out of unstable exchange rate. I always sell my L$ below the highest price and wait till it goes down to that rate. But yes, I second using Today's Average as default price. That will eliminate many errors from unknowledge sellers.
_____________________
Nargus Asturias, aka, StreamWarrior Blue Eastern Water Dragon Brown-skinned Utahraptor from an Old Time
|
ReserveBank Division
Senior Member
Join date: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,408
|
03-23-2006 18:10
We need a Futures Market on Linden Dollars.
I'll Buy Dec05 100,000 Puts @ L$300
|
Shaun Altman
Fund Manager
Join date: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 1,011
|
03-23-2006 18:43
From: eltee Statosky i don't think creating an unstable permanently falling economy works, unless yer of course 'short selling' the $L for fun and profit, or running some kind of interest based scam Those problems are fundamental and have nothing to do with the currency exchange. I thought you were discussing the exchange market model itself. The economic issues are a whole other ball of wax, which I'm pleased to learn that LL is finally taking a close and professional look at with a real economist.
|
Jon Rolland
Registered User
Join date: 3 Oct 2005
Posts: 705
|
03-23-2006 22:52
From: ReserveBank Division We need a Futures Market on Linden Dollars.
I'll Buy Dec05 100,000 Puts @ L$300 how soon do you want them? and can i sell you a bridge to go with your expired options? *big grin*
|
Jesrad Seraph
Nonsense
Join date: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 1,463
|
03-23-2006 22:55
From: ReserveBank Division We need a Futures Market on Linden Dollars. I've been suggesting this several times already. We can sell at a given rate, why can't we buy at a given rate too ? With enough Buy orders at rate+1, manipulation like the one we saw yesterday would be much harder, as pending Buys would damp the rise of the rate immediately.
_____________________
Either Man can enjoy universal freedom, or Man cannot. If it is possible then everyone can act freely if they don't stop anyone else from doing same. If it is not possible, then conflict will arise anyway so punch those that try to stop you. In conclusion the only strategy that wins in all cases is that of doing what you want against all adversity, as long as you respect that right in others.
|
Lord Kaos
Linux User
Join date: 1 Oct 2005
Posts: 34
|
03-24-2006 05:14
Kool the rate is back to 300 , with an amount of 38 000L!
(and even nothing between 299 and 291)
|
Jason Foo
Old Timer
Join date: 6 Feb 2004
Posts: 105
|
03-24-2006 05:20
Here we go again, who the hell is the one selling at 300? either a complete idiot, or someone with a master evil plan. Dr. Evil?
|
ReserveBank Division
Senior Member
Join date: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,408
|
03-24-2006 05:22
From: Jon Rolland how soon do you want them? and can i sell you a bridge to go with your expired options? *big grin* Only if the bridge is over a lake in the Sahara.. Otherwise, no deal.
|
ReserveBank Division
Senior Member
Join date: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,408
|
03-24-2006 05:26
From: Jesrad Seraph I've been suggesting this several times already. We can sell at a given rate, why can't we buy at a given rate too ? With enough Buy orders at rate+1, manipulation like the one we saw yesterday would be much harder, as pending Buys would damp the rise of the rate immediately. I agree Jesrad.. But these are complex economic terms for the Linden Labs Mgmt team to understand. Anything beyond a basic Buy/Sell is beyond the scope of Linden Comprehension... Oh course, if you start a 3rd party firm to meet this demand, it'll only take a short time before Linden Labs decides to GOM You in the Back. Virtual World Financial Pipeline Shutting Down written by Tony Walsh | posted on September 27, 2005 @ 11:03 pm tagged Business Internet Networks Mixed Reality Second Life Virtual Reality http://www.secretlair.com/index.php?/clickableculture/entry/virtual_world_financial_pipeline_shutting_down/The Gaming Open Market (GOM), which traded the virtual-world finances of Second Life for real-world currency, will be closing Sunday, October 2. The shutdown of the trusted currency exchange comes on the heels of its president's resignation, and after the makers of Second Life announced their intention to implement their own integrated currency exchange into the virtual world (thus getting the home field advantage over competing traders). The absence of the GOM could have a major impact on Second Life's economy and its resident entrepreneurs, some of whom are able to make a decent salary from cashing out play-money accumulated from virtual-world transactions. Linden Lab hasn't yet launched their integrated currency exchange, leaving residents to deal with IGE, a large and clumsy virtual-world financial pipeline catering to numerous online games.
|
ReserveBank Division
Senior Member
Join date: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,408
|
03-24-2006 05:27
From: Jason Foo Here we go again, who the hell is the one selling at 300? either a complete idiot, or someone with a master evil plan. Dr. Evil? I take the 5th...
|
Jesrad Seraph
Nonsense
Join date: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 1,463
|
03-24-2006 05:31
From: Jason Foo Here we go again, who the hell is the one selling at 300? either a complete idiot, or someone with a master evil plan. Dr. Evil? The only rational explanation I can find is that the person is expecting a panic sell to bring the rate even lower, for later profit when the rate stabilizes back.
_____________________
Either Man can enjoy universal freedom, or Man cannot. If it is possible then everyone can act freely if they don't stop anyone else from doing same. If it is not possible, then conflict will arise anyway so punch those that try to stop you. In conclusion the only strategy that wins in all cases is that of doing what you want against all adversity, as long as you respect that right in others.
|
Lord Kaos
Linux User
Join date: 1 Oct 2005
Posts: 34
|
03-24-2006 05:39
Welcome to SL.
|
Ricky Zamboni
Private citizen
Join date: 4 Jun 2004
Posts: 1,080
|
03-24-2006 08:35
From: Jesrad Seraph The only rational explanation I can find is that the person is expecting a panic sell to bring the rate even lower, for later profit when the rate stabilizes back. How about, "Damn it! Every time I place my currency for sale at L$1 below the current rate, some joker comes in and undercuts me and my order never sells. Well, I'm getting sick of it! I'm placing it at L$10 below the current rate so I can just get rid of it." Case in point: About a month ago, there were roughly L$6M available at L$261/US$, which were typically undercut by a few million placed L$1 to $L3 below it. A couple of weeks ago, the L$6M order had dropped down to L$278, again with a couple of million quickly piling up just below it. Now, that L$278 order has begun evaporating, and I'd bet dollars to donuts it's partly due to sellers getting suck of their stuff not selling.
|
ReserveBank Division
Senior Member
Join date: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,408
|
03-24-2006 08:56
From: Ricky Zamboni How about, "Damn it! Every time I place my currency for sale at L$1 below the current rate, some joker comes in and undercuts me and my order never sells. Well, I'm getting sick of it! I'm placing it at L$10 below the current rate so I can just get rid of it."
Case in point: About a month ago, there were roughly L$6M available at L$261/US$, which were typically undercut by a few million placed L$1 to $L3 below it. A couple of weeks ago, the L$6M order had dropped down to L$278, again with a couple of million quickly piling up just below it. Now, that L$278 order has begun evaporating, and I'd bet dollars to donuts it's partly due to sellers getting suck of their stuff not selling. And that is just how Markets should work. Just like the current Real Estate Slowdown. People put their home on the market for US$700,000 and it doesn't move, but similar homes are still selling for US$650,000. Which means the person asking US$700,000 can either wait until the market to correct or lower the price to complete the Sale. The same logic applies to the Linden Dollar. 'Cept some people around here seem to think they have a "right" to a higher price and that market dynamics don't apply to them for some reason.
|
Anshe Chung
Business Girl
Join date: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 1,615
|
03-24-2006 10:22
Oh my, what one thread!  Of course the idea to drive down some L$ market that trades 6+ mio daily is complete nonsense. Every L$ you sell you must first remove from the market before you can put it back into market. And the one who loose money of course is yourself  The simple and much less spectacular truth is: 1) there is some businesses that must convert 7 digits L$ on daily basis to funds auctions, tier and salaries and 2) if you put 2 mio L$ on LindeX these days, if not put it slightly below market it will not sell, but instead after maybe 10% sells, the market will drop below. In this particular case you saw L$ convert into US$ to mostly funds Dreamland tier charges during remainder of this month.
_____________________
ANSHECHUNG.COM: Buy land - Sell land - Rent land - Sell sim - Rent store - Earn L$ - Buy L$ - Sell L$ SLEXCHANGE.COM: Come join us on Second Life's most popular website for shopping addicts. Click, buy and smile 
|
ZATZAi Asturias
Artificial Isle
Join date: 7 Oct 2005
Posts: 189
|
03-26-2006 22:01
Hehe, hey Anshe, is there a group we can join to get announcements when your going to sell at this rate, or is this a monthly affair we should all come to expect? 
_____________________
- ZATZAi
|