Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Warning and a Message To All Content Developers & Designers!

Joannah Cramer
Registered User
Join date: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,539
06-28-2006 08:11
From: Meghan Eldrich
Purchasing the product to review it with the sole intention of "ripping it off" speaks volumes for the charecter of Adriana Caligari (..)

With that said.. I don't believe that copying a good idea is illegal (or ever should be), the N30 product is superior to most that I have viewed, hence why I purchased the product. I think if a competitor wants to make a competing product with just as many good features, that, that is in the best interest of us all. It's what inspires "pushing the envelope" so to speak and can only make SL a better place.

... So, society on the whole benefits from people copying and improving others' ideas, but to check out someone's creation precisely for that purpose... 'speaks volumes for the character' of person in question?

It doesn't really make sense. You can have it one way or the other. not both...
Mitzi Suntzu
Registered User
Join date: 2 Jan 2006
Posts: 1
vendor hack
06-28-2006 09:06
From: Adriana Caligari
I did not mention the word HACK

If fact I did not go into the details of how I happened to observe the behaviour in that particluar vendor, I did however make it public knowledge and petitioned SL to fix it as soon as the behaviour was seen ( that very night - within minutes of verifying that the behaviour was not localised - verifiable via LL )

Would a HACKER be so upfront and ask for the door to be closed when they could have ripped the whole of SL without anyones knowledge ?



here is a solution to checking out if there is a hole in a vendor that lets you test it out, WITHOUT attacking somone elses vendors. buy a copy of the system and try it out on your own , by testing the exploit on your OWN vendors? or asking a friend who owns a vendor system you want to see if said exploit can be used on it, to let you TEST it on a cheap item they purposely put on the said vendor for you to test it?

although i have never used any of these exploits , i always use my own or a friends vendors to test them out and make sure it doesnt affect our stuff. i have yet to find anything in sl that would be worth this kind of headache to actually use them for gain. but that is just me.

i am sorry if this post is viewed as an attack on anyone, it wasnt meant to be. it was merely meant to show that their are always ways to test exploits like this without involving a stranger, and inviting situations such as these.

and a parting question. why didnt you just send an im to madamg stating you think the vendors she uses can be exploited and she should check into it asap, then buy the product for the full amount from get go?
Sensual Casanova
Spoiled Brat
Join date: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 4,807
06-28-2006 09:28
Wow Madam, I hate to say it, but with all the trouble you have been having lately I am beginning to wonder "the other side"
Sorry about all the bad luck =/
Sensual Casanova
Spoiled Brat
Join date: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 4,807
06-28-2006 09:33
From: Adriana Caligari




Ok lets take this to pieces one bit at a time



The individual IM'd you immediately advising you of the exploit and sent you the money before you replied ( I have a copy of your thankyou note received 2 days later ) - the individual also posted a warning of exploit on the forums - see battle previously




Yeps I posted that as your advert clearly stated all updates to come free - I was a purchaser
And yeps I thanked you for it using my real avatar name






I PM'd you once via SLexchange and never received a reply - nowhere in my PM did i mention opening source code ( quite frankly I don't need it )




If you had taken the time to read the manual you would have seen my product has features required of a photo studio and several that yours still has not got.
( although I see you are adding them rather rapidly )




Untrue - Photo Studio is entirely my own work ( Functionality and design alterations were made after consultation with another Studio maker to make the unit more user friendly )





Possibly because there wasn't and never has been a conversation between ourselves - if you believe it to be the case - please post it - I would love to read what I am supposed to have said


So in short

I offered a collaboration to you mentioning that I saw the natural progression of my camera system and particle system with your studio system to produce a good studio.
I never received a reply - I did not pursue the matter further with you

I started creating a studio
Yes after creation I purchased your system ( actually on the day I discovered the exploit ) as I wanted to see what the competition looked like so that my product COULD NOT be accused of being a copy.

I then - eventually posted the product ( much delays were had due to SL 1.10 )

Then the fun and games began.
  1. You ejected my alt from your group
  2. You suddenly started a heavy advertising campaign
  3. Your price suddenly dropped
  4. After seeing that my product was rapidly approaching the best seller at SLX you posted a DMCA
  5. I counter posted
    ( I might add here that if you actually thought that a DMCA was valid you would have posted it with Linden Labs as well, and SLB - LL could see in an instant who's work was who's - you didn't - you posted with SLXexchange who had no way of verifying your claim )
  6. None of that caused me to withdraw the product
  7. You post this fantasy in a further attempt to discredit me



Believe whichever side of the story you will

I know the truth from my side

Wow, being that I am an animator and we have a modeling group, and am a clothing designer I was going to make a photo studio... does this mean I will have to face all this drama if I do?
Sensual Casanova
Spoiled Brat
Join date: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 4,807
06-28-2006 09:38
From: MadamG Zagato
I always have an advertising campaign. So what?

Most products that are cheap imitations of other product in fact DO sell rapidly. So what?.

IS all this drama in the forums lately, one of them? sorry had to ask...
malaysia Dion
Registered User
Join date: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 8
my own opinion
06-28-2006 09:54
MadamG :reading both sides of the story, I came to a decision that the hack was done with a second alt this leads me to the question Why? Too Hide ! If not, why didnt she use her primary alt? Hacking is wrong period, unless the maker is paying you to find bugs in his program. MadamG you did the right thing by trying not to disclose her name.
I wouldnt give this person a second thought, just keep on doing your thing. I wasnt thinking of buying a photo studio before now, but I believe in put up or shut up. HeeHee. So pls contact me with information on your store location.
Sensual Casanova
Spoiled Brat
Join date: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 4,807
06-28-2006 09:56
I love how al these first time posters have decided to come in with all the wonderful accusations and opinions... hope you all are around when I need back up *winks* ;)
MadamG Zagato
means business
Join date: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 1,402
06-28-2006 10:10
From: Adriana Caligari
I did not mention the word HACK

If fact I did not go into the details of how I happened to observe the behaviour in that particluar vendor, I did however make it public knowledge and petitioned SL to fix it as soon as the behaviour was seen ( that very night - within minutes of verifying that the behaviour was not localised - verifiable via LL )


More fiction.

The JEVN expolit had been made known long before your hacking into my vendor and from what I understand had already been patched by the developer of the vendor system. You did not "Find" anything. If that is the case then how was I able to obtain and patch my vendor system so soon after it was hacked?

So you are saying that after you purchased it for L$1 you notified LL and they fixed the discrepancy in the system ASAP, then the developer of JEVN rushed to issue updates all with a matter of hours?

And then you made it public knowledge? How so? Did you post it somewhere? Please share the link with us.

Bologna.

From: Adriana Caligari
Would a HACKER be so upfront and ask for the door to be closed when they could have ripped the whole of SL without anyones knowledge ?

(How do we know you didn't? The only reason we know about this is because you exposed yourself)
malaysia Dion
Registered User
Join date: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 8
06-28-2006 10:15
Sensual when I buy your product, which I have (nice stuff) it tells me how much to pay, I dont pay one linden for any of your stuff.

An I did start off saying it was "My opinion" and first time posting has nothing to do with it.

Finally, I will support anyone or any org/group trying to do the right thing even in game.
MadamG Zagato
means business
Join date: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 1,402
06-28-2006 10:20
From: Sensual Casanova
I love how al these first time posters have decided to come in with all the wonderful accusations and opinions... hope you all are around when I need back up *winks* ;)

Yes, it is amazing who you see post for the first time no matter who's side they are on. Just for reference:

^ Not Me
Sensual Casanova
Spoiled Brat
Join date: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 4,807
06-28-2006 10:30
I am not chosing sides here cus I am not a physic, but this thread really scares, cus Asri and I were truley debating on making a photo studio, especially since all the new lighting effects SL has =/
Joannah Cramer
Registered User
Join date: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,539
06-28-2006 10:42
From: MadamG Zagato
So you are saying that after you purchased it for L$1 you notified LL and they fixed the discrepancy in the system ASAP, then the developer of JEVN rushed to issue updates all with a matter of hours?

And then you made it public knowledge? How so? Did you post it somewhere? Please share the link with us.

I believe this is the thread in question. caused quite a stir on scripting forum a while ago:

/54/1c/102527/1.html#post1005665
MadamG Zagato
means business
Join date: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 1,402
06-28-2006 10:42
From: Sensual Casanova
I am not chosing sides here cus I am not a physic, but this thread really scares, cus Asri and I were truley debating on making a photo studio, especially since all the new lighting effects SL has =/


Remember, I am not complaining because she made one. I am disgusted at the manner in which she went about doing it. It shows a total disregard for other designers and a complete lack of creativity.

A couple people keep posting as if I am saying it was wrong for her to make one. Please do not put words in my mouth and do not attempt to twist my words around to alter the subject at hand.

With all due respect, I could care less what your plans are.
malaysia Dion
Registered User
Join date: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 8
06-28-2006 10:52
1) Psychic? Paying one linden for a photo studio with an alt? hummm

2) You should make a photo studio or any thing you want to make. That is called free enterprise! If you buy my wigget and make a better one, bravo!!! That is called research developement !!! We all benefit from that. But if you try to buy my wigget for one linden and I am clearly selling it for 1500Linden....hummm that is called....xxx
Over Sleeper
I Dream in LSL
Join date: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 141
06-28-2006 10:53
From: Joannah Cramer
I believe this is the thread in question. caused quite a stir on scripting forum a while ago:

/54/1c/102527/1.html#post1005665/54/1c/102527/1.html#post1005665


From: Adriana Caligari
Linden Lab have replied to me on both the forum and in an email from development that the fault is due to be fixed in an up and coming release.

I will not go into details of what the bug is except it is still there.

To safegaurd yourself - just do as suggested in the threads above - check the amount in the PAY event.


According to MadamG, the hack occured on April 23, 2006. The post you mention was on April 26, 2006 which was 3 whole days later. So she knew about it for 3 days and didn't say anything until then. Why? What was she doing in the mean time...hacking more vendors? Makes me wonder.

That thread was started on April 25, 2006 by someone else:
/54/1c/102527/1.html

Not her. Since her character has already been comprimised by using the exploit in the first place to obtain a product - which should be in violation of "something", I wouldn't read too much into the fact that she made one little post. Obviously she did it after she had already hacked X amount of vendors and got what she needed.

3 days later? What a joke.
_____________________
-Please don't feed the troll.
It feeds on your responses.
It stays here because you give it a place to dwell.
It lives because you continue to breathe life into it.

-This is YOUR WORLD and YOUR IMAGINATION
(not Her World and Her Imaginiation)!
Joannah Cramer
Registered User
Join date: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,539
06-28-2006 11:03
From: Over Sleeper
According to MadamG, the hack occured on April 23, 2006. The post you mention was on April 26, 2006 which was 3 whole days later. So she knew about it for 3 days and didn't say anything until then.

According to the very post you mention, in the meantime she apparently contacted LL through both email and forum post, as well as maker of affected vendor system (JEVN, later down the thread) ... however the maker was already aware of the bug at this point, and had the update for system already prepared.

From: someone
I wouldn't read too much into the fact that she made one little post.

Am not reading anything into that particular post. MadamG asked if she posted anything regarding the subject, and this happened to be relevant.

There's quite a bit more in that thread than "one little post" from her, btw. I don't think it's necessary to skew facts like that and then go into slandering hypothesis about who was doing what in the meantime like you did, just because you've already made your mind all up on the issue...
Adriana Caligari
Registered User
Join date: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 458
06-28-2006 11:05
From: Over Sleeper
According to MadamG, the hack occured on April 23, 2006. The post you mention was on April 26, 2006 which was 3 whole days later. So she knew about it for 3 days and didn't say anything until then. Why? What was she doing in the mean time...hacking more vendors? Makes me wonder.

That thread was started on April 25, 2006 by someone else:
/54/1c/102527/1.html

Not her. Since her character has already been comprimised by using the exploit in the first place to obtain a product - which should be in violation of "something", I wouldn't read too much into the fact that she made one little post. Obviously she did it after she had already hacked X amount of vendors and got what she needed.

3 days later? What a joke.


I believe you should be looking at this

/139/49/102466/1.html

If you check your calendar for April you will see the sunday of that week was the 23rd
_____________________
Maker of quality Gadgets
Caligari Designs Store
Richie Waves
Predictable
Join date: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 1,424
06-28-2006 11:08
Sorry to hear bout all the trouble Madam.. but that said, the N30 is an awesome product and I believe will stand up against any rip offs that come along, that combined with the exellent customer support you provide will beat anything :) so I wouldnt worry to much ;)
_____________________
no u!
Over Sleeper
I Dream in LSL
Join date: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 141
06-28-2006 11:14
This is what I was looking for:


Terms of Service
CONDUCT BY USERS OF SECOND LIFE
4.1 .....(viii) interfere with or disrupt the Service or servers or networks connected to the Service, or disobey any requirements, procedures, policies or regulations of networks connected to the Service; (ix) attempt to gain access to any other user's Account or password; or (x) "stalk", abuse or attempt to abuse, or otherwise harass another user. Any violation by you of the terms of the foregoing sentence may result in immediate and permanent suspension or cancellation of your Account.

Community Standards
Global Attacks
Objects, scripts, or actions which broadly interfere with or disrupt the Second Life community, the Second Life servers or other systems related to Second Life will not be tolerated in any form. We will hold you responsible for any actions you take, or that are taken by objects or scripts that belong to you. Sandboxes are available for testing objects and scripts that have components that may be unmanageable or whose behavior you may not be able to predict. If you chose to use a script that substantially disrupts the operation of Second Life, disciplinary actions will result in a minimum two-week suspension, the possible loss of in-world inventory, and a review of your account for probable expulsion from Second Life.

Alternate Accounts
While Residents may choose to play Second Life with more than one account, specifically or consistently using an alternate account to harass other Residents or violate the Community Standards is not acceptable. Alternate accounts are generally treated as separate from a Resident's principal account, but misuse of alternate accounts can and will result in disciplinary action on the principal account.

Not sure if it would classify as a global attack. But since the "Exploit" effected a large group in SL (thiose who use JEVN) and anyone who knew how it could be used, it might be. And why then would she have "tested" it on MadamG's vendor? Does she not have a JEVN vendor or could she have went to JEVN and tested the exploit there instead? Then she would not have obtained the product she wanted of course for only L$1.

MadamG if I were you, I would be notifying LL about what transpired. If anyone else had done what she had admitted to doing, they have been banned by now.
_____________________
-Please don't feed the troll.
It feeds on your responses.
It stays here because you give it a place to dwell.
It lives because you continue to breathe life into it.

-This is YOUR WORLD and YOUR IMAGINATION
(not Her World and Her Imaginiation)!
Sensual Casanova
Spoiled Brat
Join date: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 4,807
06-28-2006 11:21
From: malaysia Dion
1) Psychic? Paying one linden for a photo studio with an alt? hummm

2) You should make a photo studio or any thing you want to make. That is called free enterprise! If you buy my wigget and make a better one, bravo!!! That is called research developement !!! We all benefit from that. But if you try to buy my wigget for one linden and I am clearly selling it for 1500Linden....hummm that is called....xxx

My understanding is she bought it for $L1 and Imed the creator and explained that, and paid the corrected amount willingly... what am I missing?
MadamG Zagato
means business
Join date: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 1,402
06-28-2006 11:26
From: Joannah Cramer
According to the very post you mention, in the meantime she apparently contacted LL through both email and forum post, as well as maker of affected vendor system (JEVN, later down the thread) ... however the maker was already aware of the bug at this point, and had the update for system already prepared.


Am not reading anything into that particular post. MadamG asked if she posted anything regarding the subject, and this happened to be relevant.

There's quite a bit more in that thread than "one little post" from her, btw. I don't think it's necessary to skew facts like that and then go into slandering hypothesis about who was doing what in the meantime like you did, just because you've already made your mind all up on the issue...


The fix if I recall had already been issued at that point. JEVN users had been receiving new deliveries from esmay rand's SL Courier (spelling?) quite frequently during this time for whatever reason. Some were optional updates. Whenever I was logged on and heard the converstations in the JEVN group (which can be pretty persistant at times LOL) someone might ask what the new delivery was for? And people would say it is optional. Since they were optional, and many of the users had complained that after they updated their vendor/server that they did not work right, I though it would be best to leave these updates alone until they were neccessary.

When she used the exploit, I contacted either the group or the developer and was told to use the latest "patch"/"update" to fix it. At that point I had to go change out all my vendors hoping that this would not happen again.

So the exploit had been out and either had a fix or a temporary patch by the time she had hacked mine. This was not the first she had heard of it and being a memebr of the JEVN group she knew about it and the fix/patch (whichever it was).

So no amount of posting to the forums AFTER she had hacked mine and got what she wanted for L$1 excuses that.
Over Sleeper
I Dream in LSL
Join date: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 141
06-28-2006 11:30
From: Sensual Casanova
My understanding is she bought it for $L1 and Imed the creator and explained that, and paid the corrected amount willingly... what am I missing?


That sounds like heresay and cannot be proven unless she sent the chat history to the Lindens in an AR at that point in time (correct me if I am wrong). That would have been cool if she had AR'd herself!!!

So she can say pretty much anything. I see the posts that were made at SLX, and if MadamG has the transaction in her transaction history, then the Lindens will see that as well.

If someone pays L$1 for something it will be in their transaction log. Period.
There's proof in there. The best thing would have been not to do it at all.

So maybe that's what you're missing.
Sensual Casanova
Spoiled Brat
Join date: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 4,807
06-28-2006 11:32
From: Over Sleeper
That sounds like heresay and cannot be proven unless she sent the chat history to the Lindens in an AR at that point in time (correct me if I am wrong). That would have been cool if she had AR'd herself!!!

So she can say pretty much anything. I see the posts that were made at SLX, and if MadamG has the transaction in her transaction history, then the Lindens will see that as well.

If someone pays L$1 for something it will be in their transaction log. Period.
There's proof in there. The best thing would have been not to do it at all.

So maybe that's what you're missing.

Umm MadamG said it herself that she paid the corrected amount, so I dont think I am missing anything
Adriana Caligari
Registered User
Join date: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 458
06-28-2006 11:33
From: MadamG Zagato
The fix if I recall had already been issued at that point. JEVN users had been receiving new deliveries from esmay rand's SL Courier (spelling?) quite frequently during this time for whatever reason. Some were optional updates. Whenever I was logged on and heard the converstations in the JEVN group (which can be pretty persistant at times LOL) someone might ask what the new delivery was for? And people would say it is optional. Since they were optional, and many of the users had complained that after they updated their vendor/server that they did not work right, I though it would be best to leave these updates alone until they were neccessary.

When she used the exploit, I contacted either the group or the developer and was told to use the latest "patch"/"update" to fix it. At that point I had to go change out all my vendors hoping that this would not happen again.

So the exploit had been out and either had a fix or a temporary patch by the time she had hacked mine. This was not the first she had heard of it and being a memebr of the JEVN group she knew about it and the fix/patch (whichever it was).

So no amount of posting to the forums AFTER she had hacked mine and got what she wanted for L$1 excuses that.


If you will stop for a minute and check your records you will see the vendor I purchased it from WAS NOT A JEVN - that exploit was never linked to JEVN despite the countless attempts to do so.
_____________________
Maker of quality Gadgets
Caligari Designs Store
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
06-28-2006 11:34
From: Over Sleeper
That sounds like heresay and cannot be proven


Its as provable as the alternative. You're just choosing which you want to believe.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
1 2 3 4