Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Question about private islands

Chas Connolly
Registered User
Join date: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,433
11-27-2007 14:10
From: Alyx Sands
Anybody mentioned the war yet?


Which one? It seems we're equal opportunity bigots here.
_____________________
Logic : The art of thinking and reasoning in strict accordance with the limitations and incapacities of the human misunderstanding - The Devil's Dictionary
Conan Godwin
In ur base kilin ur d00ds
Join date: 2 Aug 2006
Posts: 3,676
11-27-2007 14:11
From: Chas Connolly
I accepted anarchy was silly when I was 17 years old. But I live in hope. Well, I live in a drunken stupour, slowing spiralling into insanity, but I cling desperately to my youthful ideals.



"Not to be a socialist at twenty is proof of want of heart; to be one at thirty is proof of want of head."
- Georges Clemenceau
_____________________
From: Raindrop Cooperstone
hateful much? dude, that was low. die.

.
Sy Beck
Owner of Group ???
Join date: 9 Feb 2007
Posts: 202
11-27-2007 14:11
From: Colette Meiji
No they deported SOME to Australia

Public hanging was still a common punishment for theft over a certain value. It was cheaper than sending the person to the penal colony if it was determined they were either too incorrigible or simply not all that valuable (youth or age being a factor)

In the old west execution was much cheaper than incarceration.


Hey that's not a public hanging! That was entertainment for the masses. We had that and the US has the Fox network, which will get there soon I'm sure. ;)
_____________________
"Insert witty quip here!"
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
11-27-2007 14:15
From: Sy Beck
Hey that's not a public hanging! That was entertainment for the masses. We had that and the US has the Fox network, which will get there soon I'm sure. ;)


I think over a certain social standing in both the UK and the US you wouldn't be deported or killed for horse theft. Just fined more than a poor person could even dream of paying.

Nowadays people of that social standing make sex videos and get plastered on Youtube (ala Paris Hilton) or get their custody battles discussed on .. Fox News (Ala Britney).
Chas Connolly
Registered User
Join date: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,433
11-27-2007 14:15
From: Conan Godwin
"Not to be a socialist at twenty is proof of want of heart; to be one at thirty is proof of want of head."
- Georges Clemenceau


But... but, he was French, for pete's sake. You're quoting a Frenchman for wisdom?
_____________________
Logic : The art of thinking and reasoning in strict accordance with the limitations and incapacities of the human misunderstanding - The Devil's Dictionary
Oryx Tempel
Registered User
Join date: 8 Nov 2006
Posts: 7,663
11-27-2007 14:16
From: Chas Connolly
I accepted anarchy was silly when I was 17 years old. But I live in hope. Well, I live in a drunken stupour, slowing spiralling into insanity, but I cling desperately to my youthful ideals.

Hey! Me too!
_____________________
Conan Godwin
In ur base kilin ur d00ds
Join date: 2 Aug 2006
Posts: 3,676
11-27-2007 14:17
From: Chas Connolly
But... but, he was French, for pete's sake. You're quoting a Frenchman for wisdom?



The French smell funny, but they do occasionally say something sensible. They say it in a comical voice though.
_____________________
From: Raindrop Cooperstone
hateful much? dude, that was low. die.

.
Sy Beck
Owner of Group ???
Join date: 9 Feb 2007
Posts: 202
11-27-2007 14:20
From: Chas Connolly
But... but, he was French, for pete's sake. You're quoting a Frenchman for wisdom?


Je pense, donc je ne suis pas francaise?
_____________________
"Insert witty quip here!"
Chas Connolly
Registered User
Join date: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,433
11-27-2007 14:21
From: Conan Godwin
The French smell funny, but they do occasionally say something sensible. They say it in a comical voice though.


And like any much quoted prominent - of any nationality - they usually have a reason for bombarding us with such banalities. He certainly did.
_____________________
Logic : The art of thinking and reasoning in strict accordance with the limitations and incapacities of the human misunderstanding - The Devil's Dictionary
Conan Godwin
In ur base kilin ur d00ds
Join date: 2 Aug 2006
Posts: 3,676
11-27-2007 14:22
From: Chas Connolly
And like any much quoted prominent - of any nationality - they usually have a reason for bombarding us with such banalities. He certainly did.


Context is for losers.
_____________________
From: Raindrop Cooperstone
hateful much? dude, that was low. die.

.
Chas Connolly
Registered User
Join date: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,433
11-27-2007 14:25
From: Conan Godwin
Context is for losers.


I'm glad you agree.
_____________________
Logic : The art of thinking and reasoning in strict accordance with the limitations and incapacities of the human misunderstanding - The Devil's Dictionary
Chas Connolly
Registered User
Join date: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,433
11-27-2007 14:26
From: Oryx Tempel
Hey! Me too!


Oh good, I have a bottle of rather fine Armagnac I've been saving. Care for a cigar?
_____________________
Logic : The art of thinking and reasoning in strict accordance with the limitations and incapacities of the human misunderstanding - The Devil's Dictionary
Oryx Tempel
Registered User
Join date: 8 Nov 2006
Posts: 7,663
11-27-2007 14:28
From: Chas Connolly
Oh good, I have a bottle of rather fine Armagnac I've been saving. Care for a cigar?

Let me put on my blue dress...
_____________________
Alyx Sands
Mental Mentor Linguist
Join date: 17 Feb 2007
Posts: 2,432
11-27-2007 14:41
From: Chas Connolly
Which one? It seems we're equal opportunity bigots here.

Right now, I'm not certain....this certainly IS the Doom Thread of Bigotry.....
_____________________
~~I'm a linguist. RL sucks, but right now it's decided to be a little less nasty to me - you can still be nice to me if you want! ~~
->Potestatem obscuri lateris nescitis.<-
Rebecca Proudhon
(TM)
Join date: 3 May 2006
Posts: 1,686
11-27-2007 14:42
From: Colette Meiji
No he is actually right

Chances of being the victim of violence in the very loosely governed "Wild west" were very small.

Unless someone were of American Indian ancestry. Plenty of government showed up to make sure they got their share of violence sadly.



People wore guns routinely. It's just historical revisionism, to say the "Wild West" violence is a myth or that it wasn't totally exploitive. When people had issues it more then likely turned into armed conflicts and people with the most guns, won. Gang wars. The same lowest common denominator can still destoys peace today, that is why there are laws and the need for constant effort and dialogue to keep the peace and reasons to criticize warmongers.

If people want anarchy, or peace, they are going to have to become enlightened first.
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
11-27-2007 15:39
From: Rebecca Proudhon
People wore guns routinely. It's just historical revisionism, to say the "Wild West" violence is a myth or that it wasn't totally exploitive. When people had issues it more then likely turned into armed conflicts and people with the most guns, won. Gang wars. The same lowest common denominator can still destoys peace today, that is why there are laws and the need for constant effort and dialogue to keep the peace and reasons to criticize warmongers.

If people want anarchy, or peace, they are going to have to become enlightened first.


The "Wild West" as envisioned in Hollywood movies or in pulp novels is a fictional construct.

The legendary shootouts at high noon in every town really didn't take place. This is why the actual gunfights that did take place are so legendary.

Its not Historical revisionism, its Historical fact. The problem was the record was clouded by fiction and tall tales.

Certain towns did have some marked violence for short periods of time. Such as Tombstone. Or Dodge city but these periods were over quickly.

Dodge city was only a cattle drive town for a couple of years. The whole Cattle drive phenomena wasn't all that long relatively anyway.

Of course people who traveled out beyond "civilization" carried guns for protection. But the image of everyone wearing a gun in the towns is mythical. In fact the legendary "gunfight at the OK corral" was the result of enforcing a weapons ban.

---------------

The conflicts with the Indians were real and violent (usually the Indians bearing the brunt) of course they were a direct descendant of Jackson's policy of forcibly evicting Indians off land they were given in treaties whenever US expansion moved into their vicinity.

The Cherokee nation for example won in the SUPREME COURT and Jackson forced them off their land anyway.

But properly those conflicts were warfare and occupation, not violence caused by a lack of government but rather violence imposed by a government.
Oryx Tempel
Registered User
Join date: 8 Nov 2006
Posts: 7,663
11-27-2007 15:42
From: Colette Meiji

The conflicts with the Indians were real and violent (usually the Indians bearing the brunt) of course they were a direct descendant of Jackson's policy of forcibly evicting Indians off land they were given in treaties whenever US expansion moved into their vicinity.

The Cherokee nation for example won in the SUPREME COURT and Jackson forced them off their land anyway.

But properly those conflicts were warfare and occupation, not violence caused by a lack of government but rather violence imposed by a government.

Ahh, Manifest Destiny. Whatever happened to the good old days?

JUST KIDDING. :p
_____________________
Chris Norse
Loud Arrogant Redneck
Join date: 1 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,735
11-27-2007 15:59
Even in the cattle towns, violence was pretty much limited to areas where single young men away from home gathered to consume alcohol. Susy Schoolmarm and Sam Shopkeeper were very unlikely to be victims of violence.

A gun is just a tool, no different than a hammer or ax.
_____________________
I'm going to pick a fight
William Wallace, Braveheart

“Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind”
Douglas MacArthur

FULL
Oryx Tempel
Registered User
Join date: 8 Nov 2006
Posts: 7,663
11-27-2007 16:01
From: Chris Norse
Even in the cattle towns, violence was pretty much limited to areas where single young men away from home gathered to consume alcohol. Susy Schoolmarm and Sam Shopkeeper were very unlikely to be victims of violence.

A gun is just a tool, no different than a hammer or ax.

So do you guys stand around comparing the sizes of your tools? :p
_____________________
Rebecca Proudhon
(TM)
Join date: 3 May 2006
Posts: 1,686
11-27-2007 16:12
From: Chris Norse
Even in the cattle towns, violence was pretty much limited to areas where single young men away from home gathered to consume alcohol. Susy Schoolmarm and Sam Shopkeeper were very unlikely to be victims of violence..


Okay so in a small western town Susy Schoolmarm and Sam Shopkeeper might be okay if they hide when the gunfights start. There are plenty of cases in Western towns where criminal elements and corruption took over the town and common people lived in fear.

Exploitation and Violence was way out of control in the Wild West. There is no way around it. Add alchohol to the mix and you get drunken griefers of all kinds.

From: someone
A gun is just a tool, no different than a hammer or ax.



An AX is to chop thing...hopefully just trees. A hammer is to hammer nails or pound things, hopefully inanimate objects. A guns primary use is self defense or aggression. Clearly if you need to carry a gun you are living in a nasty place.
Conan Godwin
In ur base kilin ur d00ds
Join date: 2 Aug 2006
Posts: 3,676
11-27-2007 16:14
From: Rebecca Proudhon
An AX is to chop thing...hopefully just trees. A hammer is to hammer nails or pound things, hopefully inanimate objects. A guns primary use is self defense or aggression. Clearly if you need to carry a gun you are living in a nasty place.


Guns can also be used to shoot cans and to start illegal drag races down at the old abandoned aquaduct.
_____________________
From: Raindrop Cooperstone
hateful much? dude, that was low. die.

.
Rebecca Proudhon
(TM)
Join date: 3 May 2006
Posts: 1,686
11-27-2007 16:29
From: Colette Meiji
The "Wild West" as envisioned in Hollywood movies or in pulp novels is a fictional construct.

The legendary shootouts at high noon in every town really didn't take place. This is why the actual gunfights that did take place are so legendary.



Yes they took place. What history books are you reading?


From: someone
ts not Historical revisionism, its Historical fact. The problem was the record was clouded by fiction and tall tales.

Certain towns did have some marked violence for short periods of time. Such as Tombstone. Or Dodge city but these periods were over quickly.

Dodge city was only a cattle drive town for a couple of years. The whole Cattle drive phenomena wasn't all that long relatively anyway.


When one uses the phrase "Wild West" it is Tombstone, Dodge, Deadwood, Laramie, Cheyenne and a host of others, that is being referred to. All the famous cow towns and settlements is what is meant by the "Wild Wild West." Civil war, Range wars, Railroad wars, Fur and pelt wars, Mineral wars, Indian wars, Water wars, Race Wars even Religious Wars.


From: someone
Of course people who traveled out beyond "civilization" carried guns for protection. But the image of everyone wearing a gun in the towns is mythical. In fact the legendary "gunfight at the OK corral" was the result of enforcing a weapons ban.



Regardless of the reasons for the fighting, or how long the period lasted, it was the "Wild West" and whoever had the most guns won. Peaceful Citizens had to ban up and carry guns and hire sheriffs and create laws to protect themselves.

---------------

From: someone
The conflicts with the Indians were real and violent (usually the Indians bearing the brunt) of course they were a direct descendant of Jackson's policy of forcibly evicting Indians off land they were given in treaties whenever US expansion moved into their vicinity.

The Cherokee nation for example won in the SUPREME COURT and Jackson forced them off their land anyway.

But properly those conflicts were warfare and occupation, not violence caused by a lack of government but rather violence imposed by a government.



That governments have been imperfect and crazy as well, or that cities were also dangerous places, is no reason to think anarchy in the Wild West was somehow better.

The exploitation and violence in the "Wild West," was no myth.
Oryx Tempel
Registered User
Join date: 8 Nov 2006
Posts: 7,663
11-27-2007 16:31
It would still have been fun to live then/there.
_____________________
Conan Godwin
In ur base kilin ur d00ds
Join date: 2 Aug 2006
Posts: 3,676
11-27-2007 16:34
From: Oryx Tempel
It would still have been fun to live then/there.


I'd have been like Yul Brynner's character in "Westworld"; all grim and stern and silent until someone stood in my spot at the saloon. Except not a robot.
_____________________
From: Raindrop Cooperstone
hateful much? dude, that was low. die.

.
Rebecca Proudhon
(TM)
Join date: 3 May 2006
Posts: 1,686
11-27-2007 16:50
From: Oryx Tempel
It would still have been fun to live then/there.


Not for me. I hated it.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8