Large SL Bank update
|
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
|
08-06-2007 16:20
From: SqueezeOne Pow I agree with what you're saying overall in your post but this part stuck out to me and made me look at this situation from a different angle.
Howcome we want LL to leave us alone with issues such as the "broadly offensive" issue yet want them to step in and regulate when it comes to a pretend bank that we all should have known would be a risk in one way or another? We want our hands held by the same people we are constantly complaining about and criticize for various business decisions they make...unless it's something we don't like then we criticize and complain.
Supwifdat?!
This is probably exactly why they stay vague and try not to make any assertions about their role beyond advertisement and basic maintenence.
I just thought of that and found it interesting in this situation. I could put forth the theory that people want to be left alone with the "broadly offensive" because, aside from getting your feelings hurt, there's no actual harm done to anyone, whereas with the banking situation there is quantifiable harm done. Dunno, not involved in either.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
|
Adz Childs
Artificial Boy
Join date: 6 Apr 2006
Posts: 865
|
08-06-2007 16:20
From: SqueezeOne Pow I agree with what you're saying overall in your post but this part stuck out to me and made me look at this situation from a different angle.
Howcome we want LL to leave us alone with issues such as the "broadly offensive" issue yet want them to step in and regulate when it comes to a pretend bank that we all should have known would be a risk in one way or another? We want our hands held by the same people we are constantly complaining about and criticize for various business decisions they make...unless it's something we don't like then we criticize and complain.
Supwifdat?!
This is probably exactly why they stay vague and try not to make any assertions about their role beyond advertisement and basic maintenence.
I just thought of that and found it interesting in this situation. Nice one.
_____________________
http://slnamewatch.com — Second Life Last Name Tracking — Email Alerts — Famous People Lookup — http://adz.secondlifekid.com/ — Artificial Boy — Personal Blog From: Tofu Linden Hmm, there's nothing really helpful there, but thanks for pasting.
|
Raudf Fox
(ra-ow-th)
Join date: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 5,119
|
08-06-2007 16:28
From: SqueezeOne Pow I agree with what you're saying overall in your post but this part stuck out to me and made me look at this situation from a different angle.
Howcome we want LL to leave us alone with issues such as the "broadly offensive" issue yet want them to step in and regulate when it comes to a pretend bank that we all should have known would be a risk in one way or another? We want our hands held by the same people we are constantly complaining about and criticize for various business decisions they make...unless it's something we don't like then we criticize and complain.
Supwifdat?!
This is probably exactly why they stay vague and try not to make any assertions about their role beyond advertisement and basic maintenence.
I just thought of that and found it interesting in this situation. *chuckles* Because 'broadly offensive' is a 'moral thing,' while 'fraud' is a 'law thing,' I think. We don't want morals shoved down our throats, but we do want them to enforce the RL law. There's probably a lot of other psychological stuff going on, but that's not on topic  However, this is a very interesting point on why they do try to avoid being specific in many areas of their 'rules.'
_____________________
DiamonX Studios, the place of the Victorian Times series of gowns and dresses - Located at http://slurl.com/secondlife/Fushida/224/176
Want more attachment points for your avatar's wearing pleasure? Then please vote for
https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-1065?
|
SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
|
08-06-2007 16:40
I don't see much of a difference...maybe because I don't take SL as seriously as many do... This can't be compared to a RL bank for one simple reason...you pretty much HAVE to use a bank these days. You can choose to put your money into a fake bank in a video game just like you can choose to look at (and in some cases "look for"  or put up offensive images all over a sim. I have not been in a situation in SL where I NEEDED/WAS FORCED to put L$ in a bank just like I have not been in a situation where I NEEDED/WAS FORCED to look at naked kids. Anyone's decision in either matter is or should be based on that person's own moral and philisophical opinions. Is looking at/making this a healthy choice? Is putting this big of a sum of money in the hands of a guy I'll never meet (except maybe in court  ) a healthy choice? Seems the same to me the more I think about it...
_____________________
Semper Fly -S1. Pow
"Violence is Art by another means"
Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
|
Desmond Shang
Guvnah of Caledon
Join date: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 5,250
|
08-06-2007 16:41
Business concerns win the day. When there wasn't much attention paid to the grid, nobody much cared if people played naughty dollies, or how. One might get a 'that's sick' comment but who could take it seriously? Now, offending content makes the tabloid media rounds whenever there isn't a fire somewhere, and Inspector Clouseau is on the case. If the grid becomes Ponzi Paradise just like it was Gambling Paradise for a while, you bet the Feds will have a peek and that will threaten the business model. Then you'll see enforcement. It's *already* not okay to run pyramid schemes and such on the grid. I'm guessing the Company is worried about another Bragg case, where some duped 'investor' decides it was the Company, not a scammer, that prevented 'recovery of his investment' and sues. The best thing that could EVER happen to a Ponzi scammer would be: to be banned from SL. "I didn't walk away, I was banned - blame THEM!!!" Eyah. Righto.
_____________________
 Steampunk Victorian, Well-Mannered Caledon!
|
SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
|
08-06-2007 16:48
I just think people would be upset if we turned over financial regulation to LL now. They'd be wise to keep out of the way and let this guy try to handle it (he seems like he's legitimately trying even if he's making bad decisions) or face international court (which will be interesting to see.)
Coming up next...
Law & Order: International Metaverse Court
_____________________
Semper Fly -S1. Pow
"Violence is Art by another means"
Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
|
Raudf Fox
(ra-ow-th)
Join date: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 5,119
|
08-06-2007 16:55
From: SqueezeOne Pow I just think people would be upset if we turned over financial regulation to LL now. They'd be wise to keep out of the way and let this guy try to handle it (he seems like he's legitimately trying even if he's making bad decisions) or face international court (which will be interesting to see.)
Coming up next...
Law & Order: International Metaverse Court I can see what you mean about people being upset if LL set up some financial regulation. They don't seem to have the greatest track record for decision making either, looking back a bit. So, the question would then become after having dealt with (or not) this fiasco, would we really want Linden Labs to try to create some vague financial regulation for Second Life? Because, vague it would be and that would be worse in some ways that completely unregulated.
_____________________
DiamonX Studios, the place of the Victorian Times series of gowns and dresses - Located at http://slurl.com/secondlife/Fushida/224/176
Want more attachment points for your avatar's wearing pleasure? Then please vote for
https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-1065?
|
SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
|
08-06-2007 16:59
From: Raudf Fox I can see what you mean about people being upset if LL set up some financial regulation. They don't seem to have the greatest track record for decision making either, looking back a bit. So, the question would then become after having dealt with (or not) this fiasco, would we really want Linden Labs to try to create some vague financial regulation for Second Life? Because, vague it would be and that would be worse in some ways that completely unregulated. I agree and think they should stay out of it now. Money is math and math can't be vague!
_____________________
Semper Fly -S1. Pow
"Violence is Art by another means"
Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
|
Elex Dusk
Bunneh
Join date: 19 Oct 2004
Posts: 800
|
08-06-2007 17:51
From: SqueezeOne Pow Is putting this big of a sum of money in the hands of a guy I'll never meet (except maybe in court  ) a healthy choice? That would involve people accepting responsibility for their own decisions. If that happened there'd never be any warning threads.
|
Uvas Umarov
Phone Weasel Advocate
Join date: 8 Feb 2007
Posts: 622
|
08-06-2007 18:14
Well, it looks like Ginko will survive as some sort of investment fund. A good portion of deposits have shifted to term. I think the term is one year. The queue for withdrawals is about 40% of what they have left in demand deposits.
So I predict the next run on whatever is left of Ginko will be this time next year, when the 40+ million L of term deposits that have been made in a one week period come due.
_____________________
"On the other hand, if you are convinced that I spent all the money on a new sports car, then getting even 2.5% instead of 0% back would be quite a deal, wouldn't it?" ---ginko bank owner on his financial dealings
|
Wilhelm Neumann
Runs with Crayons
Join date: 20 Apr 2006
Posts: 2,204
|
08-06-2007 18:55
If he labels it as "high risk investment fund" then people should get the appopriate idea and despite what he says presently thats not what he was calling it. If he wants to change direction its one thing but the only reason he is changing direction is because he can't survive as a "bank" any longer. He needs to clear the obligations he made to those who looked at it as a "bank" and pay those debts off and those who want to continue in a high risk investment fund can do so. All the doublespeak in the world which was enough to sink a ship in the last few days wont erase the fact that this is a change in direction in order to keep in business and maintain his expensive hobby of borrowing other people's money to play with. Unfortunately he can't pay those who want their money from the "bank" right now and they are being forced to invest even if they dont actually press the investment fund button inside the site. Its either that or nothing really they can invest there or wse not much of a choice really.
ah well such is life people are stil forced to close stores etc while he carries on his merry way doing what he wants. kindy well crappy and not what I would call a good business, but then there is no rule that says you have to be good at business in sl or anywhere there are crappy business men all over the place. One thing is for sure if i were thinking of investing just listening to the guy speak would change my mind.
|
Alesia Schumann
Registered User
Join date: 13 May 2007
Posts: 88
|
08-06-2007 21:28
This is not just a Ginko Issue. There are plenty of other banks waiting to be "discovered" in SL!
_____________________
Exhibit A Photography, for profile pictures: http://slurl.com/secondlife/Oakworm/24/248/21
My items on Xstreet SL: http://www.xstreetsl.com/modules.php?name=Marketplace&MerchantID=77918
|
Alicia Sautereau
if (!social) hide;
Join date: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 3,125
|
08-06-2007 21:50
lemme remind u all of 1 thing,
befor u go screaing from the roof that LL should add some regulation, go think of the paypal and even CC issues we still have, with the paypal issues going on for months
so if they can`t take care of their own RL financial system, do u really expect theyd do any better with our virtual economy?
let that sink in...
|
Talarus Luan
Ancient Archaean Dragon
Join date: 18 Mar 2006
Posts: 4,831
|
08-06-2007 22:36
I don't think LL really can get involved at this point. I think this is just gonna have to be a HARD lesson learned by all who got taken. It sucks, but I still fall back on my mantra "stupid should hurt".
No matter what happens, though, Ginko is done; probably other banks as well. People just aren't going to trust them like they did. I think that is a good thing; it means educated and conscientious self-regulation by the customers, which is ultimately the best way.
|
FD Spark
Prim & Texture Doodler
Join date: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 4,697
|
08-06-2007 23:03
From: SqueezeOne Pow I How come we want LL to leave us alone with issues such as the "broadly offensive" issue yet want them to step in and regulate when it comes to a pretend bank that we all should have known would be a risk in one way or another?
In my opinion "Broadly Offensive" matters is moral, sometimes legally imposed. While L is virtual money to gain it requires real dollars. Sometimes a whole lot of effort, skill or disposable income. If there isn't trust in how our real life investments in our virtual world economy and some type of security involving this eventually it will have effect in long term and it will effect Lindex. People will buy less and less lindens, which will eventually effect Linden Labs bottom line and the less funds will come from the residents except for membership dues and what currently already exist. When this happens LL will have to do something if they want more money. I have strong hunch eventually less and less people will be spending real money on virtual dollars.
|
Saur Holt
http://forsakenhearts.blo
Join date: 18 May 2006
Posts: 803
|
adree
08-06-2007 23:06
From: Talarus Luan I don't think LL really can get involved at this point. I think this is just gonna have to be a HARD lesson learned by all who got taken. It sucks, but I still fall back on my mantra "stupid should hurt".
No matter what happens, though, Ginko is done; probably other banks as well. People just aren't going to trust them like they did. I think that is a good thing; it means educated and conscientious self-regulation by the customers, which is ultimately the best way. I agree i count on my monthly cash in so this month will be hard. when i opened my business My gut was telling me not to use a sl bank but every one told me to keep it in a bank so i did. now every one telling me to bank with another bank * will not name the bank* . i will not use a sl bank again unless its run by a real bank or ran by sl. although the owner of ginko could have close his accounts and made a alt. but he has not so may be their is some hope.
_____________________
http://forsakenhearts.blogspot.com/
|
John Horner
Registered User
Join date: 27 Jun 2006
Posts: 626
|
08-07-2007 02:31
From: FD Spark In my opinion "Broadly Offensive" matters is moral, sometimes legally imposed. While L is virtual money to gain it requires real dollars. Sometimes a whole lot of effort, skill or disposable income. If there isn't trust in how our real life investments in our virtual world economy and some type of security involving this eventually it will have effect in long term and it will effect Lindex. People will buy less and less lindens, which will eventually effect Linden Labs bottom line and the less funds will come from the residents except for membership dues and what currently already exist. When this happens LL will have to do something if they want more money. I have strong hunch eventually less and less people will be spending real money on virtual dollars. I broadly agree with that. And the posts that have commented that you were not forced to use an SL bank in order to play the game/platform. Like a bad investment there comes a time to cut losses and walk. We will have to wait and see if there is any fallout over this - I cannot imagine someone who has potentially lost a few thousand lindens trying to take legal action, but it remains to be seen how people who have potential losses that equate to a tangible material first life loss react.
|
Wilhelm Neumann
Runs with Crayons
Join date: 20 Apr 2006
Posts: 2,204
|
08-08-2007 21:17
I"m posting in this thread instead of starting yet another one ginko just closed its doors and transfered everything to wse and gave everyone those bonds read the site here https://ginkofinancial.com/someone posted on their blog this was going to happen however i didn't think that it was gonna happen like 10 minutes after i read it ..
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
08-08-2007 21:23
From: Wilhelm Neumann I"m posting in this thread instead of starting yet another one ginko just closed its doors and transfered everything to wse and gave everyone those bonds read the site here https://ginkofinancial.com/someone posted on their blog this was going to happen however i didn't think that it was gonna happen like 10 minutes after i read it .. wow.
|
Gordon Wendt
404 - User not found
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 1,024
|
08-08-2007 21:48
From: Wilhelm Neumann I"m posting in this thread instead of starting yet another one ginko just closed its doors and transfered everything to wse and gave everyone those bonds read the site here https://ginkofinancial.com/someone posted on their blog this was going to happen however i didn't think that it was gonna happen like 10 minutes after i read it .. here - http://www.your2ndplace.com/node/366, and they updated it recently after it actually happened but the first part is still the original from pre-closing.
_____________________
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/GWendt Plurk: http://www.plurk.com/GordonWendt GW Designs: XStreetSL
|
Rocketman Raymaker
Registered User
Join date: 4 Feb 2007
Posts: 530
|
08-09-2007 01:05
From: Wilhelm Neumann I"m posting in this thread instead of starting yet another one ginko just closed its doors and transfered everything to wse and gave everyone those bonds read the site here https://ginkofinancial.com/someone posted on their blog this was going to happen however i didn't think that it was gonna happen like 10 minutes after i read it .. and you get 12% interest a year, how awesome, i can do better than that in real life and with nowhere near as much risk. This was a very poor decision on lukes behalf but brilliant on nicks behalf, now he has no obligation to pay the depositors at all, in fact he can buy back most of the bonds at a fraction of the cost and end up making a profit from it.
_____________________
"Proud member of the anti-ginko busy body committee"
|
Justin Slade
Registered User
Join date: 6 Feb 2007
Posts: 132
|
08-09-2007 04:28
I know the shut down happened, But when can we expect the bonds? What happens if you already have a WSE account?
Boy I'm glad I had a reserve
|
Brodsky Zapedzki
Registered User
Join date: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 337
|
08-09-2007 04:38
From: Rocketman Raymaker and you get 12% interest a year, how awesome, i can do better than that in real life and with nowhere near as much risk. actually the bonds are trading at 0.19 ask so they're actually yielding about 60% for the same risk assumption you make.
|
Uvas Umarov
Phone Weasel Advocate
Join date: 8 Feb 2007
Posts: 622
|
08-09-2007 04:40
Well, you lose about 85% of the face value as soon a you buy one of those said bonds.
So how does -85% on your money affect the yield?
_____________________
"On the other hand, if you are convinced that I spent all the money on a new sports car, then getting even 2.5% instead of 0% back would be quite a deal, wouldn't it?" ---ginko bank owner on his financial dealings
|
Chianamber Mirabeau
Registered User
Join date: 1 Oct 2005
Posts: 4
|
Seeing Balances or Bonds
08-09-2007 04:40
Can someone tell me exactly where to see my bonds and are the term deposits still being held and where to see those balances?
Help would be much appreciated. I don't find any balance on WSE.
Chianamber
|