Info on the Future Plans for SL- by the Lindens
|
|
Isablan Neva
Mystic
Join date: 27 Nov 2004
Posts: 2,907
|
03-12-2009 16:02
From: Amity Slade When you do a Search, and uncheck the "Include parcels with Mature Content" box, maybe the Mature parcels should not be included in the Search. If you only got PG parcels when you unchecked the "Include parcels with Mature Content" box, it would probably greatly reduce your exposure to mature content when you are trying to avoid it. Why Linden Lab is trying something complicated, when it can't do the simple, is beyond me.
I think the point is to differentiate between "mature" as Ahoy! Possible Nudity Ahead and "adult" as Explicit Sexual Content -- not unlike the way entertainment is rated. Explicit sex is "adult" and that appears to be where the dividing line is being drawn here. From: Blondin Linden The idea is that overtly sexual or violent themed areas would be classified as Adult. Sex beds in a private home, skins, and the such are all fine and would not have to move. Its when the theme or main advertising point is sexual that it would cross a line between mature and adult. So, Ralektra is right in that when doing a search on "beach" in Mature, you should be able to find a nude beach, but not sex beach. How a place is advertised is what it looks like LL is going after.
_____________________
 http://slurl.com/secondlife/TheBotanicalGardens/207/30/420/
|
|
Isablan Neva
Mystic
Join date: 27 Nov 2004
Posts: 2,907
|
03-12-2009 16:07
From: Ralektra Breda Ain't it just like the obvious to elude me completely! I never thought of checking the PG box. I mean...it's a beach. There was a big brouhaha a few years ago when LL set Search to automatically be PG and you had to check it to include Mature. Every business owner on Mature land screamed bloody murder (which is to say, most of them.) Unfortunately, what that lead to is Mature ok is the default for search and it is spammed to death with sex content that has traffic botted its way to the top and uses keywords of the most popular search terms.
_____________________
 http://slurl.com/secondlife/TheBotanicalGardens/207/30/420/
|
|
Lindal Kidd
Dances With Noobs
Join date: 26 Jun 2007
Posts: 8,371
|
03-12-2009 18:03
From: Weston Graves I applaud this subtle change. Just on a cursory glance at the blogs and forums it looks like everything will stay just about the same - there just may be a little more lag in the adult areas if they are all crowded together. Honestly -- as I approach my second year rezday still chaste (my alt too), I wouldn't really miss the shallow adult stuff. I might miss the sexual tension created by the remote possibility of something happening, however. So I think these changes are the absolute wisest course of action, and will lend credibility to the grid without sacrificing freedom. Bravo! It won't be subtle, trust me. It will be disruptive in the extreme. We are going to see plunging land prices. We are going to see businesses fold. We are going to see a massive exodus of people. And it's all useless. Anyplace on the grid is a teleport away from anything else. Cameras can see through walls and into the next sim. There is NO WAY under the current structure to protect the eyes of the prudish, sensitive, or underaged from content that may be offensive. The ONLY way to keep adult content separate is the solution we have now: separate grids. If LL had half a brain, they would set up a new grid or expand the Teen Grid, and call THAT "Second Life", and rename our current grid "Adult Life". I've offered to bet any Linden L$100,000 that if they do that, "Adult Life" will grow faster than the squeaky-clean "Second Life" grid. And the policy isn't even one that most people want. What is the percentage of the grid that's PG today? That would be a good indicator of how many people find adult content so alarming that they want to never have to see it. I don't know the figure, but I bet it's far from a majority. This is being driven by a few moralistic loudmouths, a fear of parental lawsuits, and a dream of SL becoming a popular platform for RL businesses. I'm so disgusted. I'm leaving the Mentors. I no longer wish to volunteer my time to help a group of people who are so clearly clueless. I'm putting my land up for sale, tiering down, and reverting to Basic membership. At the very least, we are in for rough times, and if my fears are true, we'll all be looking for a new virtual home within the year.
_____________________
It's still My World and My Imagination! So there. Lindal Kidd
|
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
03-12-2009 18:14
You and your letters, Lindal......*shakes fist*
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
|
|
Nimue Jewell
Unabashedly Leggy
Join date: 20 Mar 2007
Posts: 1,745
|
03-12-2009 18:27
From: Brenda Connolly One concern I have is the effect on the land market. whether you scoff and sneer at Xrated content or nut,... Best. Typo. Ever.
|
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
03-12-2009 18:34
From: Nimue Jewell Best. Typo. Ever. And Pep isn't here to see it.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
|
|
Viktoria Dovgal
…
Join date: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 3,593
|
03-12-2009 18:38
The little spot where I set up Viktoria's house is sandwiched between some orgy house and a "forced fantasy roleplay" mini-city. It's sure going to get quiet around there 
|
|
Scott Savira
Not Scott Saliva
Join date: 10 Aug 2008
Posts: 357
|
03-12-2009 18:46
This will not end well.
|
|
Weston Graves
Werebeagle
Join date: 24 Mar 2007
Posts: 2,059
|
03-12-2009 18:47
From: Lindal Kidd It won't be subtle, trust me. It will be disruptive in the extreme. We are going to see plunging land prices. We are going to see businesses fold. We are going to see a massive exodus of people.
I too worry about land prices and land "scalpers," but otherwise - in view of this quote from Blondin Linden, it just doesn't sound all that disasterous. From: Blondin Linden The idea is that overtly sexual or violent themed areas would be classified as Adult. Sex beds in a private home, skins, and the such are all fine and would not have to move. Its when the theme or main advertising point is sexual that it would cross a line between mature and adult.
_____________________
Goodbye for now from human Weston, beagle Weston, and Keyboard Guy.  Best of both lives to you all. 
|
|
Kitty Barnett
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 5,586
|
03-12-2009 18:56
From: Lindal Kidd It won't be subtle, trust me. It will be disruptive in the extreme. We are going to see plunging land prices. We are going to see businesses fold. We are going to see a massive exodus of people. Am I missing something obvious?  I really can't see how this would - in any significant way - change an average resident's daily SL-life, even if they are specifically (or even primarily) looking for adult content. This is aside from any "we're all adults etc" debates... just the practical "global" impact on SL of what LL is currently proposing. I hardly think uprooting mainland business owners and dumping them elsewhere is a perfect solution, but I'm just highly puzzled at "disruptive in the extreme" comments not just by you but all over the place.
|
|
Treasure Ballinger
Virtual Ability
Join date: 31 Dec 2007
Posts: 2,745
|
03-12-2009 19:46
From: Amity Slade I've read through the terms of service and community standards several times, and I've never seen that having an Adult place in Picks is against the Terms of Service.
If the Picks place has a picture with nudity or somesuch, that would be. If it contains naughty words, it would be. But if the Picks content is clean- and it's just the place that's not- then I've read nothing to suggest that's against the TOS.
And an individual Linden's opinion would not overrule the TOS. The TOS are contractual. I don't have the quote in front of me, saw it earlier in the other forum where the Lindens are talking. But they did quote the TOS. You're probably right, I'm sure, as long as the picture or description wasn't overt.
|
|
Isablan Neva
Mystic
Join date: 27 Nov 2004
Posts: 2,907
|
03-12-2009 20:12
From: Lindal Kidd And it's all useless. Anyplace on the grid is a teleport away from anything else. Cameras can see through walls and into the next sim. There is NO WAY under the current structure to protect the eyes of the prudish, sensitive, or underaged from content that may be offensive. From the sounds of things, the idea is that there will be an "adult" continent for those not already on private islands. You won't be able to see in -- or TP in -- without being age verified. At least that's what I get from this thread: /352/38/311510/1.html
_____________________
 http://slurl.com/secondlife/TheBotanicalGardens/207/30/420/
|
|
Clarissa Lowell
Gone. G'bye.
Join date: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 3,020
|
03-12-2009 20:25
I wanna quote Lindal's entire post and say Hurrah - I so agree with every word.
Isn't there *already* a way to not see Mature content in search? Do a PG search. Isn't there *already* a way to not see it elsewhere. Only go to PG sims.
I think everyone should have the right to enjoy SL how they wish (within RL laws) including those who don't want to see this stuff. I can fully understand this. And I even applaud it.
But I am so against losing privacy and RL security over playing a video game online. I am NOT going to give my SS# so I can have an alt. I am NOT giving out my personal info to some third party data collection agency. I recall a (true) story in which a marketing firm employed convicts, and one of them used the data provided to add to his rap sheet for rapes. I am NOT saying that will happen here...but some other form of violation seems likely - it is at the very least possible, and without asking this of people it would not BE possible.
I guard my privacy as well as I can online...I never, ever, ever give out my SS#. Driver's license - why would I want to put that online? Where does it go?
Tell you what. When LL does the same for us, we'll call it even. Which of them are going to send us their Driver's license in an email?
Yes I'm being facetious but I am not a happy camper...Call it the hippie in me.
|
|
Weston Graves
Werebeagle
Join date: 24 Mar 2007
Posts: 2,059
|
03-12-2009 22:11
From: Clarissa Lowell Yes I'm being facetious but I am not a happy camper...Call it the hippie in me.
Well gee - if it's a Cause I'm ready to grow my hair and hoist the old peace symbol again. 
|
|
Ralektra Breda
Template Painter
Join date: 7 Apr 2008
Posts: 1,875
|
03-12-2009 22:40
I guess it is going to depend on where LL will draw the imaginary line. I have no problem with nudity, I have no problem with sexual innuendo, etc. Like I said, I'm not a prude...but when a simple 'beach' search brings up f*** s*** P**** c*** etc. multiple times in keywords, that is something I really wasn't looking for. I don't mind adult content a bit, and I don't have any problem with nudity or sexuality. As far as property/land, I'm still up in the air about that. But it would make me very happy to know that the chances of a sex club springing up next to my shop on the mainland have been reduced to none 
_____________________
 Mainstore: http://slurl.com/secondlife/Phantasm/51/164/501 http://rbzdesign.blogspot.com/ I'm not a designer IRL, but I RP one on SL!
|
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
03-12-2009 22:47
I don't like how LL is changing the rules mid game and only affecting a small portion of the population, who are not doing anything wrong. They were told to have mature businesses on mature land, which they have and now they are being told to move.Perhaps a year from now, some special interest decides that their being in their own area isn't good enough, so they are told to move again, this time out of SL entirely.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
|
|
Lindal Kidd
Dances With Noobs
Join date: 26 Jun 2007
Posts: 8,371
|
03-12-2009 22:59
From: Kitty Barnett Am I missing something obvious?  I really can't see how this would - in any significant way - change an average resident's daily SL-life, even if they are specifically (or even primarily) looking for adult content. This is aside from any "we're all adults etc" debates... just the practical "global" impact on SL of what LL is currently proposing. I hardly think uprooting mainland business owners and dumping them elsewhere is a perfect solution, but I'm just highly puzzled at "disruptive in the extreme" comments not just by you but all over the place. It's the changeover that'll be disruptive. Go through a few commercial areas. There are sex related stores and clubs ALL OVER. Not everywhere you look, but one here, one there. All these businesses (and private and public areas with adult content) will have to be uprooted and relocated. Plus, in an already-depressed land market, they're building another continent! Nobody will get land they're happy with, nobody will get a decent price for the land they're forced to leave. Everyone's landmarks will be screwed up. I didn't say anything about the gambling ban, and no, it didn't affect me much because I don't gamble. But it DID have an effect. The SL economy tanked there pretty good for a while. Now they're talking about messing with an even larger industry, the one major entertainment people are willing to pay for (I don't mean just escorts. People who buy sexy clothes, people who buy land to build a castle with a dungeon, people who go to dance clubs with a date or hoping to pick one up, people who buy poseballs and MLP beds). Where does this "2 to 5 percent" figure come from? Linden Lab, the same people who tell us that only 10% of the people on line are bots? The same people who boasted about "12 million registered users", but just cut 2 million inactive accounts from that tally? And I don't believe the assurances that "only very hard core sex and violence" will be affected. That is NOT what the proposed guidelines say. If they are followed, everything from skin stores that show nipples to Abranimations' store will get evicted. Who decides? Why, the G Team. Now THERE'S a comforting thought, given their past record. All four of LL's stated goals sound great. If they could be accomplished, I'd applaud. But NONE of them can be achieved, given the way the current grid is implemented. The only way to isolate people from content is to put them on a separate grid, like we do now with the Teen Grid. If LL wants a pristine paradise for prudes, let them expand the Teen Grid. Give THAT the "Second Life" name. Bring in the kids and the corporations. Leave the current grungy, dirty, porn-ridden grid alone. Give it a new name, "Adult Life". For gods' sake, let us degenerate in peace.
_____________________
It's still My World and My Imagination! So there. Lindal Kidd
|
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
03-12-2009 23:08
From: Ralektra Breda I guess it is going to depend on where LL will draw the imaginary line. I have no problem with nudity, I have no problem with sexual innuendo, etc. Like I said, I'm not a prude...but when a simple 'beach' search brings up f*** s*** P**** c*** etc. multiple times in keywords, that is something I really wasn't looking for. I don't mind adult content a bit, and I don't have any problem with nudity or sexuality. As far as property/land, I'm still up in the air about that. But it would make me very happy to know that the chances of a sex club springing up next to my shop on the mainland have been reduced to none  What would you rather have next to you though? A shop that was tastefully designed and sold items of a sexual nature, where customers made their purchases and went on their way, or a club full of blingtards.? And not saying you would, but what stops people from saying that we don't want the clubs full of blingtards next to us, let's move them to their own island? Who's next?
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
|
|
Damien1 Thorne
Registered User
Join date: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,877
|
03-12-2009 23:22
From: Brenda Connolly Who's next? Duct tape afficianados?
_____________________
As we fade into the darkness...
|
|
Elanthius Flagstaff
Registered User
Join date: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,534
|
03-12-2009 23:32
From: Isablan Neva If SL is to grow it has to become something other than Virtual Porn World from a public relations standpoint. Good point. Because there's no growth potential or profit making opportunity or future whatsoever in virtual porn. That's why the internet became so popular after they banned all porn.
_____________________
Visit http://ninjaland.net for mainland and covenant rentals or visit our amazing land store at Steamboat (199, 56). Also, we pay L$0.15/sqm/week for tier donated to our group and we rent pure tier to your group for L$0.25/sqm/week. Free L$ for Everyone - http://ninjaland.net/tools/search-scumming/
|
|
Elanthius Flagstaff
Registered User
Join date: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,534
|
03-12-2009 23:33
From: Brenda Connolly What would you rather have next to you though? A shop that was tastefully designed and sold items of a sexual nature, where customers made their purchases and went on their way, or a club full of blingtards.? And not saying you would, but what stops people from saying that we don't want the clubs full of blingtards next to us, let's move them to their own island? Who's next? Blingtard clubs always have stripper poles and tons of mostly naked people. They'll all have to move too.
_____________________
Visit http://ninjaland.net for mainland and covenant rentals or visit our amazing land store at Steamboat (199, 56). Also, we pay L$0.15/sqm/week for tier donated to our group and we rent pure tier to your group for L$0.25/sqm/week. Free L$ for Everyone - http://ninjaland.net/tools/search-scumming/
|
|
Clarissa Lowell
Gone. G'bye.
Join date: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 3,020
|
03-13-2009 00:16
From: Weston Graves Well gee - if it's a Cause I'm ready to grow my hair and hoist the old peace symbol again.  1 user thanks Weston for the smile.
|
|
Love Hastings
#66666
Join date: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,094
|
03-13-2009 00:21
Who let in the hippies?
|
|
Elanthius Flagstaff
Registered User
Join date: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,534
|
03-13-2009 00:58
From: Brenda Connolly One concern I have is the effect on the land market. whether you scoff and sneer at Xrated content or nut, it is a big part of the SL economy. setting up new areas for this content could lead to some serious price gouging on the land market. What will prevent some from buying up all these parcels and selling them to displaced businesses at exhorbiatant rates. Especially if LL has an eviction time table in their bag of tricks. It's going to be a very complicated situation. Note that I am notoriously poor at predicting the future, but here you go anyway. 2-4% of mainland is 100-200 sims. Obviously no normal person thinks that it will be only 2-4% of the land area efffected but even if you take that number it's a huge amount of land. Prices on the old mainland will fall because people will be abandoning it in droves. Not just the adult oriented businesses, all those Goreans, BDSM groups, free sex joints, every single club in SL with stripper poles etc but also since freebie accounts can't access any of that content anymore their numbers will drop off. After the finish of the big crash I suppose things may come back as more Disney people move in but I think it's a big risk that there are more Disneyfied potential residents than there are adults here for adult reasons. The situation in the porn ghetto is going to be even more complex. It will be very hard for SL to build an entire continent of exactly the right size. Prices there will fluctuate wildly. If there's too little land prices will rocket as every profitable adult business tries to get whatever they can and keep their businesses alive. If there's too much land then prices will be even lower than the old mainland and we could see prices drop way below L$1/sqm as there will simply be too much land and no-one who wants to buy it. I sure as hell can't absorb 100 sims and I doubt anyone else can either.
_____________________
Visit http://ninjaland.net for mainland and covenant rentals or visit our amazing land store at Steamboat (199, 56). Also, we pay L$0.15/sqm/week for tier donated to our group and we rent pure tier to your group for L$0.25/sqm/week. Free L$ for Everyone - http://ninjaland.net/tools/search-scumming/
|
|
Kenbro Utu
Registered User
Join date: 26 Sep 2006
Posts: 483
|
03-13-2009 01:13
So I guess this means they are going to actually have to make age verification work...
|