Private but Polite
|
|
Genevieve Gateaux
Oh yeah, I'm an alt baby!
Join date: 4 Nov 2005
Posts: 24
|
06-28-2006 11:08
From: Ceera Murakami Actually, there is plenty that they can do.
They can fill your home with prims, if you haven't switched off build permissions.
They can fire off any number of SL weapons or explosives that include massive push effects, and knock every 'physical' object in your house into the next sim... We've had griefers before that apparently thought it was hilarious to knock all our wind chimes off the eaves of the roof and scatter them all over the place.
Not to mention the possibility of someone simply waiting there in your home with a weapon, planning to blow you into the next sim as soon as you come home.
I have no problem with polite and curious visitors. I have lost track of how many times I have politely greeted a stranger who entered my home, and on getting a polite response from them, I spent a pleasant time chatting with them, offering freebies, and giving them a tour of my home. But with the influx of untracable griefers, I am getting very wary of any stranger. It's quite sad. I want to believe that the new update will allow LL to actually ban someone AND prevent them from creating unlimited numbers of new alts so they can just come back. But so far, that remains to be proven. Ceera, I understand that not having the tools available when it is group land and you're not an officer. You wouldn't be able to turn on ban lines either. I think all group members should have the ability to eject somebody from group owned land. That is something that LL does need to work on. When I said they can't do anything to my home, I meant anything permanant. Prims are returnable, and for land owners, you can eject and ban those firing weapons at you, though that griefer can fire at you from the other side of the ban lines. I think we are mostly talking about land owners here. You do have some very valid points though. 
|
|
Genevieve Gateaux
Oh yeah, I'm an alt baby!
Join date: 4 Nov 2005
Posts: 24
|
06-28-2006 11:11
From: Tyci Kenzo i know of one security system that will send an email and or im to the land owner of everything said on the land while they are not online so i can track what is said and done on my land while im offline if i chose
why do i have security while im not there? and you say cuz its my stuff and i pay for the land isnt good enough...well IT IS a good enough reason i do pay for it with the money i earn in sl if they want land and a home and furniture to play with they can go buy it or earn it somehow not use other peoples
im not trying to attack anyone but i am protecting what is mine and my friends I never said those reasons weren't good, but they aren't great either. If you have a problem with certain people, put them on the ban list. That way they can't come back. Why are you punishing everybody else who is just trying to fly by just so your things aren't touched?
|
|
Lavanya Hartnell
Registered User
Join date: 9 Dec 2005
Posts: 55
|
06-28-2006 11:12
I think we can agree that having someone sitting on my couch in my home (if I had one) when I'm not around is pretty harmless on the face of it. I think maybe some people want their homes to be "private" because they don't really wish to share all their dirty laundry with the rest of the grid. Some people are shy and wouldn't want to admit to having sex balls, for example. Granted, that someone can look into a parcel seems to rule out this sort of privacy if a pose ball has hover text. It's fair then to ask if privacy of this sort is moot. I suppose one could argue that with a parcel large enough, it's hard to get a good look at what is inside a building, so I guess it's not moot. However, that a person person may be on my couch when I show up and want some alone-time is a legitimate issue. Yes, I can ask him to leave, but I don't see that I should have to. LL created SL with the concept of ownership in mind, so it seems only fair that people will expect to exercise that privillege.
|
|
Tyci Kenzo
K2 Owner and Designer
Join date: 8 Dec 2005
Posts: 285
|
06-28-2006 11:16
From: Genevieve Gateaux I never said those reasons weren't good, but they aren't great either. If you have a problem with certain people, put them on the ban list. That way they can't come back. Why are you punishing everybody else who is just trying to fly by just so your things aren't touched? because then a ban list is full within a few short months as i said right now my land is open and there just seems to be incident after incident in the last few weeks that makes me regret that
|
|
Lavanya Hartnell
Registered User
Join date: 9 Dec 2005
Posts: 55
|
06-28-2006 11:18
Incidentally, I don't think the debate over whether there should be privacy is productive. I think most of us agree that there should be some means to ensure some levels of privacy. I'd rather discuss the means than question this nearly universal premise. Positive solutions and debating them seems preferable to debating whether there are people who abuse other people.
|
|
Loniki Loudon
Homes By Loniki
Join date: 5 Dec 2005
Posts: 176
|
06-28-2006 12:18
Concept; Special Prim Features; Security Prim
A security prim is a phantom prim with a permissions list. Once set up it can be easily copied and placed where ever needed. A security prim is invisable for all intensive purposes to all on the access list but are black, solid, and not phantom to anyone who is not. The use of security prims would not be abused as there is a real prim cost for each one in use. Security prims can be used to block access to rooms, entire homes, or selected outside areas.
|
|
Lavanya Hartnell
Registered User
Join date: 9 Dec 2005
Posts: 55
|
06-28-2006 14:18
Neat idea, but a couple of technical issues. 1.) Prims are limted to 10 x 10 x 10 meters in size. You might have to duplicate your access list across many such prims. 2.) There are no solids in SL. All objects are hollow "shells". This is due to how OpenGL works. So you'd need only to camera surf into such a prim. 3.) Selection during building will be hampered. Try working with cubes inside a big cube. It's doable, but harder than in free-space.
|
|
Ananda Sandgrain
+0-
Join date: 16 May 2003
Posts: 1,951
|
06-28-2006 14:50
Anyone else think it's about time SL had an "indoors"? You can buy a private island, but that's more than most people need simply for some private time. I'd propose a two-stage process by which LL converted over to real privacy and then made the mainland back into a public, neighborly place.
First, start selling private spaces in smaller sizes, down to 1/16 of a sim. They would have most of the estate tools but would be located and placed on servers at LL's discretion.
Second, once these are widely available, eliminate the mainland ban lines.
This way you could have the "outside" of your house in the grid where everyone could fly by, sightsee, and visit. Then if you want privacy, just step onto the teleport pad inside and go to your own private mini-island.
---------
I had some further thoughts on social engineering that might be useful, but I'm not sold on them totally. One is that if private spaces become too popular, the mainland might empty out entirely. Perhaps a way to prevent this is to require that any such "indoor" space be accessed via a link from the mainland. You would have to place your teleporter somewhere there, and take people in that way. This might encourage people to congregate in neighborhoods and display their figurative yard art. It'd be interesting to see what a high-density zone might look like in this scenario. This might also encourage more group activity areas on the mainland.
|
|
Warda Kawabata
Amityville Horror
Join date: 4 Nov 2005
Posts: 1,300
|
06-28-2006 15:20
Some people are making an analogy that SL hokmes are like web pages, and therefore public.
BS.
I have a website. Most of it is public. Some parts of it are private, and invisible to normal viewers, and not linked externally, and passworded. I'd be pretty annoyed if someone else foudn their way there. Yes, there is a valid reason for it being locked up so as well, which I won't disclose here for security/privacy reasons.
So if SL homes are like web pages, then give us the tools to lock them up like web pages already.
|
|
Ghoti Nyak
καλλιστι
Join date: 7 Aug 2004
Posts: 2,078
|
06-28-2006 15:56
From: Warda Kawabata I have a website. Most of it is public. Some parts of it are private, and invisible to normal viewers, and not linked externally, and passworded. Just like certain private islands. Private, invisible from the mainland, and you have to be 'special' to get in. -Ghoti
_____________________
"Sometimes I believe that this less material life is our truer life, and that our vain presence on the terraqueous globe is itself the secondary or merely virtual phenomenon." ~ H.P. Lovecraft
|
|
Warda Kawabata
Amityville Horror
Join date: 4 Nov 2005
Posts: 1,300
|
06-28-2006 16:01
From: Ghoti Nyak Just like certain private islands. Private, invisible from the mainland, and you have to be 'special' to get in.
-Ghoti Oh, I don't pay my service providor any extaordinary fees to have this security in place. Unlike the case with SL private islands.
|
|
Jonas Pierterson
Dark Harlequin
Join date: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 3,660
|
06-28-2006 16:14
From: Genevieve Gateaux I never said those reasons weren't good, but they aren't great either. If you have a problem with certain people, put them on the ban list. That way they can't come back. Why are you punishing everybody else who is just trying to fly by just so your things aren't touched? The question is why are you trying to punish everyone who wants their land untouched just so you can fly? It all depends on priority- and guess whos desires come first if they own the land.
_____________________
Good freebies here and here I must protest. I am not a merry man! - Warf, ST: TNG, episode: Qpid You killed my father. Prepare to die. - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride You killed My father. Your a-- is mine! - Hellboy
|
|
Jonas Pierterson
Dark Harlequin
Join date: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 3,660
|
06-28-2006 16:20
From: Kerrigan Moore Well then once you logged on your ban lines and security scripts would kick back in and they'd all be ejected. Tada' .. problem solved  Problem not solved. They shouldn't have been able to get on the skybox in the first place. Security system ejecting after 6 seconds. Tada, problem solved.
_____________________
Good freebies here and here I must protest. I am not a merry man! - Warf, ST: TNG, episode: Qpid You killed my father. Prepare to die. - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride You killed My father. Your a-- is mine! - Hellboy
|
|
Surreal Farber
Cat Herder
Join date: 5 Feb 2004
Posts: 2,059
|
06-28-2006 16:30
From: Genevieve Gateaux I never said those reasons weren't good, but they aren't great either. If you have a problem with certain people, put them on the ban list. That way they can't come back. Why are you punishing everybody else who is just trying to fly by just so your things aren't touched? That's the nice thing about having an island. You can have complete privacy if you set it to group only and invisible from mainland. Considering that island owners pay $195 a month, it seems quite reasonable to me that they be able to do this if they choose. Living on the mainland gives you fewer options, which is frustrating. I understand that it's frustrating to move around in all the ban lines too. I have alot of sympathy for both sides. I remember how frustrating it was when we lived on the mainland to try and do any content creation work without dealing with constant flybys - not just the time lost, but also the opportunity for someone to see an idea you were working on before it was ready to market. Perhaps the answer for the mainland is more Linden-owned rights of way to make touring possible. I've always liked the protected waterways for just that reason.
_____________________
Surreal
Phobos 3d Design - putting the hot in psychotic since 2004
Come see our whole line of clothing, animations and accessories in Chaos (37, 198, 43)
|
|
Aliasi Stonebender
Return of Catbread
Join date: 30 Jan 2005
Posts: 1,858
|
06-28-2006 16:35
From: Lavanya Hartnell 30 seconds is long enough to lose your privacy.  I could understand 10, though. Shouldn't take longer than 10 seconds to cross most of a sim. 1 second is enough. Camera, you know. 
_____________________
Red Mary says, softly, “How a man grows aggressive when his enemy displays propriety. He thinks: I will use this good behavior to enforce my advantage over her. Is it any wonder people hold good behavior in such disregard?” Anything Surplus Home to the "Nuke the Crap Out of..." series of games and other stuff
|
|
Merlyn Bailly
owner, AVALON GALLERIA
Join date: 7 Sep 2005
Posts: 576
|
06-28-2006 17:00
From: Ghoti Nyak So you Freeze them and then send them home. The easy answer beats the drama.
-Ghoti How do you freeze someone?
_____________________
SL used to be a game -- now it's a corporate advertising/marketing platform.
|
|
Pratyeka Muromachi
Meditating Avatar
Join date: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 642
|
06-28-2006 17:01
From: Khamon Fate It's also wrong, though perhaps not a definitive scam, to convince people that Second Life affords them any sense of privacy at all. Anonymity perhaps, but not inworld privacy. Do Not believe that security scripts and access lists prevent people from seeing what you have rezzed over the land mesh. That's simply not true. It's not at all true. It will never be true.
Exactly! The very fact that your AV is totally anonymous provide the best privacy possible. It is not YOU who is happily "pixel slapping" on that couch, it's a virtual representation of your perverted mind. Doing it in a virtual world is like flashing your ass in the window... Too many people seem not to be able to separate virtual world from reality. If you need to have virtual sex so bad, get a partner in RL and do it with a window between you and with a bag over your head.     
_____________________
gone to Openlife Grid and OpenSim standalone, your very own sim on your PC, 45,000 prims, huge prims at will up to 100m, yes, run your own grid on your PC, FOR FREE!
|
|
Merlyn Bailly
owner, AVALON GALLERIA
Join date: 7 Sep 2005
Posts: 576
|
06-28-2006 17:03
From: Ceera Murakami That only works if YOU are the land owner. I have two homes. One I share with a friend, and it sits on group land that I am not a group officer for. So virtually none of the current or promised anti-griefing tools work there for me. I love that shared home and my friends that I share that parcel with, but I spend less and less time there because I have absolutely no recourse if someone invades that home and causes trouble. All I can do is run away and make a vague attempt to AR them, or pray that one of the officers in the land group is around, so maybe I can beg them to defend me. I'm seriously considering paying for a security system, just so my housemate and I can both control access to our home there and my skybox.
My other home is on a parcel on a privately-owned island, where I bought the parcel. One strong factor motivating me to buy that plot was to have someplace that I could retreat to where I could control access and ban unwelcome troublemakers. I'm also an estate manager for that sim, so I can ban someone from the whole sim if I have to.
I like new people. If they are polite and want to enjoy SL, I will happily spend lots of time helping them, offering freebies, and making them welcome. But the unimpeded flood of untracable griefers is forcing me to seriously consider banning all unverified accounts from any land that I have any control over. So buy a security script for the building -- the Damani villa I own has a great security script -- only people whom you place on the list will be recognized and can walk into the house. Everyone else has to "knock" first -- when someone walks up to the door, the security script notifies you (if you're home) that someone is there and wants to come in. That works great.
_____________________
SL used to be a game -- now it's a corporate advertising/marketing platform.
|
|
nimrod Yaffle
Cavemen are people too...
Join date: 15 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,146
|
06-28-2006 17:05
From: Merlyn Bailly How do you freeze someone? If you own the land they are on, right click them then select freeze, then click the freeze button. I believe it freezes them for 30 seconds, in that time they can TP somewhere else, but not do anything on your land.
_____________________
"People can cry much easier than they can change." -James Baldwin
|
|
Aliasi Stonebender
Return of Catbread
Join date: 30 Jan 2005
Posts: 1,858
|
06-28-2006 18:08
From: Pratyeka Muromachi Too many people seem not to be able to separate virtual world from reality. If you need to have virtual sex so bad, get a partner in RL and do it with a window between you and with a bag over your head.
If you need to have a virtual temple so bad, go buy some LEGOs? 
_____________________
Red Mary says, softly, “How a man grows aggressive when his enemy displays propriety. He thinks: I will use this good behavior to enforce my advantage over her. Is it any wonder people hold good behavior in such disregard?” Anything Surplus Home to the "Nuke the Crap Out of..." series of games and other stuff
|
|
Angelique LaFollette
Registered User
Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 1,595
|
06-28-2006 22:34
From: Lavanya Hartnell I'm starting to create skyboxes that I'd like to make private. Sadly, the No Entry barriers don't extend high enough for most skyboxes. The obvious answer of extending the no-entry barrier limit skyward is probably not a great answer. Personally, I think it would be nice to make it so you can indicate the minimum and maximum height for the no-entry box on your parcel. You could, for example, keep your ground level store open to the public while putting a barrier around your skybox residence. - Lavanya The Barriers do now, for people Specificly on your Ban List. as for general Flyers, the hight is still more or less the same, SO, Place your Skybox at around 600 metersThat was always enough privacy for me (Though in one case i did have a security sphere on the roof). Angel
|
|
Ghoti Nyak
καλλιστι
Join date: 7 Aug 2004
Posts: 2,078
|
06-29-2006 04:02
From: Warda Kawabata Oh, I don't pay my service providor any extaordinary fees to have this security in place. Unlike the case with SL private islands. In SL, you get what you pay for. You can not carry these analogies to 100% equality. -Ghoti
_____________________
"Sometimes I believe that this less material life is our truer life, and that our vain presence on the terraqueous globe is itself the secondary or merely virtual phenomenon." ~ H.P. Lovecraft
|
|
Warda Kawabata
Amityville Horror
Join date: 4 Nov 2005
Posts: 1,300
|
06-29-2006 04:06
From: Ghoti Nyak In SL, you get what you pay for. You can not carry these analogies to 100% equality.
-Ghoti Tell that to LL. They are the ones trying to turn SL into the www Mk II.
|
|
Khamon Fate
fategardens.net
Join date: 21 Nov 2003
Posts: 4,177
|
06-29-2006 07:11
From: Surreal Farber That's the nice thing about having an island. You can have complete privacy if you set it to group only and invisible from mainland. Considering that island owners pay $195 a month, it seems quite reasonable to me that they be able to do this if they choose. Mainland sim owners pay $195 a month.
_____________________
Visit the Fate Gardens Website @ fategardens.net
|
|
Timmins Hamilton
Registered User
Join date: 15 May 2004
Posts: 68
|
06-29-2006 07:19
From: Jonas Pierterson I do. Agaian, I don't leave my rl doors unlocked when I'm at work. Do you? Judging by this quote, yes, you do. After all, if you're not around, who cares, right? LOL - I know there is a certain amount of sarcasm in your post but of course there IS a difference between RL and SL.... In RL people can break into your house cause damage, mess the place up, steal your stuff etc etc.... In SL they can...well... they can sit down on your stuff. When they go its as if they hadnt been there. What? You have your property to allow people to rez stuff there and no auto return? Well turning them on is surely an easy way to stop people doing that. As for people spying on you when you are there - or even looking at your stuff when you are out.... they can do that locked down or not. Just my 2p worth..... - Timmins
|