Now we have King George in the USA..proof

An investigation. I need one. You should too. Just because an organization supposedly takes resonsibility does not remove obligation to the original victims to investigate the original murders and discover what really happened.

It's not unfounded at all. And of course I read it.

so when a murderer pleads guilty they should still have the trial?

What evidence is there to suggest that there will not be one, Elinea? These are people that work on a different timescale. You did, I imagine, hear about the terrorist attack on London less than a year ago? Is this not evidence enough that whatever Al-Qaeda is (and do you know?) is quite capable striking?

"In War crap happens"? Do you feel at war with the Iraqi and Afghan civilians? Where is your evidence to suggest they had anything to do with 9/11? Bush has none, Blair has none.

They had nothing to do with it. This war, illegal in the eyes of the United Nations, leaves innocent blood on the hands of all of us that did nothing or little to prevent it.

"Hate breeds Terrorists...and Liberals" What is a terrorist, Elinea? Do you know that? If it is defined by those attacks on New York, it can similarly be defined by the "shock and awe" unleashed upon Baghdad in the opening stages of the invasion.

And Afghanistan can only aspire to being a second world country, can it? Well, there is not time here to discuss that country's venerable history.

There is nothing to be done when the aggression and greed of nations is bouyed by its people's vitriol.



38000 civilians dead. Over ten times the number that perished on 9/11.

so when a murderer pleads guilty they should still have the trial?

Quite. They might be lying. Who trusts a murderer?

Terrorist cells are always claiming responsibility for each others acts, it's par for the course.

And, I ask, who can tell us what Al Qaeda is?

We, or I at least, am talking about what happens before a trial. You have one group who has supposedly confessed, but a lot of different leads that point in other directions. Sure you can just use the scapegoat confession, but it doesn't attempt to solve the murder.

Are you a lazy cop or a good cop?

they tell us repeatedly, ever hear one of Bin Laden's tapes or recordings?

You also are not allowed to legally have a trial without the accused. Since we can't get Bin Laden we can't put him on trial can we?

Yeah, I have. I'm still none the wiser. He's not exactly giving names and addresses, is he?

and his proof is where? exactly he discusses the Polish discovering evidence and then links to an article about New Zealand.

so when a murderer pleads guilty they should still have the trial?

Obviously, but we're not sure he did it. We only have a video which does not clearly show him claiming he did it. If this WERE the NYPD, they would turn that evidence over to legal to see if they can get a trial-in-absentia going while they pursue other leads. Just because you have a potential prime suspect does not mean you ignore other potential suspects.

Quite. They might be lying. Who trusts a murderer?

Terrorist cells are always claiming responsibility for each others acts, it's par for the course.

And, I ask, who can tell us what Al Qaeda is?

that countries history involves being conquored repeatedly, A terrorist by definition targets CIVILIANS to make a political point. If they attacked say men in uniform they wouldn't be the scourge of the Earth, they would be called soldiers/freedom fighters/w/e now our "Shock and Awe" targeted MILITARY installations, NOT CIVILIANS. Thats why I can say we are not terrorists.

it's got one misdirected link out of a dozen other links.

I'm not your nursemaid -- do some research into what the article states.

If you saw the same pictures we all did of Baghdad during that attack, and have lived in a city of a similar size, you cannot reasonably claim that it was only military personell targeted. It certainly wasn't only military personnel dying.

And you are absolutely right, Afghanistan's history does involve being invaded all the time, the poor souls. Must have something there we all want there, wouldn't you say?

Sadly, I must away, and therefore cannot defend against these outrageous claims any longer.

I did and got nothing. Seems like more unfounded propaganda Kendra

you know the parts where he says "our islamic brothers in Iraq"

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/01/19/D8F7RDH00.html

just to make it an easier search.

prove it.

Good God, Billybob, if I only had the time. Someone please help out in my absence.

In this country they do.

let me see *pulls up Bill Of Rights*
Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence

hard to confront your accusers when you are not there isn't it? Now I know it has happened before, but a simple appeal would get you off

yeah Massoui (?) the hijacker they just put on trial