Minute Men: Is we is or is we ain't?

1. We ain't in the city.
2. Even in many cities, those of us who are licensed to carry concealed weapons can and do on a daily basis.
3. In Arizona, I can strap a firearm to my leg and walk down the street of most cities/twons. Check it out. (Because I can does not mean I do.)

I couldn't care less about your aversion to guns, hunting, sports or otherwise. I have a Constitutional right to bear arms within the limits of certain laws. So long as I abide by those laws, you are entitled to your leftist opinion and I am entitled to shoot it down by my actions. That I am actually in a GROUP of people who are like-minded in at least this sense frightens you? OMFG. So what? The issue is you are taking possibility to an extreme and want action based on that... sorry. I cut rosebushes down for fun with my auomatic weapon on the range near my home. Why should this forum be any different?

Uh, you certainly did and have predicted problems in the manner in which you stated your your "concerns". It's not the words per se, it's the construct within that is predictive.

Then again, you assume we are untrained... It's clearly postulated in your posts multiple times. Again, you haven't got a clue. Why don't you go find some rosebush feed. All you'll find here is weed killer.

1. I don't have to prove sh** to you. I state a fact that you cannot disprove and I have no reason to lie abou. So, take your circular reasoning and flush it.

As for proving kknowledge of tactical organization... I have to laugh. Again... a post with no clue makes an empty charge based on a personal inability to deal with the fact that they can dispute but not disprove something. Guess what... I'll pay you $100US if you can prove anything about my knowledge or lack thereof as far as "military ops" or Minutemen goes. Come on.. put your sluething skills to work.

I don't know what I am talking about? Show me proof. Tell me something that I have said that is provably false. One thing.

If it's obvious that I am playing a game and I have been found out, then you lose by stating it in public because by acknowledging me, I gain the "negative attention that is still attention." So, YOU lose. you kill me.. I have to tell you you are prety funny.

I am ashamed of myself for giving you a "chance" to take a shot at me... it was like trying to fight with a pig in a sty. You tick off the pig and just get dirty. I need to go take a shower now.

Ooooh. The weed speaks. Back your disdain up with evidence that I am not a Minuteman. Come on. I'll make the same offer to you that I made above.. $100US if you can prove I am not a Minuteman.

As for as contempt for lawfulness... you foolish simpleton. The Minutemen were formed to help those charged with enforcing the laws of the country in a thankless and difficult task. It is shameful how you so easily ignore that in an attempt to make an argument.

My contempt is for those who, like you, cannot make legitimate argument, for those who do not understand the need for enforcing the law, for helping out those charged with a thankless task who appear to be overwhelmed and underfunded.

So.. weedy the foolish herb.... I hope you never actually run into some "weed be gone" or you'll be a poinless memory in a few minds.. and that's all.

Oh, Snap. Did you hear that? He's protecting the world from rosebushes. That's some dangerous game.

Try an Everquest board, I hear they are actually into roleplay there.

That you are a Minuteman.

Show us the evidence. I don't need to do "sleuthing" work because you're still using circular logic to defend your point. Countering a logical fallacy with "shove it" is not an argument, nor is it evidence.

If you were actually an adult who spent his free time patrolling the borders, you wouldn't have time to waste writing amateurish taunts on a game forum.

ROFLMAO... and if that is not circular logic... I have no clue what is... ROFLMAO

As Bugs Bunny used to intone.. what a maroon!

This I agree.

"The dragon in my garage."

Nah, not many. Just the few who deserve it.

I'm not sure where you got the impression that I have an adversion to firearms, certaintly not from my posts. I am a gun owner and I strongly support a citizens right to bear arms. If that makes me a leftist, then so be it. Labels never bothered me one way or the other.

Nor did I ever state that I was frightened. Look it up in the wikipedia, concern and fear do not have the same meaning.

I did not initially assume you were untrained, I posed the question to you about whether or not you had border patrol training or even law enforcement training in a previous post and you did not say that you did. So the construct still stands, that you in fact, have no training in this area.

The actions of one poorly trained or misguided armed civilian playing at border patrol can result in a number of serious consequences as I have pointed out in previous post.

In fact, Ranch Rescue has already been embroiled in a lawsuit and one of their members was arrested.


The entire report about the incident can be found at this link: http://www.svherald.com/articles/2003/12/20/news/news2.txt and here: http://www.kpho.com/Global/story.asp?S=1924785

While the allegations resulted in a mistrial, they did raise suspicions and further degrade the relationship between Mexico, the U.S. and border states.

Last but not least, your affinity for weed killing is not my concern though I am glad to see that you took my signature line by Oscar Wilde to heart.

.

i think its a good idea keeps illegals out ofthe dman country (thats whats wrong with this country ppl that try to protect or give rights to non american citizens)

Fact: You are not a minuteman.

This is a simple fact that you cannot disprove.

I called this so early in the thread.

The difference between children and adults is that adults have seen crap like this before, so we recognize the smell. Children are immature and inexperienced and they believe they can get away with anything.

If you only knew what I know.

If you only knew what you think you know...

I am forming a volunteer group of fake firemen.

We are going to patrol the country because there are far to many people running around with their pants on fire.

He does know what he thinks he knows, that's why he said so.

What you should have said was "If only you knew what I knew what you thought you knew."

But what you don't know can't hurt you- you know?

He who Knows not & Knows not that he know not, he is a fool - Ignore him
He who Knows & Knows not that he knows, he is asleep - Awake him
He who Knows not & Knows that he Knows not, he is a learner - Teach him
He who Knows that he Knows, he is a wise man - Follow him

I would not follow Neehai anywhere as there is no doubt there is little wisdom in those ankle-biter posts.
Weedy needs to be weeded because there seemed, at one point, to be a microscopic chance he might be educable. But I am rapidly giving up hope.
Liane... well, I tend to ignore her sleepy posts. Unfortunately, I accidentally paid atention in this thread.

As for me, what can I say. I am here. I am involved. None of you are. So, all things considered.... draw your own conclusions wrong as they may be.


PS. Liane.. I suggest that you never correct someone with the words "what you should have said". In doing so, you presume to know the thoughts of the other person better than he or she does. In my case, I said EXACTLY what I meant. I understand very well the difference in meaning caused by moving the modifier. Apparently, you don't. And thus, you don't understand my meaning.

If you don't know that you don't know, then you think you know. Therefore, he who knows that he knows could very easily not know that he doesn't know because he refuses to know that he might not know. You obviously think that you know you know, and (according to your proverbs above) that means you think people should follow you.

Why are you looking for sycophants on a game forum? Especially, a game dedicated to separating itself from reality?

I don't think anybody here is likely to help you overthrow the U.S. government.

That reminds me. What is the difference between involved and committed?

It's like a bacon and egg breakfast. The chicken is involved while the pig is committed.

Neehai I wuv you - will you marry my brother so that I can have you as a family member?

(In case your wondering, he IS cute).

Blechhhh...why is it that each and every time I take a shot at a serious discussion it turns into an "I know you are but what am I" battle of the twits Maybe I should stick to the fluffernutter of poetic verse in and stop with the fight for intelligent debate on topics that affect all of us in some way regardless of the degree of affect. Pfft....we are all doodie heads and morons. Not a one of us knows anything for certain about the world at large nor one another...phew now that is over and we can commence with an actuall debate hopefully. Though I believe my dellusion with regard to the human mind may be of the grandeur sort.