I didn't not post this as an alt. This was someone else. I just wanted to say that, as it makes it look like I'm calling people names, which I'm not.
~Ulrika~
~Ulrika~
You didn't not ? Hehehe Double entendre?

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Official Word on Outing Alts In The Forums |
|
Lecktor Hannibal
YOUR MOM
![]() Join date: 1 Jul 2004
Posts: 6,734
|
09-29-2005 13:54
I didn't not post this as an alt. This was someone else. I just wanted to say that, as it makes it look like I'm calling people names, which I'm not. ~Ulrika~ You didn't not ? Hehehe Double entendre? ![]() _____________________
YOUR MOM says, 'Come visit us at SC MKII http://secondcitizen.net '
Oh, Lecktor, you're terrible. Bikers have more fun than people ! |
Pendari Lorentz
Senior Member
Join date: 5 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,372
|
09-29-2005 13:54
Pathfinder never said that. There is nothing in the ToS, CS, or Guidelines that excludes. Alt names have nothing to do with RL information. ~Ulrika~ He did state it Ulrika, see MrsJakal's post above. Unfortunatly, Path claimed in that quote that it was against "the Guidelines". But, those "guidelines" are not written anywhere. At least not on any official document that is posted for the public to see. _____________________
*hugs everyone*
|
MrsJakal Suavage
Purple Butterfly
![]() Join date: 18 Jul 2004
Posts: 1,434
|
09-29-2005 14:01
He did state it Ulrika, see MrsJakal's post above. Unfortunatly, Path claimed in that quote that it was against "the Guidelines". But, those "guidelines" are not written anywhere. At least not on any official document that is posted for the public to see. The actual saying "alts are not to be outed" isn't in the guidelines but he does say that it is a violation of privacy which is in the Forum Guidelines. |
Pendari Lorentz
Senior Member
Join date: 5 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,372
|
09-29-2005 14:03
The actual saying "alts are not to be outed" isn't in the guidelines but he does say that it is a violation of privacy which is in the Forum Guidelines. Valid point. One that can be disputed still though. hehe.. But I see what you are saying. ![]() _____________________
*hugs everyone*
|
Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
![]() Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
|
09-29-2005 14:05
Well, the Guidelines or TOS or whatever include the part about the privacy. If a person wants to keep his alt private, then outing it is a violation of that privacy.
coco _____________________
|
MrsJakal Suavage
Purple Butterfly
![]() Join date: 18 Jul 2004
Posts: 1,434
|
09-29-2005 14:05
Valid point. One that can be disputed still though. hehe.. But I see what you are saying. ![]() Agreed. Everything can be disputed. ![]() |
Weedy Herbst
Too many parameters
![]() Join date: 5 Aug 2004
Posts: 2,255
|
09-29-2005 14:05
Pathfinder never said that. There is nothing in the ToS, CS, or Guidelines that excludes. Alt names have nothing to do with RL information. ~Ulrika~ Ulrika took off her makeup once, and we found Jimmy Hoffa ![]() _____________________
|
Ulrika Zugzwang
Magnanimous in Victory
![]() Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 6,382
|
09-29-2005 14:06
Personally, I think alts are great for in-world use but I believe they should not be permitted on the forum.
~Ulrika~ _____________________
Chik-chik-chika-ahh
|
Ulrika Zugzwang
Magnanimous in Victory
![]() Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 6,382
|
09-29-2005 14:07
Ulrika took off her makeup once, and we found Jimmy Hoffa ![]() ![]() ~Ulrika~ _____________________
Chik-chik-chika-ahh
|
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
![]() Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
|
09-29-2005 14:09
I believe it is definitely against the TOS, both in game and out, unless someone specifies who their alt is on their profile, or has been stated by that person already on the forums. That goes for any rl info one may not wish to share. coco Show me the rule - show me the law ![]() After all if I can I should - ain't that so? _____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread |
Weedy Herbst
Too many parameters
![]() Join date: 5 Aug 2004
Posts: 2,255
|
09-29-2005 14:10
Weedy took off her makeup once, and we found Waldo. ![]() ~Ulrika~ Outted ![]() _____________________
|
Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
![]() Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
|
09-29-2005 14:11
Personally, I think alts are great for in-world use but I believe they should not be permitted on the forum. ~Ulrika~ That wouldn't work, though, if a person has alts that sell things. coco _____________________
|
Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
![]() Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
|
09-29-2005 14:14
Show me the rule - show me the law ![]() After all if I can I should - ain't that so? The rule and the law is that it is a violation of privacy. Pathfinder himself has judged it so. coco _____________________
|
Ulrika Zugzwang
Magnanimous in Victory
![]() Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 6,382
|
09-29-2005 14:24
The rule and the law is that it is a violation of privacy. Pathfinder himself has judged it so. ![]() ~Ulrika~ _____________________
Chik-chik-chika-ahh
|
Dianne Mechanique
Back from the Dead
![]() Join date: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 2,648
|
09-29-2005 14:28
I believe it is definitely against the TOS, both in game and out, unless someone specifies who their alt is on their profile, or has been stated by that person already on the forums. That goes for any rl info one may not wish to share. coco ![]() On this one you are right and Ulrika is wrong (according to how I read the TOS), and that is a rare double-event indeed. ![]() Because they always add that line equating "personal information" with anything *not* shown on your profile, one's status in terms of how many alts you have or who they are is (technically) a forbidden topic of conversation. As you point out, anything you do not offer to share in your profile is against the rules for others to "share" for you. Ulrika is right about it being a fairly minor issue that is situationaly decided though (assuming I paraphrased that correctly). In the game, alts are most often either inconsequential drones or complete alternate characters. In the forums on the other hand, they are just extra voices that are specificaly created to cheat and to harrass people, and thus a much bigger deal from the abuse standpoint. On the other, other hand, this is all really picky stuff and the rules are unevenly enforced anyway. We would all be better off just to use some common sense. _____________________
.
black art furniture & classic clothing =================== Black in Neufreistadt Black @ ONE Black @ www.SLBoutique.com . |
Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
![]() Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
|
09-29-2005 14:30
Glad you support me on this one, Diane!
This is probably another thing they should make more clear. coco _____________________
|
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
![]() Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
|
09-29-2005 14:59
On the other, other hand, this is all really picky stuff and the rules are unevenly enforced anyway. We would all be better off just to use some common sense. I totally agree with using common sense - I try and do it across the board.. my point though was with people who stick to the letter of the law when it suits them or gives them an advantage - then switch to the spirit of the law and cry foul when it doesn't. _____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread |
Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
![]() Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
|
09-29-2005 15:14
I totally agree with using common sense - I try and do it across the board.. my point though was with people who stick to the letter of the law when it suits them or gives them an advantage - then switch to the spirit of the law and cry foul when it doesn't. If you are referring to me - as you obviously were in your earlier post - it is not correct to state that I stick to the letter of the law when it suits me or gives me an advantage, then switch to the spirit of the law and cry foul when it doesn't. That would indicate that I'm nothing more than an opportunist, with no morals or ethics whatever. The actual facts are that (1) I never thought I was doing anything wrong getting my 512 First Land. (Obviously, or I wouldn't have mentioned it on the forums.) Then I was told I had. Now it's sitting on the Hotline waiting for an official answer. (2) I never had any problem understanding that outing alts would be outing personal information. That seems to me very basic. Particularly since Pathfinder already clarified it once. But to others, it doesn't. And they may well not have seen Pathfinder's clarification. Now this matter, too, sits on the Hotline waiting for an official answer. Should there be an individual who outed an alt without realizing it is against the rules, then they didn't knowingly commit any crime. Should I purchase a 512, not realizing it is against the rules (which it still doesn't appear to be), then I didn't knowingly commit any crime either. Therefore, it is not a matter of being a spineless opportunist, an unethical and devious liar, or anything else you may be thinking. I would never out a person's alt. But I would - when I get another account on any given game - assume that account is a real account, with all the real perks that come with it, and use them without a second thought. coco _____________________
|
pandastrong Fairplay
all bout the BANG POW NOW
![]() Join date: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 2,920
|
09-29-2005 15:15
If you are referring to me - as you obviously were in your earlier post - it is not correct to state that I stick to the letter of the law when it suits me or gives me an advantage, then switch to the spirit of the law and cry foul when it doesn't. That would indicate that I'm nothing more than an opportunist, with no morals or ethics whatever. coco Obviously? There are a lot of people besides you who do that here. ![]() _____________________
"Honestly, you are a gem -- fun, creative, and possessing strong social convictions. I think LL should be paying you to be in their game."
~ Ulrika Zugzwang on the iconography of pandastrong in the media "That's no good. Someone is going to take your place as SL's cutest boy while you're offline." ~ Ingrid Ingersoll on the topic of LL refusing to pay pandastrong for being in their game. |
Lisse Livingston
Mentor/Instructor/Greeter
![]() Join date: 16 May 2004
Posts: 1,130
|
09-29-2005 16:23
AFAIAC, it's not okay to out alts unless they're your own alt.
Oh, or unless it's obvious (for example, if anyone thinks Anshe Chung and Anshee Chung aren't alts, they score a 10 on the naivety scale!) Personally, I'd never make a forum post using my own alt, but that's because my forums posts are written from the point of view of my real first life persona and I can't see a reason to express one person's pov using two identities. I noticed that a few people found the concept of treating alts as separate personalities a little "creepy". I think that's a culture thing, with those of us coming from a role-playing background (tabletop RPGs, MUSHes, MUCKs etc.) having less of a problem with it than those coming from other milieus. In fact, the concept of whether your avatar is you, or a roleplayed character could start an interesting discussion on the topic of in-world relationships and whether that is "cheating" on your first life relationships - but that might be something for Hamlet to explore ![]() _____________________
Land Developer, Builder and Real Estate Agent Come to my events! Sundays at 10:00 am: Texturing Contest Tuesdays at 5:00 pm: Land 101 and at 7:00 pm: Trivia Thursdays at 7:00 pm: Land 101 Fridays at 7:00 pm: Primtionary (Other events occasionally scheduled) Read my LiveJournal! Visit my Livingston Properties web site for your Real Estate and Building needs! |
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
![]() Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
|
09-29-2005 16:33
If you are referring to me - as you obviously were in your earlier post - it is not correct to state that I stick to the letter of the law when it suits me or gives me an advantage, then switch to the spirit of the law and cry foul when it doesn't. I was referring to lots of people - but are you one of those people? Well to me you are.. but thats not here nor there now is it? That would indicate that I'm nothing more than an opportunist, with no morals or ethics whatever. I said nothing of the such in my post. But it's a very good point and I agree with it. Therefore, it is not a matter of being a spineless opportunist, an unethical and devious liar, or anything else you may be thinking. I'm so very glad I have you to tell me what I'm thinking Coco.. I could never have worked that out on my own.. Now had I said such a thing, you'd be double clicking that AR like a 15yr old on his first porn site. News Flash Coco - you don't get to tell me what I think. _____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread |
Lecktor Hannibal
YOUR MOM
![]() Join date: 1 Jul 2004
Posts: 6,734
|
09-29-2005 16:37
I must congratulate 'a poster' on getting Siggy riled. I've never seen it in over a year and months in my SL. /clap
_____________________
YOUR MOM says, 'Come visit us at SC MKII http://secondcitizen.net '
Oh, Lecktor, you're terrible. Bikers have more fun than people ! |
Torley Linden
Enlightenment!
![]() Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 16,530
|
09-29-2005 16:39
I noticed that a few people found the concept of treating alts as separate personalities a little "creepy". I think that's a culture thing, with those of us coming from a role-playing background (tabletop RPGs, MUSHes, MUCKs etc.) having less of a problem with it than those coming from other milieus. In fact, the concept of whether your avatar is you, or a roleplayed character could start an interesting discussion on the topic of in-world relationships and whether that is "cheating" on your first life relationships - but that might be something for Hamlet to explore ![]() This is very well-expressed, Lisse. At least, that's the way I see it. When possible, I like to ask someone questions about their approach to SL, and hopefully they can be articulate and explain to me, at great length, what gets them passionate. ![]() As for me, I generally don't find separate personalities in different alts to be creepy—unless they are lame greefer kin. Hehehe. Infact, I've stuffed enough multiple personalities into my Torley Torgeson Resident account, so maybe I will need another one to catch all the overflow or sidechain everything that's dripping over so it doesn't go to waste! I'm also curious how this will be reflected with more cultural diversity as SL grows greater internationally. _____________________
|
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
![]() Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
|
09-29-2005 16:39
I must congratulate 'a poster' on getting Siggy riled. I've never seen it in over a year and months in my SL. /clap hahah thats not 'riled' .. I didn't say the 'C' word ![]() To get the full effect reread that only imagine I'm nodding my head straight faced and giggling into my hand the moment the other person turns away ![]() Just pointing out that Miss Koala doesn't get to tell me what to think -- personally I beleive if she did I'd be on the short end of the stick ![]() _____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread |
Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
![]() Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
|
09-29-2005 16:56
"Show me the rule - show me the law
![]() After all if I can I should - ain't that so?" I suppose the above - directed at me, which I ignored - and followed up with an explanation of what you meant by directing that at me, which I didn't ignore - is totally meaningless, then, right? If you don't want to stand behind what you say to me, don't say it. coco _____________________
|