I don't get it...
|
Nexus Nash
Undercover Linden
Join date: 18 Dec 2002
Posts: 1,084
|
04-20-2006 09:23
After the release of that data, something isn't adding up...
L$ per capita is down GDP per capita is up Spending per capita is almost 100% up (in real
The L$ should be going up...
Are we simply facing a credibility problem? People anticipate the L$ to go down so it does?!
Is it because we are expecting the L$ to go down, ( ie like the interest rate is going down (left movment of the IS curve), restrictive monetairy policy (LM up) ). I'm almost ready to blam it on anticipation and lost of confidence in the L$ or 'money run'... IE no one wants to hold L$ so they get ride of it so it's value goes down. (This happened in Brazil in the 90s) what's the term again... dollarisation...
|
Lordfly Digeridoo
Prim Orchestrator
Join date: 21 Jul 2003
Posts: 3,628
|
04-20-2006 10:02
The value's going down because there isn't really anything to spend it on. Land sales are flat now that everyone's renting, there aren't any "must have" items that have come out lately; content creators are simply dumping the money as it comes in back out into the Lindex. There's nothing buoying its value.
_____________________
---- http://www.lordfly.com/ http://www.twitter.com/lordfly http://www.plurk.com/lordfly
|
Desmond Shang
Guvnah of Caledon
Join date: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 5,250
|
04-20-2006 10:08
This is a really good question - I've puzzled over it some but I don't have any pre-set ideology or preconceptions to explain it. That leaves just the facts, and thinking. I'll get back to you if I figure anything out.
_____________________
 Steampunk Victorian, Well-Mannered Caledon!
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
04-20-2006 10:11
I have to say that I've been wondering the same thing... what's come out lately to spend Lindens on? If the drop in the value of the Linden is due to a lack of compelling content, then killing Dwell payments won't do squat to fix it.  PS: From: Nexus Nash Proposal 1165 - Inventory Shortcuts Transferred my votes from a similar proposal to this one.
|
Fade Languish
I just build stuff...
Join date: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 1,760
|
04-20-2006 10:17
This is why I've always argued against the single-variable theorists. I think the real truth may be there's a myriad of causes, some economic, but some psychological, other in-world factors such as Lordfly suggested... sometimes I think even a particularly bad update, or lag could be a factor, if it's reducing the desirabilty of SL enough could lead people not to buy Lindens. Human behaviour is rarely simple.
|
Introvert Petunia
over 2 billion posts
Join date: 11 Sep 2004
Posts: 2,065
|
04-20-2006 10:20
GDP as applied to SL is only slightly less meaningful than in RL.
In RL, if we have a fender bender, the GDP goes up by the amount of our repair bills even though nothing of "value" has been created only restored to its former state. In SL, if I give you L$1000 because I think you are nifty and you give me L$1000 to stay away from you, the GDP has just gone up by L$2k even though absolutely, literally nothing happened - all wallets and inventories remain as they were.
And what LF said.
|
Schwanson Schlegel
SL's Tokin' Villain
Join date: 15 Nov 2003
Posts: 2,721
|
04-20-2006 10:22
I still beleive their are several big players that would like to see the value of the $L remain low on Lindex.
By placing these large holding blocks they insure that the smaller sellers will leap frog their positions, thus devaluing the $L more. Lack of confidence of course plays into this, if people were confident the $L would recover quickly from these holding blocks, they would likely not leap frog those positions. That or I am completely fucking nuts and have no clue as to what I am talking about. ***shrugs***
|
Psyra Extraordinaire
Corra Nacunda Chieftain
Join date: 24 Jul 2004
Posts: 1,533
|
04-20-2006 10:22
From: Lordfly Digeridoo there aren't any "must have" items that have come out lately I know this is true of me, I've lost the knack since about October last year. Creativity waning. Damn management germs.....  Alice: You have drunk from the cup of management. Loud Howard: NOW YOU'RE INFECTED. Dilbert: What are you talking about? That's ridiculous. Wally: Soon your technical skills will evaporate like the fine mist on a summer lawn.
_____________________
E-Mail Psyra at psyralbakor_at_yahoo_dot_com, Visit my Webpage at www.psyra.ca  Visit me in-world at the Avaria sims, in Grendel's Children! ^^
|
Nexus Nash
Undercover Linden
Join date: 18 Dec 2002
Posts: 1,084
|
04-20-2006 10:44
From: Argent Stonecutter Transferred my votes from a similar proposal to this one. Ya it's not my prop, but I would find it really usfull! Ya I think it's anticipations in general. People don't trust LL, or anticipate LL to boost the L$ in anyway. Philip should take a 'Greenspan' role, say all is well so everything goes well. That and what LF said 
|
ReserveBank Division
Senior Member
Join date: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,408
|
04-20-2006 11:34
From: Lordfly Digeridoo The value's going down because there isn't really anything to spend it on. Land sales are flat now that everyone's renting, there aren't any "must have" items that have come out lately; content creators are simply dumping the money as it comes in back out into the Lindex. There's nothing buoying its value. The actually hits on a point I've always harped about. There are no "investments" in SL to lock up L$ from being sold on the LindenX. If somebody gives me L$1,000,000 because I sold them a widget, what are my choices to do with that cash aside from selling it on the LindenX for USD? There are no Bonds, Stock Markets, Commodities to stockpile, etc... Once you own a plot of land, built your prim house/store to your liking, an acquired all the cool widgets in the game, you are done. You have nothing to spend your money on, just sell it on LindenX and collect your USDs.. If LL could develop ways of in-game investment vehicles, then people would invest. And to do so, they would create a demand for L$, causing the price to rise.
|
Fade Languish
I just build stuff...
Join date: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 1,760
|
04-20-2006 11:37
From: ReserveBank Division The actually hits on a point I've always harped about. There are no "investments" in SL to lock up L$ from being sold on the LindenX.
If somebody gives me L$1,000,000 because I sold them a widget, what are my choices to do with that cash aside from selling it on the LindenX for USD? There are no Bonds, Stock Markets, Commodities to stockpile, etc...
Once you own a plot of land, built your prim house/store to your liking, an acquired all the cool widgets in the game, you are done. You have nothing to spend your money on, just sell it on LindenX and collect your USDs..
If LL could develop ways of in-game investment vehicles, then people would invest. And to do so, they would create a demand for L$, causing the price to rise. Struggling to find your relevance in the post dwell world?
|
ReserveBank Division
Senior Member
Join date: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,408
|
04-20-2006 12:35
From: Fade Languish Struggling to find your relevance in the post dwell world? Fade: Forget about Dwell. That is nothing more than a handout. What I'm talking about is creating Investment Opportunities in SL. Allow players to issue interest paying bonds on their land as a possible investment spark in SL. A player issues a Bond for L$100,000 against their land for 1 year at say 8%. So over the course of the year, that player pays off the bond, netting the investors (bond buyers) L$108,000. Who in turn trade the bond among themselves for a price over that year. If the user defaults, their land is revoked and pass onto a 3rd party for sale. The proceeds of the sale are paid to the bond holders. So from the player side, they can receive investment money and use their valuable land as leverage in the short term. Maybe use the money to pay scripters to create cool new content (ie: Tringo). The investors pile in to gobble up those bonds to earn cash over the long term. Throw in a couple of safe guards to make sure nobody screws anybody and boom. You'll have an economic boomtime on your hands. And its a Win-Win for everybody. And best of all, since everything is quoted in Linden Dollars, folks have to "buy" Linden Dollars to do business. Sparking a demand for L$ and pushing up the valuation. Having a similar effect of making the Linden Dollar a Reserve Currency like the USD....
|
Fade Languish
I just build stuff...
Join date: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 1,760
|
04-20-2006 12:42
From: ReserveBank Division Fade:
Forget about Dwell. It was never a thought of mine to forget RBD.
|
Caliandris Pendragon
Waiting in the light
Join date: 12 Feb 2004
Posts: 643
|
04-20-2006 13:17
I think the Lindex exchange system is partly to blame for this. Many people like me who only occasionally sell and buy Lindens, didn't realise that you could set your price with the new system - they automatically accepted the price that the system filled in for them. I know that has changed now, but there are still a lot of occasional traders who are simply going to accept whatever price is filled in for them by the system/LL.
Myabe that doesn't have an immediate impact, but I think it will have a gradual one, whichever way the system is set to react. Cali
_____________________
Numbakulla: Pot Healer's Mystery, free to play and explore http://caliinsecondlife.blogspot.com/ http://www.nemesis-content.com]Nemesis Content Creation _________________________________________________ The main obstacle to discovery is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge~Daniel J. Boorstin
|
Balthazar Rothschild
Registered User
Join date: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 6
|
04-20-2006 13:57
From: ReserveBank Division Fade:
Forget about Dwell. That is nothing more than a handout. What I'm talking about is creating Investment Opportunities in SL.
Allow players to issue interest paying bonds on their land as a possible investment spark in SL. A player issues a Bond for L$100,000 against their land for 1 year at say 8%. So over the course of the year, that player pays off the bond, netting the investors (bond buyers) L$108,000. Who in turn trade the bond among themselves for a price over that year.
If the user defaults, their land is revoked and pass onto a 3rd party for sale. The proceeds of the sale are paid to the bond holders.
So from the player side, they can receive investment money and use their valuable land as leverage in the short term. Maybe use the money to pay scripters to create cool new content (ie: Tringo). The investors pile in to gobble up those bonds to earn cash over the long term. Throw in a couple of safe guards to make sure nobody screws anybody and boom. You'll have an economic boomtime on your hands. And its a Win-Win for everybody.
And best of all, since everything is quoted in Linden Dollars, folks have to "buy" Linden Dollars to do business. Sparking a demand for L$ and pushing up the valuation. Having a similar effect of making the Linden Dollar a Reserve Currency like the USD.... I've been thinking that something like this would be great. I'm sure many people are thinking smilar thoughts. Although, I was thinking about an exchange that was more like penny stocks for smaller RL companies. Of course significant due diligence would have to be performed, but talk about an enormous economic boost.
|
Kazanture Aleixandre
Here I am.
Join date: 5 Oct 2005
Posts: 524
|
04-20-2006 13:58
From: Nexus Nash After the release of that data, something isn't adding up...
L$ per capita is down GDP per capita is up Spending per capita is almost 100% up (in real
The L$ should be going up...
Are we simply facing a credibility problem? People anticipate the L$ to go down so it does?!
Is it because we are expecting the L$ to go down, ( ie like the interest rate is going down (left movment of the IS curve), restrictive monetairy policy (LM up) ). I'm almost ready to blam it on anticipation and lost of confidence in the L$ or 'money run'... IE no one wants to hold L$ so they get ride of it so it's value goes down. (This happened in Brazil in the 90s) what's the term again... dollarisation... Wanna hear what? Only a theory: Look at last 4 months' data(whatever data you have.) You wont believe me but there is only one reasen for the current L$ low value: Telehub land buy backs.It was the activation energy for the L$ value drop. When i looked the data i saw something, there was a magical balance between L$ market stock and L$/usd rate till telehub land buybacks, Then...: 1-: P2P announced. 2-: People cried /130/6f/73873/1.html3-: Some told them not to cry : /130/6f/73873/4.html#post7991254-: LL offered buy back with EXTRA CREATED L$, not with USD : /3/32/79899/1.html5-: Telehub land owners sold their telehub lands, and converted this extra L$s to usd on the market. 6-: L$ value dropped fast : People told different reasons about it. But it was about overstocked lindex because of extra Telehub buy back L$s at this month. 7-: People lost trust to L$ value. 8-: L$ stock at the market normal at the moment but there is no real reason to gain value again if LL doesnt create an artificial reason: Dont accept sell requests for this weekend(i never suggest).Possible results: Pink one : L$ gains value ad everything will be better Black result : Trust to L$ will decrease more and people will start to think: "what if one day LL blocks sells for a month?Where can i sell? omg SELL NOW?!?!" Alternative solution? Maybe a slow one, reduce L$ stock at the market(cancel dwell payments(done), more sinks etc). I am not sure about this one's success. There is no real reason for L$ to gain value again. So, maybe we will be able to start to learn with 300/usd value, it will damage some residents(especially land business people) for months, it will damage LL(less sim sells etc.). It will be a long and hard way to walk. BTW i dont agree with supply/demand comments, there are many REAL economical value in SL: chat, sex, advertisement opportunuties, fun... AND, LL, if you decide to buy back things again please buy with USD if you can, if you cant, just dont buy back. LL must understand one thing: L$ is not free, and must be managed carefully. Unfortunately all residents paid(less income(devaluation) for business owners, lower stipend(devaluation) for all residents,Cancel of dwell(devaluation)) for the telehub land buy backs, Not LL. But it was not LL's fault, they are not economy professors, they couldnt guess, their first business is creating a wonderfull virtual world platform and they are doing it very well. But when it comes to economy, please be more carefull.
|
Jellin Pico
Grumpy Oldbie
Join date: 3 Aug 2003
Posts: 1,037
|
04-20-2006 14:09
I think being able to buy plots of land directly from the Linden land auction with $L like we used to be able to do would be the one and only shot the economy needs.
_____________________
 It's Official! From: Trinity Serpentine Jellin, you are soooooo FIC! Fabulous, Intelligent and Cute
|
Keiki Lemieux
I make HUDDLES
Join date: 8 Jul 2005
Posts: 1,490
|
04-20-2006 14:21
From: Lordfly Digeridoo The value's going down because there isn't really anything to spend it on. Land sales are flat now that everyone's renting, there aren't any "must have" items that have come out lately; content creators are simply dumping the money as it comes in back out into the Lindex. There's nothing buoying its value. Perhaps for people who have been around for a while, who look at their lindens as income, there isn't much as far as content to buy. But someone likes what they see. GDP is way up, so someone feels there are worthwhile things to buy. I'm guessing that the new player today sees a heck of lot more "must have" things then the new player a year ago or two years ago.
_____________________
imakehuddles.com/wordpress/
|
Gabe Lippmann
"Phone's ringing, Dude."
Join date: 14 Jun 2004
Posts: 4,219
|
04-20-2006 14:23
From: Keiki Lemieux the new player today sees a heck of lot more "must have" things then the new player a year ago or two years ago. 
_____________________
go to Nocturnal Threads 
|
Sensual Casanova
Spoiled Brat
Join date: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 4,807
|
04-20-2006 14:24
From: Nexus Nash After the release of that data, something isn't adding up...
L$ per capita is down GDP per capita is up Spending per capita is almost 100% up (in real
The L$ should be going up...
Are we simply facing a credibility problem? People anticipate the L$ to go down so it does?!
Is it because we are expecting the L$ to go down, ( ie like the interest rate is going down (left movment of the IS curve), restrictive monetairy policy (LM up) ). I'm almost ready to blam it on anticipation and lost of confidence in the L$ or 'money run'... IE no one wants to hold L$ so they get ride of it so it's value goes down. (This happened in Brazil in the 90s) what's the term again... dollarisation... If you dont remember , on or around April 1st, Anshe Chung sold over $50,000 USD worh of $L at an extremley low rate... it will be at least another month before the market stableizes again is my guess... I am also thinking she did this to try and encourage others her A$$ was a good idea...
|
Raudf Fox
(ra-ow-th)
Join date: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 5,119
|
04-20-2006 14:32
From: Argent Stonecutter I have to say that I've been wondering the same thing... what's come out lately to spend Lindens on? If the drop in the value of the Linden is due to a lack of compelling content, then killing Dwell payments won't do squat to fix it.  PS: Transferred my votes from a similar proposal to this one. Precisely. I think a lot of people are just looking at it as a 'Quick Cashout' rather than a long term investment. Add the fact that there is a major update coming up, a lot of people are cashing out now, rather than bank it against the next update creating a new rash of "must have items." Of course the flip side to this logic is that after 1.9.1 there might be an influx of buying L, as people realize that there are things that have now become 'must haves.' (That'd be logical, but heck, when has economics ever responded to logic?)
_____________________
DiamonX Studios, the place of the Victorian Times series of gowns and dresses - Located at http://slurl.com/secondlife/Fushida/224/176
Want more attachment points for your avatar's wearing pleasure? Then please vote for
https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-1065?
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
04-20-2006 14:44
From: Psyra Extraordinaire I know this is true of me, I've lost the knack since about October last year. Creativity waning. Damn management germs.....  I'd pay upwards of L$3000 for a blindingly good Ythrian (from People of the Wind) avatar.
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
04-20-2006 14:53
From: Sensual Casanova If you dont remember , on or around April 1st, Anshe Chung sold over $50,000 USD worh of $L at an extremley low rate... And she bought a bunch of sims at the same time. You can see them coming online with some amazing terraforming north of the Atoll Continent now. There's no reason to assume anything more malicious than "she wanted to create some really nice residential sims".
|
Sensual Casanova
Spoiled Brat
Join date: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 4,807
|
04-20-2006 16:00
From: Argent Stonecutter And she bought a bunch of sims at the same time. You can see them coming online with some amazing terraforming north of the Atoll Continent now. There's no reason to assume anything more malicious than "she wanted to create some really nice residential sims". You're right... it was just a coincidence she started a thread about the A$$ currency at the same time. Regardless what she did with the money, selling $50k USD worth of $L has a big effect on the market and the reason the rates are what they are today.
|
Ricky Zamboni
Private citizen
Join date: 4 Jun 2004
Posts: 1,080
|
04-20-2006 16:08
From: Sensual Casanova You're right... it was just a coincidence she started a thread about the A$$ currency at the same time. Regardless what she did with the money, selling $50k USD worth of $L has a big effect on the market and the reason the rates are what they are today. This is completely false. The rates have been steadily decreasing for *months*. At the most, the the injection of an extra $50k may have increased the volatility of the price in that region of time.
|