Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Blizzard goes after Bots in WoW

Rebecca Proudhon
(TM)
Join date: 3 May 2006
Posts: 1,686
03-27-2008 17:10
From: Nathan Childs
If you had any true understanding of these things you would know that there is a war against keyloggers and viruses. A war that cannot be won by either side. The virus/keylogger hunters lag way behind the virus writers and can only do something about them after they have happened and caused damage. Also more and more of your computers resources goes into searching for these things as time goes by.

If this principle were applied to SL and there was a Bot scanner the effect would be the same - the grid would suffer for all worse than having the bots and you would be in a war you simply cannot win.



Baloney. No point in arguing about it further. Only very careless people catch viruses and keyloggers today. The war was won because people didn't roll over and play dead to the threats from megamoniacal sociopathic hackers with personality disorders.
Nathan Childs
Registered User
Join date: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 56
03-27-2008 17:13
From: Rebecca Proudhon
Baloney. No point in arguing about it further. Only very careless people catch viruses and keyloggers today. The war was won because people didn't roll over and play dead to the threats from megamoniacal sociopathic hackers with personality disorders.


That is also untrue and the cost to the consumer for ongoing virus updates and subscriptions to software to combat it plus the need for better hardware so that the impact of using this stuff does not cripple your machine completely is considerable.
If you dont beleive me - use the most recent version of any anti-virus on the oldest computer you can find that will support it and see how that computer then performs compared to a version from a few years ago.

Many people around the globe are infected with viruses all the time still despite the escalating war between vendors and virus writers.

EDIT: No war has been won at all - if that were true then we would not need the virus checkers or keylogger checkers.
Racal Hanner
Ghost
Join date: 16 Jun 2006
Posts: 406
03-27-2008 17:14
/me doesn't give a crap what teh OP is about.. / ** just posts a picture of a pie !

** well I would if I thought it was worth it it !**


** Imagine a "Pie" **
Rebecca Proudhon
(TM)
Join date: 3 May 2006
Posts: 1,686
03-27-2008 17:15
From: Nathan Childs
If that was true then why are we getting another clamp down on Bots in WoW? It is not the first time they have gone after bots.


This is not "another clamp down." it's just a continuous daily process like flushing the toilet to get rid of the refuse.
Racal Hanner
Ghost
Join date: 16 Jun 2006
Posts: 406
03-27-2008 17:15
WooHoo near 150 posts !


Did I mention pie ?
Nathan Childs
Registered User
Join date: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 56
03-27-2008 17:16
From: Rebecca Proudhon
This is not "another clamp down." it's just a continuous daily process like flushing the toilet to get rid of the refuse.


So tell me again why this is necessary if they won?
Rebecca Proudhon
(TM)
Join date: 3 May 2006
Posts: 1,686
03-27-2008 17:19
From: Nathan Childs
EDIT: No war has been won at all - if that were true then we would not need the virus checkers or keylogger checkers.



Then why do we need locks? Why not just leave all your money in the front yard since the need for lock or bank vaults, prove that the crooks will win...so why bother having door locks?---thats what you are saying.
Nathan Childs
Registered User
Join date: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 56
03-27-2008 17:20
From: Rebecca Proudhon
Then why do we need locks? Why not just leave all your money in the front yeard since lock prove that the crook will win...so why bother having door locks?---thats what you are saying.


Because we have not completely erradicated crime either - society has not yet won that battle either.
Pie Psaltery
runs w/scissors
Join date: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 987
03-27-2008 17:22
From: Racal Hanner
Pie ?


Yes?


You don't need to ban bots, you just need to eliminate traffic as a factor in search results and pow, you reduce the annoying useless bot population by the thousands... heck it could even be millions. Easy Peasy.

In the recent blog post Jeska Linden didn't seem to grasp the simplicity of this as a solution, which is kind of ridiculous.

From: someone
71 Jeska Linden Says:

March 26th, 2008 at 4:30 PM
RE: Traffic, camping bots, zombies and other unique methods of increasing the visibility of your parcel.

I’m not ignoring the questions, I just don’t have a good solution to present here and this blog post is not specifically addressing the future of these complex issues. I appreciate the passion that these topics raise and know that we are listening.


Pssst... Jeska.... kill "traffic".... problem solved.

Honestly, how complex is that? You guys had no problems figuring out that the ancient ratings system was being gamed to death and eliminating it, how is it that 3+ years later you can't see the very same issue with the 'traffic' system and simply eliminate it as irrelevant.

O wait, I know, it has to do with those total subscriber and concurant user numbers you sell, doesn't it? Might I suggest you try selling a stable reliable client instead of jacked up numbers?
_____________________
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
03-27-2008 17:22
From: Rebecca Proudhon
Then why do we need locks? Why not just leave all your money in the front yard since the need for lock or bank vaults, prove that the crooks will win...so why bother having door locks?---thats what you are saying.


Cloak of shadows has completely ruined locks ability to beat those pesky thieves but we still need the locks, they're powerful most of the time.
Nathan Childs
Registered User
Join date: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 56
03-27-2008 17:23
There is a big difference between protecting you and your family from harm - which should be the true reason for locks and home security - possessions should be put in second place after that - and trying to stop Bots gaming traffic, land scams and grid problems in a virtual world. If you cannot see that Rebecca then you have reached the bottom of the conversation.
Rebecca Proudhon
(TM)
Join date: 3 May 2006
Posts: 1,686
03-27-2008 17:23
From: Nathan Childs
So tell me again why this is necessary if they won?


Because there is a small percentage or people in the world who have no ethics, honestly or just generally feell entitled and who sometimes hide behind some childish ideologies, trying to excuse their behavior.
Nathan Childs
Registered User
Join date: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 56
03-27-2008 17:25
From: Rebecca Proudhon
Because there is a small percentage or people in the world who have no ethics, honestly or just generally feell entitled and who sometimes hide behind some childish ideologies, trying to excuse their behavior.


Yes you are at last saying something. Perhaps LL does not want to make the cure worse than the disease by trying to get engaged in a battle that comsumes resource which cannot be won.

EDIT: To clarify, bring injury to the vast majority for the relative few who harm.
Racal Hanner
Ghost
Join date: 16 Jun 2006
Posts: 406
03-27-2008 17:26
**URL** Pie
Nathan Childs
Registered User
Join date: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 56
03-27-2008 17:29
I know that I cannot prove what I am saying now but I am a software engineer and have been for inexcess of 15 years. I have mostly worked on closed source projects but have also benefited and contributed from Free Software (as Richar Stallman advocates) and the more popular name and movement of Open Source.
Companies around the globe every year make millions of dolalrs from using Free Software/Open Source because they too can use it as well as the individual. IBM, Microsft, Oracle, Sun...LL themselves have all benefitted Open Source/Free Software. To say it only causes harm is to have a very narrow viewpoint.
Nathan Childs
Registered User
Join date: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 56
03-27-2008 17:29
I know that I cannot prove what I am saying now but I am a software engineer and have been for inexcess of 15 years. I have mostly worked on closed source projects but have also benefited and contributed from Free Software (as Richard Stallman advocates) and the more popular name and movement of Open Source.
Companies around the globe every year make millions of dollars from using Free Software/Open Source because they too can use it as well as the individual. IBM, Microsft, Oracle, Google, Sun...LL themselves have all benefitted Open Source/Free Software. To say it only causes harm is to have a very narrow viewpoint.

BTW: I have never created a virus/keylogger or virtual world Bot either. So not all Open Source advocates are hackers in their mom's basement who want to bring anarchy to the world.
Rebecca Proudhon
(TM)
Join date: 3 May 2006
Posts: 1,686
03-27-2008 17:37
From: Nathan Childs
There is a big difference between protecting you and your family from harm - which should be the true reason for locks and home security - possessions should be put in second place after that - and trying to stop Bots gaming traffic, land scams and grid problems in a virtual world. If you cannot see that Rebecca then you have reached the bottom of the conversation.


Sorry fella but your arguments just don't hold any water. You are grossly undervaluing what paid employeees, of a strong company can do. They are paid because they are the best.
Racal Hanner
Ghost
Join date: 16 Jun 2006
Posts: 406
03-27-2008 17:40
Pie ?
Rebecca Proudhon
(TM)
Join date: 3 May 2006
Posts: 1,686
03-27-2008 17:41
From: Nathan Childs
Yes you are at last saying something. Perhaps LL does not want to make the cure worse than the disease by trying to get engaged in a battle that comsumes resource which cannot be won.


I can't tell you if LL will succeed---maybe with a very strong CEO but if they fail, there will be stronger companies who will know it is idiotic to have a virtual reality full of bots and crooks, running real customers away---such as Blizzard
Nathan Childs
Registered User
Join date: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 56
03-27-2008 17:42
From: Rebecca Proudhon
Sorry fella but your arguments just don't hold any water. You are grossly undervaluing what paid employeees, of a strong company can do. They are paid because they are the best.


Sorry Rebecca you are not even making sense - in what context are you referring to about paid employees? I am not undervaluing them at all - I am part of that work force myself.
Nathan Childs
Registered User
Join date: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 56
03-27-2008 17:43
From: Rebecca Proudhon
I can't tell you if LL will succeed---maybe with a very strong CEO but if they fail, there will be stronger companies who will know it is idiotic to have a virtual reality full of bots and crooks, running real customers away---such as Blizzard


Hmmm is that so? just tlike they cleared up the internet I suppose and dealt with corporate crime?
Rebecca Proudhon
(TM)
Join date: 3 May 2006
Posts: 1,686
03-27-2008 17:43
From: Nathan Childs
Sorry Rebecca you are not even making sense - in what context are you referring to about paid employees? I am not undervaluing them at all - I am part of that work force myself.


Use your imagination.

Anyway no point in arguing more about it. The crooks win in your Hollywood movie---too much film noir if you ask me.
Nathan Childs
Registered User
Join date: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 56
03-27-2008 17:46
Then don't - I am stepping up to bat against the false statements being made about the supposed harm caused by open source. That is the discussion that matters to me.

EDIT: Where is the real world where the crooks have lost then? I think my world is more real than a hollywood movie.
Tod69 Talamasca
The Human Tripod ;)
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,107
03-27-2008 17:47
Hmmm... silly question....

Wouldnt a sim packed with tons of camping/traffic boosting Bots be on the verge of crashing where, anyone visiting & wearing something that's taxing on sim resources, might crash it?

Just wondering!!! ;)


*not that I have any intention of doing so. I've got better things to do. But that information might be "helpful" to others.
_____________________
really pissy & mean right now and NOT happy with Life.
Damien1 Thorne
Registered User
Join date: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,877
03-27-2008 17:50
From: Tod69 Talamasca
Hmmm... silly question....

Wouldnt a sim packed with tons of camping/traffic boosting Bots be on the verge of crashing where, anyone visiting & wearing something that's taxing on sim resources, might crash it?

Just wondering!!! ;)


*not that I have any intention of doing so. I've got better things to do. But that information might be "helpful" to others.

Are you meaning a sim being crashed by real person's av going into the sim that is overtaxed by bots?
1 2 3 4 5