Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

New Home for Griefing Tools

OSourcerer Flytrap
Registered User
Join date: 23 Jan 2005
Posts: 36
03-16-2005 05:03
Seems like the griefers no longer have to hawk their bombs in the sandboxes. They are taking it to the masses. Here are a couple item description excerpts from the weapons section on SL Exchange:

"Simple to use. Just type in /5 boom and the whole world explodes!! Forces most AVs to relog. Super powerful. Unlimited C-4 Packs per purchase. Great item, great deal."

Griefing Tool

"Don't let this weapon fall into the hands of SL terrorists. The ultimate of ultimates, upon detonation this bomb kills every avatar in the sim and hurls their bodies to the surrounding sims."

Griefing Tool

Somehow posting "Purchaser expected to use within SL Terms of Service." doesn't seem to make this right. Considering neither of these can be used within the TOS.
_____________________
Copying is not nice.
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
03-16-2005 05:11
From: OSourcerer Flytrap
Seems like the griefers no longer have to hawk their bombs in the sandboxes. They are taking it to the masses. Here are a couple item description excerpts from the weapons section on SL Exchange:

"Simple to use. Just type in /5 boom and the whole world explodes!! Forces most AVs to relog. Super powerful. Unlimited C-4 Packs per purchase. Great item, great deal."

Griefing Tool

"Don't let this weapon fall into the hands of SL terrorists. The ultimate of ultimates, upon detonation this bomb kills every avatar in the sim and hurls their bodies to the surrounding sims."

Griefing Tool

Somehow posting "Purchaser expected to use within SL Terms of Service." doesn't seem to make this right. Considering neither of these can be used within the TOS.


Yeah, someone was selling listening devices specificly designed for covert spying a few weeks ago there too. Might still be, I dunno.

I guess it's not really the sites job to police the content, but you would think the Lindens would take a critical view of this.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
Oz Spade
ReadsNoPostLongerThanHand
Join date: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 2,708
03-16-2005 05:13
So this is an interisting issue.

Should sellers, of both Webshops and Malls (not to descriminate), take responsibility in not allowing these sort of things that could for all purposes, and most likely are, used against the TOS?

How do you differenciate? To me, the first item which would force avatars to relog, is more dangerous than the second item. I would definitly not allow the first one to be sold in my mall/onlineshop, but the second one I may. Its a judgement call that is up to the personal viewpoint of the owner of said mall/webshop.
_____________________
"Don't anticipate outcome," the man said. "Await the unfolding of events. Remain in the moment." - Konrad
Kris Ritter
paradoxical embolism
Join date: 31 Oct 2003
Posts: 6,627
03-16-2005 05:49
I think it's a fine line with some things, even 'covert devices', as to whether they violate the ToS or not. Certainly the last time it was discussed, there were some plausible legitimate uses for them put forward.

However, can anyone see any legitimate reason why you would need bombs, the effect of which is to clear the sim by abusing everyone in it? I can't, to be honest. And as such, it would seem that this is a clear cut case of items designed with one sole purpose which is explicitly forbidden by the ToS. I don't think it would be at all unreasonable to ban them for sale, or for the Lindens to take action merely for the sale of them.

YMMV, of course :)
Pirate Cotton
DarkLifer
Join date: 26 Sep 2003
Posts: 538
03-16-2005 05:51
I think shops are partly responsible. I'd be talking to the shop/web-keeps sternly and warning/temp-banning the creators of those items
Shiryu Musashi
Veteran Designer
Join date: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,045
03-16-2005 05:59
In real world shop keepers are responsible for what they sell. I wonder why it shouldn't be the same for SL...
_____________________
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
03-16-2005 06:05
From: Shiryu Musashi
In real world shop keepers are responsible for what they sell. I wonder why it shouldn't be the same for SL...


Only to a certain extent, of course, at least in America.

A store that sells a gun used to shoot someone isn't generaly responsible, as long as the gun was purchased legaly... back ground check, waiting period, etc. Basicly, as long as the sale itself was kosher, the store is safe.

The same is true here, I would assume.

None of these things are actually illegal to own. Any halfway competent scripter could make either of them. Using them IS against ToS, but that's another issue entierly.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
Buster Peel
Spat the dummy.
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,242
03-16-2005 06:06
From: OSourcerer Flytrap
Somehow posting "Purchaser expected to use within SL Terms of Service." doesn't seem to make this right. Considering neither of these can be used within the TOS.


Clearly these things are illegal because, as you say, they can't be used within the TOS. Trouble is, Linden can't enforce the rules on external web sites. If Linden finds one of these in-world then they could take action.

"Weapons" are allowed. Weapons that cause users to have to re-log (other than by freak occurance) are not allowed.

I would suggest Linden take a page from the FBI handbook and monitor these sites. When these things appear, buy one. Now you have in-world proof and you can take appropriate action against the creator. (i.e., warning, suspension, whatever depending on the nature of the item.)

Another suggestion is to designate a particular Linden as an "inspector". If a resident believes that an object violates the TOS, give a copy to the designated Linden. The Linden can examine the item and decide if it violates the TOS. (The snitch is out the cost of the item.) I suspect that a lot of things that people THINK would violate the TOS actually don't. It's only a problem if the item can't be used in compliance with the TOS, and then there are some gray areas.

Buster
Kris Ritter
paradoxical embolism
Join date: 31 Oct 2003
Posts: 6,627
03-16-2005 06:13
From: Reitsuki Kojima
None of these things are actually illegal to own. Any halfway competent scripter could make either of them. Using them IS against ToS, but that's another issue entierly.


I see the parallel, but then guns have a legitimate use, both in RL and SL. However, I doubt that you can walk into a store anywhere RL and buy a nuke to clear your entire neighborhood of residents, and I'd be pretty sure the authorities would be quite interested should someone be selling them. Given that they dont have a legimate use, there is no legitimate reason to buy or own one either, surely? So wouldnt it therefore be safe to outlaw them entirely without really infringing on anyones rights?
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
03-16-2005 06:17
From: Kris Ritter
I see the parallel, but then guns have a legitimate use, both in RL and SL. However, I doubt that you can walk into a store anywhere RL and buy a nuke to clear your entire neighborhood of residents, and I'd be pretty sure the authorities would be quite interested should someone be selling them. Given that they dont have a legimate use, there is no legitimate reason to buy or own one either, surely? So wouldnt it therefore be safe to outlaw them entirely without really infringing on anyones rights?


At the moment, however, there isn't so far as I know any rule gainst OWNING any level of agressive weaponry in SL. There are only rules against its use. So saying "Ban the creators", as a couple people have suggested, and so forth isn't called for, yet.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
Malachi Petunia
Gentle Miscreant
Join date: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 3,414
03-16-2005 06:18
When private ownership of tactical nuclear weapons of mass destruction is outlawed, only outlaws will have tactical nuclear weapons of mass destruction.

I have been waiting sooo long for an apropos moment to say that. :p
Kris Ritter
paradoxical embolism
Join date: 31 Oct 2003
Posts: 6,627
03-16-2005 06:20
well, I guess the other parallel to draw then is the worlds nuclear arsenal. As long as everyone has the capability and everyone else knows they each own enough firepower to blow the shit out of everyone else, it should be a big enough deterrant against people using one :p
Shiryu Musashi
Veteran Designer
Join date: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,045
03-16-2005 06:21
From: Reitsuki Kojima
At the moment, however, there isn't so far as I know any rule gainst OWNING any level of agressive weaponry in SL. There are only rules against its use. So saying "Ban the creators", as a couple people have suggested, and so forth isn't called for, yet.



No, but strongly discourage the sale of weapons that objectively have no other use than griefing could be a good idea.
There is a lot of difference between a Seburo that can be used to play some FPS action (and just a great decorative item as well), and something that just blows a sim away..
Anyway more than discourage the sale i would punish the use in a much more strict way. There are people that blows sims away and even boast about it in their profile, have been reported multiple times and are still around.
Someone blows a sim away? Ban. Simple.
_____________________
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
03-16-2005 06:26
From: Shiryu Musashi
No, but strongly discourage the sale of weapons that objectively have no other use than griefing could be a good idea.
There is a lot of difference between a Seburo that can be used to play some FPS action (and just a great decorative item as well), and something that just blows a sim away..


Either something is against the ToS, or it isn't. If it isn't, the lindens shouldn't be doing anything, including discouraging the sale of such things. Now, what the denizens of SL choose to do, of course, is another story. And if you think it should be against the ToS, feel free to make that case... as with the land scanners, for example.

But right now, as far as the ToS is concerned, there is no difference between these and a seberu.


From: Shiryu Musashi
Anyway more than discourage the sale i would punish the use in a much more strict way. There are people that blows sims away and even boast about it in their profile, have been reported multiple times and are still around.
Someone blows a sim away? Ban. Simple.


Wellllllll...

I've done it accidently a couple times. I don't think it should be a simple "if this then this" equation, but I agree punishment for deliberatly using these things needs to be alot more harsh.

And a lot of users come from There or TSO, or have a similar mindset... "If I can buy it, it must be ok, right?". A first warning isn't unreasonable.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
Kris Ritter
paradoxical embolism
Join date: 31 Oct 2003
Posts: 6,627
03-16-2005 06:26
From: Shiryu Musashi
Someone blows a sim away? Ban. Simple.


I dunno if it is that simple. People pass stuff to me without word all the time, and yes, as a general rule I'm pretty darn cautious about using them. Case in point, only last week someone gave me a device called C4 with the description 'say /3 boom' or something like that. Now there are a number of devices in SL with dynamite or c4 kinda packaging. Some do harmless particle effects, and others blow away everyone in the sim.

If someone gets something dropped on them and doesn't think before trying it, it'd be a bit harsh to permaban them for having a momentary lapse of common sense because they didnt know what the effect would be.
Shiryu Musashi
Veteran Designer
Join date: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,045
03-16-2005 06:30
Right now LL's policy seems to be: "give a first warning, give a second, give a third, suspend for a day, suspend for two days, if he is nice make him wash the car, after all he is not so bad make him wash the car again... etc, etc, etc...."
_____________________
Travis Lambert
White dog, red collar
Join date: 3 Jun 2004
Posts: 2,819
<cough> Land Tools <cough>
03-16-2005 06:39
I've been begging for this for quite some time: Give parcel owners the ability to block push scripts completely via parcel options.

Then objects like these become irrelevant, and the rest of us can enjoy SL more. People who want to blow each other up with these things can do it on their own land.

Isn't a proactive approach to grief better than a reactive one?

Travis
Talen Morgan
Amused
Join date: 2 Apr 2004
Posts: 3,097
03-16-2005 06:39
Hopefully one day LL will ban the use of pitchforks and torches...
_____________________
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...set a man on fire and he'll be warm the rest of his life :D
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
03-16-2005 06:42
From: Talen Morgan
Hopefully one day LL will ban the use of pitchforks and torches...


Public disaproval of something does not equate to pitchforks and torches, thanks. The drama just isn't to be found here.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
Malachi Petunia
Gentle Miscreant
Join date: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 3,414
03-16-2005 06:43
From: someone
... As long as everyone has the capability and everyone else knows they each own enough firepower to blow the shit out of everyone else, it should be a big enough deterrant against people using one :p
"Gee, I wish we had one of them doomsday machines." - General "Buck" Turgidson
Schwanson Schlegel
SL's Tokin' Villain
Join date: 15 Nov 2003
Posts: 2,721
03-16-2005 06:43
Guns and bombs don't grief.
Griefers grief.
Good grief. :rolleyes:
_____________________
Talen Morgan
Amused
Join date: 2 Apr 2004
Posts: 3,097
03-16-2005 06:52
From: Reitsuki Kojima
Public disaproval of something does not equate to pitchforks and torches, thanks. The drama just isn't to be found here.


Certain people in this thread seem to dissaprove and want to ban everything and anyone involved with whatever hot button topic is being discussed. That does equate to pitchforks and torches. You can bet the creator of such weapons will get reported by someone with this mindset and by default other creators will also come under scrutiny.

Grifers will grief with a plywood prim because they can....I would venture to guess there are thousands of weapons in SL used responcibly by people and not as griefing tools. Who doesn't like to have a good ol fashioned fire fight with thier friends now and again.
_____________________
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...set a man on fire and he'll be warm the rest of his life :D
Shiryu Musashi
Veteran Designer
Join date: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,045
03-16-2005 06:55
From: Talen Morgan
Certain people in this thread seem to dissaprove and want to ban everything and anyone involved with whatever hot button topic is being discussed. That does equate to pitchforks and torches.


No that does equate to a couple hot button topic than in someone's vision need a stricter policy.
And generalizing talking about pitchforks and torches is just a meager and kinda pathetic attempt to belittle their individual opinions. You definately deserved your award, enjoy it :)
_____________________
Liv Karuna
Registered User
Join date: 12 Jun 2004
Posts: 82
Zero Tolerance for Terrorism
03-16-2005 06:57
I firmly stand with a zero tolerance policy for people who instigate terrorism in SL including the development and dissemination of WOMD.

When I first began experiencing the terrorism first hand in TOS I was rather lenient. Forgive and forget.....attempting to negotiate.....remaining satisfied with an Abuse Report etc. However, I have since learned that all of that is meaningless to the SL terrorist. They thrive on the chaos and the notoriety. They take up time and resources. They do not care about the SL world and community.

At this point the handslaps and 3 day suspensions are meaningless. There needs to be firm message from Linden Labs that terrorism to the community will not be tolerated -- beginning with a permanent ban of the offending party. At-most a one-warning policy could be issued first...just in case the person is completely ignorant of the TOS.

As for the WOMD's......they continue to stronger and more damaging....what's next a virus generated by a SLterrorist? My guess is that it has already been tried.

Outside parties that carry these items for sale will not have my business....that is my own zero tolerance policy in action.
Shiryu Musashi
Veteran Designer
Join date: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,045
03-16-2005 06:59
From: Liv Karuna

As for the WOMD's......they continue to stronger and more damaging....what's next a virus generated by a SLterrorist? My guess is that it has already been tried.


It has, it's called LB v2
_____________________
1 2 3 4 5