Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Marines killed Iraqi women and children in cold blood

David Valentino
Nicely Wicked
Join date: 1 Jan 2004
Posts: 2,941
05-21-2006 14:00
From: Alexin Bismark

The only problem is, as you are not indicating that you are responding directly to anyone but me, I've not said anything to the contrary. If you can find anywhere in this thread where I have denied that horrendous acts occur in wartime, show me. If you can find anywhere in this thread where I have said that cover-ups don't occur, show me. Otherwise you’re just pulling an argument out of your ass that isn't there so you can vent your spleen.


Perhaps you should re-read your original response to me. I stated that I know for a fact things like this have happened alot in times of war and strife and were covered up, and you responded by questioning how I could possibly know this, and then you turn around and say you know it as well. So..not sure why you took issue with my original statement. I didn't say I knew for a fact that this particular massacre happened, but just that things of this nature happen, have happened, and have been covered up. I went on to state that our government and military tries to keep them under cover.

From: someone
What I *have* said is that people might actually want to...oh I don't know...actually read the report itself instead of let someone tell them what it says or what "the probe will show."


I agree it will be interesting to see what their findings are, but I certainly have no faith in the honesty and integrity of our system in finding, and releasing the real facts. They have every reason to try and cover it up, soften it, or use a variety of excuses, as we've seen in their initial reactions to journalistic reports on this and other incidents.

It is always deny first, then misdirect, then stall, and then if backed into a corner, investigate and soften things as much as possible before handing out punishments. The spin is what it's all about these days.

From: someone
What I *have* said is perhaps people might give the investigators a chance to complete their investigation as there'll be plenty of time for you to say they're covering up the truth after the investigation is done and the results are published. Pace yourself.


I agree, and I'm not screaming in outrage, but merely responding to some of the polar opposite reactions of excuse making and denial, and misplaced trust in our military and governmental justice machines.

From: someone
What I *have* said IF the investigation shows they are guilty of a violating the Uniform Code ONLY THEN do I believe they should be found guilty and punished. Their punishment should be in keeping with what is defined by law, taking into account any mitigating circumstances that may apply under the Articles. However until such time, since ours is a country of laws, we should follow the established principle that they are innocent until proven guilty. But that whole 'innocent until proven guilty' thing is just a part of my terrible naiveté and tunnel vision fed by my ignorance of history. :rolleyes:


Ours is presently not a country of laws that are equal for all, nor has it been for quite some time. Laws are tossed to the side for power, money and politics. Do we have to live with it for the present? Sure. Do we have to agree with how it's handled and the injustices done everyday? Not at all, and it's a good thing that folks speak out about such, or we'd never hear about anything the corporate machine, or the puppet government they control, didn't want us to.

Let me ask you this, if there were no witnesses to the scene (even if immediately after), other than those doing the shooting, do you think we would have heard about this in a timely manner or ever saw an investigation? If just the military or administration knew about it, and no one else, do you think there would be anything said about it to public or press? Do you think justice would be done?

From: someone
I have stated categorically and will now repeat that *I* don't know if they are guilty or not. If they are found guilty *I* think they should be appropriately punished. But *I* don't claim to even begin to have enough facts to make that sort of call. As such, I don't think I'm in a position to call for their heads. And unless you've got some inside information on the case we're talking about here, you aren't in such a position either. The fact that attrocities were committed by other individuals in the past are is not sufficient evidence to convict these specific soldiers of a crime or punish them in my little world, you obviously may think differently.


I don't know if they are guilty or not either, but I'd have to lean toward some god-awful guilt if it's even made it to this stage. If it was easily explained, or evidence wasn't present, or those that did report it hadn't witnessed the scene, it would never have went past the stage of "enemy combatants (terrorists) killed in daring raid" press release.

From: someone
But I'm open minded. If you've got a hotline to the absolute undisputed truth of what happened in the incident this thread was talking about (hey, Oral Roberts claimed he held conversations with God, right?), maybe some evidence that we in the unwashed masses you referre to as "the general public and press" aren't privy to, trot it out so we can all have a look.


In most cases none of us have a hotline to the truth, and will never hear the actual truth. But believing what we are told by people that have repeatedly lied about, and covered things up, and would like nothing better than to do the same in this case, isn't, perhaps, the wisest course either. I just am not sure what plausible explanation of innocence there can be for a room full of unarmed civilians, many of them women and children, being killed by our troops, after being herded there at gunpoint. Remember, there were non-military folks around, and not just Iraqi's, and that's why it "came to light" in the first place.

From: someone
You are of course entitled to believe that when someone doesn't see things the way you see them it's because they are naive, ignorant, blind. But I think that's pretty stupid and narrow minded myself, but by all means knock yourself out. That's what's great about freedom of expression.


Well, thus far, at least according to the direction and continuing fallout over the repeated lies and corruption by our government, I feel justified in saying that it's time to wake up and smell the corruption and waste of human life to those that repeatedly claim how that same administration is just trying to do the right thing

From: someone
[Note: This is WAY too much typing for a post on a Sunday. I'm going to seek absolution in a bowl of ice cream and some porn.]


Mmm...Ice Cream and Porn, breakfast of champions! ;)
_____________________
David Lamoreaux

Owner - Perilous Pleasures and Extreme Erotica Gallery
Starax Statosky
Unregistered User
Join date: 23 Dec 2003
Posts: 1,099
05-21-2006 17:52
Billybob Goodliffe
NINJA WIZARDS!
Join date: 22 Dec 2005
Posts: 4,036
05-22-2006 08:13
ok I am just going to give my $0.02 since I am a combat vet. When in combat for a prolonged time a soldier has a tendency to develop a slanted view of right and wrong. they will begin to judge what is right and wrong using the surrounding circumstances as a barometer. under normal conditions soldiers abhorre civilian casualties. however, some cases may seem unavoidable to the soldiers on the frontlines. IE it is common sense to not want an enemy behind you as well as in front of you, so if you have a group of people that have demonstrated hostile intent (not saying that is what occured just speculating) you don't really want them behind you while you advance possibly under fire. the logical thing to do is "neutralize" the ones behind you first. while sadly over there right now neutralize means kill because those that are outwardly pro-american may have bombs hidden in thier basement. I'm sorry to break this news to you but its true. now I will guarentee those same soldiers under any other circumstances would be appaled by this incident (if the facts substantiate the claims). just my $0.02

(fyi I served with the NATO peacekeepers in Kosovo/Bosnia)
Carson Bjornson
Registered User
Join date: 22 Oct 2005
Posts: 4
05-22-2006 09:23
From: Musuko Massiel
Now think on this: We have "liberated" Iraq from its system of government to replace it with one that we think is better, and now we're complaining that some Iraqis are acting ungrateful.

Now remember the Soviets...those people who were dead set intent on liberating Americans from their system of government and replacing it with communism, a system they thought was better...

...now just imagine how you (or, more likely, your parents) would have felt if they'd have succeeded.


/sarcasm on
Yeah, cause I know that the one thing I hate about our country and it's government is the ability so speak my mind without fear of retribution. I'd much rather live my life scared that the secret police will burst through my door, take away me and my family and torture me till I learn to like the government again.
/sarcasm off
Seriously, when you think about what we've given them by outing the old government, and by helping to rebuild the country, it's hard to believe they could act this way. We've given them schools, education, water treatment plants (so they don't have to worry about the channels of sewage running down the streets backing up and going into their houses), and the freedom to say what they want without fear. Unfortunately, they're using that freedom to vent anger at us.
Problem, if it isn't a religious thing, seeing as how muslims believe they are the one true religion, and many are willing to fight to erradicate all other religions, many people over there are hateful to us and whatever we give them solely on that reason. Others, have valid reasons, like the fact that we have done something to their property or family. But that brings up another problem our troops face. Some citizens rise up against us, and they get put down. And when that happens, their families hate us, and they turn against us, and it makes an endless cycle.
Another thing that happens is that the insurgents we face don't follow any rules. They do whatever they can to take out our soldiers, even at the risk of the civilians over there. Like hiding in a building full of innocent women and children. If we don't shoot at them, they'll shoot back and kill a couple of us, they win. We do shoot, we kill them and a few innocents, they still win, cause they can spin that into hatred to the soldiers. What if this is what happened in the incident that started this whole thread? What if they popped some shots out of a building, and the soldiers returned fire, only to find out after the smoke cleared that there were innocents in the line of fire.
See, the enemy we face over there isn't dumb. At least the higher up insurgent leaders aren't. Others, like Mr.AK-versus-tank, well they're not so bright. The leaders over there know they can't beat us toe to toe, so they wage a war back here in the states, only one without bullets. They know if they bait us into doing something bad, or just straight killing innocents, our media will eat that up and work us over and make us lose faith in the troops over there. And eventually, the support will be so low that we have no choice to pull out, and the insurgents win.
I'm going to be pretty blunt about this... some people are in serious need of experience before you comment on certain subjects. Until you've been in the suck, and have to deal with people shooting at you with REAL bullets, you won't know what's going on in the minds of the troops. I have spent a year over there, and I'd do it again gladly, knowing that people over there are actually benefitting from us. The media is so biased over there it isn't even funny. If they spend all their time in the base huddled over the radios listening for casualty reports, they don't see civil affairs missions that help build schools, train people in valuable work skills, and get the community back on it's feet again. They're quick to find the guys who've had to much and are close to the edge of breaking or the loudmouths who cry about having to do their job, but they ignore the quiet professionals, the ones that it doesn't matter whether they want to be there or not, they've got a job to do and they're doing it.
twolips Falcone
Registered User
Join date: 16 May 2004
Posts: 14
Yep Im gonna sayt it!!!!!!!! :O
07-12-2006 14:23
We should of just bombed them all right after 9/11. EYE FOR AN EYE------Innocent civilians for Innocent civilians.
1 2 3