Lindens get the **** off the LindeX!
|
Svar Beckersted
Registered User
Join date: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 783
|
07-21-2006 10:40
From: Amy Faddoul As you have so graciously taught me..that your all just a bunch of whiny little talking heads who, if they are disagreed with respond with OMG. Sarcasm. How dare you criticize me. If you don't like it leave. Naw. I think I'll stay. I am entitled to my 2 cents as well. See ya about. I'm not picking on you but why do you call us "all just a bunch of whiny little talking heads"? Who are you really mad at and why? We can certaintly discuss your anger and I'm not blaming you for the source of it as I'm sure it is not your fault. I'm not being sarcastic I want to hear your issues.
|
Amy Faddoul
Carrion Eater
Join date: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 129
|
07-21-2006 11:29
I do apologise to You as a human being Burnman in regards to the greedy pinhead comment. I was generalizing and I am not very well versed in the ettiquite of grammar and sentence structure. Blame chatroom burn out I suppose. But I will agree with you on one thing I am angry. Why am I angry? when I myself say it's more or less just a game? A couple of reasons I suppose. 1. I do see a distinction between the haves and have nots in this (I call it a game You can call it anything you want) game. The fact that getting rich and making money is not the whole issue. I am all for a free market economy. I am not for price gouging, blatent manipulation of the "In game" prices through forum speculation" actions of a few apparently privledged few. I makes me angry to come to these forums and see the same 12 fatcats wheeling and dealing cause they milked the system hard and fast and now can swing thier virtual dicks with impunity at anyone who stands in thier way. Again I am generalizing. I mean noone in particular and everyone of those 12 in general. this "Game" has always been for geeks,nerds, socially inept geniouses(sp= I am not one of them) to come and answer simple yes or no questions with paragraph spanning bluster and commentary on every nuanse of asked question. "I just asked if It was for sale jeeze" But I dunno call me crazy but the forums have intellectualized themselves into a virtual game of I know more then you so shut up and grovel and don't you dare so much as dissagree with me or I will verbally bludgeon you into a pixelled pulp.
As for the sarcasm. What kind of world would it be if EVERYONE had to sink down to the level of verbal one upmanship to get thier point across? I admit it. I am not as worded(long winded as mebee) as some of you folks. I can't off the top of my head spin out a half dozen Post links to everything from social economic graphical data anaylisys in regards to stratification of existing social boundries to the existence of a virtual sentient ai yeti stalking residents of neualtenburg so I, like many in my seeming social class resort to sarcasm,parody, lowbrow humor and apparently griefing to get my point across. I'm not trying to look smart. I'm just saying that no matter how you word it. If it looks like a skunk, acts like a skunk and smells like a skunk. It's probably a skunk. This current issue with the stipends,lindenX and 5k 512s looks a lot like a skunk. I'll stop posting in these forums and let the huge brained talking heads go back to thier wheeling and dealing. I'm done. Your all smarter then me. I'll let my friends know that we are just to stupid to rent your land,buy your land and to not bother with your great intellectual properties in general. I like T-shirts and stiff hair anyhow. Feel free to screech at me in world though. I actually go there. Watch out though. I am a simple peseant and may react to your mighty intelligence with fear and violence. Peace Comrades.
|
Burnman Bedlam
Business Person
Join date: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,080
|
07-21-2006 11:50
Uh... well, you and I are not much different in some of our views... we just go about them in different ways, I suppose. I sure as hell aren't one of the "power players" of SL economics... and I have been aggrivated all to hell about market manipulation through forum posts. I've discussed some of my concerns with the Lindens regarding the posts which are made simply to mess with the economy. I also hate price gouging... check my sig. Sarcasm always bugs the pants off me, which is why I reacted the way I did. I see nothing productive in it, all it does is make the target get defensive and makes dealing with an issue 10 times more difficult. Never called you stupid, just pointed out the sarcasm as obnoxious. Without it, you and I might be discussing methods of dealing with the problems rather than going back and forth about sarcasm. From: Amy Faddoul I do apologise to You as a human being Burnman in regards to the greedy pinhead comment. I was generalizing and I am not very well versed in the ettiquite of grammar and sentence structure. Blame chatroom burn out I suppose. But I will agree with you on one thing I am angry. Why am I angry? when I myself say it's more or less just a game? A couple of reasons I suppose. 1. I do see a distinction between the haves and have nots in this (I call it a game You can call it anything you want) game. The fact that getting rich and making money is not the whole issue. I am all for a free market economy. I am not for price gouging, blatent manipulation of the "In game" prices through forum speculation" actions of a few apparently privledged few. I makes me angry to come to these forums and see the same 12 fatcats wheeling and dealing cause they milked the system hard and fast and now can swing thier virtual dicks with impunity at anyone who stands in thier way. Again I am generalizing. I mean noone in particular and everyone of those 12 in general. this "Game" has always been for geeks,nerds, socially inept geniouses(sp= I am not one of them) to come and answer simple yes or no questions with paragraph spanning bluster and commentary on every nuanse of asked question. "I just asked if It was for sale jeeze" But I dunno call me crazy but the forums have intellectualized themselves into a virtual game of I know more then you so shut up and grovel and don't you dare so much as dissagree with me or I will verbally bludgeon you into a pixelled pulp. As for the sarcasm. What kind of world would it be if EVERYONE had to sink down to the level of verbal one upmanship to get thier point across? I admit it. I am not as worded(long winded as mebee) as some of you folks. I can't off the top of my head spin out a half dozen Post links to everything from social economic graphical data anaylisys in regards to stratification of existing social boundries to the existence of a virtual sentient ai yeti stalking residents of neualtenburg so I, like many in my seeming social class resort to sarcasm,parody, lowbrow humor and apparently griefing to get my point across. I'm not trying to look smart. I'm just saying that no matter how you word it. If it looks like a skunk, acts like a skunk and smells like a skunk. It's probably a skunk. This current issue with the stipends,lindenX and 5k 512s looks a lot like a skunk. I'll stop posting in these forums and let the huge brained talking heads go back to thier wheeling and dealing. I'm done. Your all smarter then me. I'll let my friends know that we are just to stupid to rent your land,buy your land and to not bother with your great intellectual properties in general. I like T-shirts and stiff hair anyhow. Feel free to screech at me in world though. I actually go there. Watch out though. I am a simple peseant and may react to your mighty intelligence with fear and violence. Peace Comrades.
_____________________
Burnman Bedlam http://theburnman.com Not happy about Linden Labs purchase of XStreet (formerly SLX) and OnRez. Will this mean LL will ban resident run online shoping outlets in favor of their own?
|
Svar Beckersted
Registered User
Join date: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 783
|
07-21-2006 11:55
From: Amy Faddoul I do apologise to You as a human being Burnman in regards to the greedy pinhead comment. I was generalizing and I am not very well versed in the ettiquite of grammar and sentence structure. Blame chatroom burn out I suppose. But I will agree with you on one thing I am angry. Why am I angry? when I myself say it's more or less just a game? A couple of reasons I suppose. 1. I do see a distinction between the haves and have nots in this (I call it a game You can call it anything you want) game. The fact that getting rich and making money is not the whole issue. I am all for a free market economy. I am not for price gouging, blatent manipulation of the "In game" prices through forum speculation" actions of a few apparently privledged few. I makes me angry to come to these forums and see the same 12 fatcats wheeling and dealing cause they milked the system hard and fast and now can swing thier virtual dicks with impunity at anyone who stands in thier way. Again I am generalizing. I mean noone in particular and everyone of those 12 in general. this "Game" has always been for geeks,nerds, socially inept geniouses(sp= I am not one of them) to come and answer simple yes or no questions with paragraph spanning bluster and commentary on every nuanse of asked question. "I just asked if It was for sale jeeze" But I dunno call me crazy but the forums have intellectualized themselves into a virtual game of I know more then you so shut up and grovel and don't you dare so much as dissagree with me or I will verbally bludgeon you into a pixelled pulp.
As for the sarcasm. What kind of world would it be if EVERYONE had to sink down to the level of verbal one upmanship to get thier point across? I admit it. I am not as worded(long winded as mebee) as some of you folks. I can't off the top of my head spin out a half dozen Post links to everything from social economic graphical data anaylisys in regards to stratification of existing social boundries to the existence of a virtual sentient ai yeti stalking residents of neualtenburg so I, like many in my seeming social class resort to sarcasm,parody, lowbrow humor and apparently griefing to get my point across. I'm not trying to look smart. I'm just saying that no matter how you word it. If it looks like a skunk, acts like a skunk and smells like a skunk. It's probably a skunk. This current issue with the stipends,lindenX and 5k 512s looks a lot like a skunk. I'll stop posting in these forums and let the huge brained talking heads go back to thier wheeling and dealing. I'm done. Your all smarter then me. I'll let my friends know that we are just to stupid to rent your land,buy your land and to not bother with your great intellectual properties in general. I like T-shirts and stiff hair anyhow. Feel free to screech at me in world though. I actually go there. Watch out though. I am a simple peseant and may react to your mighty intelligence with fear and violence. Peace Comrades. I just want to thank you for sharing that with me. You are entitled to your opinion and I respect it. I myself am a non-land owning noobie who spends many hours inworld and have called SL a game as well. That really irritates some people but if SL weren't a game to me I wouldn't be here. I have been playing computer games for over 25 years and SL is my first on-line game so it is still new to me. I have only 1 account and am amused at those who have multiple accounts mostly to troll the forums. I find it great entertainment when my inworld partner is away and I am bored. The LindeX fasinates me and that is why I spend so much time in this forum. Have fun ingame and I will look for your posts in the forums as well.
|
Dark Korvin
Player in the RL game
Join date: 13 Jun 2005
Posts: 769
|
07-21-2006 12:11
From: Amy Faddoul I do apologise to You as a human being Burnman in regards to the greedy pinhead comment. I was generalizing and I am not very well versed in the ettiquite of grammar and sentence structure. Blame chatroom burn out I suppose. But I will agree with you on one thing I am angry. Why am I angry? when I myself say it's more or less just a game? A couple of reasons I suppose. 1. I do see a distinction between the haves and have nots in this (I call it a game You can call it anything you want) game. The fact that getting rich and making money is not the whole issue. I am all for a free market economy. I am not for price gouging, blatent manipulation of the "In game" prices through forum speculation" actions of a few apparently privledged few. I makes me angry to come to these forums and see the same 12 fatcats wheeling and dealing cause they milked the system hard and fast and now can swing thier virtual dicks with impunity at anyone who stands in thier way. Again I am generalizing. I mean noone in particular and everyone of those 12 in general. this "Game" has always been for geeks,nerds, socially inept geniouses(sp= I am not one of them) to come and answer simple yes or no questions with paragraph spanning bluster and commentary on every nuanse of asked question. "I just asked if It was for sale jeeze" But I dunno call me crazy but the forums have intellectualized themselves into a virtual game of I know more then you so shut up and grovel and don't you dare so much as dissagree with me or I will verbally bludgeon you into a pixelled pulp. As for the sarcasm. What kind of world would it be if EVERYONE had to sink down to the level of verbal one upmanship to get thier point across? I admit it. I am not as worded(long winded as mebee) as some of you folks. I can't off the top of my head spin out a half dozen Post links to everything from social economic graphical data anaylisys in regards to stratification of existing social boundries to the existence of a virtual sentient ai yeti stalking residents of neualtenburg so I, like many in my seeming social class resort to sarcasm,parody, lowbrow humor and apparently griefing to get my point across. I'm not trying to look smart. I'm just saying that no matter how you word it. If it looks like a skunk, acts like a skunk and smells like a skunk. It's probably a skunk. This current issue with the stipends,lindenX and 5k 512s looks a lot like a skunk. I'll stop posting in these forums and let the huge brained talking heads go back to thier wheeling and dealing. I'm done. Your all smarter then me. I'll let my friends know that we are just to stupid to rent your land,buy your land and to not bother with your great intellectual properties in general. I like T-shirts and stiff hair anyhow. Feel free to screech at me in world though. I actually go there. Watch out though. I am a simple peseant and may react to your mighty intelligence with fear and violence. Peace Comrades. I don't believe I've seen many that say they are smarter than others when it comes to the economy. There are a few like Lina and ReserveBank that will tell people that they don't understand the economy, but that is all a matter of politics. You see republicans telling democrats they are stupid and crazy all the time. It doesn't mean they are. Just like real life, the Second Life economy has no simple answers. There can be two valid points that say two different things at the same time. There is nothing wrong with you having an opinion that SL needs to change. Some people want the Second Life to be a better opportunity for an online business. Some people want SL to be a low cost entertainment. Others want SL to be just like another game (The Sims, WOW, There, whatever). There is nothing wrong with people having different opinions about what SL should be about. The real answer probably lies somewhere in the middle. It isn't about who is smarter, it is simply about what your personal interests are and what you want out of a system that can't always cater to everyone at once. In the end SL will become whatever Linden Labs wants it to be. If everyone disagrees with them, then they will go out of business. If people do agree with them, then they will make millions. Just feel lucky that most of us have little at stake when it comes to the success or failure of SL.
|
Lina Pussycat
Texture WizKid
Join date: 19 Jun 2005
Posts: 731
|
07-21-2006 13:20
Dark if the point of SL isnt to become in business then why is the Stipend evil in your eyes? Another thing is it doesnt take money from residents actually it gives them more money to make a profit off of. If you listened carefully to my posting i never said they thought buying it from residents was evil simply that those that dont buy L now are not likely to in the future and people wont take kindly into being forced into doing such. At one way it varies how you look at it. It may take some money from residents but at the same time if i dont have money to buy that residents product thats taking money from residents more so. LL are giving free L which takes no money from anyone and gives people money. It'd be different in the aspect if they were selling it on lindex but they arnt they give it to people who in turn often spend that stipend on products in world.
I for one just used my stipend yesterday to buy a new player a skin which was 1k. Now i would of needed to spend 3.61 at 277 > 1usd. Which was the exchange for 1k. I dont have the close to 4 dollars to buy the L alot of the time and that isnt taking money from anyone. Its giving me L which i in turn give to the person im purchasing something from and they most likely go and sell it on LindEx. Thats how SL works and thats how its worked for a long time. Your thinking is as flawed as mine if you bring that up and for you to say the point of SL isnt business after disagreeing with me seems a bit hypocritcal on your end.
What i was stating was that if Lindex is the only way for people to get L those that dont buy L now simply wont. Its not going to put demand for L up and i think alot of people fail to realize that. In the end mabye they will do it and mabye then people will see how wrong they have been when SL becomes mundane and there is nothing to do. I dont want SL to turn into something sheerly driven by business it should be a balance of social experience and business not one or the other. LL will need to balance it and realize the majority of us that are subscribers to their services (I myself pay like 95 usd a month at the moment) arnt out there trying to make money constantly and that the majority of SL are consumers and in a consumer based market one needs to have money to spend or the people hoping to make money wont make it.
Ask an expert on consumer related things as opposed to economics what is the right way to do the situation they are going to know more considering how things are driven in SL. Im not saying you dont know economics im saying you dont know SL's economy and many people dont and have proven it. I'm concerned about SL's future unlike R&D and i care for people im not calling them stupid im just saying quite simply mabye they should look into how the economy works fully before making a decision on taking out the stipend. Mabye you do understand the economy mabye you dont but if they do understand the economy my next guess would be that they dont care about SL.
I for one dont want to see things turn into what R&D wants i like SL how it is and if its focused to much onto the economic side that will ruin things regardless of what someone like R&D says. Calling people like me a bleeding heart. Well guess what buddy the majority of the people in SL are and you cant just replace what is already here that easily. Dark i say how people dont know much about the economy because quite simply look at posts made by quite a few people. They prove either 1 they know little about sl's economy or 2 that they dont care about SL in general. I argue the point because i am a more social player even though i co own a club i do it for fun im not cashing out constantly and then pushing to ruin stuff for people that play socially.
Realize that the social player makes up the majority of the residents in SL and that ruining that aspect of things will only hurt SL's future. And as i said SL needs a balance of the two area and even you state that. You see there are points i make that are very valid. There is a middle ground and we are in it. But LL is pushing things to much towards the economic end. It had a balance but the people that hold the money seem to be getting more perks then someone like me or a new player.
LL needs to stick to the middle ground i dont want them to go one way or another i want them to keep it into the middle ground how its been for a long time.
|
Dark Korvin
Player in the RL game
Join date: 13 Jun 2005
Posts: 769
|
07-21-2006 13:51
From: Lina Pussycat Dark if the point of SL isnt to become in business then why is the Stipend evil in your eyes? Another thing is it doesnt take money from residents actually it gives them more money to make a profit off of. If you listened carefully to my posting i never said they thought buying it from residents was evil simply that those that dont buy L now are not likely to in the future and people wont take kindly into being forced into doing such. At one way it varies how you look at it. It may take some money from residents but at the same time if i dont have money to buy that residents product thats taking money from residents more so. LL are giving free L which takes no money from anyone and gives people money. It'd be different in the aspect if they were selling it on lindex but they arnt they give it to people who in turn often spend that stipend on products in world. I for one just used my stipend yesterday to buy a new player a skin which was 1k. Now i would of needed to spend 3.61 at 277 > 1usd. Which was the exchange for 1k. I dont have the close to 4 dollars to buy the L alot of the time and that isnt taking money from anyone. Its giving me L which i in turn give to the person im purchasing something from and they most likely go and sell it on LindEx. Thats how SL works and thats how its worked for a long time. Your thinking is as flawed as mine if you bring that up and for you to say the point of SL isnt business after disagreeing with me seems a bit hypocritcal on your end. What i was stating was that if Lindex is the only way for people to get L those that dont buy L now simply wont. Its not going to put demand for L up and i think alot of people fail to realize that. In the end mabye they will do it and mabye then people will see how wrong they have been when SL becomes mundane and there is nothing to do. I dont want SL to turn into something sheerly driven by business it should be a balance of social experience and business not one or the other. LL will need to balance it and realize the majority of us that are subscribers to their services (I myself pay like 95 usd a month at the moment) arnt out there trying to make money constantly and that the majority of SL are consumers and in a consumer based market one needs to have money to spend or the people hoping to make money wont make it. Ask an expert on consumer related things as opposed to economics what is the right way to do the situation they are going to know more considering how things are driven in SL. Im not saying you dont know economics im saying you dont know SL's economy and many people dont and have proven it. I'm concerned about SL's future unlike R&D and i care for people im not calling them stupid im just saying quite simply mabye they should look into how the economy works fully before making a decision on taking out the stipend. Mabye you do understand the economy mabye you dont but if they do understand the economy my next guess would be that they dont care about SL. I for one dont want to see things turn into what R&D wants i like SL how it is and if its focused to much onto the economic side that will ruin things regardless of what someone like R&D says. Calling people like me a bleeding heart. Well guess what buddy the majority of the people in SL are and you cant just replace what is already here that easily. Dark i say how people dont know much about the economy because quite simply look at posts made by quite a few people. They prove either 1 they know little about sl's economy or 2 that they dont care about SL in general. I argue the point because i am a more social player even though i co own a club i do it for fun im not cashing out constantly and then pushing to ruin stuff for people that play socially. Realize that the social player makes up the majority of the residents in SL and that ruining that aspect of things will only hurt SL's future. And as i said SL needs a balance of the two area and even you state that. You see there are points i make that are very valid. There is a middle ground and we are in it. But LL is pushing things to much towards the economic end. It had a balance but the people that hold the money seem to be getting more perks then someone like me or a new player. LL needs to stick to the middle ground i dont want them to go one way or another i want them to keep it into the middle ground how its been for a long time. Again, to someone that cares about US$ profits, people having more $L makes no difference at all. The $L a business person makes off of a product is a percentage of the $L that will go up for sale on the Lindex. What matters is how much US$ is coming into the Lindex and back out to residents. LL could give out L$1,000,000/week to every resident, but that would not give any extra US$ to the residents. Residents make US$ off of the Lindex, they do not make US$ off of the stipends. Only Linden Labs gets the US$ that bought the stipend. I don't think the stipend is evil, but I do recognize the fact that many people give US$72 to Linden Labs for $L. The only differences between stipend money and Lindex money is the people who receive the US$. When you buy something in $L, you are normally buying something that a resident made instead of something that LL made. The resident buying gets the $L, but the residents selling all together do not get the US$. The stipend is a tax on all sellers put together. It makes sense for there to be a tax, because we all benefit from LL making money in the simple fact that they keep the world existing, but the stipend is still a tax. I did not say evil, though many people think taxes are evil. There is no logical reason to refuse to buy from the Lindex. You buy products from residents. Why would you refuse to allow those same residents the right to get US$ for their work. The still get US$, because there are 1000's who will buy on the Lindex, but if everyone only bought stipends, then no US$ would ever go to residents. There is nothing wrong with the Lindex, and now LL gets a cut there too, so you may still be buying from the game company without knowing. I believe that most people running businesses are social as well. You don't have to be one or the other. Most people in SL likely come here for the fun of it. If someone has the skills in Photoshop, Poser, programming, or simple trading to make more money in SL than real life, then why wouldn't they try to make money here as well. If you don't have the skills to do jobs meaningful to other people in SL, than do jobs meaningful to people in RL and spend a small fraction of that money on your entertainment in a SL where you don't have to work. I don't know why you continue to make the Lindex sound like something people have to be forced to use. People should use the Lindex any time it benefits them, which is most of the time compared to a stipend you have to wait a month or a year to receive money from.
|
Lina Pussycat
Texture WizKid
Join date: 19 Jun 2005
Posts: 731
|
07-21-2006 14:56
Do you run a business? I myself co own a club and i dont make a profit and im very busy all the time. I come here for fun but im working alot of the time im on. The thing is the usd may be going to LL but hey guess what they need to earn money to and if it does great. You may wanna run a non profit business and see how that goes as opposed to a business for profit or run a business for that matter in general and see how much time is just for fun. The Stipend is neccessary regardless and your still out money if your actually spending what goes towards the stipend just on L. Lets do this as a technicality only 5 usd if paid monthly goes towards a stipend even if they are just paying for the stipend. In which case sure they should just go buy off Lindex but if they want to start a business or own land its a horrid deal. Basically if you want to run a business in SL and only have land with 512 sq m which costs 5 usd about and you have 10 dollars to spend and you want that land you only get 1304L a month (thats subtracting the fee's that would need to go up for find as well) As opposed to owning 512 sq m and getting 1880L a month.
And alot of people running most of the big businesses arnt really social. I try to be but im busy most of my im's are related to work in game. While people can make a profit off SL there are a number that are just using it for that and those are the ones that are concerned about the balance of the lindex really. For the average player it means nothing. It only helps those that have alot of L now no one else. And its not refusing to buy off Lindex just the majority of people dont and wont. Mabye over time as they get used to SL they will but with no introduction to the economy at all whats the point?
|
Gigs Taggart
The Invisible Hand
Join date: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 406
|
07-21-2006 17:21
From: Dark Korvin They are working to lowering if not eliminating the stipend.. They've pretty much said it's going to be eliminated for new premium accounts eventually. As for what to offer then, they've said there's two possibilities, premium content for premium users only, or just eliminate the idea of new premium accounts completely and let basics buy land.
|
Lina Pussycat
Texture WizKid
Join date: 19 Jun 2005
Posts: 731
|
07-21-2006 17:36
premium content is a bad idea and we all know why. Dont limit SL to basic accounts more then it is. Removing more money from SL for new signups is a bad idea for sl's future for a few reasons but i wont go into all that because it'd draw this out needlessly. Letting basic accounts buy land isnt a bad idea though but i think keeping the current system would be fine for the regular player and those cashing out now and then for a little extra money. Those using SL soley for income are being rewarded and the rest of us suffer basically.
|
Dark Korvin
Player in the RL game
Join date: 13 Jun 2005
Posts: 769
|
07-21-2006 17:42
From: Lina Pussycat Do you run a business? I myself co own a club and i dont make a profit and im very busy all the time. I come here for fun but im working alot of the time im on. The thing is the usd may be going to LL but hey guess what they need to earn money to and if it does great. You may wanna run a non profit business and see how that goes as opposed to a business for profit or run a business for that matter in general and see how much time is just for fun. The Stipend is neccessary regardless and your still out money if your actually spending what goes towards the stipend just on L. Lets do this as a technicality only 5 usd if paid monthly goes towards a stipend even if they are just paying for the stipend. In which case sure they should just go buy off Lindex but if they want to start a business or own land its a horrid deal. Basically if you want to run a business in SL and only have land with 512 sq m which costs 5 usd about and you have 10 dollars to spend and you want that land you only get 1304L a month (thats subtracting the fee's that would need to go up for find as well) As opposed to owning 512 sq m and getting 1880L a month. And alot of people running most of the big businesses arnt really social. I try to be but im busy most of my im's are related to work in game. While people can make a profit off SL there are a number that are just using it for that and those are the ones that are concerned about the balance of the lindex really. For the average player it means nothing. It only helps those that have alot of L now no one else. And its not refusing to buy off Lindex just the majority of people dont and wont. Mabye over time as they get used to SL they will but with no introduction to the economy at all whats the point? I ran a business for 6 months. I made a great deal of US$ profit off of programming. I made some profit off of land sales. The programming made more per hour of work. I don't come to SL for the money though. I enjoy programming, and I enjoy guessing on the value of land and re-selling it. It more of a recreation that paid me, though in the end when I started getting several sims the work became greater than the profit was worth. My main activity in Second Life involved hanging out with those I care about, and I greatly enjoy trying to build things. I know that alot of the other business people I met were social. I've met people with over 7 sims of land that I talked a great deal with every week. I don't know of these people you speak of that are in business, but who never use the game for anything social. I know alot of people including myself hate clubs, dancing, and other such activities, but that is more having to do with the boredom of watching a rag doll dance, and a preference for smaller groups of people. You are right that the lower teir land fees are a bit expensive. I don't think an introduction to the economy is needed, however. SL isn't about making money. If money was all there was here, then why would anyone come here in the first place. There is a possibility of making money in SL, but it is not a neccessity. Nobody playing other games feels obligated to work in the gaming industry to make enough money to buy computer games. People work in the career they are best suited for and they bring their money to play. If SL is where you are best suited to work, then have fun taking the risky enterprise of your own business. There is no need for a majority of people to figure out the economy, because most people should just be here to have fun. Most people should rather just spend a little bit of money that they made through a real job, rather than wanting to spend hours trying to learn new skills and risk huge land teir fees just to have a risky possibility of making money in Second Life. Your statement that most people don't buy on the Lindex is rather pointless to me as well, because I've seen a great deal of US$ coming in on the Lindex since the beginning. Every unique person giving US$ on the Lindex has US$72 less to spend on this market because of the stipend they are waiting to pay out to them over the year. People that buy on the Lindex right now will buy on the Lindex when their stipend is gone. I know I will, I would of bought my stipend from the Lindex in the first place. Those that don't spend US$ on the Lindex have never made me US$ in the first place. I don't make my US$ till I sell on the Lindex. The more Linden Labs gets rid of the stipend, then the more they can sell on the Lindex to make up for the loss of premium accounts. Luckily, now they have an option to limit their profit if it is having a detrimental effect on the economy. Before the profit was decided by the random number of people who signed up for the premium account. Now they have control to actually make less money, and amazingly enough they seem willing to actually limit their profits for the good of the economy. There will always need to be new $L created, and LL will always need to make a profit, but LL having the power to balance the economy at a cost to themselves should not be something that people complain about. Ecspecially when the complaint is that now people will have to buy instant cash rather than cash they must wait for. You still get charged for the US$5 for the tier, and you still get at least a US$5 discount on your first 512 meter2 of land. They will likely lower the price if enough people just go back to basic.
|
Dark Korvin
Player in the RL game
Join date: 13 Jun 2005
Posts: 769
|
07-21-2006 17:59
From: Lina Pussycat Do you run a business? I myself co own a club and i dont make a profit and im very busy all the time. I come here for fun but im working alot of the time im on. The thing is the usd may be going to LL but hey guess what they need to earn money to and if it does great. You may wanna run a non profit business and see how that goes as opposed to a business for profit or run a business for that matter in general and see how much time is just for fun. The Stipend is neccessary regardless and your still out money if your actually spending what goes towards the stipend just on L. Lets do this as a technicality only 5 usd if paid monthly goes towards a stipend even if they are just paying for the stipend. In which case sure they should just go buy off Lindex but if they want to start a business or own land its a horrid deal. Basically if you want to run a business in SL and only have land with 512 sq m which costs 5 usd about and you have 10 dollars to spend and you want that land you only get 1304L a month (thats subtracting the fee's that would need to go up for find as well) As opposed to owning 512 sq m and getting 1880L a month. And alot of people running most of the big businesses arnt really social. I try to be but im busy most of my im's are related to work in game. While people can make a profit off SL there are a number that are just using it for that and those are the ones that are concerned about the balance of the lindex really. For the average player it means nothing. It only helps those that have alot of L now no one else. And its not refusing to buy off Lindex just the majority of people dont and wont. Mabye over time as they get used to SL they will but with no introduction to the economy at all whats the point? Yes, I have run a business in Second Life. I made a little money selling land, and I made alot of money scripting. I've talked endlessly with people who own over 7 sims of land, and many of them were doing multiple types of businesses in SL at once. I've never met someone in SL here soley for the money, though I'm sure there are a few. Linden Labs is actually willing to limit themselves on the amount of profit they make by relying on the Lindex for revenue. This is a reward to those here for an income as you have pointed out. It doesn't screw anyone except those too stubborn to buy on the Lindex in the first place. If they were too stubborn to buy on the Lindex then they never gave one US$ to content creators. I don't see them as making an economic difference unless they eventually were going to buy on the Lindex. Again, the way to fix that is an extremely large initial bonus to new players, and not a stipend. I'd rather see a new premium player have 5-10k$L initial bonus for a US$5 premium account. Instead, we make them wait every week to get a measly 500$L that they had to pay to get. The answer was never in the stipend that pays to even the oldest players. If initial money is the concern, then give the new players initial money.
|
Lina Pussycat
Texture WizKid
Join date: 19 Jun 2005
Posts: 731
|
07-21-2006 20:43
Its not intial money that is a concern after you spend initial money you gotta still buy L stuff gets expensive in SL if you. They are an economic concern actually unless you only take LindEx and the money now being the economy. If people dont have new money to spend and are tighter with their money these people making a profit make less and less. If people get that money having paid for it new money gets introduced and they are more willing to spend that money. You run into the fact also what i stated regardless of your paying 5 usd for 2k a month. Even if your paying the full 10 dollars only 5 usd is going towards the stipend and 5 towards land.
LindEx is comprised on stipend money and other bonuses that money was gotten freely. No one is actually taking money from anyones hand as the linden actually have no stated value. The actual value of L is based on what the buyers/sellers work it out to be worth but forcing people to buy something is never a good solutions in Online games. I've seen bad economic moves made in other games over the years and they lost a huge amount of their userbase and ended up becoming trivial to simply try to enjoy. Frankly not everyone is going to use LindEx and making a policy to force them to if they want any money is likely to unchange that. You own land and a business you in fact have relied on the stipends yourself heavily. If people buy a single thing from anyone arguing that the stipend needs to go away your point is simply mooted by the fact your relied on the stipend or some free source of L in existance at some point to make that sale.
I dont mind the linden's being on lindex but the pinching the amount of in world L readily availlable to people without buy L i do mind as it really just hurts the social players who are the majority of the SL users. Its not about starting money its about being able to play socially and develop things in SL without worrying about buying L at every corner just to buy that outfit you like or a skin you want and having to fork out at minimum a buck each time you have to buy L which most outfits cost in the range of 1 dollar atm. The stipend has existed and you rely on it being in business yet you think it is taking money from people. How then would you expect to get $?
|
Dark Korvin
Player in the RL game
Join date: 13 Jun 2005
Posts: 769
|
07-21-2006 23:25
Lina, your numbers make the stipend sound even worse. Now you are saying that residents could be competing against $L sold at L$2167/US$1 for the yearly fee. That is what you get when you count US$5 of the premium account towards land. If the stipend is used to buy content or land, then you have a $L seller who puts that new money on the market with US$0 extra being put on the market on the buy side. Supply of $L has increased without demand in US$ increasing. If that person is one of the small group of people that turn around and sells the $L they get every week, then the stipend seller can sell as low as L$2166/US$1 and still make a profit. How do those numbers not sound like they will have a negative effect on the values on the Lindex. The Lindex is all fellow residents have to make US$ for what they do in SL. There are three scenarios here. 1. Residents could have a source of cheap $L that bypasses the Lindex allowing more people to be able to afford content, but having a negative effect on those that turn around and sell their $L. 2. Residents could be forced to buy $L at the market value allowing people to afford the content they can actually afford, but not having a negative effect on those that turn around and sell their $L. 3. New $L could not be created at all causing the economy to support a smaller amount of transactions, but allowing those who already have $L to make money by doing nothing. I personally think 1 and 3 are bad things. I'd rather see SL move more toward 2.
|
Gigs Taggart
The Invisible Hand
Join date: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 406
|
07-22-2006 06:40
From: Dark Korvin Lina, your numbers make the stipend sound even worse. Now you are saying that residents could be competing against $L sold at L$2167/US$1 for the yearly fee. I'm in full agreement with your sentiments, but you should probably check your math. Even if you figure the value of renting 512 square meters in, the Linden value you get from a premium account is no where near that high. 361L/1USD is a common number not counting the land. 512 of land is only worth about 700 lindens a month.
|
Lina Pussycat
Texture WizKid
Join date: 19 Jun 2005
Posts: 731
|
07-22-2006 13:36
Actually i'm basing it off a monthly fee as opposed to yearly it differs with the payment options. Which would lead to the basis of at the moment earning 24,000 L a year vs getting 18089. Its 6k more a year well a little less then 6k more a year atm. Which is better for the buyers. There is quite a bit of flawed logic in this "2. Residents could be forced to buy $L at the market value allowing people to afford the content they can actually afford, but not having a negative effect on those that turn around and sell their $L."
For starters this: Residents could be forced to buy $L at the market value allowing people to afford the content they can actually afford" forcing them to buy L to buy content they can just afford. How does that not have a negative effect on the people selling L? For starters if I only buy the content i can afford im alot tighter with my money having a negative impact on the people selling the L. Sure the value of their L may be a little higher but they are going to have Less L to sell which will have a negative impact.
Remember one thing here Dark SL is a consumer market and to make money the consumers have to be willing to buy things if they cant the people trying to make money wont make as much if they money was worth a little less. Basing it off that its logical to make it easier for people to have money at an easier rate and if the sellers are patient they can sell for a higher value. But to punish the social player that wants to own some land and still get a decent amount of L per month cuz some money hungry people are using SL to make some sort of income and relying heavily on it to make payments is just flawed in and of itself.
I really am not sure where you see the good aside from the value of L going up a little thats the only + side to this situation at all. Damaging the consumer power to help the sellers make a little more L > USD value while pushing down the L they can potentially earn is just a flawed logic.
|
Dark Korvin
Player in the RL game
Join date: 13 Jun 2005
Posts: 769
|
07-24-2006 15:37
From: Gigs Taggart I'm in full agreement with your sentiments, but you should probably check your math. Even if you figure the value of renting 512 square meters in, the Linden value you get from a premium account is no where near that high. 361L/1USD is a common number not counting the land. 512 of land is only worth about 700 lindens a month. Counting US$5 for land as it is at the next teir level, then US$1/month is being spent on $L. That means with 52 weeks in a year, you get 26000$L/US$12. That price comes out to 2167$L/US$1.
|
Dark Korvin
Player in the RL game
Join date: 13 Jun 2005
Posts: 769
|
07-24-2006 15:42
From: Lina Pussycat Actually i'm basing it off a monthly fee as opposed to yearly it differs with the payment options. Which would lead to the basis of at the moment earning 24,000 L a year vs getting 18089. Its 6k more a year well a little less then 6k more a year atm. Which is better for the buyers. There is quite a bit of flawed logic in this "2. Residents could be forced to buy $L at the market value allowing people to afford the content they can actually afford, but not having a negative effect on those that turn around and sell their $L." For starters this: Residents could be forced to buy $L at the market value allowing people to afford the content they can actually afford" forcing them to buy L to buy content they can just afford. How does that not have a negative effect on the people selling L? For starters if I only buy the content i can afford im alot tighter with my money having a negative impact on the people selling the L. Sure the value of their L may be a little higher but they are going to have Less L to sell which will have a negative impact. Remember one thing here Dark SL is a consumer market and to make money the consumers have to be willing to buy things if they cant the people trying to make money wont make as much if they money was worth a little less. Basing it off that its logical to make it easier for people to have money at an easier rate and if the sellers are patient they can sell for a higher value. But to punish the social player that wants to own some land and still get a decent amount of L per month cuz some money hungry people are using SL to make some sort of income and relying heavily on it to make payments is just flawed in and of itself. I really am not sure where you see the good aside from the value of L going up a little thats the only + side to this situation at all. Damaging the consumer power to help the sellers make a little more L > USD value while pushing down the L they can potentially earn is just a flawed logic. The $L changing value is a seperate issue from the stipend taking money away from residents. The residents don't automatically get more US$ when the $L is going up in value with a stipend. The US$ are still not going to residents with the stipend even if the $L climbs to a value of 1$L/US$1. I think a rising $L is just as bad as a falling $L. I'm not against money going to LL. I'm just trying to get you to recognise that at least some of those US$ would be in resident's hands if LL didn't collect the money first through the stipend. That first dibs on the US$ is what I'm calling a tax like effect. There will always be a tax of some sort for LL whether it be for land or $L to keep the game running, but the simple fact is that it is a tax good or bad.
|