|
Aleister Montgomery
Minding the gap
Join date: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 846
|
07-09-2007 22:01
From: Lucrezia Lamont No offense, but I thought this thread was about animated sit poses and not bling. Can we please keep this on topic? If bling is a concern for anyone, a new thread is easy enough to make and I suggest doing so.
Thanks.
Dierk, I'll be contacting you later and thank you very kindly for your offer. Cheers! Oh, a hobby mod. Can we please not get upset when a resident answers another resident's questions in "Resident Answers"? The question of the OP was already answered. Then someone else asked another question, which I answered. Does that make less sense than the usual threads where 35 residents write exactly the same in different words, without bothering to read the previous answers?
_____________________
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room.
|
|
Lucrezia Lamont
Neko Onmyoji
Join date: 25 Jan 2007
Posts: 808
|
07-09-2007 22:53
From: Aleister Montgomery Oh, a hobby mod. Can we please not get upset when a resident answers another resident's questions in "Resident Answers"? The question of the OP was already answered. Then someone else asked another question, which I answered. Does that make less sense than the usual threads where 35 residents write exactly the same in different words, without bothering to read the previous answers? No, not a hobby mod (and I won't take offense to your less than kindly intended remark because 'dis is da intarwebs), but if we are not permitted to quazi mod our own questioning posts, then I do apologize for making that assumption and will never do so again. *shrug* Personally, it's one thing to go off topic in a social way (which I have no issues with), but entirely another matter to derail the intent of an original post. For example... I see a post about "ice cream" -- ohhh, I like ice cream so I click and instead find within not a discussion regarding the merits of adding crushed oreo cookies to mint chip ice cream, but numerous comments regarding the biology of slugs, which I've no interest in. Am I inclined to continue reading about ice cream? No. But perhaps, according to you, my logic is fuzzy... like my head. *shrug* Your comparison in the latter part of your retort does not make sense... at least not to me. But then maybe I need some ice cream.
_____________________
Ronin Neko Onmyoji
|
|
Ava Glasgow
Hippie surfer chick
Join date: 27 Jan 2007
Posts: 2,172
|
07-10-2007 09:43
From: Lucrezia Lamont if we are not permitted to quazi mod our own questioning posts, then I do apologize for making that assumption and will never do so again. *shrug* Totally support Lucrezia here. There is nothing wrong with an OP asking politely for the thread to stay in the general vicinity of the clearly-stated thread topic. And the appropriate response to such a request is "Oops, sorry, I'll take it to a new thread." |
|
Ann Launay
Neko-licious™
Join date: 8 Aug 2006
Posts: 7,893
|
07-10-2007 09:46
From: Lucrezia Lamont
By the way, I just got back from Anti Antonelli's shop, which I highly recommend.
His animations are smooth, fluid, subtle, and beautiful. You will not be disappointed. I cannot express how wondrous his animations are!
He's also a hell of a nice guy. 
_____________________
~Now Trout Re-Re-Re-Certified!~ From: someone I am bumping you to an 8.5 on the Official Trout Measuring Instrument of Sluttiness. You are an enigma - on the one hand a sweet, gentle, intelligent woman who we would like to wrap up in our arms and protect, and on the other, a temptress to whom we would like to do all sorts of unmentionable things.
Congratulations and shame on you! You are a bit of a slut.
|
|
Aleister Montgomery
Minding the gap
Join date: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 846
|
07-10-2007 14:42
From: Lucrezia Lamont No, not a hobby mod (and I won't take offense to your less than kindly intended remark because 'dis is da intarwebs), but if we are not permitted to quazi mod our own questioning posts, then I do apologize for making that assumption and will never do so again. *shrug*
Personally, it's one thing to go off topic in a social way (which I have no issues with), but entirely another matter to derail the intent of an original post. For example... I see a post about "ice cream" -- ohhh, I like ice cream so I click and instead find within not a discussion regarding the merits of adding crushed oreo cookies to mint chip ice cream, but numerous comments regarding the biology of slugs, which I've no interest in. Am I inclined to continue reading about ice cream? No. But perhaps, according to you, my logic is fuzzy... like my head. *shrug*
Your comparison in the latter part of your retort does not make sense... at least not to me. But then maybe I need some ice cream. Sorry, I didn't realize that you asked the original question, and had a somewhat bad day. There are lots of people here who post not much else than "This is the wrong forum" or "This has been answered already, search for it" or "This is off topic, I'll call a mod"... somehow I mistook your comment for one of those. I apologize for my remark.
_____________________
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room.
|