Snooping on a neighbor wrong?
|
|
Yuki Callahan
Priestess of Artemis
Join date: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 50
|
12-07-2004 17:09
Well, I was browsing on SL, and I happened to find a thing called the Snoopy Discrete Eavesdropper. I read it and got interested and well, I bought 5 ><. Link So, I was wondering, how annoyed would you be if all your conversations at your SL home were heard ^^? I decided to play with it and planted one in one of my neighbors homes(No anmes will be mentioned). So is this wrong ?
_____________________
<3 I wuv cows ^^ <3
|
|
Korg Stygian
Curmudgeon Extraordinaire
Join date: 3 Jun 2004
Posts: 1,105
|
12-07-2004 17:20
From: Yuki Callahan Well, I was browsing on SL, and I happened to find a thing called the Snoopy Discrete Eavesdropper. I read it and got interested and well, I bought 5 ><. Link So, I was wondering, how annoyed would you be if all your conversations at your SL home were heard ^^? I decided to play with it and planted one in one of my neighbors homes(No anmes will be mentioned). So is this wrong ? * from Second Life standards, section 4... Remotely monitoring conversations, posting conversation logs, or sharing conversation logs without consent are all prohibited in Second Life
|
|
Yuki Callahan
Priestess of Artemis
Join date: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 50
|
12-07-2004 17:22
Whjo said I would post/share ^^? (On sl, mwahahah)
_____________________
<3 I wuv cows ^^ <3
|
|
Korg Stygian
Curmudgeon Extraordinaire
Join date: 3 Jun 2004
Posts: 1,105
|
12-07-2004 17:25
* from Second Life standards, section 4... Remotely monitoring conversations
|
|
Yuki Callahan
Priestess of Artemis
Join date: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 50
|
12-07-2004 17:27
 Its hardly detectable anyways ,its the size of this period . I would love to do it in Lisse Livingstons condos near my Cottonwood home ^^. Put one in each 
_____________________
<3 I wuv cows ^^ <3
|
|
Rysidian Rubio
Ruby Red Head
Join date: 14 Jan 2004
Posts: 263
|
12-07-2004 17:31
IMO it's completely against the TOS. but when i reported this device it wasn't removed, so I guess LL decided it's ok.
|
|
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
|
12-07-2004 17:40
My understanding is that they are NOT ok on someone else's land. I know of a player who was disciplined for just that a while back.
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
|
|
Sezmra Svarog
Pointy-Eared Geek
Join date: 8 Jul 2004
Posts: 446
|
12-07-2004 17:41
Well it certainly is rude as hell, I think we can agree on that. What's "right" and what's "wrong" can be highly subjective, especially when it comes to virtuality.  If it's against the TOS in any way, then yeah, DUR.(whether or not something is done about it) Really, I stick with the "treat others as I want to be treated". Which includes not purposefully snooping around to eavesdrop on conversations. 
_____________________
- sezmra svarog - slife.sezmra.com
|
|
Yuki Callahan
Priestess of Artemis
Join date: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 50
|
12-07-2004 17:46
Its the same as using the little alt thingy. Anyways, I have created a better version of this I call the Ohu. It was done just by studying and a little practice. Ohu is afternoon in Korean and I think this suits the new device since it is the device that most shines in this area. These are a few reasons to buy the new Ohu when it comes out(Saturday, night at the latest):
- You expect your lover may be having an affair.
- You want to know who comes and when!
- You want evidence for later usage.
- You have angoraphobia, and extremely paranoid.
- You like novelty items ^^
It will be posted on slexchange.com for 250. It is worth it though because of more storage space and a better sleeker, more appropriate design. Would love to hear more replies 
_____________________
<3 I wuv cows ^^ <3
|
|
Alan Palmerstone
Payment Info Used
Join date: 4 Jun 2004
Posts: 659
|
12-07-2004 17:47
From: Nolan Nash My understanding is that they are NOT ok on someone else's land. I know of a player who was disciplined for just that a while back. What about on their own land, right next to yours? If they were online at the time, they could have heard you live. Is recording you for later playback when they aren't around any different? Not trying to be argumentative, it is just that when there are no other dots around, people act differently. I would hate to have something taken out of context because I didn't know someone was listening.
_____________________
Visit Parrot Island - relax on the beach, snuggle at the waterfall, ride the jetskis, make a movie and buy a pool!
|
|
Nephilaine Protagonist
PixelSlinger
Join date: 22 Jul 2003
Posts: 1,693
|
12-07-2004 17:48
It is wrong, rude, disrespectful, and explicitly against the rules.
|
|
Yuki Callahan
Priestess of Artemis
Join date: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 50
|
12-07-2004 17:54
I took it out, but did I mention I have a new Ohu in every one of my homes, usually 5 per, and in my land in blue some dude happened to be sexually harassing my stargate ? I had to take it out, and I was there at the time too, only in my car, but I didn't move it since he got their and he was pretty new. THIS IS WHY I MUST INSIST I SPREAD MY OHUS! But I see your point and now say to keep it on your own property as a disclaimer 
_____________________
<3 I wuv cows ^^ <3
|
|
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
|
12-07-2004 17:58
From: Alan Palmerstone What about on their own land, right next to yours? If they were online at the time, they could have heard you live. Is recording you for later playback when they aren't around any different?
Not trying to be argumentative, it is just that when there are no other dots around, people act differently. I would hate to have something taken out of context because I didn't know someone was listening. You would still be knowingly recording on someone else's land, since the device description clearly states the ranges, which should fall under; "from Second Life standards, section 4... Remotely monitoring conversations... without consent are all prohibited in Second Life" If a person doesn't trust someone so much you feel you need to start recording them, maybe it's you who isn't to be trusted or has trustworthiness issues. Or maybe you chose the wrong friend/lover/business partner. Folks who have a hard time trusting others are often untrustworthy themselves because they realize that; 'hey I do it, so why wouldn't they?' I could never trust someone again if I found out they were recording me without my permission, no matter how benevolent their intentions.
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
|
|
Zoey Jade
Registered User
Join date: 21 May 2003
Posts: 263
|
12-07-2004 17:58
LMAO. Go put it in someones house who you know has alot of av sex LOL. Too funny.
|
|
Jonquille Noir
Lemon Fresh
Join date: 17 Jan 2004
Posts: 4,025
|
12-07-2004 18:02
From: Nolan Nash I could never trust someone again if I found out they were recording me without my permission, no matter how benevolent their intentions. Nor could I. And I would also ban anyone from my land that I knew possessed and/or used this type of spy crap.
_____________________
Little Rebel Designs Gallinas
|
|
Cristiano Midnight
Evil Snapshot Baron
Join date: 17 May 2003
Posts: 8,616
|
12-07-2004 18:07
From: Yuki Callahan Well, I was browsing on SL, and I happened to find a thing called the Snoopy Discrete Eavesdropper. I read it and got interested and well, I bought 5 ><. Link So, I was wondering, how annoyed would you be if all your conversations at your SL home were heard ^^? I decided to play with it and planted one in one of my neighbors homes(No anmes will be mentioned). So is this wrong ? You seem to clearly miss the point that it is fully against the terms of service, whether it is rude or not (which it is).
_____________________
Cristiano ANOmations - huge selection of high quality, low priced animations all $100L or less. ~SLUniverse.com~ SL's oldest and largest community site, featuring Snapzilla image sharing, forums, and much more. 
|
|
Yuki Callahan
Priestess of Artemis
Join date: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 50
|
12-07-2004 18:08
I am not trying to be rude right now, but what do you people say when you are alone? I say hover tv on stargate PX49, to operate things, cause you sound touchy  I dont know why people talk when nobody is there though...
_____________________
<3 I wuv cows ^^ <3
|
|
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
|
12-07-2004 18:19
From: Yuki Callahan I am not trying to be rude right now, but what do you people say when you are alone? I say hover tv on stargate PX49, to operate things, cause you sound touchy  I dont know why people talk when nobody is there though... Huh?
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
|
|
Launa Fauna
Dork
Join date: 31 Aug 2003
Posts: 529
|
12-07-2004 18:41
From: Yuki Callahan  Its hardly detectable anyways ,its the size of this period . I would love to do it in Lisse Livingstons condos near my Cottonwood home ^^. Put one in each  Its against TOS. I would be upset. And ask Cristiano... I can see something the size of a period on the ground in sl...
_____________________
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.- Arthur C. Clarke
|
|
Alan Palmerstone
Payment Info Used
Join date: 4 Jun 2004
Posts: 659
|
12-07-2004 18:46
From: Nolan Nash You would still be knowingly recording on someone else's land, since the device description clearly states the ranges, which should fall under; "from Second Life standards, section 4... Remotely monitoring conversations... without consent are all prohibited in Second Life"
If a person doesn't trust someone so much you feel you need to start recording them, maybe it's you who isn't to be trusted or has trustworthiness issues. Or maybe you chose the wrong friend/lover/business partner. Folks who have a hard time trusting others are often untrustworthy themselves because they realize that; 'hey I do it, so why wouldn't they?' I could never trust someone again if I found out they were recording me without my permission, no matter how benevolent their intentions. Good. That was the response I was looking for. I was actually asking from the point of view of ME finding the device on my neighbors land and if I would have recourse. Just wanted to make sure that there was no misunderstanding that I might want to use such a thing. I wonder if slexchange will remove this product.
_____________________
Visit Parrot Island - relax on the beach, snuggle at the waterfall, ride the jetskis, make a movie and buy a pool!
|
|
Raz Rutledge
Registered User
Join date: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 12
|
12-07-2004 19:16
Shooting people with a gun in the game is considered harrassment and violates the TOS, but the guns won't be removed from SL. Same as with this snooping device; it violates the terms of service if used improperly, but one must get caught using it. Until those people are caught, I suggest you all invest into a script scanner, and keep a close eye on your surroundings, especially if you're being intimate with a significant other, because people are now listening to every word you say.
|
|
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
|
12-07-2004 19:29
Actually one doesn't have to be found using it.
If I find one on my land and report it - I'm pretty sure something will be done about it, and it's owner, pretty quickly.
So it has been in the past.
Siggy.
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals. From: Jesse Linden I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
|
|
Lisse Livingston
Mentor/Instructor/Greeter
Join date: 16 May 2004
Posts: 1,130
|
12-07-2004 19:31
May people will use the mini-map to look for nearby green dots before having confidential conversations. Obviously, this would not show up as a green dot, and therefore they would think they were alone. MUSHes have the PUPPET flag for objects, which will relay everything heard in its vicinity back to its owner (if online). Objects can also listen and log whatever they hear. HOWEVER - the command '@sweep' will give a list of any objects set to listen, or with the PUPPET flag on, so that the people in the room can easily check whether their conversation might be being listened to, or recorded. Second Life currently has no such command, and it would be a very desireable addition. Imagine if you could click a SWEEP button and all Avatars and objects listening for Channel 0 within a 20m radius were listed on your screen: Listening within 20m: Name: Lisse Livingston Type: Avatar Owner: Lisse Livingston ONLINE Name: Bingo Caller Type: Object Owner: Germaine LaFollette ONLINE Name: Ohu Type: Object Owner: Yuki Callahan OFFLINE
_____________________
Land Developer, Builder and Real Estate Agent Come to my events! Sundays at 10:00 am: Texturing ContestTuesdays at 5:00 pm: Land 101 and at 7:00 pm: TriviaThursdays at 7:00 pm: Land 101Fridays at 7:00 pm: Primtionary(Other events occasionally scheduled) Read my LiveJournal! Visit my Livingston Properties web site for your Real Estate and Building needs!
|
|
Ace Cassidy
Resident Bohemian
Join date: 5 Apr 2004
Posts: 1,228
|
12-07-2004 19:39
From: Lisse Livingston Second Life currently has no such command, and it would be a very desireable addition. Imagine if you could click a SWEEP button and all Avatars and objects listening for Channel 0 within a 20m radius were listed on your screen: The problem with this approach is that the vast majority of objects that are listening are not "remotely monitoring". Any object with an llListen() call in it would be suspect, when most are just waiting for commands from someone. - Ace
_____________________
"Free your mind, and your ass will follow" - George Clinton
|
|
Carnildo Greenacre
Flight Engineer
Join date: 15 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,044
|
12-07-2004 23:50
From: Lisse Livingston MUSHes have the PUPPET flag for objects, which will relay everything heard in its vicinity back to its owner (if online). Objects can also listen and log whatever they hear. HOWEVER - the command '@sweep' will give a list of any objects set to listen, or with the PUPPET flag on, so that the people in the room can easily check whether their conversation might be being listened to, or recorded. Second Life currently has no such command, and it would be a very desireable addition. Imagine if you could click a SWEEP button and all Avatars and objects listening for Channel 0 within a 20m radius were listed on your screen If you were to run that on my land in Davenport, you'd find a half-dozen or more listeners -- even more, if I was on the land at the time. However, all of them will only respond to things I say.
_____________________
perl -le '$_ = 1; (1 x $_) !~ /^(11+)\1+$/ && print while $_++;'
|