Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Voice Chat, good or bad move ?

SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
05-08-2007 14:58
I was actually referring to people switching genders and whatnot. Sorry if I offended.

I'm actually pretty introverted when talking to new people but I've learned to overcome it when needed while still being myself and retaining my solitude when I want to.

Maybe this could be an opportunity for the people that use SL to be anti-social to come that much closer to healthy interaction!

I agree with the RP people, though. I do non-sexual RP in places and when I'm in the middle of a game I dont' want to know about any of the people IRL because it changes my perception of everything. I think it's good people can turn the chat option off on their land. I don't want to hear Cartman talking out of a burly, red-haired dwarf!!

I also wouldn't use it on the mainland. Too many people and it's harder to control who you are forced to interact with.
_____________________
Semper Fly
-S1. Pow

"Violence is Art by another means"

Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
Vanessa Sakai
Registered User
Join date: 21 Oct 2006
Posts: 103
05-08-2007 15:02
I will not be using voice because there are usally people around me when I am logged in. I think what will happen is a few people will use it but most won't. The voice users will become just another minorty on the grid.
Sonia Nagy
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2007
Posts: 364
05-08-2007 15:03
That will be a somewhat strange experience, then. Being in the majority for a change. :)
SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
05-08-2007 15:06
From: Vanessa Sakai
I will not be using voice because there are usally people around me when I am logged in. I think what will happen is a few people will use it but most won't. The voice users will become just another minorty on the grid.


I find it amazing how pessimistic and resistant to change so many people are in SL considering it's such a new thing. This all reminds me of what people said about so many items that we all use daily.

Just an observation...
_____________________
Semper Fly
-S1. Pow

"Violence is Art by another means"

Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
Taylor Bayliss
Registered User
Join date: 17 May 2006
Posts: 144
05-08-2007 15:11
From: Gummi Richthofen
I'm entirely anti the whole idea. However, I spot a business opportunity - my dulcet cockney tones are available at L$250 per 15-second sample to intone "bugger off you 'kin nonce": should be the equivalent of bear spray for RL females seeking to put off in-world harassment!


Hehe - and I may be able to pick up some extra lindens helping folks from England pronounce Welsh place names prior to their holidays <grin>

*** Pronounce "Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch" like a local farmer for only L$500 !!! *** - lol

Seriously, I think voice will be fun, have it's uses, and not be used by the majority for years.
Vanessa Sakai
Registered User
Join date: 21 Oct 2006
Posts: 103
05-08-2007 15:18
I tried it in there.com, and didn't like it. Again I don't think most preople will use it. Not all new things catch on (wern't we all supposed to have picture phones by the 21st century?). Most people don't want them and most people don't want voice on the internet including games. Voice shoud be oo\p-in not op-out (see new feature proposal #3267).
SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
05-08-2007 15:21
From: Vanessa Sakai
Voice shoud be oo\p-in not op-out (see new feature proposal #3267).


I agree with that. You should start with only having chat with your friends and then click specific people to "un-mute" them. Voice mute should also be independant from typing mute.

And as far as "picture phones"...how many of us have cameras in our cellys? ;)
_____________________
Semper Fly
-S1. Pow

"Violence is Art by another means"

Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
Sonia Nagy
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2007
Posts: 364
05-08-2007 15:22
From: SqueezeOne Pow
I agree with that. You should start with only having chat with your friends and then click specific people to "un-mute" them. Voice mute should also be independant from typing mute.

And as far as "picture phones"...how many of us have cameras in our cellys? ;)


I don't even have a cell-phone, but then . . . don't have a use for one :)
SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
05-08-2007 15:23
From: Sonia Nagy
I don't even have a cell-phone, but then . . . don't have a use for one :)


Well maybe if you talked more IRL...just kidding :)
_____________________
Semper Fly
-S1. Pow

"Violence is Art by another means"

Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
05-08-2007 15:24
From: Sonia Nagy
I don't even have a cell-phone, but then . . . don't have a use for one :)


I have one, but I hardly use it. It stays in my car.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Mortus Allen
Registered User
Join date: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 528
05-08-2007 15:25
Voice has a lot of problems associated with it when you get groups involved in it, and especially multiple groups in proximity and in different conversations. If voice is 3D rendered, IE those closer to you will come in louder than those farther away, will eleviate some of it as long as someone in an adjacent group does not come through very loud. Also new ediquite needs to be adheared to as only one person can speak and be understood at a time, this is far easier than it sounds. It was hard enough to establish this ediquet among 6 users on my guild Vent server emagine trying to do so with larger groups.

I do not see this being effective for mass communication, I see it more being used within groups rather than openly, not so much to hide a conversation but to avoid voice overlap with others. Maybe I am wrong, just another thing that is "Wait and See" on my list I guess. ;)
SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
05-08-2007 15:28
From: Mortus Allen
Also new ediquite needs to be adheared to as only one person can speak and be understood at a time, this is far easier than it sounds.


haha...it's called "civil conversation". I think people will be able to figure it out.
_____________________
Semper Fly
-S1. Pow

"Violence is Art by another means"

Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
Dnali Anabuki
Still Crazy
Join date: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 1,633
05-08-2007 16:19
From: Atashi Yue
There will be some really good places to use voice, classes in SL being one of them. How to stop students from all asking quetions at the same time? How to politely ask those who have their music blaring in the background to turn it off?

As it stands now, you either have to mute each immature av, or turn off the voice option completely plunging yourself into a silent world.



I am not sure about the voice being good for classes because it would be hard to go over the chat history and catch up if you fall behind.

My first reaction would be that chat will still be the best for classes but who knows?

I was really surprised how nice it was to hear voices, to hear them even in the background. But I come from a large rambunctious family and like the hustle bustle of other people around me. That being said, I say more in chat than in voice..I'm far more shy in voice than in chat.
Gillian Vuckovic
Purple Power!
Join date: 4 Mar 2007
Posts: 176
05-08-2007 16:23
From: SqueezeOne Pow
For those of us NOT hiding behind our avs this will be a great opportunity!!


Why is this always dredged up? Can't people enjoy using the feature without labelling/demeaning/judging those that don't? :confused:
_____________________
It's always a party with Funzo!
Winter Phoenix
Voyager of Experiences
Join date: 15 Nov 2004
Posts: 683
Been there, it tends to totally blow
05-08-2007 16:34
Played a few games where voice was used. HATED IT! Went from mildly annoying to a sheer cacophony of pointless babble. There are aftermarket voice systems if someone is so inclined. I dont want to be forced to listen just because some folks cant type. Regardless of the fact that the smoky gravel of my phone voice could get me laid, I have no desire whatsoever to be tied to some microphone and headset. BAH HUMBUG!!
_____________________
~GIVEN FREE REIGN THE SYSTEM WILL TELL YOU,
WHAT TO DO,
WHEN AND HOW TO DO IT,
WHAT YOU CAN READ, VIEW, OR LISTEN TO,
WHAT YOU CAN SAY,
WHAT YOU CAN DO WITH YOUR OWN BODY,
AND SUCK ALL YOUR MONEY OUT OF YOUR POCKET WHILE IT DOES THIS!
QUESTION AUTHORITY!~ W.P
Xio Jester
Killed the King.
Join date: 13 Nov 2006
Posts: 813
05-08-2007 17:06
FPS Games...Playstation, X-Box, etc...

There was a HUGE rise in the amount of folks who bought games w/ voice chat after they found out how to:

1: Mute a hopeless idiot

2: Use voice to coordinate a team or train (mostly team - oriented fighting videogames use voice, so you can coordinate in Real Time), this can be translated ta SL classes and making Machinima, building a Sim or an Island, etc.

3: "Grow up" because everybody else wanted ta USE THE SERVICE & not just be disrupted. The ones who kep sendin white-noise into the mic got repeatedly rejected, bored, & quit the game.

4: Learn controls, features & functions at least TWICE as fast as usual, cause folks could tell em the basics in "a hear-beat", instead of 10 minutes of text.


THESE points at least make Voice sound good ta me, even though I'll probably WAIT for a while...& let some of the initial random chaos go down, since I'm bipolar psychotic. LOL, I would probably get banned...too reactionary.

Thats one more thing BTW...our RL personalities are gonna be brought into SL A LOT more than before...which will change a lotta current relationships too.
_____________________
~ In Shakespeare, 'Tis The Fool Who Speaks The Most Profound Truth. ~

http://slexchange.com/modules.php?name=Marketplace&MerchantID=37521
PeiMei Hax
Registered User
Join date: 25 Feb 2007
Posts: 5
05-08-2007 17:45
Voice Chat will flop on the main grid.
- Talking to a PC will be uncomfortable for many SLers. People with accents, speech issues, who are introverted, weird voices, etc., will all avoid this like the plague.
- SL is a social community, there is no game. Voice actually creates social barriers between SLers, and will probably lead to voicism.
- LAG
- Many of us, myself included, don't have sound turn on. I prefer to listen to music while in SL.
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
05-08-2007 18:26
From: Gillian Vuckovic
Why is this always dredged up? Can't people enjoy using the feature without labelling/demeaning/judging those that don't? :confused:


No-

And thats why Voice will be devisive

At least until people realize that people can still voice and hide things.

Then things will go back to normal.

I expect a bumpy year though.
Kitty Barnett
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 5,586
05-08-2007 22:48
From: Colette Meiji
At least until people realize that people can still voice and hide things.
They have that covered already :(.

Philip is excited about adding the feature to graft your RL appearance onto your avie as your skin.

Meanwhile, identification will march on as well:
From: someone
“It may be possible for Residents to choose to verify and share other information about themselves later,” Daniel Linden said in during a meeting with residents within Second Life. “For instance, a real-world business person might want to share and verify their real name in SL to build trust.”
*snip*
It may also be possible for verified accounts to display the verified real-life gender of an avatar’s user, but Linden executives insisted such disclosures would be voluntary.
The above does relates to voice because each step is a step away from a Second Life to an e-Life where we're all just who we are in RL.
Tod69 Talamasca
The Human Tripod ;)
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,107
05-08-2007 23:33
From: Simon Nolan
...
There's a lot of good info in these places, and I hope everyone will read about HOW voice chat is implemented before jumping to conclusions.



Too late!! Folks have already predicted it'll be then End of Second Life *cue dramatic music*- Sims Crashing, Griefers Griefing, Furries & Goreans Living together in harmony! TOTAL CHAOS!!!!!

Seriously, Like all "new" things in Second Life- it'll be a novelty at first. Then slowly it'll quiet down till it finds a nice lil' niche for itself.
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
05-09-2007 05:20
From: Kitty Barnett
They have that covered already :(.

Philip is excited about adding the feature to graft your RL appearance onto your avie as your skin.

Meanwhile, identification will march on as well:
The above does relates to voice because each step is a step away from a Second Life to an e-Life where we're all just who we are in RL.


Gah - this is is too much.

Nam does the RL skin graft thing - its expensive (cheap for an artist's work tho) - looks pretty good.

Guaranteed it looks better than LL's version will tho. lol

RL appearance will end the Racier Sex in SL faster than anything else -
who will work in a virtual strip club when at any minute someone from your rl could walk into the door.

Your Pastor, Your Boss, Your Dad, Your Husband.


I wonder if Phil is in touch with the Real Second Life -

I cant think of many people on my freidns list who would want to look exactly like themselves in real life.

I cant think of less whod want their RL name available.
Mandy Marseille
Registered User
Join date: 13 Oct 2006
Posts: 30
05-09-2007 05:27
It will be kinda funny. Bc people can turn off voice feature entirely, so they won't even recognize others are trying to communicate with them.

Also, a lot seem to forgot about the emotes, like I often do *smiles*, ook, I can do that in voice too (tho I won't use it, my relatives don't appreciate me laughing at 2am *s*) but what about more complex thingies? Plus I don't wanna flirt with anyone with a voice, because that's almost like RL and I'm really not one to mix the two and go into sex phone biz lol.

But I fear I will be left out of things this way, eventually forced to use it and there goes my illusion away (tho it will be gone sooner, cos all my friends sounding SO different than I imagined them). As someone mentioned... this was like reading a book... with voice, on beta it felt I'm in a conference call with some colorful mannequins (avies) representing the RL people.
DancesWithRobots Soyer
Registered User
Join date: 7 Apr 2006
Posts: 701
05-09-2007 05:34
I tried voice chat a few beta's ago. It was OK. I use Skype with friends from time to time, so, that doesn't bother me. I'll probably enable it on my property.

I DO see where there are going to be some issues tho. I doubt it will work well on marginal computers. And I something tells me it's going to be a while before someone comes up with a real time live speech Babbler type device.

My friend who joined me on the test grid had issues. I could hear her and talk to other people, but she couldn't hear anything.

Just like everything else that happens in SL, voice will settle in at its level of acceptance, and no one will worry much about it any more.
Cat Lassally
Registered User
Join date: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 3
05-09-2007 05:42
Voice is gonna affect escorts more than anyone else, probably,and a lot are really worried about it. And NOT just because some of them are guys! I run a small escort agency and polled my girls about voice and they were overwhelmingly against it, and I do not believe 95% of them are really boys! The poll was so surprising that I started the Escorts Union of Second Life to get a wider opinion, and so far am finding the same thing . . escorts don't want voice. The reason, I think, is that it's gonna make us into RL phone-sex girls at Linden prices, and much as I love escorting, I'm not willing to become a RL whore. So our sim will be voice-free, though I'm gonna be interested in seeing whether market forces drag us into voice against our will. If it does I know a lot of girls who will leave the biz. I think voice is a shame, only because it blurs RL and SL, but I guess those who want to use it will love it . . I tried it on beta-grid and thought it detracted from SL's magic. Oh well, as Shakespeare said (way over-educated whore), we shall see what we shall see.
Lucrezia Lamont
Neko Onmyoji
Join date: 25 Jan 2007
Posts: 808
05-09-2007 05:54
I personally feel that voice will be a sad addition for some residents.

For one, it does destroy some illusions. You can easily fill in the blanks about some aspects of an avatar, including their voice, which makes them more appealing and comfortable. It's like reading a great novel and filling in the details yourself -- suddenly the book becomes more alluring.

Secondly, and this is the big one -- people who are deaf and/or mute. SL is the great equalizer for many of us with handicaps (self included) and I would be very sad to learn that some residents will be adversely affected by voice for reasons other than griefing and immaturity. While I use speech-recognition and can provide my own built in "text to accompany my voice", I do dictate punctuation and other commands -- who on the grid wants to hear that?

Now... it is exciting, and the flip side is voice will save many who are borderline tendonitis victims. But it's a double edged sword. It'll be interesting to see how it plays out.
_____________________
Ronin Neko Onmyoji
1 2 3 4 5 6