At least they haven't gotten rid of adult content.. yet.
They did on the Teen Grid, maybe that's a the testing ground !
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
denied Access to Adult areas! |
|
|
Dekka Raymaker
thinking very hard
Join date: 4 Feb 2007
Posts: 3,898
|
08-13-2009 09:16
At least they haven't gotten rid of adult content.. yet. They did on the Teen Grid, maybe that's a the testing ground ! |
|
Raudf Fox
(ra-ow-th)
Join date: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 5,119
|
08-13-2009 12:21
They did on the Teen Grid, maybe that's a the testing ground ! *snerks* Actually, you have to jump through more hoops to get on the teen grid.. which is why most of the teens are on the main grid ![]() _____________________
DiamonX Studios, the place of the Victorian Times series of gowns and dresses - Located at http://slurl.com/secondlife/Fushida/224/176
Want more attachment points for your avatar's wearing pleasure? Then please vote for https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-1065? |
|
LittleMe Jewell
...........
Join date: 8 Oct 2007
Posts: 11,319
|
08-13-2009 12:46
....land is far to high in price _____________________
♥♥♥
-Lil Why do you sit there looking like an envelope without any address on it? ~Mark Twain~ Optimism is denial, so face the facts and move on. ♥♥♥ Lil's Yard Sale / Inventory Cleanout: http://slurl.com/secondlife/Triggerfish/52/27/22 . http://www.flickr.com/photos/littleme_jewell |
|
Pussycat Catnap
Sex Kitten
Join date: 15 Jun 2009
Posts: 1,131
|
08-13-2009 13:59
This is the tricky part. Many people FALSELY think that marking a parcel *age verified* gets them out of having to actually be on ADULT land. This is NOT TRUE. According to a meeting yesterday with Blondin Linden, Its said that come mid-september, anyone having ADULT content on mature mainland will have to get in on the auctions for adult rated land, or move to a private adult rated island. So no more sexbeds in private homes? Or do you mean COMMERCIAL adult content? . _____________________
![]() |
|
Brieanne Bomazi
Don't forget the *E*
Join date: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 383
|
08-13-2009 14:09
So no more sexbeds in private homes? Or do you mean COMMERCIAL adult content? . Commercial, or anything open to the public. Private homes are fine. First time you invite your friends over for a private orgy, they can get you... if someone see's and files an Ar. You and your partner in your own home is fine. It will likely be a witch hunt.. but here's hoping not. ~Brie _____________________
You know the saying: If it ain't broken... it's not LL owned. http://www.flickr.com/photos/brieannebomazi/ Actually, I think we'll have a better chance of winning the lottery than figuring out the information from the Lindens. Curious about the Emerald Viewer and all the features? http://modularsystems.sl/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24&Itemid=16 |
|
Pussycat Catnap
Sex Kitten
Join date: 15 Jun 2009
Posts: 1,131
|
08-13-2009 14:13
Well... that would be an attempt to enforce monogamy on people in SL, which would just be fraught with all kinds of other problems.
If you can have one person in bed, I have serious doubts they'd be policing against private parties. Where is the text of this conversation? _____________________
![]() |
|
Clarissa Lowell
Gone. G'bye.
Join date: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 3,020
|
08-13-2009 14:26
Commercial, or anything open to the public. Private homes are fine. First time you invite your friends over for a private orgy, they can get you... if someone see's and files an Ar. You and your partner in your own home is fine. It will likely be a witch hunt.. but here's hoping not. ~Brie Not that I'm planning one. Lol. But, wouldn't that be private too - if invitation were required, and it was not in search or open to the general public? _____________________
|
|
Gabriele Graves
Always and Forever, FULL
Join date: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 6,205
|
08-13-2009 14:31
Commercial, or anything open to the public. Private homes are fine. First time you invite your friends over for a private orgy, they can get you... if someone see's and files an Ar. You and your partner in your own home is fine. _____________________
![]() Trout Rating: I'm giving you an 8.2 on the Troutchter Earth-Movement Slut Scale. You are an amazing, enchanting woman, and, when the situation calls for it, a slut of the very best sort. Congratulations and shame on you! |
|
Kazimir MacMoragh
Registered User
Join date: 10 Oct 2008
Posts: 34
|
08-13-2009 15:23
I have never read anything that suggests this is true. If the orgy is not in public and was not advertised via search then how many partners you are with is irrelevant, it is still fine on mature land. Not intending to sound argumentative, but have you heard anything to suggest that it *isn't* true? Linden Labs repeatedly ignored any and all questions asking them to clarify what the definition of "public" was in the context of adult content, and to my knowledge they still have no workable definition that the've seen fit to enlighten us with. It won't surprise me at all when the first story comes out about how someone was evicted from their land during a 2 week break from SL because some random person "exploring" found their non-banlined house and started making themselves at home, becase the hot tub was "outside" and therefore "public". |
|
Gabriele Graves
Always and Forever, FULL
Join date: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 6,205
|
08-13-2009 15:28
Not intending to sound argumentative, but have you heard anything to suggest that it *isn't* true? Linden Labs repeatedly ignored any and all questions asking them to clarify what the definition of "public" was in the context of adult content, and to my knowledge they still have no workable definition that the've seen fit to enlighten us with. It won't surprise me at all when the first story comes out about how someone was evicted from their land because some random person "exploring" found their non-banlined house and started making themselves at home. Whether or not enforcement is consistent with their statements of what is policy is anybody's guess and equally applies to Brieanne's claim's. I was making no statement about enforcement - just stated policy and I have the items I listed to back up my assertions whereas nothing that has ever been posted publicly by or on behalf of LL has ever said that private orgies are against policy on mature mainland. I hope that clears that up for you. _____________________
![]() Trout Rating: I'm giving you an 8.2 on the Troutchter Earth-Movement Slut Scale. You are an amazing, enchanting woman, and, when the situation calls for it, a slut of the very best sort. Congratulations and shame on you! |
|
Kazimir MacMoragh
Registered User
Join date: 10 Oct 2008
Posts: 34
|
08-13-2009 15:59
I have read every statement and question/answer that I have been aware of and that has been publicly posted on the forums/blog and from posted transcripts of office hours as have a lot of people who keep up to date with this kind of stuff. Whether or not enforcement is consistent with their statements of what is policy is anybody's guess and equally applies to Brieanne's claim's. I was making no statement about enforcement - just stated policy and I have the items I listed to back up my assertions whereas nothing that has ever been posted publicly by or on behalf of LL has ever said that private orgies are against policy on mature mainland. I hope that clears that up for you. Understood, and you're right, I was mixing policy together with enforcement. And I also agree that I too have seen LL specify that the policy is that adult behavior is OK on mature mainland as long as it's done "in private". My question was more focused on my observation that LL never made any attempt to clarify what "private" actually meant. So I don't think it's unreasonable to question whether or not "inviting a group of friends over for an orgy" will really be considered "private" from a policy standpoint (considering especially that at one point in the discussion Blondin I believe made a comment to the effect that "word of mouth" *might* be considered a type of "advertising" . |
|
Shambolic Walkenberg
Registered User
Join date: 24 May 2008
Posts: 152
|
08-13-2009 16:33
I tried reading all the posts on the Adult BS when it first kicked off, and I'm *still* unsure where my build fits in.
I built a home early after joining, somewhere away from the madding crowds when I wanted somewhere private to enjoy company. I soon realised I liked the idea of offering this place to others who also wanted somewhere less laggy, busy, public. I found I'd built a place that just felt too big and empty for the infequent times I had need, and liked the idea of giving something back so to speak by leaving my doors open to others. Over time I improved the build, and still call it my home. However, the doors aren't locked, visiters are welcome (so long as they stick to the rules), and aside from a donation box (collection plate, actually) I ask for no money in this. I have a few friends who like yo relax as well as play there, and they're more than welcome to bring guests back too. There is no "theme" as such, but there is certainly the idea of it being for what is now called "adult" activities. There is a group, but that is seldom used, and is mainly to be able to keep regular guests and friends informed of any changes that might happen. So, I take no money, I have no other "home", but I let strangers use my facilities. Sometimes there may be informal gatherings of people who are less than clothed and just chatting I do not consider it a club (I do consider it somewhere that may be of use after finding a partner at a club, if more privacy is desired), and it is most definitely not commercial. Yet I have a feeling it should be classed as Adult rather than Mature from the general vibe given off by LL. This is one of the reasons I am still renting land, I do not want to buy mature mainland to find others perception is I must be on Adult land. And given Zindra land is no doubt going to sell for ludicrous amounts, I can't see me afford ing land when it does go up for sale.I am currently on an estate which is very.. Liberal.. regarding sex, and feel far more relaxed than ever before. I leave it to the estate manager to work out what tag needs to be used, so far as I am concerned I am renting land on a fairly sexually themed estate and have a home on said land where sexually themed things happen. But, if I were to try and save a little by going premium and getting mainland, try to feel more secure in my land rights, then I'd be completely befuddled and stressed by this whole Adult thing. I still think it's been a terribly implented policy, with PR and justification that makes no sense whatsoever to anyone capable of comprehending words laid before them. I did nearly quit Sl after hearing about the proposals, and I still have an uneasy feeling this is merely the thin end of a very puritan wedge. |
|
Gabriele Graves
Always and Forever, FULL
Join date: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 6,205
|
08-13-2009 16:38
Understood, and you're right, I was mixing policy together with enforcement. And I also agree that I too have seen LL specify that the policy is that adult behavior is OK on mature mainland as long as it's done "in private". My question was more focused on my observation that LL never made any attempt to clarify what "private" actually meant. So I don't think it's unreasonable to question whether or not "inviting a group of friends over for an orgy" will really be considered "private" from a policy standpoint (considering especially that at one point in the discussion Blondin I believe made a comment to the effect that "word of mouth" *might* be considered a type of "advertising" ._____________________
![]() Trout Rating: I'm giving you an 8.2 on the Troutchter Earth-Movement Slut Scale. You are an amazing, enchanting woman, and, when the situation calls for it, a slut of the very best sort. Congratulations and shame on you! |
|
DanielRavenNest Noe
Registered User
Join date: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 1,076
|
08-13-2009 16:54
I tried reading all the posts on the Adult BS when it first kicked off, and I'm *still* unsure where my build fits in. The policy requires "publicly promoted adult content" to be on adult land, which they have mostly claimed involves a parcel listed in search, and using adult terms in the search listings. The Governance Team is known for random enforcement of the rules, but if you do not advertise in search and are located on a private estate, you are most likely not required to be on adult land. Exactly because of the vagueness of their answers about where the line is, I set up this page to track what the Governance Team has actually *done* about it: http://www.slapt.me/wiki/index.php/Governance_Team_Actions http://www.slapt.me/wiki/index.php/Governance_Team_Actions So far, most of the actions recorded have been about who got the Zindra land swaps and who didn't, which informs us somewhat about what they think is "adult". As the upcoming search changes and full enforcement of the policy starts, I expect to see more stories posted about things like your situation. |
|
Innula Zenovka
Registered User
Join date: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,825
|
08-13-2009 17:10
Commercial, or anything open to the public. Private homes are fine. First time you invite your friends over for a private orgy, they can get you... if someone see's and files an Ar. You and your partner in your own home is fine. It will likely be a witch hunt.. but here's hoping not. ~Brie |
|
Brieanne Bomazi
Don't forget the *E*
Join date: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 383
|
08-13-2009 17:57
: Originally Posted by Brieanne Bomazi Commercial, or anything open to the public. Private homes are fine. First time you invite your friends over for a private orgy, they can get you... if someone see's and files an Ar. You and your partner in your own home is fine. It will likely be a witch hunt.. but here's hoping not. ~Brie Well, the extent to which one may rely on such assurances is maybe a moot point, since the left hand at Linden Labs doesn't always seem to know what it's doing, let alone the right hand, but Blondin has told us that orgies are OK.. so long as they aren't advertised: /352/11/314444/228.html#post2405967/352/11/314444/228.html#post2405967 Ok, just to clear up the confusion... read what i said. If someone sees you and files an AR. I didn't say it was against the rules. I didn't say it was policy. i said IF SOMEONE SEES YOU AND FILES AN AR. Gteam is KNOWN for action first, question later. That was the point of saying it will likely be a witch hunt. Its well known to all of us that have been following this from the start that the mass population does NOT know about any of this. When the auctions start, and the letters go out about flagging Private Islands ADULT, there will, in fact, be the reams of over zealous people that start sending AR's about any and everything *THEY* think is adult, and should be done *elsewhere*. This whole ordeal has been handled in such a shoddy matter, that it seems to be rooted in pegging the residents against each other. ~Brie _____________________
You know the saying: If it ain't broken... it's not LL owned. http://www.flickr.com/photos/brieannebomazi/ Actually, I think we'll have a better chance of winning the lottery than figuring out the information from the Lindens. Curious about the Emerald Viewer and all the features? http://modularsystems.sl/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24&Itemid=16 |
|
Gabriele Graves
Always and Forever, FULL
Join date: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 6,205
|
08-13-2009 18:01
Ok, just to clear up the confusion... read what i said. If someone sees you and files an AR. I didn't say it was against the rules. I didn't say it was policy. i said IF SOMEONE SEES YOU AND FILES AN AR. Gteam is KNOWN for action first, question later. Private homes are fine. _____________________
![]() Trout Rating: I'm giving you an 8.2 on the Troutchter Earth-Movement Slut Scale. You are an amazing, enchanting woman, and, when the situation calls for it, a slut of the very best sort. Congratulations and shame on you! |
|
Sony Swords
Linux Ubuntu 8.04 LTS
Join date: 17 Jan 2009
Posts: 176
|
08-13-2009 18:54
since my last message, I decided to leave second life, Im not being a pawn in the united states politics, I NEVER send passport or ID or driving license copies to anyone but official united kingdom agencies. like tax /pensions or benefit claims offices. Im not about to send these private documents to a game website! Second life is nothing like it was when i joined in 2007..land is far to high in price, to much politics are creeping ever further into , whats only a game. Time to leave, and cry over the 2000$ I gave to LL over 2 years. Bye all LMAO! There are so many easy ways to get this fixed |
|
Sony Swords
Linux Ubuntu 8.04 LTS
Join date: 17 Jan 2009
Posts: 176
|
08-13-2009 18:57
I sent a message to LL about this matter, all I got was an automated reply saying use passport or driving license if u live in the UK As it happens I dont have either of these anyway, and as I said earlier, I wouldnt give these sort of details to a game website. But i may reinstall Second life and go thro some of the things that Cortex says, but the enjoyment I used to get out of playing sl has gone, as it seems to be political correctness has taken over. Dekka U said "If it was only a game"! Well it is! Thats the official line from LL. Some time ago, Gambling was banned if i remember, and many people who owned casinos. land etc, were wiped out over night. When they tried to get compensation, LL refused to pay back any money, because they said the definition of Second life, is thats it a game, and therefore no liability can be accepted, as its not a real world, although ironicly people paid real £ or $ in the first case. As i see the writing is on the wall, for the end of second life as we know it, as i understand from recent press reports that most virtual worlds are going to stop the abilty for users to make content, because of legal issues over owner ship. LL, like the lambs they are, are bound to follow the others, thus it will be the end of SL as we know it now. Long live farm town in facebook lol ONE easy way: Just create an Paypal account - its done in 2 mins |
|
Pussycat Catnap
Sex Kitten
Join date: 15 Jun 2009
Posts: 1,131
|
08-13-2009 20:47
LMAO! There are so many easy ways to get this fixed NO!!! M U S T O V E R - R E A C T ! ! ! N O W AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ![]() _____________________
![]() |
|
Michaelatv Destiny
Registered User
Join date: 13 Feb 2008
Posts: 110
|
lol sorted
08-14-2009 01:41
Hey, Since getting some advice from Coretx, and a second life mentor, Managed to see that payment information is in fact in my profile. Returning to second life, i ticked show all content, and now, i have no problem acccessing previosly banned areas.
So looks like I be staying, but still bit annoyed that i had no knowledge of this change when i returned to second life, im not a mind reader u know. looks like other folk have bigger problems than me now, hope they all get sorted soon, beta applications have a lot of bugs/strange things that sometimes need/ and will probably get sorted. All i need to do is re activate my account, but guess what, the link i got in the email i had from LL, returns an error 404 page not find, so now i cant re activate my account at momment , anybody know how to re activate an account on hold? Thanks for all replies, sorry being bull head, suppose im one of those "Come dine With me moaners" from television XD btw had paypal account many months |
|
DanielRavenNest Noe
Registered User
Join date: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 1,076
|
08-14-2009 04:03
So looks like I be staying, but still bit annoyed that i had no knowledge of this change when i returned to second life, im not a mind reader u know. We know, we complained about that too, a lot. They freaking changed the Community Standards page one day without telling anyone, and that's one of the two top policy pages. The fundamental reality is SL is a beta product, and is always changing. They treat us that way too. Expecting us to all know it's beta, in constant flux, and that we keep up with all the changes. The lack of product documentation is so bad, that they have ended up quoting stuff *I* wrote on the wiki as gospel. I found that tremendously funny. |
|
Innula Zenovka
Registered User
Join date: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,825
|
08-14-2009 04:19
Ok, just to clear up the confusion... read what i said. If someone sees you and files an AR. I didn't say it was against the rules. I didn't say it was policy. i said IF SOMEONE SEES YOU AND FILES AN AR. Gteam is KNOWN for action first, question later. That was the point of saying it will likely be a witch hunt. Its well known to all of us that have been following this from the start that the mass population does NOT know about any of this. When the auctions start, and the letters go out about flagging Private Islands ADULT, there will, in fact, be the reams of over zealous people that start sending AR's about any and everything *THEY* think is adult, and should be done *elsewhere*. This whole ordeal has been handled in such a shoddy matter, that it seems to be rooted in pegging the residents against each other. ~Brie I wholly agree about the dangers of over-zealous folks firing off ARs. It's why my residential tenants on my islands are pleased I'm going to flag them as Adult -- not because they want to hold orgies particularly, either indoors or outdoors, but because they just don't want to have to worry about whether whatever they're doing is visible or not, in case some chance, uninvited and officious visitor might take exception and complain about it. |
|
Clarissa Lowell
Gone. G'bye.
Join date: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 3,020
|
08-14-2009 04:24
Ok, just to clear up the confusion... read what i said. If someone sees you and files an AR. I didn't say it was against the rules. I didn't say it was policy. i said IF SOMEONE SEES YOU AND FILES AN AR. Gteam is KNOWN for action first, question later. That was the point of saying it will likely be a witch hunt. ~Brie I understood the post, no need to shout. ![]() Someone can see you while you are inside your home, if they cam inside. So it would not be ARable and not a reason to force anyone to move to Zindra. Not as things currently stand, at least. You're assuming if someone ARs it, right or wrong, a move to Zindra will follow, regardless. It isn't so. |
|
Innula Zenovka
Registered User
Join date: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,825
|
08-14-2009 06:45
I understood the post, no need to shout. ![]() Someone can see you while you are inside your home, if they cam inside. So it would not be ARable and not a reason to force anyone to move to Zindra. Not as things currently stand, at least. You're assuming if someone ARs it, right or wrong, a move to Zindra will follow, regardless. It isn't so. |