Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Robin's Comments on Teluhubs, p2p tp, compensation for people near telehubs

Pendari Lorentz
Senior Member
Join date: 5 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,372
08-24-2005 07:55
From: Doc Nielsen
We'll see. Meantime I have a plan B in place if it happens.


Ok. I'm too curious not to ask. :p What is plan B?? :o
_____________________
*hugs everyone*
Khamon Fate
fategardens.net
Join date: 21 Nov 2003
Posts: 4,177
08-24-2005 08:05
From: Doc Nielsen
So, that kind of shoots down the proposition that new commercial enterprises, freed from telehub dependency by P2P won't turn up in nice peaceful residential sims, doesn't it?

They don't have to wait for p2p Doc. They're already there. It's a rare quiet residential sim that has no club or mall in it. For that matter, strictly residential sims can be even worse as people pile thousands of minute concave prims, as many large scale textures, and dozens of active scripts into the homes. If you want to talk about ugliness and lag, clubs and malls are not the problem, we are.
_____________________
Visit the Fate Gardens Website @ fategardens.net
Doc Nielsen
Fallen...
Join date: 13 Apr 2005
Posts: 1,059
08-24-2005 08:08
From: Pendari Lorentz
Ok. I'm too curious not to ask. :p What is plan B?? :o



Oh... sorry, thought that was obvious. If P2P goes ahead I'll be buying a few joined island sims, moving my rentals over and dumping my mainland property while it still has value...

I'm probably going the island route anyway, on the mainland it doesn't seem to matter how much land you buy up, some tasteless idiot always pops up on your border with an eyesore. At least islands are safe from that. ;)
_____________________
All very well for people to have a sig that exhorts you to 'be the change' - I wonder if it's ever occurred to them that they might be something that needs changing...?
Jsecure Hanks
Capitalist
Join date: 9 Dec 2003
Posts: 1,451
08-24-2005 08:09
From: Kris Ritter
Absolutely. Agree 100% about this - there most definitely should not be any compensation; you just have to accept that SL is pretty fluid, and if you've put all your bizznizz eggs in a telehub shaped basket... tough tits for being so blinkered!


I third this. So many people have lost out in the past when something changed in SL, and nobody's ever going to forget the 1.2 change when EVERYTHING changed and many lost land.

What's different NOW that suddenly compensation should come in? I don't think there should be compensation till there is back compensation for all presentable grievances since SL came out of beta way back when.
Doc Nielsen
Fallen...
Join date: 13 Apr 2005
Posts: 1,059
08-24-2005 08:12
From: Khamon Fate
They don't have to wait for p2p Doc. They're already there. It's a rare quiet residential sim that has no club or mall in it. For that matter, strictly residential sims can be even worse as people pile thousands of minute concave prims, as many large scale textures, and dozens of active scripts into the homes. If you want to talk about ugliness and lag, clubs and malls are not the problem, we are.


Not in my residential sims Khamon! No malls/clubs/'x'ingo/casinos/etc. Or skyboxes. Or masses of listening scripts...
_____________________
All very well for people to have a sig that exhorts you to 'be the change' - I wonder if it's ever occurred to them that they might be something that needs changing...?
Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
08-24-2005 08:12
LL's bottom line is what drives their decision making. They ask themselves.. will killing hubs affect business? will keeping hubs affect business.

With hubs we see a 20% per month growth. No one is leaving SL because they have to use a telehub to go places.

Will people leave if Hubs go away? The answer is a definite "MAYBE". Some big money players who loose thousands of real dollars would most likely pull out and cut their loses. Those are the big tier people. Once they go away prices for land will fall dramatically. Who will take over all their tier charges?

Some people who love to create quietly might leave because their home sim was over run by businesses.

Some small business owners might fold up and reduce their land tier.

My guess is most of those upset players will reduce their account to basic, reducing the income flow to LL by even a larger margin.

The devil you know(telehubs) is better than the devil we don't know(the possible issues involved in the change to P2P).
Jsecure Hanks
Capitalist
Join date: 9 Dec 2003
Posts: 1,451
08-24-2005 08:17
Kline, you're just living in your own dream world with that stuff. People streaming out of SL because they can go where they want. People streaming in to SL cause they have to get caught up in someone's laggy store...

This is the world entirely through your eyes only, and it's not in keeping with the situation out on the street.
Pendari Lorentz
Senior Member
Join date: 5 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,372
08-24-2005 08:19
From: Doc Nielsen
I'm probably going the island route anyway, on the mainland it doesn't seem to matter how much land you buy up, some tasteless idiot always pops up on your border with an eyesore. At least islands are safe from that. ;)



hehe. I agree! And see, this is the reason I don't think the concern that P2P "will make clubs and businesses appear all over the place" is valid. Because this *already* happens. Having P2P will not increase or decrease this current practice any. At least it is my belief that it won't. :D
_____________________
*hugs everyone*
Pendari Lorentz
Senior Member
Join date: 5 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,372
08-24-2005 08:20
From: Alondria LeFay
  • I don't believe that telehub land owners should be compensated, since as pointed out, LL has not done compensation for changes in the past. I know I personally lost a hoard of land in the 1.2 shift, lost the ability to hold it (for a US$ price I could afford) and lost a lot of L$ I invested in the land which I was forced to sell off for a reduced price. I think LL needs to just go along with their "things change" mantality in order to keep things fair to all.


  • I agree with this as well! For the same reasons! :)
    _____________________
    *hugs everyone*
    Merwan Marker
    Booring...
    Join date: 28 Jan 2004
    Posts: 4,706
    08-24-2005 08:26
    From: Alondria LeFay
    I can see the truth in many people's assertations about this, and likewise I feel some are not necessarily true:
    1. The pre-telehub world was too different to really draw a comparison on the effects of the telehubs. SL was not as commercialized at that point. $L were practically worthless. Less emphasis was placed on running a successful business to make $US than now.
    2. The current telehub system is painful for the average users. It is a waste of reasources to download the hoard of textures you have no interest in. I feel for those with ISP's that limit bandwidth.
    3. Existing clubs and stripmalls probably won't move. It would cause future stripmalls and clubs to be more open to choose your backyard in bfe than they would be with the telehubs.
    4. The idea that telehubs create "community centers" has failed. The average user skirts away.
    5. I don't believe that telehub land owners should be compensated, since as pointed out, LL has not done compensation for changes in the past. I know I personally lost a hoard of land in the 1.2 shift, lost the ability to hold it (for a US$ price I could afford) and lost a lot of L$ I invested in the land which I was forced to sell off for a reduced price. I think LL needs to just go along with their "things change" mantality in order to keep things fair to all.
    6. I believe a mixed system of free telehubs and paid for p2p could happily co-exist.
    7. I agree that the ability to turn off p2p for a plot of land would be a valuable thing.
    8. I think hippos are cute.



    Hippos are Excellent! and cute - and I also agree with your No Compensation position.


    :cool: :p
    _____________________
    Don't Worry, Be Happy - Meher Baba
    Kevn Klein
    God is Love!
    Join date: 5 Nov 2004
    Posts: 3,422
    08-24-2005 08:39
    From: Jsecure Hanks
    Kline, you're just living in your own dream world with that stuff. People streaming out of SL because they can go where they want. People streaming in to SL cause they have to get caught up in someone's laggy store...

    This is the world entirely through your eyes only, and it's not in keeping with the situation out on the street.


    It may be my dream world, but I wouldn't be selling hub land cheap right now. If I were a betting man, my money would be on LL doing what's in their best interest. And as my last post point out, changing the trasportation system in this way would harm SL in a profound way.

    I don't have any hub land, I just have small shops within a sim or two of a hub. I don't have a home, so I welcome the idea people can click a button to arrive at my shop.

    If P2P ever did happen, how ever unlikely that is, I would move much closer to the residential areas, so my things would be more visible to those in the area.
    Khamon Fate
    fategardens.net
    Join date: 21 Nov 2003
    Posts: 4,177
    08-24-2005 08:40
    green hippos are especially attractive in a greenish hippoy sort of way
    _____________________
    Visit the Fate Gardens Website @ fategardens.net
    Smiley Sneerwell
    Registered User
    Join date: 6 Jun 2005
    Posts: 210
    08-24-2005 09:26
    From: Kevn Klein
    If I were a betting man, my money would be on LL doing what's in their best interest. And as my last post point out, changing the trasportation system in this way would harm SL in a profound way.


    What is in the best interest of LL is growing the user base. Let's hope they realize that. Improving the transportation system improves the ga.., er, user experience in SL. LL needs to implement every opportunity it can to improve the average user's enjoyment of SL if it wants to survive. If LL caters to a couple of users, at the expense of everyone else, SL stagnates and dies in the face of competing products that users find to be better.

    With SL at the two year mark and getting a lot of exposure in the press lately, SL is probably in it's period of high growth right now. If it can't improve and continue to grow now, it may never do so.
    Kevn Klein
    God is Love!
    Join date: 5 Nov 2004
    Posts: 3,422
    08-24-2005 09:32
    From: Smiley Sneerwell
    What is in the best interest of LL is growing the user base. Let's hope they realize that. Improving the transportation system improves the ga.., er, user experience in SL. LL needs to implement every opportunity it can to improve the average user's enjoyment of SL if it wants to survive. If LL caters to a couple of users, at the expense of everyone else, SL stagnates and dies in the face of competing products that users find to be better.

    With SL at the two year mark and getting a lot of exposure in the press lately, SL is probably in it's period of high growth right now. If it can't improve and continue to grow now, it may never do so.



    I understand SL is growing at 20% per month. That is a huge growth number, almost unsustainable unless LL is very organized. So growth isn't a problem if LL keeps hubs.

    The "few" we are talking about are the power players. The land barons etc are carrying the tier load. If they stop holding all that land it will either go back to LL as first land or it will be sold for pennies on the dollar. If it's sold for pennies, prices everywhere in SL will plummet.

    This isn't a dream, it's a nightmare.
    Doc Nielsen
    Fallen...
    Join date: 13 Apr 2005
    Posts: 1,059
    08-24-2005 09:49
    From: Kevn Klein
    LL's bottom line is what drives their decision making. They ask themselves.. will killing hubs affect business? will keeping hubs affect business.

    With hubs we see a 20% per month growth. No one is leaving SL because they have to use a telehub to go places.

    Will people leave if Hubs go away? The answer is a definite "MAYBE". Some big money players who loose thousands of real dollars would most likely pull out and cut their loses. Those are the big tier people. Once they go away prices for land will fall dramatically. Who will take over all their tier charges?

    Some people who love to create quietly might leave because their home sim was over run by businesses.

    Some small business owners might fold up and reduce their land tier.

    My guess is most of those upset players will reduce their account to basic, reducing the income flow to LL by even a larger margin.

    The devil you know(telehubs) is better than the devil we don't know(the possible issues involved in the change to P2P).



    Hmmm, I'm afraid you are giving LL credit for more business sense than their observed actions suggest they possess. They don't exactly have a brilliant track record of making the best decisions about SL from a business point of view...
    _____________________
    All very well for people to have a sig that exhorts you to 'be the change' - I wonder if it's ever occurred to them that they might be something that needs changing...?
    Smiley Sneerwell
    Registered User
    Join date: 6 Jun 2005
    Posts: 210
    08-24-2005 10:00
    From: Kevn Klein
    I understand SL is growing at 20% per month. That is a huge growth number, almost unsustainable unless LL is very organized. So growth isn't a problem if LL keeps hubs.

    The "few" we are talking about are the power players. The land barons etc are carrying the tier load. If they stop holding all that land it will either go back to LL as first land or it will be sold for pennies on the dollar. If it's sold for pennies, prices everywhere in SL will plummet.

    This isn't a dream, it's a nightmare.



    It is the land barron's customers who are carrying the tier load, and the land barron.

    Land barron's are in the business of inflating the price of land. If the price of land plummets, that makes more money available to content creators - a better situation for SL as a whole.

    If land barrons all suddenly decided to cash out their huge oversupply of land, the price drop would, at most, only last a month, until the land was sold for anything it could get, then the remainder released to reduce tier costs. The real dollar value of land is the price it is made available for from LL.
    Jamie Bergman
    SL's Largest Distributor
    Join date: 17 Feb 2005
    Posts: 1,752
    08-24-2005 11:22
    Big business is definately lobbying for the preservation of telehubs

    /invalid_link.html
    Kevn Klein
    God is Love!
    Join date: 5 Nov 2004
    Posts: 3,422
    08-24-2005 11:28
    The price of land made avaliable by LL is $L512 per 512m2 lot. Or $1L per square meter. Most people paid much more than that from private parties. We could say.. "tough luck to you older residents who paid dearly for that land". New player would love the cheap land though.

    But even if LL disregarded the powerplayers concern, and ignored the devaluation issue, LL will have to create a zoning system that will need constant policing by LL staff. The way LL has been moving is towards self-policing methods.

    These are just points that come to mind when trying to determine the future actions of LL.
    :)
    crucial Armitage
    Clothing Designer
    Join date: 30 Aug 2004
    Posts: 838
    08-24-2005 11:47
    From: someone
    I think the only real question is if they wanna piss off numba one customa



    omg you made me laugh so hard with that one

    THANK YOU :D
    Margaret Mfume
    I.C.
    Join date: 30 Dec 2004
    Posts: 2,492
    08-24-2005 12:09
    From: Jamie Bergman
    Big business is definately lobbying for the preservation of telehubs

    /invalid_link.html

    This link was included in Hiro's original post in this thread.
    _____________________
    hush
    1 2 3 4