Judge outlaws prison group's Bible program
|
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
06-11-2006 09:29
From: Groucho Mandelbrot I confess to not knowing too much about the British education system. Do they just tell you to look up the answers in the back of the book? Do the teachers just hand out the tests with all the answers.
Apparently so, and we can see how well that has worked out. Let's try something different. How about you try to puzzle it out on your own. Maybe find a few friends who are smarter than you who can nudge you in the right direction.
Of course, since you haven't even figured out the right questions to ask, it might be difficult. As someone else suggested, why not create a new thread, forumulate your question into a single concise post and I'm sure someone will help you. The sandbox is chock full of helpful people like Nolan. if you are attempting to prove your point - it does help to clarify where your "facts" come from at times. "Just becuase i said so -if dont beleive me look it up" is school yard bully debate tactics. |
|
Musuko Massiel
Registered User
Join date: 4 Nov 2005
Posts: 435
|
06-11-2006 10:30
"How about you try to puzzle it out on your own. Maybe find a few friends who are smarter than you who can nudge you in the right direction."
I'm not trying to be educated, idiot. I asked you a question so I could hear your opinion. That you seem unwilling to give it says a lot.
""Just becuase i said so -if dont beleive me look it up" is school yard bully debate tactics."
Actually, it's "idiot trying to hide that he doesn't know what he's talking about" tactics.
Groucho, if you don't want to spend the time "educating" us, WHY DO YOU PERSIST IN POSTING REPLIES TO THIS THREAD?
Musuko.
|
|
Groucho Mandelbrot
is no more
Join date: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 296
|
06-11-2006 10:58
I tried answering your questions (hypothetical and otherwise) early on and every time you both covered your eyes and ears and continued on with the same nonsense. I can learn from my mistakes. I will probably give the next person the benefit of the doubt, but you two have shown you just have an axe to grind and there is no possible way to get through to you in this thread.
So, Musuko, my previous offers still stand. You have two ways to illuminate yourself.
1) Hold Rasah, Colette and everyone else to the same standard you are applying to me. I.e. that you should never decide any real-world decision using statistics. In fact, that just stating a statistic shows bigotry and prejudice.
2) Formulate the propostiion/question you have for me in a single concise post and start a new thread that is open to everyone. Hopefully the post is more substantive than "Why does Groucho hate gay people?" If you still fail to understand where you're going wrong after that thread has reached a few pages, I will answer you fully and honestly.
|
|
Musuko Massiel
Registered User
Join date: 4 Nov 2005
Posts: 435
|
06-11-2006 11:07
"So, Musuko, my previous offers still stand. You have two ways to illuminate yourself." I take option three: 3: Assume myself the winner in this debate by default as you have decided not to continue. So I win. And you're proven wrong.  Musuko. |
|
Groucho Mandelbrot
is no more
Join date: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 296
|
06-11-2006 11:27
From: Musuko Massiel 3: Assume myself the winner in this debate by default as you have decided not to continue. So I win. And you're proven wrong. Okay, you win. Your prize is that you get to carry your ignorance and righteous (although unfounded) indignation on to the next thread! Congradulations. I'm very proud of you. P.S. With all the free time you're going to save by not responding to this thread I suggest you take your novel ideas to the National Health Service. Rather than fighting a faceless asshole on the net, try to convince them that their blood donor questionnaire is bigoted. Or perhaps you should tell them they're spending too much money educating young gay men on the risks of HIV, since they are no more at risk than any other "group" and it is prejudicial to even consider them a "group". That should go well. |
|
Musuko Massiel
Registered User
Join date: 4 Nov 2005
Posts: 435
|
06-11-2006 11:35
"Okay, you win. Your prize is that you get to carry your ignorance and righteous (although unfounded) indignation on to the next thread!"
Nope. I'll stay right here. You lost, you leave. ^_^
"P.S."
Oh no...no postscript. You're not allowed to continue. You've conceeded defeat. You've stepped out of the debate. Move on Groucho.
Musuko.
|
|
Surreal Farber
Cat Herder
Join date: 5 Feb 2004
Posts: 2,059
|
06-11-2006 12:04
Can someone scratch some sand over this thread? It's starting to stink.
Sandbox.. Catbox.... hmmmm
_____________________
Surreal
Phobos 3d Design - putting the hot in psychotic since 2004
Come see our whole line of clothing, animations and accessories in Chaos (37, 198, 43)
|
|
Devlin Gallant
Thought Police
Join date: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 5,948
|
06-11-2006 13:23
From: Groucho Mandelbrot I tried answering your questions (hypothetical and otherwise) early on and every time you both covered your eyes and ears and continued on with the same nonsense. I can learn from my mistakes. I will probably give the next person the benefit of the doubt, but you two have shown you just have an axe to grind and there is no possible way to get through to you in this thread.
So, Musuko, my previous offers still stand. You have two ways to illuminate yourself.
1) Hold Rasah, Colette and everyone else to the same standard you are applying to me. I.e. that you should never decide any real-world decision using statistics. In fact, that just stating a statistic shows bigotry and prejudice.
2) Formulate the propostiion/question you have for me in a single concise post and start a new thread that is open to everyone. Hopefully the post is more substantive than "Why does Groucho hate gay people?" If you still fail to understand where you're going wrong after that thread has reached a few pages, I will answer you fully and honestly. If Musuko is as uneducated as you think he/she is, why do you come across as a psuedointellual idiot with delusions of adequacy? Torley Linden:
This thread is closed:
Private discussions – the forums are a public area for the Second Life community’s use. Individuals who have a dispute with each other have other channels of communication to discuss their differences or communicate – private messaging, IM within Second Life, or chatting within Second Life. Also, threads that are addressed to a single individual or group are inappropriate on the forums, this includes slander or "naming names" in a posts title, starting polls about a particular resident or group, etc.
Please see the forum Guidelines for info about what's appropriate on the SL Forums.
_____________________
I LIKE children, I've just never been able to finish a whole one.
|