Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Serious question about LIFE.. maybe TO serious BUT I am curios to know more..

Jillian Callahan
Rotary-winged Neko Girl
Join date: 24 Jun 2004
Posts: 3,766
07-26-2005 17:39
From: Ananda Sandgrain
*splat*
:eek: Nice imagry. ;)
_____________________
a lost user
Join date: ?
Posts: ?
07-26-2005 21:31
From: Hamaar Tyne
I just thought I would throw in my 2 cents in with the rest of you.
Whow! Hamaar, a real term paper ;)

From: Hamaar Tyne
... There is a lot more to a strong relationship then what you can achieve while chatting online. When you are in person, things like body language and tone of voice can be screaming something to you without the person having spoken a word. To some extent you can mymic body language in secondlife in terms of promimity and animation, but it is very limited, and also very deliberate. Sometimes the most reveiling body language is that which is unintended.
Aggreed. I still would love to see more possibilities (or simple solutions) for expressing ourselves with gestures and facial expression. Even within the restrictions of SL "more" is possible!

From: Hamaar Tyne
... Once the icebreaking has happened, all that is left is to move to the next level. The computer will never be the be all end all of relationships until we all have unlimited bandwith, incredible vr goggles, and full body suits. The net can never carry a romatic relationship by itself, it has to be moved to the phone, and to face to face meetings if it wants to continue to grow.
I am not sure of that. At least not in the long run. Yes, there is a great urge to go to that next step. Always ... when you've found someone that touches your soul. We ARE physcal beings! But I am sure people will find a way and adapt - emotionally - and there will be very intense relationships where the partners never meet. This may be hard to imagine for us now - even for us residents of SL.
From: Hamaar Tyne
... It can be a platform to maintain and create new friendships. It can be a vehicle to start a romantic relationship, but will never serve to replace an inplace physical one.
Agreed, too - for now. But I am not so sure if "online romance" necessarily has to "replace" physical one. I can imagine a not so distant future where at least some people have a stable and happy relationship in RL and one "in the Metaverse", sometimes with the same mind behind it, sometimes not. And even in the second case this might not be cheating. Because the relationships are different. None is "worse" than the other. My spouse know about my Love in SL. We talked about it ... lots. And we agreed that it might be good for our marriage, not destructive. And No, I am not "playing".

And in the long run - yes I am an avid consumer of SF literature ;) - I am not even sure, if the life in the Metaverse might not be more important to some of us than the so called "RL". Read some of Gibsons books or - even mor interesting in some regard -"Eon" or "Otherland". I am not sure, if what is decribed there is possible. But I would not rule it out ...

From: Hamaar Tyne
... The people you meet online are no different that those you meet in real life. Some are genuine, some are fake, some are floating inbetween. You'll just have to use your best judgment to figure out which they are.
:)
PetGirl Bergman
Fellow Creature:-)
Join date: 16 Feb 2005
Posts: 2,414
07-27-2005 01:19
Small things but GREAT feelings..

The ”small” but VERY important things in daily life as.. a touch... (cam be everywhere of course) a fast kiss.. holding hand.. staying at the side.. body to body.. eyes seeking the lover.. a fast smile.. .and lot more.. are nearly to non function in Sl right now.


But more and more will be added - I am sure of that.. al depends on the ”market” of course.. but also our demand for them all.. start to ask for the small things.. again and again and the scripters will u-stand that all are not fast sex...in all combinations..

Computer software/Hardware are all the time developing so a day our avas will of course be able to do more.. and i hope that it will be easier than today..


Sweet Craig Altman has done two very fine tuned and romantic balls.. for me (for us - Dei and me) hold and hands and see the other in eyes.. and now hold hands and stay beside each other.. both very lovely ones. VERY! I am not sure if they are in his stores but if not Im him:-))) Craig Altman

We need more of those ”small daily” situations as long as they are not built in directly into our body (avas)

Yes Craig has more of the small ones.. eating for example..


We make a move for the small daily balls dont we??:-)))))
a lost user
Join date: ?
Posts: ?
Excellent paper on the effect of 3D virtual worlds on the human mind
07-27-2005 09:06
Even though it is not really "new" anymore an excellent treatment on the effect 3D virtual worlds have on us humans is contained in Cory Ondrejkas (Lindens) paper CHANGING REALITIES (http://www.themis-group.com/uploads/Changing%20Realities.pdf).

It focuses mainly on the economic side of systems like SL, but includes a brief explanation on why 3D worlds and the personification as an avatar have so profound effects on the feeling of "being there".

Most interesting is the stated opinion (that I see as a fact), that it is not THAT important to have high tech gadgets like head mounted displays or data gloves to get that feeling. Most important is a believable 3D spatial context and (even more important) the communication with others in a shared (consensual) environment.
Katja Marlowe
Registered User
Join date: 15 Apr 2005
Posts: 421
07-27-2005 13:22
The thing that most people forget or don't even factor in while thinking of online relationships, is the constant sharing/communicating that must happen.

This _was_ touched on with the first date example, however I'm going to say it a bit more plainly. In real life, you can get away with not talking. You can stare out a window, or you can let your body speak some for you. In an online medium, you don't have that option. If you want to get to know someone you _have_ to talk to do so. This speeds the whole creating intimacy/sharing/bonding part of the making friends. You have to continue to disclose more and more info about you in order to keep the connection going.

That being said, I have found, unlike most chat mediums I have been in previously, that sl does allow you to get to a point where you can be with someone you're close with WITHOUT talking. Maybe they're building, or maybe you're building, or you're in a dozen ims, or etc etc. And it's enough that you're in proximity with them. That is the biggest main difference I have noticed between the relationships I form in sl and the prior cyber relationships I formed. There is the space for silence.
Memory Harker
Girl Anachronism
Join date: 17 Jun 2005
Posts: 393
07-27-2005 14:00
From: Deirdre Boyer

Most interesting is the stated opinion (that I see as a fact), that it is not THAT important to have high tech gadgets like head mounted displays or data gloves to get that feeling. Most important is a believable 3D spatial context and (even more important) the communication with others in a shared (consensual) environment.


How can I sufficiently concur? Because that's been my experience, too: an eerily physical response to SL. Like when my avatar's been walking for a while and, even though I'm doing nothing more than pushing my fingers on the arrow keys, I feel like I've gotta sit down and take a restor ride my bike instead. Or when I go into a hot tub (especially that one on Parrot Island :) ), I feel much more relaxed in RL. And it's not that I'm pretending or playacting or whatever: there's something deeply psychosomatic going on, the body replaying, as best it can, sensations that SL's 3D environment sparks the memories of.

I expected a lot of things from SL --- which expectations have been mostly met or surpassed, ty very much --- but I never expected this.


From: Katja Marlowe


That being said, I have found, unlike most chat mediums I have been in previously, that sl does allow you to get to a point where you can be with someone you're close with WITHOUT talking. Maybe they're building, or maybe you're building, or you're in a dozen ims, or etc etc. And it's enough that you're in proximity with them. That is the biggest main difference I have noticed between the relationships I form in sl and the prior cyber relationships I formed. There is the space for silence.


YES! The sense of PLACE über alles!

We can't really smell this virtual world; touch must be inferred from a combo of sight and sound; and what's the worst absence is that of proprioception. But still, the amount of immersion we already obtain is remarkable ... and it bodes well for the future of this and other subsets of the Metaverse.
a lost user
Join date: ?
Posts: ?
Room for silence in a "3D Chatroom" ...
07-27-2005 19:52
From: Katja Marlowe
That being said, I have found, unlike most chat mediums I have been in previously, that sl does allow you to get to a point where you can be with someone you're close with WITHOUT talking. Maybe they're building, or maybe you're building, or you're in a dozen ims, or etc etc. And it's enough that you're in proximity with them. That is the biggest main difference I have noticed between the relationships I form in sl and the prior cyber relationships I formed. There is the space for silence.
Thank your for that beautiful example, for why a 3D consensual space is really more than a glorified chatroom. I loved it ...

... if only because exactly that did happen to me two days ago. I just sat there while my Love was building. I admit, that I not only sat there, but did a little work IRL, too. But again and again I just watched. And guess what? I felt good just to "be with her" :)

I don't understand that. Maybe I don't have to. But I would like. Thats why I am still looking for further info on the subject.
1 2