All Out by 2009?

What am I missing? Why are big corporations vital to SL?

We've all seen the many, many threads which debate the future and possible demise of SL.

Gartner

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gartner)

have come out with a credible analysis which, because of its audience, is likely to have a real impact on SL's future.

The source can be found here:

http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=619513

Content is as follows:

Technical Issues Will Cause Consumers and Consumer-Facing Businesses to Seek Alternatives to Second Life by the End of 2009


STAMFORD, Conn., March 11, 2008 —

Organizations need to think carefully before they deploy virtual environments such as Second Life, because of issues with access and use, according to Gartner Inc. Gartner said that the allure of environments such as Linden Lab's Second Life can be intoxicating for users and, in some cases, for organizations, but IT managers need to exercise caution and consider other options.

"Second Life is acceptable for pilots and prototypes," said James Lundy, managing vice president at Gartner. "However, current technical issues would have a significant impact on any organisation that wanted to use it in a production environment, and we are advising companies to evaluate alternatives."

Gartner has identified three key challenges that organizations face in using Second Life and offered the following advice to businesses considering deploying virtual environments:

Challenge One – Graphics Card Issues
One of Second Life's issues is desktop support. Second Life widely supports NVIDIA graphics cards and now certain ATI cards (but not all). This circumstance puts severe pressure on IT departments when a business unit decides that it wants to use Second Life. Not all business users will have access to a PC that is considered "gaming class." Gartner said that even in the same PC model from the same manufacturer, graphics cards can differ, and organizations need to examine this reality, especially as user experiences become more graphics-intensive.

Challenge Two – Downtime
While Second Life now notifies users in advance of planned downtime via a Google shared calendar, that calendar has been found to be somewhat out of date with limited warning of future planned outages or rolling restarts. Although casual users of Second Life have become used to this downtime dilemma, any organization that wishes to use it for business purposes, such as running training sessions, may have to delay or reschedule those sessions if loss of service occurs during these rolling restarts. These issues are usually intolerable for enterprises that expect 24/7 access, scalability and reliable, bug-free operation from their virtual environments.

Challenge Three – Other Platforms Emerge
Gartner expects that other, more scalable virtual environments will emerge to challenge Second Life in the consumer-facing segment and that Sony's forthcoming Home could be one of these challengers. By the end of 2009, Gartner predicts that because of continued technical issues, consumers and consumer-facing businesses will seek other virtual environments as alternatives to Second Life.

"Second Life is a positive tool for learning, and as a pioneer in the market it deserves credit for that," said Carol Rozwell, vice president and distinguished analyst at Gartner. "However, we urge organisations to look beyond marketing hype when evaluating virtual environments. Platform uptime is a critical success factor, and Second Life has a questionable track record in this metric."

Gartner analysts will provide additional analysis on virtual worlds at the upcoming Gartner Symposium/ITxpo 2008: Emerging Trends, to be held from April 6 through April 10 at Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino in Las Vegas. Gartner Symposium/ITxpo: Emerging Trends is Gartner's premier event focused on the emerging trends, technologies, business models and new management thinking poised to have a dramatic impact on business, the economy and society. Thousands of IT professionals from the world's leading enterprises rely on Gartner's Symposium/ITxpo: Emerging Trends event to gain insight into how their organizations can use technology to address business challenges and improve operational efficiency. For more information, please visit www.gartner.com/us/emergingtrends. Members of the media can register by contacting [email]GartnerEvents@text100.com[/email]

Any corporate IT person who took Gartner's advice and looked into Home for more than five minutes would know they don't know what they're talking about.

Call me cynical, but I'm wondering now if maybe all that's happening here is that Gartner is positioning itself to do a bunch of reports on other Virtual Worlds, and in order for anyone to want to buy them they have to devalue SL's current market dominance.

Not to mention that LL is "Corporate Ammurica" as well.

It may have 'started' as an american company - but I wouldn't really class it as one any more. It just happens to have its main base there.

Good.

I've always maintained that LL's pursuit of Corporate Amurrica is a big mistake. Their real customer base is US...the individual residents, both those who just play here and those who use SL to operate a small business.

Maybe if corporate interest dries up, LL will see the light.

Because of my company coming to SL as a pilot / prototyping tool I am here. I am not saying we are going into upgrading everyone's PC and make SL our model of the future. If I didn't learn of SL through my company or have the USD$ to play with I would not be in SL.

Corporations while not perfect do drive the world's RL economy.

"CX"

Maybe it was a typo. No need for paranoia every time someone spells something incorrectly, surely?

I am calling you cynical. For Gartner to manipulate the image of an industry in order to earn money would be pretty unethical. They are a company that is supposed to provide analysis.



LOL - cynical AND of course entirely within the realm of possibility.

Since when are Ethics and Making Money mutually inclusive?

So to respond in an anti-American manner rather than an anti-corporate manner, makes the critic of Corporate America equally guilty of the same type of behaviour.

Considering the political power of special interests (often meaning Corporate America) it would easily possible to be against both at the same time.

Or to be against the end result but not actually against the concept of America or even Corporations.

Because the investors are important. If corporations lose faith in the platform, then investors will too.

"Second Life is acceptable for pilots and prototypes," said James Lundy, managing vice president at Gartner. "However, current technical issues would have a significant impact on any organisation that wanted to use it in a production environment, and we are advising companies to evaluate alternatives."

Special Interest is a term politicians use to try and convince you that they are fighting for the little guy. But the AARP is a special interest group. And it represents lots of little guys, as do many other special interest groups who have legitimate constituents.

The problem is that neither politcal party really cares about the little guy. They only care about getting re-elected. And they both lie to do it.

Special Interest is a term politicians use to try and convince you that they are fighting for the little guy. But the AARP is a special interest group. And it represents lots of little guys, as do many other special interest groups who have legitimate constituents.

The problem is that neither politcal party really cares about the little guy. They only care about getting re-elected. And they both lie to do it.

There's one reason why SL is not dead: because it's unique.

Why? Because it allows content creation. And it provides an economy to sell/buy these contents.

This is true, predicting SL's demise without a viable competitor out there is pretty unrealistic.

I always thought SL would be an excellent place for politicians to chase young women instead of the Oval Office.