These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
FirstIsland |
|
|
Schwanson Schlegel
SL's Tokin' Villain
Join date: 15 Nov 2003
Posts: 2,721
|
05-05-2006 11:35
It would be impossible to prevent alts from taking advantage of this. I can think of 3 totally easy ways to get as many first sims as I want, and I wasn't even trying.
_____________________
![]() |
|
Siobhan Taylor
Nemesis
Join date: 13 Aug 2003
Posts: 5,476
|
05-05-2006 11:41
How are they destroying SL? If it were not for private islands, I personally, would have probably left SL long ago... _____________________
http://siobhantaylor.wordpress.com/
|
|
Khamon Fate
fategardens.net
Join date: 21 Nov 2003
Posts: 4,177
|
05-05-2006 11:41
It would be impossible to prevent alts from taking advantage of this. I can think of 3 totally easy ways to get as many first sims as I want, and I wasn't even trying. _____________________
Visit the Fate Gardens Website @ fategardens.net
|
|
Hiro Pendragon
bye bye f0rums!
Join date: 22 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,905
|
05-05-2006 11:52
As I understand it, Linden Lab basically takes a loss as it is on the price of servers. We need Linden Lab to not go bankrupt.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with a business practice of offering premium features to users who spend more money. That's the way most things in the world work; we're not in a communist republic. Linden Lab has done better than that - saying that they will implement the same features from private islands on the mainland, as well, given the time to implement this more tricky operation. So, we're already getting a pretty damn good deal. Starax - as for your comments, I don't think anyone will feel a raw deal, because people hosting their own servers will still have to buy the equipment and pay for what I am sure is an exhorbitant bandwidth rate. If anything, since Linden Lab does it in bulk, their rates will probably be *more* affordable than doing it yourself, at least at first. _____________________
Hiro Pendragon
------------------ http://www.involve3d.com - Involve - Metaverse / Emerging Media Studio Visit my SL blog: http://secondtense.blogspot.com |
|
Surreal Farber
Cat Herder
Join date: 5 Feb 2004
Posts: 2,059
|
05-05-2006 11:54
It was brought to my wife's attention when calling Linden Lab that they are full aware of all alt accounts and use various methods of verifying this information. Who knows what is embedded in the Second Life application and what data is being sent to them about your computer system and location. Probably best we do not know. But should some program be implemented such as the one suggested here in this thread, I'd be willing to bet that not only would they have to prevent alts from taking advantage, but they would be exposing their efforts to all of us in doing so. Sorry, I know exactly how I would go about creating an free standing alt, and I know people who have. If you have a different name, different credit card, different email, and different ISP you are home free. _____________________
Surreal
Phobos 3d Design - putting the hot in psychotic since 2004 Come see our whole line of clothing, animations and accessories in Chaos (37, 198, 43) |
|
Cocoanut Cookie
Registered User
Join date: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,741
|
05-05-2006 12:47
Bah... Odds are good that most people on the forums don't even know who Prok is anymore. I see people arguing this on merit. I seem to recall that there was a long set of post about you buying "first land" as an alt. Regardless, gaming of 1st land has been a serious problem. I can see lots of "first" sims changing hands pretty quickly. It is labor intensive to track down alt accounts, even when it's possible. Credit card, ISP address, and email are not reliable indicators --- to say nothing of those couples who share the above and are not alts. Opinion: My buying First Land on my second premium account has nothing to do with this. When I purchase a legitimate SL account - and pay them $72 of my actual money each year of that account (which I have done twice, for two premium accounts) - my ability to purchase a 512 lot directly from the Lindens for 512 (worthless to them) Lindens is part of that account and not against the rules. (In fact, it would be hard for them to have such a rule, unless they were willing to offer premium accounts without First Land at a lower price.) In the case of First Land, the only problem is determining whether all those purchasing it are actually purchasing it on a legitimate account - that is, one that is within the number they are limited to, as defined by the personal (or household) limit. Apparently, there are ways around this, and the Lindens don't care to take the time to find those people who actually break the rules - i.e., who buy First Land with premium accounts they weren't legitimately entitled to. This reluctance is likely because the money they get from any illegimate alts ($9.95 a month) is more than worth any "loss" they incur from those accounts purchasing First Land. I put "loss" in quotes, because there is no loss. They get the monthly premium, and the 512 Lindens the land costs is burnt. In fact, it's hard for me to understand how anyone could profit from flipping illegitimate First Lands, considering they would have to pay $9.95 for each one in the first place. It could be all the sales you see are just due to people buying First Land in the normal way, then others wanting to buy it from them. However, in the case of Islands, they sell for cash money in the first place, and a pretty penny, at that. If the Lindens gave a discount on one's First Island, they would actually in fact LOSE say, $500, at 50% of the $1000 real money they would have received for that island. That would make it necessary to have a rule that it is only one island per customer, not per legitimate account, forever; the end. And still it would be difficult if not impossible to prevent people from getting more than one First Island anyway. Moreover, with $500 of real money at stake for any island purchasers, the motivation to cheat on any such limits would be high for some, and I'm not sure any system exists that could completely control for this. That is what I meant when I said the alt problem would be the problem with this idea. coco _____________________
|
|
Surreal Farber
Cat Herder
Join date: 5 Feb 2004
Posts: 2,059
|
05-05-2006 12:53
Opinion: My buying First Land on my second premium account has nothing to do with this. When I purchase a legitimate SL account - and pay them $72 of my actual money each year of that account (which I have done twice, for two premium accounts) - my ability to purchase a 512 lot directly from the Lindens for 512 (worthless to them) Lindens is part of that account and not against the rules. (In fact, it would be hard for them to have such a rule, unless they were willing to offer premium accounts without First Land at a lower price.) In the case of First Land, the only problem is determining whether all those purchasing it are actually purchasing it on a legitimate account - that is, one that is within the number they are limited to, as defined by the personal (or household) limit. Apparently, there are ways around this, and the Lindens don't care to take the time to find those people who actually break the rules - i.e., who buy First Land with premium accounts they weren't legitimately entitled to. This reluctance is likely because the money they get from any illegimate alts ($9.95 a month) is more than worth any "loss" they incur from those accounts purchasing First Land. I put "loss" in quotes, because there is no loss. They get the monthly premium, and the 512 Lindens the land costs is burnt. In fact, it's hard for me to understand how anyone could profit from flipping illegitimate First Lands, considering they would have to pay $9.95 for each one in the first place. It could be all the sales you see are just due to people buying First Land in the normal way, then others wanting to buy it from them. However, in the case of Islands, they sell for cash money in the first place, and a pretty penny, at that. If the Lindens gave a discount on one's First Island, they would actually in fact LOSE say, $500, at 50% of the $1000 real money they would have received for that island. That would make it necessary to have a rule that it is only one island per customer, not per legitimate account, forever; the end. And still it would be difficult if not impossible to prevent people from getting more than one First Island anyway. Moreover, with $500 of real money at stake for any island purchasers, the motivation to cheat on any such limits would be high for some, and I'm not sure any system exists that could completely control for this. That is what I meant when I said the alt problem would be the problem with this idea. coco So by your understanding of the rules, if First Island worked under the same rules as First Land, it would be perfectly OK to for you and your alts to each buy an island sim for the $500, and then turn around and sell it for $750, or $1000 (still a savings to the end purchaser)? _____________________
Surreal
Phobos 3d Design - putting the hot in psychotic since 2004 Come see our whole line of clothing, animations and accessories in Chaos (37, 198, 43) |
|
Cristiano Midnight
Evil Snapshot Baron
Join date: 17 May 2003
Posts: 8,616
|
05-05-2006 12:59
I think it's a silly idea, if anything they should allow those with multiple islands a discounted rate on thier next purchase, but why discount those that have not been supporting the system in that way? While I agree with you that there should be incentives for multiple private island ownership, it is very common for companies to offer incentives for first time users of something. Honestly, the main reason I have never gotten a private island, aside from not wanting to reward Linden Lab's piss poor custom support, is that I just don't think the upfront costs make sense, especially in their current form. Certainly reduced startup costs would be an incentive to get people to sign up (not that it seems they have had any problem anyway, as the private islands have done far better than I think they ever imagined). _____________________
Cristiano
ANOmations - huge selection of high quality, low priced animations all $100L or less. ~SLUniverse.com~ SL's oldest and largest community site, featuring Snapzilla image sharing, forums, and much more. ![]() |
|
FlipperPA Peregrine
Magically Delicious!
Join date: 14 Nov 2003
Posts: 3,703
|
05-05-2006 13:02
Actually, I think LL should dispense with private islands altogether, offering the current owners a buyout then adding them to the mainland. Private islands are destroying SL. I don't agree with Siobhan's solution, but I do agree there is a much more disjointed feel to Second Life than when she and I were n00bs. What I'd prefer to see is islands being more "fluid." IE, have an automated tool that allows people to attach / detach islands to one another to forum continents at will: If owner A and owner B agree that their sims be connected on one side, make it happen automatically. If that involved shifting islands around on the map, so be it; map location isn't really crucial to islands. If either of the parties decides its time to disconnect, then do so automatically and re-separate. This, of course, gets more complex in continents, but you see where I'm going with the idea. Perhaps something like this could be worked into the revamped group system that is being worked out. Also, I think allowing islands to attach to the mainland would be great. There are quite a owners of sims who have a "null edge" with nothing but ocean. While its a pretty view, I wouldn't mind have an old trust friends to the north of Indigo; and most of the color sims along the north of the original continent are owned by single owners. I'm sure the same is true of many sims facing "null edges". Regards, -Flip _____________________
Peregrine Salon: www.PeregrineSalon.com - my consulting company
Second Blogger: www.SecondBlogger.com - free, fully integrated Second Life blogging for all avatars! |
|
Cristiano Midnight
Evil Snapshot Baron
Join date: 17 May 2003
Posts: 8,616
|
05-05-2006 13:05
How are they destroying SL? If it were not for private islands, I personally, would have probably left SL long ago... Before private islands, I owned over half of Leda, My shop was cluttered with trash, the lag in the sim was unbareable, and my events were griefed... the only thing good about that place was my neighbors.. Siobhan is right in one regard - I do think the private islands are too insular and discourage community, compared to the mainland. They definitely have to upside that you listed - but there is a cost to them as well - what we now have are a bunch of isolated gated communities disconnected from those around them - it is kind of isolating. As you spend most of your time in Le Cadre, it probably doesn't bother you. At least P2P has helped mitigate this problem somewhat, but I know whenever I go to a private island I still feel sort of cut off from the rest of SL. A lot of people don't like them for that very reason. The mainland, with all its faults, is far more interesting to me. I wouldn't like to see them go away, however. I just personally don't like them that much. _____________________
Cristiano
ANOmations - huge selection of high quality, low priced animations all $100L or less. ~SLUniverse.com~ SL's oldest and largest community site, featuring Snapzilla image sharing, forums, and much more. ![]() |
|
Cristiano Midnight
Evil Snapshot Baron
Join date: 17 May 2003
Posts: 8,616
|
05-05-2006 13:07
Also, I think allowing islands to attach to the mainland would be great. There are quite a owners of sims who have a "null edge" with nothing but ocean. While its a pretty view, I wouldn't mind have an old trust friends to the north of Indigo; and most of the color sims along the north of the original continent are owned by single owners. I'm sure the same is true of many sims facing "null edges". Yes, that is what I love about Mavericks - it has remained a null edge sim on two sides, and I own the coastal land in Kelham on the third side so it is all contiguous. It has a secluded feel, without being isolated. I can hop in a boat and sail two sims over and see what Barnesworth and Co. are up to in Deimos, or sail all the way to Federal and revel in the fact that there is now a botanical garden on the grave site of Club Elite ![]() _____________________
Cristiano
ANOmations - huge selection of high quality, low priced animations all $100L or less. ~SLUniverse.com~ SL's oldest and largest community site, featuring Snapzilla image sharing, forums, and much more. ![]() |
|
Schwanson Schlegel
SL's Tokin' Villain
Join date: 15 Nov 2003
Posts: 2,721
|
05-05-2006 13:20
So when you voted no, you meant yes? or no? Excellent point. I agree with Prok, islands should be 1/2 price to new island owners. ![]() _____________________
![]() |
|
Hiro Pendragon
bye bye f0rums!
Join date: 22 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,905
|
05-05-2006 13:52
If owner A and owner B agree that their sims be connected on one side, make it happen automatically. If that involved shifting islands around on the map, so be it; map location isn't really crucial to islands. If either of the parties decides its time to disconnect, then do so automatically and re-separate. This, of course, gets more complex in continents, but you see where I'm going with the idea. Perhaps something like this could be worked into the revamped group system that is being worked out. Also, I think allowing islands to attach to the mainland would be great. There are quite a owners of sims who have a "null edge" with nothing but ocean. While its a pretty view, I wouldn't mind have an old trust friends to the north of Indigo; and most of the color sims along the north of the original continent are owned by single owners. I'm sure the same is true of many sims facing "null edges". Regards, -Flip /rubber_stamp Great ideas. _____________________
Hiro Pendragon
------------------ http://www.involve3d.com - Involve - Metaverse / Emerging Media Studio Visit my SL blog: http://secondtense.blogspot.com |
|
Llauren Mandelbrot
Twenty-Four Weeks Old.
Join date: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 665
|
EXCELENT idea!
05-05-2006 14:15
I don't agree with Siobhan's solution, but I do agree there is a much more disjointed feel to Second Life than when she and I were n00bs. What I'd prefer to see is islands being more "fluid." IE, have an automated tool that allows people to attach / detach islands to one another to forum continents at will: If owner A and owner B agree that their sims be connected on one side, make it happen automatically. If that involved shifting islands around on the map, so be it; map location isn't really crucial to islands. If either of the parties decides its time to disconnect, then do so automatically and re-separate. This, of course, gets more complex in continents, but you see where I'm going with the idea. Perhaps something like this could be worked into the revamped group system that is being worked out. Also, I think allowing islands to attach to the mainland would be great. There are quite a owners of sims who have a "null edge" with nothing but ocean. While its a pretty view, I wouldn't mind have an old trust friends to the north of Indigo; and most of the color sims along the north of the original continent are owned by single owners. I'm sure the same is true of many sims facing "null edges". Range: -100 to +100 Ah likes this idea! Has anyone posted it as a Feature Request? Toodle-oo! |
|
Thorne Kaiser
Nice Guy
Join date: 29 Nov 2005
Posts: 132
|
05-05-2006 14:24
Sorry, I know exactly how I would go about creating an free standing alt, and I know people who have. If you have a different name, different credit card, different email, and different ISP you are home free. Be sure that you do not EVER log in on the same computer with your new 'alt' account though! As soon as you do, it may be associated with your main account. This goes for any friends you have playing or family members who may come over for a lil visit and use your computer. I have a couple of accounts that were tied into my household of people that have never lived here, do not live here...and NEVER WILL live here. But they are forever stuck to this account. Big Brother is watching . |
|
Surreal Farber
Cat Herder
Join date: 5 Feb 2004
Posts: 2,059
|
05-05-2006 14:29
Be sure that you do not EVER log in on the same computer with your new 'alt' account though! As soon as you do, it may be associated with your main account. This goes for any friends you have playing or family members who may come over for a lil visit and use your computer. I have a couple of accounts that were tied into my household of people that have never lived here, do not live here...and NEVER WILL live here. But they are forever stuck to this account. Big Brother is watching .Those would be ISP nabs then. There are a couple of ways to foil ISP addresses, including logging on from a computer at work. ![]() _____________________
Surreal
Phobos 3d Design - putting the hot in psychotic since 2004 Come see our whole line of clothing, animations and accessories in Chaos (37, 198, 43) |
|
Jauani Wu
pancake rabbit
Join date: 7 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,835
|
05-05-2006 14:29
islands should be free for everyone. we should just have to pay a small administrative fee to set it up. then monthly tier. one of the biggest hurdles people face in acquiring land is the intial cost.
_____________________
http://wu-had.blogspot.com/
read my blog Mecha Jauani Wu hero of justice __________________________________________________ "Oh Jauani, you're terrible." - khamon fate |
|
Surreal Farber
Cat Herder
Join date: 5 Feb 2004
Posts: 2,059
|
05-05-2006 14:32
Oh hey wait. I lived for 6 weeks with some folks here in SL while I was making my move, and I logged on every night from their house, on my own computer no less. No one noticed or cared.
![]() _____________________
Surreal
Phobos 3d Design - putting the hot in psychotic since 2004 Come see our whole line of clothing, animations and accessories in Chaos (37, 198, 43) |
|
jrrdraco Oe
Insanity Fair
Join date: 28 Oct 2005
Posts: 372
|
05-05-2006 15:03
I can“t imagine what hell could be LL datacenter to hold all that stuff, islands and processing units if they spend all the money buying hardware to set up a sim or island.
|
|
Thorne Kaiser
Nice Guy
Join date: 29 Nov 2005
Posts: 132
|
05-05-2006 15:11
Oh hey wait. I lived for 6 weeks with some folks here in SL while I was making my move, and I logged on every night from their house, on my own computer no less. No one noticed or cared. ![]() Well we were told that we were over our household account limit from LL when my wife attempted to create an alt account for accounting purposes LOL. They sent us an email with a list of avatars that were supposedly counted towards our 5 account limit. one was inactive and on the TEEN grid, and one belonged to a friend, and one belonged to her sister who is no longer living with us. We were told that they had at some point all logged in from the same computer and were associated with our household. Unfair if you ask me. |
|
Thorne Kaiser
Nice Guy
Join date: 29 Nov 2005
Posts: 132
|
05-05-2006 15:13
islands should be free for everyone. we should just have to pay a small administrative fee to set it up. then monthly tier. one of the biggest hurdles people face in acquiring land is the intial cost. I totally agree with you on this. $1295 is a lot of cash. That's my mortgage payment ya know? But you have to start somewhere if you wanna play with the big dogs. LOL |
|
Hiro Queso
503less
Join date: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 2,753
|
05-05-2006 15:19
islands should be free for everyone. we should just have to pay a small administrative fee to set it up. then monthly tier. one of the biggest hurdles people face in acquiring land is the intial cost. I bet that LL would more than make their initial losses back. However, even if they did have the capital, they would have to wear some pretty thick armour if they were to contemplate this ![]() _____________________
|
|
Jauani Wu
pancake rabbit
Join date: 7 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,835
|
05-05-2006 20:43
I bet that LL would more than make their initial losses back. However, even if they did have the capital, they would have to wear some pretty thick armour if they were to contemplate this ![]() you know what - it doesn't cost 5k to buy a dual opteron box. it's substantially cheaper than what they sell the 4 sims they load on it for. so i'm not sure the armour even has to be too thick. ![]() _____________________
http://wu-had.blogspot.com/
read my blog Mecha Jauani Wu hero of justice __________________________________________________ "Oh Jauani, you're terrible." - khamon fate |
|
Yiffy Yaffle
Purple SpiritWolf Mystic
Join date: 22 Oct 2004
Posts: 2,802
|
05-05-2006 22:50
Ahh, but they're crammin four on a box these days. And you can get a nice quad-proc machine for a few grand, probably less if you buy in bulk. These are just estimates. And I am offended at someone for something and reporting some stuff to someone else! MM I'd like to host my own sim locally. I can host a webserver and i have tested the metaverse software. Perhaps i'll just make my own virtual world lol. I just don't see how people can keep paying that price for 65,536 sq m of virtual land. The price jump from a 512 parcel to a entire sim is just terrible. _____________________
|
|
Hiro Queso
503less
Join date: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 2,753
|
05-06-2006 04:38
you know what - it doesn't cost 5k to buy a dual opteron box. it's substantially cheaper than what they sell the 4 sims they load on it for. so i'm not sure the armour even has to be too thick. ![]() I was thinking more for protection against all the residents that paid for sims ![]() And yes, I can't see how they cost that much. _____________________
|