Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Give 1 reason why you think LL is lame
Imnotgoing Sideways
Can't outlaw cute! =^-^=
Join date: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 4,694
10-17-2009 10:38
avatar_lad.xml

^^ If you replace the LL version of THIS file with the one the Emerald team put together, you available and visible attachment points are DOUBLED!!! (=_=)
_____________________
Somewhere in this world; there is someone having some good clean fun doing the one thing you hate the most. (^_^)y


http://slurl.com/secondlife/Ferguson/54/237/94
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
10-17-2009 10:45
From: Paulo Dielli
Why LL is lame:

- They don't act enough against copybots.
- They don't enforce their own rules regarding alt abuse and gaming search.
- They don't listen to their customers.

Why LL is NOT lame:

- They created a wonderful and unique world.

That they have absolutely no idea how to run. That is lame.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Kitty Barnett
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 5,586
10-17-2009 11:00
From: Phil Deakins
There's nothing lame about that, imo. I see no reason why an AO should be in the viewer and, therefore, no reason why it should occur to anyone at LL.
Because you actually need sim-side support to do a proper AO and LL is the only one who can make that happen. You can use a scripted or viewer-only AO but they're both still "hacks" in the sense that they have to detect and stop the default animations and start a custom one.

The ideal situation would be one where the sim simply plays the proper animation for a given state (the viewer actually is responsible for playing *some* animations - like the fidgetting ones).
1 2 3