Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

What about the poor people with no talent?

Schwanson Schlegel
SL's Tokin' Villain
Join date: 15 Nov 2003
Posts: 2,721
01-12-2005 08:51
There are many other ways to make $L other than scripting and building. I am SL's poster child for incompetant builder/scriptor. My building/scripting skills are non existant.

I have made over $25,000L off of a simple wood textured 4 prim object I have sold since I created it on my third day in SL.

I have also made several t-shirts using a 30 day trial of a paint program that I sell. I didn't enjoy making clothes, but still sell 2-3 shirts a week from that experiment.

I ran a succesful sound clip shop and still sell some sound clip bundles. This was a really easy business. Find groupings of sounds that you may think other people will like, use the free sound editor built into windows to resample and upload. My initial $1000L investment has yielded over 5000% profit.

Instructors get paid $500L per class, some of the classes are easy to teach.

People will pay you to host events. A basic trivia event takes nothing more than a trip to your local pub to nab a few of those trivia cards or a Google search for trivia.

I have had dozens of other ideas that I have tried. Some have failed, some extremely succesful. The key for me has always been to have fun, when it ceases being fun, move on.

A $9.95 basic account holder should get nothing more than the start up $1000L and $50L a week IMO. That already equates to $3600L a year which is equivelant to $14.40 USD. A $4.45 per year profit for doing nothing more than logging in once a week.
_____________________
Newfie Pendragon
Crusty and proud of it
Join date: 19 Dec 2003
Posts: 1,025
01-12-2005 08:54
From: Ingrid Ingersoll
I'm not arguing with that. But what I am rather tired of hearing is "get a job" in Second Life. Why should they? This is a service that a consumer pays for and as such is they want to sit on their lazy asses and do nothing then they should be able to.


Agreed 100% on that one. But there's two sides to that coin. SL is and has always stated that SL was explicitly a member-content-created system. LL provides the architecture, sims and the platform upon which the members create the content. Yes, the member can elect to not lift a finger and do a thing, but the only expectation they have from LL is a connectivity and land to look at. LL made no promises or guarantee of anything more than that.

From: someone
And if everyone did know how to script, build and master photoshop, then the content creators wouldn't be needed anymore, (as i stated in another thread, sorry for the redundancy)


That's a bit of a self-negating line of logic there. If everyone was a creator, then no creators are needed, etc etc.

The thing about SL is that what a person gets out of it is nearly always going to be commensurate to the amount of investment one makes in it - be it time, content, scripts, socializing, etc. There is no such thing as a need for a job in SL, but neither do the members in SL who expend effort creating content have any obligation to share it with those who elect to sit and do nothing.

In a perfect world, creators of content would share all their works happily, without any expectation of monetary remuneration, and there'd be no need for L$. But even SL isn't a perfect world. Many want to see those L$ in their account as a reflection of the effort involved in creating SL content, which also means people need money to spend to buy other's content.

What a person gets out of SL all depends on what they put into it. If that means one wishes to pay their monthly fee and nothing more, then their expectation is only for ability to connect and a sim to look at.

Then again, if one is only looking for a 'game'....perhaps World of Warcraft of EverQuest 2 might be more to your liking.
_____________________
Kris Ritter
paradoxical embolism
Join date: 31 Oct 2003
Posts: 6,627
01-12-2005 08:58
From: Newfie Pendragon
Agreed 100% on that one. But there's two sides to that coin. SL is and has always stated that SL was explicitly a member-content-created system. LL provides the architecture, sims and the platform upon which the members create the content. Yes, the member can elect to not lift a finger and do a thing, but the only expectation they have from LL is a connectivity and land to look at. LL made no promises or guarantee of anything more than that.



That's a bit of a self-negating line of logic there. If everyone was a creator, then no creators are needed, etc etc.

The thing about SL is that what a person gets out of it is nearly always going to be commensurate to the amount of investment one makes in it - be it time, content, scripts, socializing, etc. There is no such thing as a need for a job in SL, but neither do the members in SL who expend effort creating content have any obligation to share it with those who elect to sit and do nothing.

In a perfect world, creators of content would share all their works happily, without any expectation of monetary remuneration, and there'd be no need for L$. But even SL isn't a perfect world. Many want to see those L$ in their account as a reflection of the effort involved in creating SL content, which also means people need money to spend to buy other's content.

What a person gets out of SL all depends on what they put into it. If that means one wishes to pay their monthly fee and nothing more, then their expectation is only for ability to connect and a sim to look at.

Then again, if one is only looking for a 'game'....perhaps World of Warcraft of EverQuest 2 might be more to your liking.


Excellent post, Newfie.

The fact is, you DONT need money to play second life. But if you want to participate in more than the purely social side, whether as a retailer or consumer of any kind, then the fact is you need money. But then... why should that be free to those that want to have their cake and eat it?
Malana Spencer
Registered User
Join date: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 368
01-12-2005 09:07
From: Fafnir Fauna
I don't post much on the forums, but I thought this was interesting enough to post about.

The economical changes have me puzzled.. Although I don't fully agree or disagree yet because I never fully understand something until I have seen it with my own eyes over a long period of time.. I am wondering what will become of people who log on to SL primarily to socialize with their friends?

Let me explain. I know of some people who, with these changes, will NOT be able to afford a fun experience on SL. Myself included because honestly I don't have the kind of talent that's needed for these changes to draw in much income. In fact I am currently depending on the stipend bonuses to make any kind of 'living'. And that bonus is already very low as I don't get many ratings or have many visitors to my land. (maybe L$200 total income a week?)

Now if ratings are going to cost people L$25 a rate, how many people do you think are going to rate a stranger at that price? Yeah I agree the rating prices should be higher than L$1, but L$25 is a little overkill. So down goes my stipend bonus even more. Catch my drift?

So okay these changes are fabulous for people who have the talent to create amazing content they can sell and use for events, but there is a lot of us who don't have the skills.

Is SL really all about building and competition of content? What about the people who just come to hang out with friends and goof off and laugh over their dumb deformed builds and avatars? People who like to shop for gadgets made by others? Surely not everyone depends on building for fun in SL.

Now for the rant!

If the economy for SL is clubs and junky content then I'm sorry, that's the way the players apparently want it. You can't just force people to change the way they do things. If you want better content then people have to find it in themselves to make the change. Education and better documentation of the tools would be a start, because quite honestly, the current documentation sucks. :P

I'm more puzzled by this than anything.


well the nice thing about SL is u do NOT really NEED $ to exist here. If you are here to socialize so be it that takes no $ to do. & if you want $ there are STILL ways to make it. You do not have to be a skilled builder, scripter , etc to make $ in SL. Where there is a will there is a way. I think this will be a great opportunity for people to get creative.
Morse Dillon
Lifetime Member
Join date: 11 Dec 2003
Posts: 142
01-12-2005 09:12
From: Jauani Wu
yes i agree. they are paying these fees.

subscription fees guarantees a stipend. it guarantees a minimal income that is counter balanced by content creators uploads (and photo taking) as well as by growth - ie addition of land. if growth slowed down, stipends would have to be cut, or devaluation would occur even if decline in per capita consumerism did not change. (perhaps growth has slowed down?)



I hate to break it to you all, but at 9.95 lifetime, Linden Labs is LOSING (let me say it again L O S I N G) money on these accounts. The bandwidth alone is more expensive than this, not to mention support staff, taxes, capital goods...the list goes on. You can't get something for nothing in this world. If you're one of these people that think that because SL isn't "real life", that economics suddenly don't apply anymore, go ahead and leave - it certainly won't hurt my feelings, and if you're a 9.95 lifetimer that isn't planning on upgrading it sure as hell won't hurt Linden Labs'.

I will also re-iterate my earlier post - YOU DO NOT NEED A SINGLE L$ TO HAVE FUN IN THIS GAME. I give away practically everything I make (including my stipend) to my friends...in fact I probably gave away L$50-60,000 last year, and still have fun socializing..
_____________________
King Morse Dillon
King of Second Life
Ingrid Ingersoll
Archived
Join date: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,601
01-12-2005 10:09
From: Kris Ritter
Excellent post, Newfie.

The fact is, you DONT need money to play second life. But if you want to participate in more than the purely social side, whether as a retailer or consumer of any kind, then the fact is you need money. But then... why should that be free to those that want to have their cake and eat it?


Because that's what the lindens are promising when you sign up and pay LL. That's part of their deal, their contract to the customer. Lindens for those who do nothing, as much as that bothers some people, thats the way it is. End users aren't so bad. They buy things.
_____________________
Ingrid Ingersoll
Archived
Join date: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,601
01-12-2005 10:12
From: Morse Dillon
I hate to break it to you all, but at 9.95 lifetime, Linden Labs is LOSING (let me say it again L O S I N G) money on these accounts.


Then it's LL's responsibilty to fix that. And in the meantime, maybe it would be good to get off people's back who don't work for their SL living.
_____________________
Ingrid Ingersoll
Archived
Join date: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,601
01-12-2005 10:17
From: Jauani Wu
that was a stygian edit, ingrid!



i formally accuse you of cozying up to your consumer market!


J'acuse myself as well. I can't believe I actually have a formal opinion about something in SL. I must be getting sucked in.
_____________________
Torley Linden
Enlightenment!
Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 16,530
01-12-2005 10:23
Same points -- some of them my favorites -- come up time and time again. As usual, I hold court in both (or more) sides of the argument. Solely from my personal, whimsical perspective, I don't really build: I dabble some. But I do have a lot of ideas I like to suggest for the heck of it... I can't keep it all to myself. And, I have friends who are masterbuilders and uberscripters and PixelDolls in SL, and I enjoy watching them create. There are many roles for us to play here, both from a roleplaying hack-and-slash approach, a serious businessperson point-of-view, and more. And there's even more beauty in being able to combine them into a unique dish, not unlike a tasty buffet: yes, Second Life is that flexible.

I'm uncomfortable with the changes, as I perhaps should be, because I will be adapting to this crazy cyberzeitgeist. Some weeks down the road, I may have a better idea of where I stand on this -- if I'm even standing at all. Maybe I'll be rolling back and forth, expanding horizons. But oh, I'll still be here. :)
_____________________
Sunny Buttercup
Registered User
Join date: 7 Mar 2004
Posts: 46
01-12-2005 10:24
From: David Street
if i see a kool object in sl i dont waste my cash, i try to build it 1st, saves alota cash if i can make it


:)


/me makes note not to let david see anything ive made so he can't copy it..LOL :p

just messing with ya david :eek: :p
Ingrid Ingersoll
Archived
Join date: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,601
01-12-2005 10:28
From: Issarlk Chatnoir


What are people complaining about exactly?
Lesser need to hunt rates = more time to socialise.
Lesser need to hunt rates = less incentive to only visit the crowded clubs = more time to explore the world.
Lesser need to hunt rates = good.

.


I agree with all this.

My little rant want about people who try to tell others what to do in their second life. I find it irksome.
_____________________
Jauani Wu
pancake rabbit
Join date: 7 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,835
01-12-2005 10:40
regardless of how you feel ingrid, GTs are disgusting and odd and should not be used.
_____________________
http://wu-had.blogspot.com/
read my blog

Mecha
Jauani Wu
hero of justice
__________________________________________________
"Oh Jauani, you're terrible." - khamon fate


Torley Linden
Enlightenment!
Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 16,530
01-12-2005 10:41
From: Ingrid Ingersoll
I agree with all this.

My little rant want about people who try to tell others what to do in their second life. I find it irksome.


As do I -- it's your Second Life, why should I live it for you? ;)

And the answer is:

I SHOULDN'T!!!

:D
_____________________
Schwanson Schlegel
SL's Tokin' Villain
Join date: 15 Nov 2003
Posts: 2,721
01-12-2005 10:43
From: Ingrid Ingersoll
I agree with all this.

My little rant want about people who try to tell others what to do in their second life. I find it irksome.


Shut up and go build a couch! NOW!
:p
_____________________
Ingrid Ingersoll
Archived
Join date: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,601
01-12-2005 10:44
From: Jauani Wu
regardless of how you feel ingrid, GTs are disgusting and odd and should not be used.



Gin and Tonics are delicious and refreshing right before dinner. Do not insult my G&T's. I suppose you're more of an Amaretto drinker. You feted inners are just too slick.
_____________________
Jauani Wu
pancake rabbit
Join date: 7 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,835
01-12-2005 10:48
From: Ingrid Ingersoll
Then it's LL's responsibilty to fix that.


and theY took the first step today with the new version release! and the (unhelpful) comment of "get a job" has been in response to players who are upset by LL fixing that problem and having to buy L$.

getting a job - ie providing inworld services or content - would seem to be the only alternative left for them to make back the money that they "need" or "depend on."

i for one one already employ two SLers on so i know there are jobs out there to be had that are actually a lot of fun.
_____________________
http://wu-had.blogspot.com/
read my blog

Mecha
Jauani Wu
hero of justice
__________________________________________________
"Oh Jauani, you're terrible." - khamon fate


Torley Linden
Enlightenment!
Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 16,530
01-12-2005 10:51
From: Schwanson Schlegel
Shut up and go build a couch! NOW!
:p


OR SCRIPT A GUN! AND SHOOT YOURSELF WITH IT!

^meant SOLELY in jest as an example of ironic absurdity in poor taste, not as a personal attack... just to clarify... ^_^
_____________________
Disti Millions
Registered User
Join date: 11 Jan 2005
Posts: 1
*sigh*
01-12-2005 10:53
*shakes head and looks for TSO CD's* hehe I started three days ago and I'm just in WOW!
Ingrid Ingersoll
Archived
Join date: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,601
01-12-2005 10:57
From: Jauani Wu
and theY took the first step today with the new version release!.


They increased the subscription fee?
_____________________
Jauani Wu
pancake rabbit
Join date: 7 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,835
01-12-2005 11:03
From: Ingrid Ingersoll
They increased the subscription fee?


yes! now sl is only for the rich. or so i heard in ahern yesterday. so i guess the fee must be 50 USD a month or something for a basic account.
_____________________
http://wu-had.blogspot.com/
read my blog

Mecha
Jauani Wu
hero of justice
__________________________________________________
"Oh Jauani, you're terrible." - khamon fate


Ingrid Ingersoll
Archived
Join date: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,601
01-12-2005 11:06
From: Jauani Wu
yes! now sl is only for the rich. or so i heard in ahern yesterday. so i guess the fee must be 50 USD a month or something for a basic account.



okay smarty pants, now what were you REALLY referring to? :p
_____________________
Jauani Wu
pancake rabbit
Join date: 7 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,835
01-12-2005 11:07
From: Ingrid Ingersoll
okay smarty pants, now what were you REALLY referring to? :p


the pandemonium. i'm trying to establish the reason for it. didn't you suggest that they had raised the subscription fee?
_____________________
http://wu-had.blogspot.com/
read my blog

Mecha
Jauani Wu
hero of justice
__________________________________________________
"Oh Jauani, you're terrible." - khamon fate


Schwanson Schlegel
SL's Tokin' Villain
Join date: 15 Nov 2003
Posts: 2,721
01-12-2005 11:11
I do not understand how they expect us to pay the new $50 per month usage fees. I mean $50 per month for a basic account that can only hold 512m2 is ridiculous. I think we should probably protest this by creating 5000 threads.
_____________________
Bob Bravo
Registered User
Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 210
Please get SL up LLs!
01-12-2005 11:13
It's 11:11 AM PST. LL says they will be down till 1:00 PM.

Two more hours of mendaculous bickering, LOL.

Hurry up LL!

BB
_____________________
Bob Bravo
Kris Ritter
paradoxical embolism
Join date: 31 Oct 2003
Posts: 6,627
01-12-2005 11:14
From: Bob Bravo
It's 11:11 AM PST. LL says they will be down till 1:00 PM.

Two more hours of mendaculous bickering, LOL.

Hurry up LL!

BB


Someone else just posted it was up, Bob.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13