fat lot of good it'll do if they copy Gwiffy to discover that they got an inventory full of 300+ prims and no idea how to fit them all together to remake a Gwiffy
THAT ROCKS!!!! LMFAO!!! Heehee, good solution.
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Have you closed your store because of CopyBot? |
|
RobbyRacoon Olmstead
Red warrior is hungry!
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 1,821
|
11-14-2006 12:15
fat lot of good it'll do if they copy Gwiffy to discover that they got an inventory full of 300+ prims and no idea how to fit them all together to remake a Gwiffy THAT ROCKS!!!! LMFAO!!! Heehee, good solution. |
Cheyenne Marquez
Registered User
Join date: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 940
|
11-14-2006 12:16
If someone is paying that price, that's thier own business. Who are you to dictate what's too expensive? If there's a market... why not? And I'm glad you are happy to let every thief content at the risk of everyone to take down those *you* deem to be too expensive. You obviously don't even have a clue what goes into making an outfit, it takes hours of real work for good outfits. And yes, we take a risk of it being stolen, however our risk was NOT EVER before at LL's acceptance and approval. Ignore the poster Seola. She obviously harbors considerable animous against content creators who expect fair compensation for their hard work. This is not about content creators and what they charge and do not charge. That is taken care of by basic economic principle. If you appreciate the designers work, and find it worthwhile to purchase their merchandise, then you do so. If not, you don't and simply move along to the next merchant. There is no question that this situation threatens SL as we knew it. So that the issue here is not so much greed or the particular interest of consumers as oposed to content creators. This is more about the health and survival of SL by those of us who enjoy it and would love to see in continue its growing and prospering, and who are concerned that an issue of this magnitude may somehow contribute to its potential demise. |
Kitty Barnett
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 5,586
|
11-14-2006 12:21
That's irony? Perhaps you work from a different definition of the word? Also, I doubt that's a likely scenario. Lower prices might have exaggerated the effect, but that's not the one and only reason by far. The fact that you doubt that we're willing to pay for anything goes back to my statement of inherent distrust that's so widespread. The poor guy who started thread where he held gun creators responsible for griefing involving weapons got burried by criticism by exactly the same people who are today of the opinion that upon reflection, when it concerns them, they do think the creator of anything should be held responsible. More irony there as well. Or the fact that the creator of the seller's guild is generously hosting the site for the libsecondlife project if the transcript in one of the other threads is to be believed. Funnily enough, I don't see texture businesses thriving to the same extent prim clothing/hair, etc are. Do you? |
RobbyRacoon Olmstead
Red warrior is hungry!
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 1,821
|
11-14-2006 12:23
LL does not appear to be allies of content creators in terms of your correct prescription of implementing punitive measures and keeping honest people honest The statements made on the blog post are pretty wishy-washy and mostly come across as them covering their own ass. Although I am guessing they are working madly behind the scenes to deal with this, their official response smacks of callowness, not concern. Well, I do hope that the first public response is not in fact the final response by LL. I am sure that they were just as violently smacked in the face by this news as the rest of the community, and they need to manage expectations and PR in addition to trying to figure out the technical issues. While their response left a lot to be desired, I am quite certain that it is extremely important (quite likely critical) that they do not promise anything they can't fulfill. It may perhaps be better to get a statement out that is unsatisfactory but immediately responsive and handle the firedrill afterwards, then to give people a reason to think they lied. That's just my opinion, and I am obviously one of those people who likes to believe the best, ymmv. |
Kaline Lycia
your Goddess
Join date: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 16
|
11-14-2006 12:24
"I think the bot is wrong, but it's nice to see the titans tremble, even if it is for a bit
![]() "And I'm glad you are happy to let every thief content at the risk of everyone to take down those *you* deem to be too expensive. You obviously don't even have a clue what goes into making an outfit, it takes hours of real work for good outfits." Guess it's hard to tell in text. For future reference, when I use the tongue face ( ![]() "If someone is paying that price, that's thier own business. Who are you to dictate what's too expensive? If there's a market... why not?" The way I see it. If there's a market, why do you have to rip people off? Sure, stick another 100 Lindens on. But to stick X amount on it, that is, as has been said, one of the seven sins - Greed "P.S. That's not unreasonable if you might look and see what it took to make it. If it comes with all kinds of attachments, varied styles and is highly detailed... that's ALOT of work. One wedding pack for a highly detailed lace dress came with flexi veil, train, flowers, jewelry, shoes, hair, and a few different styles of the accessories... and it was transfer. Considering how many accessories you get and the time it took to create... easily worth 12kL when you think about how much all that cost separately and doesn't always match" Okay I'll point you to what I said, then I'll leave a line, if you can't figure out where you're wrong in that line, the answer will be below that blank line, here goes... "Let's go for examples, LapGirl and UFOnly, those companies I don't consider greedy, they sell their products for next to nothing, while you have other companies (who I won't mention) that sell things much like the above stateds clothing, for a few hundred, or in one case I saw, 12,000 for a gown." - Here's the line - Didn't get it? Okay. Do you see the "the sell things much like the above stateds"? That's in reference to the two above companies I stated. Make sense? Now to make things simpler, I'll put it in easier words - The 12k gown was the same standard of work as that of anything at LapGirl or UFOnly. Yes you could argue that LapGirl has some nicely detailed clothing, but it is not the most highly detailed. Thus would you expect to go into LapGirl and say, buy the red silks, not the the three colour bundle, but just the red one, for 12,000? I wouldn't either. PS: I love your stuff Shep. Was just using LapGirl as an example 'cos it was the first one that came to mind - I spend too much time there ![]() |
Seola Sassoon
NCD owner
Join date: 13 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,036
|
11-14-2006 12:29
I must have imagined the whole Dazzle mad rush then when they decided to close, or the amount of emails Ginny blogged about receiving asking her to reopen. Yes, the sale had something to do with that but in my case it wouldn't have made any difference what the price was. One of my favourite stores was closing and I wanted to get what I could before it all vanished at what was at the time going to be forever and I know a whole lot of people felt the same way. Lower prices might have exaggerated the effect, but that's not the one and only reason by far. The fact that you doubt that we're willing to pay for anything goes back to my statement of inherent distrust that's so widespread. The poor guy who started thread where he held gun creators responsible for griefing involving weapons got burried by criticism by exactly the same people who are today of the opinion that upon reflection, when it concerns them, they do think the creator of anything should be held responsible. More irony there as well. Or the fact that the creator of the seller's guild is generously hosting the site for the libsecondlife project if the transcript in one of the other threads is to be believed. A far more likely reason would be that textures simply have a far lower appeal to the average resident than clothing does. And I find it ironic that you can have such an opinion without ever having created anything. Don't be a hypocrite and tell everyone your opinion is fact. It's not and your opinion at best is skewed. Tell you what, since you are so into the Barbie club... why don't the copybotters come there, copy YOU and dance around as YOU for awhile and sell thier services cheaper than YOU do. Hey while we are at it, since you like SexGen, why don't we go copy your sexgen items, copy your body and use it next to YOUR stuff. How about we all copy YOUR look and go work in the 'adult' side of SL and do it for FREE so you can't make any money... |
Demolaous Discovolante
Registered User
Join date: 28 Jul 2006
Posts: 8
|
11-14-2006 12:29
I don't understand... I created it once... I can create it again! I for one, rather do something all over (and much better and faster may I add
![]() If greed were my motivating factor then I wouldn't be closing up shop! Again it's the principle of the matter, if merchants don't voice and express their opinions, just stand on the sidelines watching Coach Linden run the show, they risk losing the entire game (money/content/reputation) it's a team effort I'm sure everyone will agree, players communicate with coaches to result in a better game, so far all I've seen thus far is players calling FOUL FOUL and coach Linden doing nothing to enforce. Once these serious issues we are having are rectified, I'll be comfortable knowing I can play a "fair game until then I will sit the remaining games out, I mean whats the point if the rules only apply to some. |
Seola Sassoon
NCD owner
Join date: 13 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,036
|
11-14-2006 12:35
"I think the bot is wrong, but it's nice to see the titans tremble, even if it is for a bit ![]() "And I'm glad you are happy to let every thief content at the risk of everyone to take down those *you* deem to be too expensive. You obviously don't even have a clue what goes into making an outfit, it takes hours of real work for good outfits." Guess it's hard to tell in text. For future reference, when I use the tongue face ( ![]() "If someone is paying that price, that's thier own business. Who are you to dictate what's too expensive? If there's a market... why not?" The way I see it. If there's a market, why do you have to rip people off? Sure, stick another 100 Lindens on. But to stick X amount on it, that is, as has been said, one of the seven sins - Greed "P.S. That's not unreasonable if you might look and see what it took to make it. If it comes with all kinds of attachments, varied styles and is highly detailed... that's ALOT of work. One wedding pack for a highly detailed lace dress came with flexi veil, train, flowers, jewelry, shoes, hair, and a few different styles of the accessories... and it was transfer. Considering how many accessories you get and the time it took to create... easily worth 12kL when you think about how much all that cost separately and doesn't always match" Okay I'll point you to what I said, then I'll leave a line, if you can't figure out where you're wrong in that line, the answer will be below that blank line, here goes... "Let's go for examples, LapGirl and UFOnly, those companies I don't consider greedy, they sell their products for next to nothing, while you have other companies (who I won't mention) that sell things much like the above stateds clothing, for a few hundred, or in one case I saw, 12,000 for a gown." - Here's the line - Didn't get it? Okay. Do you see the "the sell things much like the above stateds"? That's in reference to the two above companies I stated. Make sense? Now to make things simpler, I'll put it in easier words - The 12k gown was the same standard of work as that of anything at LapGirl or UFOnly. Yes you could argue that LapGirl has some nicely detailed clothing, but it is not the most highly detailed. Thus would you expect to go into LapGirl and say, buy the red silks, not the the three colour bundle, but just the red one, for 12,000? I wouldn't either. PS: I love your stuff Shep. Was just using LapGirl as an example 'cos it was the first one that came to mind - I spend too much time there ![]() Sarcastic or not, your message is still the same. You are happy to see this happen to people who put prices on their work and people pay for. It isn't YOUR business or judgement to deem what should and shouldn't be a fair price for something. Using a cheap store and thier pricing has NOTHING to do with the way others price things. You said it yourself, that you could argue that it's not highly detailed. Well, some people want the highly detailed stuff and that takes time and time is money. Don't cop out just because you don't think we are charging what *you* think when there are people out there with established businesses, who have worked their butts off and charge what people will pay. It's not greed.... it's being business minded. |
Johan Durant
Registered User
Join date: 7 Aug 2006
Posts: 1,657
|
11-14-2006 12:35
I for one am motivated by greed, pure and simple. Unfortunately, I'm also stupid, and don't realize I could be making a lot more money faster by taking the subway just a few stops further than I normally do and working for an investment banking firm.
_____________________
![]() The Motion Merchant - an animation store specializing in two-person interactions |
Hiro Queso
503less
![]() Join date: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 2,753
|
11-14-2006 12:46
A far more likely reason would be that textures simply have a far lower appeal to the average resident than clothing does. So a silly analogy then really, eh? |
Jesseaitui Petion
king of polynesia :P
Join date: 2 Jan 2006
Posts: 2,175
|
11-14-2006 13:00
I'm curious, and maybe it'll help me make my decision. Is anyone thinking about closing their shop because of the CopyBot fiasco, or have you already done so? Im thinking of logging in and closing now I mean even if I file a report or even if I own the copyright to my images in RL im just wondering what all LL is going to do and once one person has my items full perms, its going to spread like wildfire and will be impossible to catch everyone Or can they run a search on the items uuid # and kill it or something? whatever, its blatently obvious LL doesnt need/want us here. |
Jesseaitui Petion
king of polynesia :P
Join date: 2 Jan 2006
Posts: 2,175
|
11-14-2006 13:02
Just saw this listed on SLX http://www.slexchange.com/modules.php?name=Marketplace&file=item&ItemID=146068&random=93524 Its supposed to be a "Simple CopyBot Defeater" Has anyone tried this? |
Yumi Murakami
DoIt!AttachTheEarOfACat!
Join date: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 6,860
|
11-14-2006 13:03
Or can they run a search on the items uuid # and kill it or something? I believe that yes - as a "grey goo" measure, the Lindens do have the power to remove all instances of a given object from the world. The CopyBot Defeater only tries to stop CopyBot alts from showing up on your land - and it may spam innocent users in the process. But it won't stop portable products being copied, unfortunately. ![]() |
Alazarin Mondrian
Teh Trippy Hippie Dragon
![]() Join date: 4 Apr 2005
Posts: 1,549
|
11-14-2006 13:05
I picked up a copy of the Simple CopyBot Defeater but haven't tried it yet.
_____________________
My stuff on Meta-Life: http://tinyurl.com/ykq7nzt
http://www.myspace.com/alazarinmobius http://slurl.com/secondlife/Crescent/72/98/116 |
Jesseaitui Petion
king of polynesia :P
Join date: 2 Jan 2006
Posts: 2,175
|
11-14-2006 13:05
Blegh, well I wouldnt want to take my product from honest ppl who have paid.
|
Kitty Barnett
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 5,586
|
11-14-2006 13:14
And I find it ironic that you can have such an opinion without ever having created anything. I also don't see how it's relevant really ![]() Tell you what, since you are so into the Barbie club... why don't the copybotters come there, copy YOU and dance around as YOU for awhile and sell thier services cheaper than YOU do Hey while we are at it, since you like SexGen, why don't we go copy your sexgen items, copy your body and use it next to YOUR stuff How about we all copy YOUR look and go work in the 'adult' side of SL and do it for FREE so you can't make any money... If I find something was sold to me with improper permission (usually turns out to be animations inside of a pose-ball) I'll contact the creator and tell them about it. If they wanted my copy back to replace it with one with the proper permissions set I wouldn't care, but usually it turns out I get a very warm thank you and possibly something free as a show of gratitude. You on the other make a personal attack that to me at least reads like you're actively wanting people to come and copy me just because I might be stating an opinion you don't agree with. Considering how I bought every single thing that isn't a true freebie, copying me or anything I own only would only result in stealing other creator's content so I'm really quite stunned by your outburst. As far as dancing goes, that's already free. People tip me because they want to, not because someone is standing behind them holding a gun to their head making them, so all in all the attack makes no sense because I already do what I do for free but still somehow get compensated for it. Funny how that works, isn't it? Even if noone tipped me, it still wouldn't make any bit of difference to me, because I have no problem paying for premium while I don't own land and I buy more L$ in a month than I ever make in-world. |
Psyra Extraordinaire
Corra Nacunda Chieftain
![]() Join date: 24 Jul 2004
Posts: 1,533
|
11-14-2006 13:18
From what I've heard, the Copybot Defeater has already been rendered obsolete, and all it does now really is spam your guests.
_____________________
E-Mail Psyra at psyralbakor_at_yahoo_dot_com, Visit my Webpage at www.psyra.ca
![]() Visit me in-world at the Avaria sims, in Grendel's Children! ^^ |
Cheyenne Marquez
Registered User
Join date: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 940
|
11-14-2006 13:18
If greed were my motivating factor then I wouldn't be closing up shop! Im thinking of logging in and closing now Isn't it futile to close shop now when the items you sold prior to closing can still be copied? The damage is done. Might as well keep your shops open and continue earning $L for as long as it lasts? ![]() |
Allana Dion
Registered User
![]() Join date: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 1,230
|
11-14-2006 13:21
I'm not closing right now. But the profits I make from my stores are what allows me the time to be here in the first place. When things like this cut into those profits significantly, I'll have no choice. It will mean closing down and going back to working more hours in RL. It will mean no longer having all this extra time I've had to spend with my children and with my partner and certainly not having the time to create as I have been.
Right now I'm hoping for the best, but I can see the potential for having no choice but to close. _____________________
|
Lucifer Baphomet
Postmodern Demon
![]() Join date: 8 Sep 2005
Posts: 1,771
|
11-14-2006 13:23
When news of GLIntercept first broke... it was presumed to be the end of the clothing texture and skin industries.
Now we're months down the road and all those businesses are still thriving... the reason? ...probably because most people are honest. I'd suggest that months down the road, this will be forgotten by most, just like GLIntercept _____________________
I have no signature,
|
Kaline Lycia
your Goddess
Join date: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 16
|
11-14-2006 13:25
The what? *grins at Lucifer*
|
Sunspot Pixie
dread heliotrope
![]() Join date: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 493
|
11-14-2006 13:25
I haven't closed my store, because I never opened one after the GLintercept thing came to my attention. As my things are texture based, I didn't want them to be ripped off, so that was the end of my plans to sell in SL. At least on 3d resource sites I have a bit more control over my material.
When these things like copybot and glintercept get publicised, LL should make huge announcements that they do not approve of copying and that they will ban those responsible, if not for any other reason than to just let us know they give a damn. Yes, it will still happen, yes, people can return with alts - that's well known. But it would help instill a bit of confidence in LL if they approached these situations from a bit more of a principled angle. |
Allana Dion
Registered User
![]() Join date: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 1,230
|
11-14-2006 13:27
When news of GLIntercept first broke... it was presumed to be the end of the clothing texture and skin industries. Now we're months down the road and all those businesses are still thriving... the reason? ...probably because most people are honest. I'd suggest that months down the road, this will be forgotten by most, just like GLIntercept I really hope you're right Lucifer. Keeping my fingers crossed. _____________________
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
11-14-2006 13:28
Those of you that are NOT Content Creators please take note: And, basically, the fact is that every product in the real world is either a physical product that gets used up, or it's information which has a sales curve with an early peak and a long slow tail of ever diminishing returns. To keep sales up, you have to keep producing product, whether that's physical product (where it's obvious) or information. There are a few (very few) products where the "long tail" is long enough that it seems infinite, but for most people EVERY product you make will sell well for a while, then eventually you'll need to make another one, and another one... Because every product in SL is information. When I came to SL over and over again I had people tell me that you can make a product in SL and get returns on it forever. And a few people will see that, because the tail of their product is longer than the life of SL as a product. But in most cases you're going to see a burst of sales and then you'll need to make something else to get the next burst. Copybot may change the length of the "long tail" for some items. Some items may lose their market much quicker than they would have otherwise. But for most content creators this isn't going to change anything, any more than Gomez' prim mirror or GLintercept did. |
Cheyenne Marquez
Registered User
Join date: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 940
|
11-14-2006 13:28
When news of GLIntercept first broke... it was presumed to be the end of the clothing texture and skin industries. Now we're months down the road and all those businesses are still thriving... the reason? ...probably because most people are honest. I'd suggest that months down the road, this will be forgotten by most, just like GLIntercept I doubt it Lucifer. Although its noble for you to presume that the texture issue hasnt been impacted as much by the GLI because of the inherent honest nature of most people, another reason might be because it takes a certain amount of knowledge and effort to effect that process. The copybot is a lot easier to operate than the GLIntercept deal. |