These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Fix the forums now or tell us why not !!!!!!!! |
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
02-18-2009 11:53
No wonder they're messed up: the 286 could only address 16MB of RAM.
_____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
|
Konu Magic
Certified Insane
Join date: 25 Nov 2008
Posts: 704
|
02-18-2009 11:57
No wonder they're messed up: the 286 could only address 16MB of RAM. Sweet! SOmeone caught onto that. Thought I was the only old time geek on here lol |
|
Pie Serendipity
Registered User
Join date: 9 Feb 2009
Posts: 217
|
02-18-2009 13:36
Sweet! SOmeone caught onto that. Thought I was the only old time geek on here lol Pie (EMS and EEMS) |
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
02-18-2009 14:02
Don't forget XMS.
God I hated the 286. _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
02-18-2009 14:35
I not only have benefitted immensely from what I've learned about techniques on this forum, I've seen a vast number of products that use those same techniques. The forum improves the SL experience for the typical resident, even those who never come here, because they use products that are better because of what their makers learned here. I've certainly seen a lot of products with scripts that came from here; sometimes with customizing mods, more often, verbatim. I have a hard time understanding how an intelligent and insightful person could serioulsy question the value of these forums. They just have to work for LL, that's how. _____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com |
|
Jig Chippewa
Fine Young Cannibal
Join date: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,150
|
02-18-2009 14:37
How childish of you. "waaahhhhh but what about himmmmm???!!???1111" So what if HE doesn't give help and is just a troll like you. It doesn't take two eyes to see that there are many people here that do give help and use the forum as intended. You may not troll to intentionally irritate people, but you are just a troll nonetheless and you have no right to diminish the forum and the contributions of other posters because it doesn't suit your purposes. Hang on, hang on. Troll? I've posted many threads here and started many discussions and they have been lively ones. Some has jiggered people up but that's too bad. I have given information and asked questions. If you think teh Ignore thread doesnt "diminish" teh forum read it through again. Yeah I ask questions. Yeah I make comments. I pay my tier. I dont flame anyone. I never AR. NEVER. I think that as a "citizen" in sl I do my bit. I give funds to newbs to help them establish themselves. I buy art for the gallery I open for the public. Just because i dont fit conveniently into general terms of behaviour around here and I am not "one fo teh gang" doesnt mean I dont make valid comments. Troll? Lol! Ask around sl to some of teh artists I support fiancially and see if they consider me a troll. Take a look at teh gallery that I have spent REAL money on that is for everybody's use. I have been involved in the construction of the arts by funding quietly since I been here. Troll? Read my comments more closely and read a few of the others also. Ask tyourself which one is teh troll. _____________________
Fine Young Cannibal
|
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
02-18-2009 14:51
But is forum really necessary to sl or is it a convenience for people who cant go on to sl because they are at work or in a restricted environment where it would be inappropriate to do so or they prefer the chat-format of the site itself? I will miss resident chat but not aspects of it. "Endless thread" has gone beyond focus upon sl and has served its purpose - it would be more appropriate in-world liek forum cartel group chat. It suits in-world. Here on teh "outside" it has become exclusionary. You keep spouting that nonsense. How can a thread where ANYBODY can talk about practically ANYTHING be exclusionary? You have your agenda. It seems to me that you have taken the stance that the thread in particular, and the forum in general has no relevancy to your purposes, and therefore must not be of value to anyone else. A bit presumptuous, even for you. If we want to waste our time here in addition to or instead of being inworld, what concern is it of yours? Persue your SL as you wish. If you get nothing from this place, then ignore it and let it die. _____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com |
|
Pie Serendipity
Registered User
Join date: 9 Feb 2009
Posts: 217
|
02-18-2009 14:52
Hang on, hang on. Troll? I've posted many threads here and started many discussions and they have been lively ones. Some has jiggered people up but that's too bad. I have given information and asked questions. If you think teh Ignore thread doesnt "diminish" teh forum read it through again. Yeah I ask questions. Yeah I make comments. I pay my tier. I dont flame anyone. I never AR. NEVER. I think that as a "citizen" in sl I do my bit. I give funds to newbs to help them establish themselves. I buy art for the gallery I open for the public. Just because i dont fit conveniently into general terms of behaviour around here and I am not "one fo teh gang" doesnt mean I dont make valid comments. Troll? Lol! Ask around sl to some of teh artists I support fiancially and see if they consider me a troll. Take a look at teh gallery that I have spent REAL money on that is for everybody's use. I have been involved in the construction of the arts by funding quietly since I been here. Troll? Read my comments more closely and read a few of the others also. Ask tyourself which one is teh troll. Pie (I think Jig doesn't realise how much she annoys people *unintentionally*) |
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
02-18-2009 14:59
Pie (I think Jig doesn't realise how much she annoys people *unintentionally*) Yes she does. But I agree, she is far from a troll. _____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com |
|
Jig Chippewa
Fine Young Cannibal
Join date: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,150
|
02-18-2009 15:02
*springs to a lady's defence* Jig is NOT a troll. A troll is someone who deliberately sets out to annoy other people on the forums. Pie (I think Jig doesn't realise how much she annoys people *unintentionally*) If it wasnt for my partner, I don think I would be here at all. I think I know you by another name but you are right. Its never been intentional. I just cant stand seeing a smooth pond without a ripple - I have to throw a stone into the middle. Maybe its time Jig went walkabout. _____________________
Fine Young Cannibal
|
|
Nika Talaj
now you see her ...
Join date: 2 Jan 2007
Posts: 5,449
|
02-18-2009 15:08
I just cant stand seeing a smooth pond without a ripple - I have to throw a stone into the middle. One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument QED . |
|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
02-18-2009 15:13
The first of 115 definitions of "troll" in the Urban Dictionary: QED . _____________________
Prim Savers - almost 1000 items of superbly crafted, top quality, very low prim furniture, and all at amazingly low prices.
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Seymour/213/120/251/ |
|
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
|
02-18-2009 15:16
Respectful disagree. Not trolling. In sl we are "electronic". I know a human types our words etc. But essentially the character who "plays" us is a corpus of pixils. In that regard (not trolling - but trying to understand what makes us "us" in this cyberspace) we dont have a history as a lateral line of "beginning to end" (if we even accept THAT as a human cultural sense of our past). The sl world flies to quickly to create a definition - unless it is a corporation's "books" at end f year. We, as beings, come and go with impunity. If we have a history at all its of discos, disappearing malls and alts replacing alts. That's not history. That's fast-food social life. That's fine with me. Information is soon redundant at high speed in this "space". Our history is as essential to our existence as text messages on my mobile. Hardly relevant. And often ignored. We can't have a "history" because we dont share a commonality - do we accept this is a "culture"? If so then what are our antecendents? Our shared cultural past? Our inbuilt respect for one another? Our investment for those who follow us? Our history is at teh mercy of Lindens. We dont MAKE our history. I dont know which culture you come from but it IS a culture with its history, so regardless, you, as a human are a link in teh chain of your family/society/genesis. Here we are blips and electronic zazz. I am no more responsible for you or you for me here than if we were cds on a shelf. Nothing more or less. We must not confuse what we do here with what is essential to our real humanity. If I understand anything of the post, then I disagree with all of it. As far as I can make any sense of it, it seems to claim that what we do in the forums, in-world, in other social media--that all of it is devoid of meaning and weirdly immune from culture simply by virtue of using some technology other than passing down the tribal legends around a campfire. That's just wrong. Digital culture is no less culture, just as digital images and music are no less art. Denying digital culture may be a comforting response to the shock of the new, but that which is denied exists nonetheless. |
|
Shirley Marquez
Ethical SLut
Join date: 28 Oct 2005
Posts: 788
|
02-18-2009 15:19
The owners chose to turn the use of BBcode off, so it's not broken. I didn't get the impression that the OP only meant the SQL problem. The owners chose to turn off BBcode because there is an exploit of the version of vBulletin that the site uses that only works if you can use it. They could also fix the exploit by upgrading, and then turn BBcode back on, but haven't done so. LL is on record as not considering forums as we know them important, and so upgrading the forum software has not been a high priority. Residents are on record as disagreeing. The basic problem with forums is that if you want to maintain civil discourse you need to put substantial effort into moderation, and that takes money. LL feels the resources would be better expended elsewhere. Again, some residents disagree. |
|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
02-18-2009 15:23
Yes, but turning a feature off does not "break" the thing, so it isn't broken.
Since that part of the dicussion, the forum has become actually broken. _____________________
Prim Savers - almost 1000 items of superbly crafted, top quality, very low prim furniture, and all at amazingly low prices.
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Seymour/213/120/251/ |
|
Shirley Marquez
Ethical SLut
Join date: 28 Oct 2005
Posts: 788
|
02-18-2009 15:26
If it's a fact that 99% of users don't come here, as you said, then that also doesn't matter because the forum is extremely useful to the 1% of users who do come here. However, I suspect that far more than 1% of users come here. Also remember that a lot of the user base has been forcibly kept out by LL -- anybody who doesn't have payment info on file can't get here. I thought that was a bad move when LL first put in that restriction, and I still think it's a bad move. |
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
02-18-2009 15:28
Also remember that a lot of the user base has been forcibly kept out by LL -- anybody who doesn't have payment info on file can't get here. I thought that was a bad move when LL first put in that restriction, and I still think it's a bad move. That has been changed, since last summer I believe. All SL account holders can access the forum now. _____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com |
|
Shirley Marquez
Ethical SLut
Join date: 28 Oct 2005
Posts: 788
|
02-18-2009 15:31
We can't have a "history" because we dont share a commonality - do we accept this is a "culture"? If so then what are our antecendents? Our shared cultural past? Our inbuilt respect for one another? Our investment for those who follow us? Our history is at teh mercy of Lindens. We dont MAKE our history. I dont know which culture you come from but it IS a culture with its history, so regardless, you, as a human are a link in teh chain of your family/society/genesis. Here we are blips and electronic zazz. I am no more responsible for you or you for me here than if we were cds on a shelf. Nothing more or less. We must not confuse what we do here with what is essential to our real humanity. I disagree. I believe that we DO have a culture and a cultural history here, and that history has created a community that is very different in character from other virtual worlds and online games. If you want to learn more about the roots of SL culture, I highly recommend James Wagner Au's (aka Hamlet Au, formerly Hamlet Linden) book The Making of Second Life: Notes from the New World. Most of the info is also in his New World Notes blog but the book digests it into a more coherent narrative. |
|
Jig Chippewa
Fine Young Cannibal
Join date: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,150
|
02-18-2009 15:57
I've read this. Over and over. And over. And while Nika says she can "understand your position well, and respect it," I'm at a total loss to find even one shred of common comprehension from which to start. If I understand anything of the post, then I disagree with all of it. As far as I can make any sense of it, it seems to claim that what we do in the forums, in-world, in other social media--that all of it is devoid of meaning and weirdly immune from culture simply by virtue of using some technology other than passing down the tribal legends around a campfire. That's just wrong. Digital culture is no less culture, just as digital images and music are no less art. Denying digital culture may be a comforting response to the shock of the new, but that which is denied exists nonetheless. I dont dispute we have a digital culture - of sorts. In a real sense I rely upon the mainstream and not-so-mainstream technlogies for my bread and butter. I just dont "trust" teh culture. Maybe its not so much I am a user but more of a provider? I dunno, its hard for me to put a finger on it and I am seriously thinking here of phrasing for this answer. I was working with a person on a idea she had in real just today and we got into ideas of matriarchy/patriarchy/culture/god and I said its not that we dont have god in our world today its just that we have simplified him/her. Its that way with the culture also. Digital culture's shockwave is kinda disipating I fear. I "logged on" too late in terms of my birth and age to see teh initial stages of teh digital revolution, but I sense there was then a more vibrant urgency. Now I see a commercialization (which was always there) but a total globocomercialism. I dont deny the digital - I feed from it. Christopher Marlowe's motto is apt "that which feeds me destroys me" - so I am hesitant to call digitization a culture with a history or herstory. I seek to define its cultural significance in my own art (if what I do would even be considered "art" because its ephemeral). We must be careful of our digital world coz we have woken a dragon and he may flame our asses. _____________________
Fine Young Cannibal
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
02-18-2009 16:10
Sure we have a digital culture. It's there in Youtube and Facebook and Myspace and Google and Second Life and Warcraft and thousands of blogs and message boards. It's messy and chaotic and organic, just like it's always been. Culture is like that, whether it's transmitted in bits and bytes, print and paper, ink and parchment, carved stone and papyrus, or mud tablet and oral tradition.
Culture isn't something you trust, or not trust, it's not something you need to believe in any more than you need to believe in shoes and umbrellas and tables. It's just there, the result of people communicating with people. And it always will be, so long as people are people. _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
|
Kornscope Komachi
Transitional human
Join date: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 1,041
|
02-18-2009 16:50
Very sorry for opening this can of worms. I wish I could purchase intelligence. Too late now...
_____________________
SCOPE Homes, Bangu
----------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
Osprey Therian
I want capslocklock
Join date: 6 Jul 2004
Posts: 5,049
|
02-18-2009 17:26
It's all right, K - it's a good time for us to think about the forum and its worth.
_____________________
|
|
Jesse Barnett
500,000 scoville units
Join date: 21 May 2006
Posts: 4,160
|
02-18-2009 17:47
It's all right, K - it's a good time for us to think about the forum and its worth. And good practice just in case someone royally screws up and hits the toss button. Torley has expressed support for archiving the forum because of it's historical importance. Unfortunately I find absolutely no comfort in those words. No one at LL has ever "gotten" the forum which is ludicrous considering the info that is available. Take a look at this thread: /8/8e/306283/1.html Long and wordy but there is absolutely no other way to convey such a wealth of information and it would loose all context if wikified. Yet we have discussions like that on a regular basis. You can not have a "discussion" in a blog, blogs are one way only(this is why LL went to a blog and away from the forum) and the same can be applied to wikis. I have always found it somewhat amusing that everyone is so enthralled with Torley's videos. A smidgen of info passed on in a few minutes of time, the sum total of all of the knowledge in all of the videos is microscopic compared to what is here.(EDIT: Before I get hate pm's I do love Torley I am just using this as an example)LL likes to think of SL as an "application" and yet if any of them actually owned and used "applications" such as Autocad, Maya, 3DS Max, Photoshop etc then they would understand the importance of forums. I dare anyone to name one major application they have on their computer that does not have a forum for support and the passing of knowledge. _____________________
I (who is a she not a he) reserve the right to exercise selective comprehension of the OP's question at anytime.
I am still around, just no longer here. See you across the aisle. Hope LL burns in hell for archiving this forum |
|
Void Singer
Int vSelf = Sing(void);
Join date: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 6,973
|
02-18-2009 19:52
Yes, but turning a feature off does not "break" the thing, so it isn't broken. Since that part of the dicussion, the forum has become actually broken. if you want to get technical it was broken, then they turned features off to prevent access to broken parts, much the same as never turning right in a car because it's wheel will fall off if you do equals turning right is broken. it may not be the source of the problem but it's still the cause of the nerfed functionality. fixing it allows the return of that functionality. but like I said before, even LL says it's broken. who or what exactly are you defend here? the semantics are pointless; especially given the focus of the OPs post was that LL promised and didn't deliver, regardless of the language used by either _____________________
|
| . "Cat-Like Typing Detected" | . This post may contain errors in logic, spelling, and | . grammar known to the SL populace to cause confusion | | - Please Use PHP tags when posting scripts/code, Thanks. | - Can't See PHP or URL Tags Correctly? Check Out This Link... | - |
|
Nina Stepford
was lied to by LL
Join date: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 3,373
|
02-18-2009 21:39
whatever jig may be, she isnt a fucking troll hey.
get real. _____________________
SLU - ban em then bash em!
~~GREATEST HITS~~ pro-life? gtfo! slu- banning opposing opinions one at a time http://www.sluniverse.com/php/vb/zomgwtfbbqgtfololcats/15428-disingenuous.html learn to shut up and nod in agreement... or be banned! http://www.sluniverse.com/php/vb/off-topic/1239-americans-not-stupid.html |