PayDay Tuesday - L$ Going Down
|
Travis Lambert
White dog, red collar
Join date: 3 Jun 2004
Posts: 2,819
|
03-01-2006 10:05
From: ReserveBank Division I guess you have been sleeping the last 2 years.
Sep '04: US$5.80 per L$1000 Feb '06: US$3.60 per L$1000
Explain this decline in valuation and why after nearly 2/years it has not risen higher? If memory serves, the Linden actually peaked higher than US$5.80 per L$1000 that summer of 2004. (God, am I on a nostalgia kick today or what?  ) If I'm not mistaken, the value of the Linden had risen above US$6. Thing is, a unique situation was going on that summer. For starters, our world was much, much, much smaller. I'd venture to say it was a tenth of the size it was today. That summer, the new Snow Sims were released, and a land rush was on. Folks were paying amazingly high prices to be the 'lucky' owners of these new snow-themed areas - and that's what drove the Linden up. Then, for some reason - the whole Snow Sim market crashed. No one wanted that land anymore, and it became some of the cheapest property in Second Life. Lots of folks lost out hardcore. Additionally, around the same timeframe - GOM switched their method of selling blocks of Lindens. Instead of selling blocks of $250 like it used to be, they switched to blocks of $1000. I'm not certain why - but it was around this time that the Linden began its fall to around $4.00 Once the Linden reached US$4 per 1000L, its pretty much stayed betwen US$3 and US$4. Ricki Zamboni could probably speak a lot more intelligently on this than I can as to why. 
_____________________
------------------ The ShelterThe Shelter is a non-profit recreation center for new residents, and supporters of new residents. Our goal is to provide a positive & supportive social environment for those looking for one in our overwhelming world.
|
Isaac Bergson
Registered User
Join date: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 66
|
This Gets My Vote!
03-01-2006 10:24
From: Bertrand Lightworker So the value of the Linden against the US dollar has gone down, is going down. So what?
And, the "inflation" of the Linden against the $US only hurts those who *do* sell Linden. So, they have an incentive to limit their sales, to support the price. If they are selling enough Linden to deflate its value against the $US, that is *their* free market choice. QUOTE]
Bertrand hit it right on as far as I can see it. It is the sellers of Linden Dollar who set where it is at. If they choose to sell it at a high price (250/1)? Then that's where it would be. If someone or more then one wants to sell it cheap say (400/1)? Then that's exactly where its going to sell at. Buyers in this case have no choice what they buy Linden at since only the sellers get to set a price.
Why does that make so many go crazy? No one forces any one to sell at what they choose. Those that sell at whatever price do so most likely because of how long it might take them to get rid of what they want to get rid of. If you don't mind waiting to sell what you have. Set it at a higher end price. If you have to have the USD like yesterday?! Then yep I guess you will just be setting the bar for those that just WANT to buy!
None of us are forced to buy or sell. But in the end it is the seller who is setting the price of Lindens not anyone else. We choose that of our own free will. We are not forced to sell at any price just the price we at that moment prefer to.
|
Michael Seraph
Second Life Resident
Join date: 9 Nov 2004
Posts: 849
|
03-01-2006 10:32
From: ReserveBank Division I've not mentioned anything about Taxes. I'm talking about making a fundamental building block in SL a commodity. Giving it value, which in turn gives all the objects created an intrinsic value higher than zero. Which is what every objects current intrinsic value is...
This then leads to inadvertent valuation growth of the Linden Dollar due to the demand for L$ denominated prims. So to make a prim a commodity, I have to pay the government (LL) for it? Do oil producers pay the government for the oil? How about gold miners or wheat farmers or whoever it is that produces pork bellies? Again, you're trying to fit an RL model on SL. Taxing the creation of prims doesn't make them commodities. It taxes the creative workers that make SL a viable enterprise. Your idea that then the objects they sell will have an intrinsic value overlooks the simple fact that these creations already have an intrinsic value, and are bought and sold. What do you want to be in this new economy, Reserve? A prim producer? Selling blank blocks to people for more than you paid for them? Instead of taxing creativity out of SL, how about you just use those prims to make something people want to buy.
|
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
|
03-01-2006 11:45
From: ReserveBank Division I guess you have been sleeping the last 2 years.
Sep '04: US$5.80 per L$1000 Feb '06: US$3.60 per L$1000
Explain this decline in valuation and why after nearly 2/years it has not risen higher? Well the onus is still upon yourself to support your original statement - not the smoke and mirror arguments you are summoning out of thin air now. (and I think Travis summed most of this up above). Now - do tell. Where is the proof to support the supposition you made in your thread title? Your original arugument, so far all you've done to try to support it is to divert the discussion to other matters. I maintain it is a made up affair - conjured out of thin air to support your own 'no stipends' cause.
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals. From: Jesse Linden I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
|
Barbarra Blair
Short Person
Join date: 18 Apr 2004
Posts: 588
|
03-01-2006 11:53
From: someone If they did *not* do so, and all the Linden stayed in SL, what would happen? When people sell Linden dollars, they sell them to other players; therefore all the Lindens sold DO stay in SL.
_____________________
--Obvious Lady
|
Paulismyname Bunin
Registered User
Join date: 29 Nov 2005
Posts: 243
|
03-01-2006 12:46
Having read through this thread again it occurs to me RBD seems to be on some type of mission to prove a point.
Here is one idea that I mentioned in part jest earlier.
Create the ability to "go short" on Lindens (as well as long) In other words introduce a facility where people can short sell the Lindon and profit if it falls. Of course this would have to be on margin, which could be a mirror of the way in which real life currency is traded...,say $1 per pip with the Linden value expressed in 4 decimal places.
Your margin would be either your Lindon dollar balance or perhaps Lindens in a separate account with gearing of 100 (usual on currency markets). We could have stop loss systems and all the usual trading rules of currency
We can still have matched bargains as those speculators who believe Lindon may appreciate will hold long, as against those who believe contra wise.
Believe me, short selling ALWAYS helps market liquidity (please read stock market research on this point) and to be fair it also prevents speculative bubbles.
Finally Lindon Labs can charge commission and earn yet more money
Land Barons will like this because it would enable them to hedge their holdings, as other content providers may too
|
Jon Rolland
Registered User
Join date: 3 Oct 2005
Posts: 705
|
03-01-2006 12:52
From: ReserveBank Division I guess you have been sleeping the last 2 years.
Sep '04: US$5.80 per L$1000 Feb '06: US$3.60 per L$1000
Explain this decline in valuation and why after nearly 2/years it has not risen higher? Not to help you ignore the obvious but LL's DESIRED rate is US$4.00 per L$1000 $3.60 is closer to that rate than $5.80 is.
|
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
|
03-01-2006 13:21
the 'mission' is pretty simple - someone who reports to have been around for that long (obviously under another account) would know that that the money system isn't closed - money leaves the system (via uploads/classifieds/l$ land auctions etc) and comes into the system (via dwell and stipends etc).
They obviously know this as they promote things akin to the old prim tax system - ways to take money out of Second Life, yet wish to plug up whereever it comes IN.
What they want isn't a stable economy, but the exact opposite of the 'doom scenario' they cite.. where money is increasingly leached out of the system making it spiral the opposite direction - as the 'pool' diminishes.. making the money they hold worth more.
Thats it... alas its just as bad an idea as the opposite, probably worse... as the population increases it becomes harder and more expensive to participate - until folks eventually leave disheartened.
Playerbase dwindles, LL doesn't recoup money to expand... and down the gurgler it goes. (on a worse case scenario).
Stipend is needed to give new players an 'in' to the game - to get them involved.
I think the key to a stable economy is LL's ability to offset the money going in with the money going out.
And so far its nowhere near the chicken little proportions some would make - the last massive rise was at the same time of the 'telehub buyback' program.. and even now that leap seems to have stopped and is steadying.
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals. From: Jesse Linden I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
|
ReserveBank Division
Senior Member
Join date: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,408
|
03-01-2006 14:24
From: Paulismyname Bunin Having read through this thread again it occurs to me RBD seems to be on some type of mission to prove a point.
Here is one idea that I mentioned in part jest earlier.
Create the ability to "go short" on Lindens (as well as long) In other words introduce a facility where people can short sell the Lindon and profit if it falls. Of course this would have to be on margin, which could be a mirror of the way in which real life currency is traded...,say $1 per pip with the Linden value expressed in 4 decimal places.
Your margin would be either your Lindon dollar balance or perhaps Lindens in a separate account with gearing of 100 (usual on currency markets). We could have stop loss systems and all the usual trading rules of currency
We can still have matched bargains as those speculators who believe Lindon may appreciate will hold long, as against those who believe contra wise.
Believe me, short selling ALWAYS helps market liquidity (please read stock market research on this point) and to be fair it also prevents speculative bubbles.
Finally Lindon Labs can charge commission and earn yet more money
Land Barons will like this because it would enable them to hedge their holdings, as other content providers may too Dude, if I could short sell, I would be all over that baby.... My name would ReserveShortBank Division
|
ReserveBank Division
Senior Member
Join date: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,408
|
03-01-2006 14:27
From: Jon Rolland Not to help you ignore the obvious but LL's DESIRED rate is US$4.00 per L$1000 $3.60 is closer to that rate than $5.80 is. US$3.60 might be closer, but US$4.00 was where it was at back in Oct/Nov 2005. Why the decline? Why didn't Linden Policy adjust to keep it from falling 10%? Why isn't LL policy changing now to keep it from falling? LL might have a "target", but to reach it, they'll have to start taking up the policies that I'm recommending. They need something to generate demand for Linden Dollars. Until that happens, L$ will continue to decline, trust me...
|
Jake Reitveld
Emperor of Second Life
Join date: 9 Mar 2005
Posts: 2,690
|
03-01-2006 14:35
eh. Its not welfare i pay ten bucks a month for $500 linden a week.
_____________________
ALCHEMY -clothes for men.
Lebeda 208,209
|
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
|
03-01-2006 14:43
From: Jake Reitveld eh. Its not welfare i pay ten bucks a month for $500 linden a week. But your not paying 10 bucks a month to give Alby $500 lindens a week, therein lies the problem 
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals. From: Jesse Linden I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
|
mcgeeb Gupte
Jolie Femme @}-,-'-,---
Join date: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 1,152
|
03-01-2006 17:53
From: ReserveBank Division US$3.60 might be closer, but US$4.00 was where it was at back in Oct/Nov 2005. Why the decline? Why didn't Linden Policy adjust to keep it from falling 10%? Why isn't LL policy changing now to keep it from falling?
LL might have a "target", but to reach it, they'll have to start taking up the policies that I'm recommending. They need something to generate demand for Linden Dollars. Until that happens, L$ will continue to decline, trust me... There has been no continuation of any decline whatsoever. The past 30 days have seen a steady price ranging from 282 to 272. I would think that this would mean that the price has been "steady" with the usual ups and downs. I'm still waiting for the $L to decline like you have said for how long??
|
Fade Languish
I just build stuff...
Join date: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 1,760
|
03-01-2006 18:00
Effectively, prims are already a commodity, and scarce. When we're trading land, what we're really trading is prim allocations. And we are already taxed on those prims, it's called tier.
|
ReserveBank Division
Senior Member
Join date: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,408
|
03-01-2006 18:42
From: mcgeeb Gupte There has been no continuation of any decline whatsoever. The past 30 days have seen a steady price ranging from 282 to 272. I would think that this would mean that the price has been "steady" with the usual ups and downs. I'm still waiting for the $L to decline like you have said for how long?? 30 days bump compared to a 18 month decline? You are missing 90% of the valuation movement. Wake Up.
|
ReserveBank Division
Senior Member
Join date: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,408
|
03-01-2006 18:45
From: Fade Languish Effectively, prims are already a commodity, and scarce. When we're trading land, what we're really trading is prim allocations. And we are already taxed on those prims, it's called tier. If prims where a commodity, then you would have a limit on the amount of widgets you can produce, period. Not a limit on the amount of widgets a piece of land can support.
|
ReserveBank Division
Senior Member
Join date: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,408
|
03-01-2006 18:53
From: Siggy Romulus But your not paying 10 bucks a month to give Alby $500 lindens a week, therein lies the problem  Are you talking about yourself against Siggy? I ran a search on this alby person and its funny that Jauani Wu in a post a month ago listed you two on the the same list. Only somebody like you hypes there own alt.. Jauani Wu the new pie Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: canada Posts: 3,130 i hereby put in place the resmod oversight commitee. basically, along side other upstanding and reputable posters of startling intellect, i will moderate the moderators on a volunteer basis. fellow resmod resmods that i have chosen arbitrarily for this program without their consent are: siggy romulus korg stygian christopher nomad zoey jade aimee weebler taco rubio alby yellowknife regnar bell briana dawson jin gupte cory edo the painfully obvious pandastrong alt zugzug grimmy moonflower nolan nash charlotte gillespie catherine cotton prokofy neva, and of course, strawberry cocopants.
|
Stephen Teazle
Jesse Camp stole my gf
Join date: 30 May 2005
Posts: 31
|
03-01-2006 18:59
Shorting the linden? Margin accounts? That's the funniest thing I've heard in a long time. Just who is going to make sure margin requirements are met? For that matter, who's going to determine just what the margin requirement is. Which Linden is going to call us when there's a margin call. Something tells me Linden Labs isn't in the brokerage business.
|
ReserveBank Division
Senior Member
Join date: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,408
|
03-01-2006 19:12
From: Stephen Teazle Shorting the linden? Margin accounts? That's the funniest thing I've heard in a long time. Just who is going to make sure margin requirements are met? For that matter, who's going to determine just what the margin requirement is. Which Linden is going to call us when there's a margin call. Something tells me Linden Labs isn't in the brokerage business. Sounds like a perfect niche market for somebody else to jump on. I don't see why it isn't possible.. A broker issues a margin line which is backed up by a deposit an account holder has made. The broker makes money off the interest and the short makes money off repurchasing the L$ at a lower price. If the short defaults and runs with the cash, the broker just forfeits the deposit. Hmmmmmm... Great business idea... Shorting the L$... I know the Linden's would hate that...Tough Love..
|
Stephen Teazle
Jesse Camp stole my gf
Join date: 30 May 2005
Posts: 31
|
03-01-2006 19:34
From: ReserveBank Division Sounds like a perfect niche market for somebody else to jump on. I don't see why it isn't possible.. A broker issues a margin line which is backed up by a deposit an account holder has made. The broker makes money off the interest and the short makes money off repurchasing the L$ at a lower price. If the short defaults and runs with the cash, the broker just forfeits the deposit.
Hmmmmmm... Great business idea... Shorting the L$... I know the Linden's would hate that...Tough Love.. No - that's not how it works. To short something, you sell something you don't have. You short a stock, say 100 shares of IBM, yoiu sell 100 shares you don't have. You have to borrow those shares and then eventually buy them back to replace the shares you borrowed. You sell Lindens you don't own, you have to borrow someone else's and eventually buy them back (hopefully at a lower price). Whose Lindens are you borrowing and what happens if the market moves against you? When you short, your theoretical loss is infinite. It doesn't matter that you have a margin account. No one in their right mind would take all the risk necessary to facilitate this in a game like SL.
|
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
|
03-01-2006 20:07
From: ReserveBank Division Are you talking about yourself against Siggy? I ran a search on this alby person and its funny that Jauani Wu in a post a month ago listed you two on the the same list.
Only somebody like you hypes there own alt.. . Do a search - learn - study.... Follow your own advice on that one  So tell me again - how did that Tuesday go.. you know.. with the stipends lowering Lindex? Thought so 
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals. From: Jesse Linden I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
|
ReserveBank Division
Senior Member
Join date: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,408
|
03-01-2006 20:33
From: Siggy Romulus Do a search - learn - study.... Follow your own advice on that one  So tell me again - how did that Tuesday go.. you know.. with the stipends lowering Lindex? Thought so  The Linden Dollar was down as predicted. From L$276 to L$279... Next Question...
|
Toy LaFollette
I eat paintchips
Join date: 11 Feb 2004
Posts: 2,359
|
03-01-2006 20:38
From: Toy LaFollette Exactly, because your scheme is NOT in place. Just who would gain if your scemes were in place? Why of course!!!! The people who just dabble in L$ purchasing and selling. I dont need to use propaganda, you seem to do it quite well yourself. Ive been there, lived it. It doesnt work. What you seem to always miss is, this isnt RL there are no basic needs. We need no food, no shelter. Its all about creating and buy if we wish, its not a need. Im curious, do you create anything? Do you own land? Im still awaiting the answers to my questions
_____________________
"So you see, my loyalty lies with Second Life, not with Linden Lab. Where I perceive the actions of Linden Lab to be in conflict with the best interests of Second Life, I side with Second Life."-Jacek
|
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
|
03-01-2006 20:42
From: ReserveBank Division The Linden Dollar was down as predicted. From L$276 to L$279...
Next Question... Well your prediction was 280... so I guess that was wrong. Data to support that it was folks cashing out stipends as you said it is... which I guess is wrong too And - I disagree with your figures too. Next? Thought so.
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals. From: Jesse Linden I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
|
ReserveBank Division
Senior Member
Join date: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,408
|
03-01-2006 21:01
From: Siggy Romulus Well your prediction was 280... so I guess that was wrong.
Data to support that it was folks cashing out stipends as you said it is... which I guess is wrong too
And - I disagree with your figures too.
Next? Thought so. Damn, I was off by L$1 dollar. Next time I'll try to be more exact on days when Stipends get dumped and the market moves lower...
|