Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Entire CopyBot Sim taken Down

Cheyenne Marquez
Registered User
Join date: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 940
06-17-2008 09:56
From: Solomon Devoix
Looks like judging.As does the following:The irony about reading comprehension here is really thick.Indeed.


Obvious troll is obvious.


The troll here is obviously you. He who has nothing to say but trolls just for the sake of trolling.

If you can't respond intelligently with a poignant point of view then be big enough to excuse yourself.

Troll.
Matthew Dowd
Registered User
Join date: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,046
06-17-2008 09:56
From: Cheyenne Marquez
But the underlying message in all of these IP theft threads is consitently that it is ok when content creators get ripped-off because, well ... "hey there is nothing we can do about IP theft so "Give up, 'stop whining,' and accept it because that's the way it is baby."


Of course in SL when you buy or are given something you don't actually get ownership of that asset, just a license to use. The creator remains the content owner.

As such Miffy Fluffy is the legal owner of the script which LL deleted. EC wasn't the legal owner of that content, the animation creators whose content was being pirated was not the legal owner of that content - Miffy Fluffy was the legal owner of that content.

So on the basis that EC used content owned by Miffy Fluffy and pirated content owned by others, Miffy Fluffy's content gets deleted.

That's like recordings of a song you wrote and recorded being banned because someone included it on a compilation with some pirated material - whilst banning the compilation makes sense, also banning recordings of just your song clearly doesn't, but that is what LL has done here.

So how does that help content creators (or their consumers) - if their content can be blacklisted and removed from SL on the basis that it was used by someone committing piracy?

Matthew
Solomon Devoix
Used Register
Join date: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 496
06-17-2008 10:01
From: Cheyenne Marquez
The troll here is obviously you. He who has nothing to say but trolls just for the sake of trolling.

If you can't respond intelligently with a poignant point of view then be big enough to excuse yourself.

Troll.

Okay, if nothing else, I have to admit that brightened my day... I needed a good laugh! I'll probably be smiling all afternoon...
_____________________
From: Jake Black
I dont know what the actual answer is.. I just know LLs response was at best...flaccid.
From: Solomon Devoix
That's a very good way to put it, and now I know why we still haven't seen the promised blog entry...

...the Lindens are still waiting for their shipment of Lie-agra to come in to firm up their flaccid reasoning.
Talarus Luan
Ancient Archaean Dragon
Join date: 18 Mar 2006
Posts: 4,831
06-17-2008 10:12
From: Solomon Devoix
Okay, if nothing else, I have to admit that brightened my day... I needed a good laugh! I'll probably be smiling all afternoon...


I find that, most often, people who resort to "noob!" or "troll!" often describe themselves more accurately than anyone they are (poorly) communicating with. It's the last bastion of the clueless, witless, and those on the losing side of a reasoned debate.

Anyway.. off to spend energy on something worthwhile; my suggestion is that you do the same, before it devolves any further below kindergarten level. :)

PS- Oh, forgot to say... I agree with you 100%. :D
Cheyenne Marquez
Registered User
Join date: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 940
06-17-2008 10:18
From: Matthew Dowd
OK, try this one.

You buy you television, dvd player, etc. from a local store. There was a bundled deal of a DVD player and some DVDs but you decided not to buy that. The following week, that store is raided by the police for selling pirated DVDs. The police come around to your house, they don't take any DVDs - because you never bought any but they do take your television, dvd player, etc.

"Oh, were these stolen property too", you ask the police officer.

"Oh no", he explains, "we checked all the paper work and the accounts, and only the DVDs were pirated. All the electronic products were sourced from a local reliable wholesaler and their receipts checked out with the wholesalers records. No, these are all legal - but we're confiscating them anyway, because, you know, he *was* selling pirated DVDs"

Matthew


At face value, yes that would be wrong Matthew. And if something along those lines did, in fact, occur then that would be obviously wrong and unfair treatment by LL.

There appears to be a lot of confusion and differing accounts to this incident though. One account has it that only those items that were co-mingled, or that contained stolen/infringed scripts, were confiscated.

But again, I am not speaking about this incident so much as I am speaking about content theft in general.

It needs to be dealt with and this lackadaisical "we can't do anything about content theft so stop whining about it and accept it" attitude needs to go.
Cheyenne Marquez
Registered User
Join date: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 940
06-17-2008 10:20
From: Talarus Luan
I find that, most often, people who resort to "noob!" or "troll!" often describe themselves more accurately than anyone they are (poorly) communicating with. It's the last bastion of the clueless, witless, and those on the losing side of a reasoned debate.

Anyway.. off to spend energy on something worthwhile; my suggestion is that you do the same, before it devolves any further below kindergarten level. ::)


Well stated.

Thank you.
Matthew Dowd
Registered User
Join date: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,046
06-17-2008 10:40
From: Cheyenne Marquez
There appears to be a lot of confusion and differing accounts to this incident though. One account has it that only those items that were co-mingled, or that contained stolen/infringed scripts, were confiscated.


Apart from the fact that most accounts of items being deleted because of scripts, the scripts concerned were the MLP 1.2 scripts or MLP 2.0 scripts which belong to either Miffy Fluffy or Cale Lear and which were licensed under a BSD opensource license so were neither stolen nor infringed. That the script creator property was EC is due to a technical quirk of how SL works rather than any IPR ownership reasons (and also was not a license infringement).

I can understand an item where there is co-mingling with pirated material being targetted.

However, in this case there are reports of items being targetted because they contain a perfectly legal to use script which just happens to be a copy of a (again perfectly legal to use) script which was used in an object with pirated animations.

it is this guilt by association.

Object A contains a pirated animation
Object A also contains a script S
Script S must be dodgy

Object B contains Script S
Object B must be dodgy

Matthew
RobbyRacoon Olmstead
Red warrior is hungry!
Join date: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 1,821
06-17-2008 10:43
From: Kitty Barnett
L$3,000/outfit * 60 copies per outfit = L$180k/outfit = US$679/outfit
Ah, gotcha. I probably shouldn't read the forums before dinner, when I have low blood sugar :) I thought you meant USD$679 for each individual outfit sold to a single customer.

.
_____________________
Morgaine Christensen
Empress of the Universe
Join date: 31 Dec 2005
Posts: 319
06-17-2008 10:52
From: Snickers Snook
People keep mixing two issues up in this and other threads. Let's be clear:

1. Items rezzed in-world containing content listing Eva Capalini as creator were removed en masse by Linden Labs.

2. Some of the content was stolen, some was not.

3. The biggest issue affecting residents were the use of MLP scripts by Miffy Fluffy. These were originally released by Miffy Fluffy under GPL and were free to copy, use, etc. as long as the copyright notice inside the script code itself stayed intact.

4. Eva Capalini uploaded the scripts to SL and they ended up in a number of in-world products including sex furniture and AOs. They properly carried the original copyright and, under terms of the GPL, she had the right to do so. Those scripts were the same that Miffy Fluffy also released in-world except they carried Eva Capalini as the "creator".

5. A lot of builders have used Miffy's scripts (in either Eva tagged or Miffy tagged form) in their products. Again, all legally. (Note that some builds contain animations used illegally but this applies to both Miffy & Eva MLP scripts.)

6. It appears that LL made no distinction in the removal of totally legal items and those that were stolen. They simply removed content that listed Eva Capalini as creator. Objects that had been completely created by their owners from scratch but used Eva's tagged versions of the MLP scripts were deleted. LL gave no notice of its intentions and seemingly, little or no thought as to the consequences of what it did.

IMHO, what LL did while admirable in many respects, was completely overreaching. A little research and prior notice to residents would have gone a long way. There was no rush to delete the in-world items -- especially since a lot of them were perfectly legal.

@Court -- receiving stolen property applies when the property is in fact stolen. In this case, some was, but much wasn't.

@Kitty -- Believe me, as a designer, I am very sensitive to content theft. I've read a lot about digital and rl copyrights. I make and upload all my own clothing textures (some of the fabrics in them are mine and some are GPL or public domain). But if you want a total guarantee of virgin origins, you will never get it. Honestly, some of the things you are looking for would drive small designers like me out of business.

AFAIK, "registering" a trademark or copyright only gives you additional damages SHOULD YOU WIN IN COURT. It confers NO additional rights to the trademark or copyright holder. The trademark holder has rights by commercial usage and origination. The copyright holder has rights by it being an original published work.

@Cheyenne -- Simply being associated with someone nefarious doesn't automatically make items you got from them "stolen" property. If the law EVER starts holding that, we'll be in a police state. 1 degree of separation will turn into 6.



Okay...I have major questions here and I think a lot of other new designers/builders might as well. HOW IN THE HELL do you know what is legit to use or not? I really don' t think people want to infringe upon copyright or intellectual property rights. But how the hell do you know? Even after checking this way and that, people can still complain your product is infringement regardless whether it is or not!

Is the MLP Script LEGAL that has Miffy's as the creator? Can I use this script with the products that I build provided I use her note card? Can I add the full perm animations I so expensively bought? What about the freebie full perms animations? Can I use those in my builds? What if I buy full perm animations/poses, then the person I bought them from gets nabbed for copy right infringement? Are all my products going to be deleted when there was no way I could of known they were copy right infringed? This is terribly confusing! How do you tell a legit merchant from a non-legit merchant?
Matthew Dowd
Registered User
Join date: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,046
06-17-2008 11:04
From: Morgaine Christensen
Is the MLP Script LEGAL that has Miffy's as the creator?


The MLP script is *legal* if it includes Miffy's license statement as the opening comment.

The creator merely indicates who cut and pasted the code into SL from the wiki/forum (which is a permitted activity by the terms of the license).

However, being legal doesn't seem to protect you from over-zealous Lindens. To be on the safe side, create a blank script and cut/paste Miffy's script from the forums so that *you* are the creator.

Matthew
Snickers Snook
Odd Princess - Trout 7.3
Join date: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 746
06-17-2008 11:17
From: Morgaine Christensen
HOW IN THE HELL do you know what is legit to use or not? I really don' t think people want to infringe upon copyright or intellectual property rights. But how the hell do you know? Even after checking this way and that, people can still complain your product is infringement regardless whether it is or not!
You really don't know unless you can prove chain of custody or you make the entire work yourself. I think you just have to make reasonable assumptions and move on.
From: Morgaine Christensen
Is the MLP Script LEGAL that has Miffy's as the creator? Can I use this script with the products that I build provided I use her note card? Can I add the full perm animations I so expensively bought? What about the freebie full perms animations? Can I use those in my builds? What if I buy full perm animations/poses, then the person I bought them from gets nabbed for copy right infringement? Are all my products going to be deleted when there was no way I could of known they were copy right infringed? This is terribly confusing! How do you tell a legit merchant from a non-legit merchant?
Miffy was the original programmer and the scripts were posted on the web for all to grab and use in SL. The MLP script is legal from a license standpoint regardless who is listed as the "Creator" in the SL perms system -- as long as Miffy's copyright notices stay intact within the scripts. However, Matthew's suggestion that you repaste the scripts into your own is a good one. Or get fresh copies of Miffy's own versions from in-world and use those. My bed has them.

If you plan to buy full perms stuff to resell, you should check with the original creator to make sure they are being purchased legally. Even if you are buying from someone you THINK is the original creator, there is no 100% way to tell that it still wasn't ripped from someone.
_____________________

Buh-bye forums, it's been good ta know ya.
Ceka Cianci
SuperPremiumExcaliburAcc#
Join date: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 4,489
06-17-2008 11:31
From: Cheyenne Marquez
If you would have taken your own advise and tried reading and comprehending my posts prior to writing your above million word dissertation you would have understood that I said we all suffer from the immoral acts of these thieves.

"All" means consumers, content creators, resellers, LL, SL, you, me, EVERYONE!

I have compassion. I am a huge consumer myself. I love shopping and anyone who knows me knows that shopping is the one thing I love doing more than anything else in SL. So of course I feel for all of the consumers who have been victimized and made to suffer from this incident.

Mine is not a consumers against content creators, or residents against LL, or me against you, cause. Mine is an everyone who is attempting to do right in SL against content thieves in SL cause.

The thing is, unlike many on these forums, I am consistent. Which is more than I can say for many posters on these forums. My fight has always been, and will always be, to come down hard on content thieves and to devise and implement stricter enforcement measuresby which to deal with this problem.

But the underlying message in all of these IP theft threads is consitently that it is ok when content creators get ripped-off because, well ... "hey there is nothing we can do about IP theft so "Give up, 'stop whining,' and accept it because that's the way it is baby."

Unless, off course, anyone else is made to suffer because god forbid then it becomes a huge problem and everyone be damned.

The point being that we are ALL made to suffer from content theft. As proven by what has happened in this situation. So that when it happens, place the blame were it belongs. Not on consumers, not on content creators, not on you, or me, or LL. Place it where it belongs, and that is directly and solely on the thieves that create the problem to begin with.

Direct your ire and anger toward them and do something to solve the problem along those lines rather than spewing the inconsistencies see in these threads that so long as it is only the content creators that are victimized it is ok, but when others are victimized it is LL, the content creators, and anyone else EXCEPT the dam thieves, who are consistently vicariously and vehemently defended by many on these forum posters through their lackadaisical "leave it alone and do nothing about content theft because there is nothing we can do about it" attitude.

Slow down and try reading, and understanding, what you read next time before you lash out at someone.

Comprehension is a wonderful thing.

i suggest you take your own advise in lashing out and in comprehension and me and you would not be going round and round like we are..you nip at me like i don't have a clue or haven't been there before and you are gonna get a long drawn out response because you are asking for one..
i've been in business since i was 10 years old..you are not giving me some kind of wake up call to content theft and who suffers more or who suffered before this..thats nothing but common sense..

i've said it long before you and one of the first to say it..that the only one not getting hurt in all this is the thief..
i'm not here to argue with you but you want to be snippy we can do that..i work for myself and i can pull up anytime i want and have someone take over while we vent hahahaha

like i said i have been doing something about content theft every chance i get and yes i hope this thief is broke for the rest of her life for pulling this crap and laughing at warnings given to him or her..
the people that don't give a crap about content theft and are out there trying to take advantage knowing they are buying black market skins and full perm stuff they have seen in creators stores for 5k then see it in these full perm stores for 100 to 500 ..they know exactly what they are doing when they buy that stuff..
they are just as much the thief..

those are the ones that deserve to have a quick switch thrown..
those are the ones that don't care about content theft..not the ones being loyal to their creators they shop at..
those people that take advantage of the full perm rippoff stores are doing nothing but promoting it..wish for them to be the ones to get hurt in all this..
not the ones buying from good people..
i wish there was a way to flip a switch and only the ones that promote it or steal it were the only ones that get hurt..
you seem to think this is going to make everyone aware of content theft and it's going to help the cause by hurting the bread and butter of these good places.

some of us bitch about it and some of us do something about it but
everyone knows about it

i'm sure not gonna feel good that people feel my pain just so they are aware now..

really i am glade to see LL finally starting to get involved i really am..maybe this was some kind of eye opener to say Hey wake up we are involved now lol

i think they would scare more people with a blog notice and a blue menu and caused less trouble than doing it how they did is all..
maybe i am too my rl and not enough sl when it comes to matters like this..
_____________________
Morgaine Christensen
Empress of the Universe
Join date: 31 Dec 2005
Posts: 319
06-17-2008 11:47
From: Snickers Snook
You really don't know unless you can prove chain of custody or you make the entire work yourself. I think you just have to make reasonable assumptions and move on.
Miffy was the original programmer and the scripts were posted on the web for all to grab and use in SL. The MLP script is legal from a license standpoint regardless who is listed as the "Creator" in the SL perms system -- as long as Miffy's copyright notices stay intact within the scripts. However, Matthew's suggestion that you repaste the scripts into your own is a good one. Or get fresh copies of Miffy's own versions from in-world and use those. My bed has them.

If you plan to buy full perms stuff to resell, you should check with the original creator to make sure they are being purchased legally. Even if you are buying from someone you THINK is the original creator, there is no 100% way to tell that it still wasn't ripped from someone.


Thank you Snickers and Matthew for the advice.

I do try to buy full perm items from the original creators. It is very hard to know upfront who was the original creator before buying costly scripts and animations. Hard to tell even after you buy if the creator is an alt of the person actually doing the selling *sighs* I do try to include any and all permission note cards in a object that uses the work of others and try to make my items and any full perms in those items no copy/mod to maintain the integrity of all that goes into a build.

If anyone wants to shamelessly plug their full perm animations and poses THEY CREATE PERSONALLY and wish to sell that will be added to furniture items I create for resale, please IM me in-world.

Thanks!
Chaz Longstaff
Registered User
Join date: 11 Oct 2006
Posts: 685
06-17-2008 12:33
From: Kitty Barnett
Popular stores make big money, claiming anything else is just silly and they're entitled to all of it, but it also gives them the ability to seek out infringers with more than barely a slap on the wrist.


Lawyers are pricey. Really, really pricey, no doubt you know.

kk let's say you gross 70,000 US a year in Second Life. Big money in SL terms. Now, minus all your costs of doing business in SL. Take it out, get hit a bit by exchange fees. Then pay your RL taxes due on it (if you're in Canada, bye-bye 50%.) Then pay your rent, your phone bill, your hydro, your car payments....

Then you're going to hire a lawyer? 5 to 10k US just to get the case started (if you're lucky.) Plus loss of income in the meantime owing to you being stressed by being involved in this (yep, it happens.)

To make this picture work, I guess we'd have to up the 70k US a year a lot higher.
Ceka Cianci
SuperPremiumExcaliburAcc#
Join date: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 4,489
06-17-2008 13:42
for those that have not seen the blog here is the link..
http://blog.secondlife.com/2008/06/17/responding-to-questions-about-the-dmca-process/


Responding to Questions about the DMCA Process
Tuesday, June 17th, 2008 at 1:20 AM by: lauraplinden

Linden Lab inadvertently disabled some inworld content this past weekend. The problem should be fixed now, and we apologize for the inconvenience it caused. If you believe your content was inadvertently disabled, please try re-rezzing it. If that doesn’t work, please contact Support at http://secondlife.com/support.

Linden Lab has not changed its DMCA policy. For privacy reasons, we don’t discuss the specifics of DMCA notifications with third parties. However, when we receive a valid DMCA notification, we send affected Residents email notice so they aren’t surprised when we remove content from their inventory and inworld locations. The email notice explains how to submit a DMCA counter-notification to seek restoration of the removed content. Be sure to keep your email address current and make lindenlab.com an exception in your spam filter so you receive notices from Linden Lab.

We’ve received questions about removing infringing items from Residents’ inventory when an inworld location (a region name and coordinates) can’t be provided. Inventory items may be subject to DMCA claims when the items are sufficiently identified. For example, if you can’t provide an inworld location, provide the names of the allegedly infringing items and avatars. Linden Lab will conduct a reasonable search for the identified items.

Also be aware that persons who materially misrepresent copyright infringement in DMCA claims may be liable for damages, including attorneys’ fees and costs. In one case, a company that sought removal of content protected by the fair use doctrine paid over $100,000 USD. For more on this, see here. If you’re unsure whether certain content infringes your copyright, we suggest speaking to an attorney before submitting a DMCA claim.

More information about Linden Lab’s DMCA process can be found on our DMCA policy page and in our recent blog post on Protecting Your Copyrighted Content. Linden Lab’s DMCA policy has not changed, and this information is up-to-date.
_____________________
Solomon Devoix
Used Register
Join date: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 496
06-17-2008 13:45
From: Cheyenne Marquez
Well stated.

Thank you.

Given that he posted that in response to my post, Cheyenne, I don't think he's agreeing with who you think he's agreeing with. I'd be careful about saying "thanks" for his post. ;) He did say in response to my post:
From: Talarus Luan
PS- Oh, forgot to say... I agree with you 100%. :D
_____________________
From: Jake Black
I dont know what the actual answer is.. I just know LLs response was at best...flaccid.
From: Solomon Devoix
That's a very good way to put it, and now I know why we still haven't seen the promised blog entry...

...the Lindens are still waiting for their shipment of Lie-agra to come in to firm up their flaccid reasoning.
Cheyenne Marquez
Registered User
Join date: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 940
06-17-2008 15:47
From: Solomon Devoix
Given that he posted that in response to my post, Cheyenne, I don't think he's agreeing with who you think he's agreeing with. I'd be careful about saying "thanks" for his post. ;) He did say in response to my post:


Excuse me but its clear that it was you who called someone out as a troll. Given that, regardless of who he meant it for, it obviously applied to you.

It is also obvious that subtle sarcasm is lost on you as well.
Solomon Devoix
Used Register
Join date: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 496
06-17-2008 15:53
From: Cheyenne Marquez
Excuse me but its clear that it was you who called someone out as a troll. Given that, regardless of who he meant it for, it obviously applied to you.

It is also obvious that subtle sarcasm is lost on you as well.

Man, I'm glad I didn't leave this thread... I got ANOTHER really good laugh out of it! :D
_____________________
From: Jake Black
I dont know what the actual answer is.. I just know LLs response was at best...flaccid.
From: Solomon Devoix
That's a very good way to put it, and now I know why we still haven't seen the promised blog entry...

...the Lindens are still waiting for their shipment of Lie-agra to come in to firm up their flaccid reasoning.
Cel Edman
Registered User
Join date: 24 May 2007
Posts: 42
06-17-2008 15:56
After a DMCA and another 'big' battle in Jan/Feb 2008 he stopped selling my stuff, but still ripped my general tos, for most of the stolen items he sold! the irony..

Cheyenne Marquez
Registered User
Join date: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 940
06-17-2008 15:58
From: Solomon Devoix
Man, I'm glad I didn't leave this thread... I got ANOTHER really good laugh out of it! :D


Keep laughing. The jokes on you.

You were simply used.

What you are not aware of is that Talarus Luan and I have prior history on this subject. He is one of those aforementioned forum posters that defends thieves through his cry of "there is nothing we can do about content theft so stop trying to do anything about it and just accept it."

Matter of fact, a statue was raised in his name on a prior thread by the content thieves of SL with a unified scream of "All Hail Talarus Luan."

But you did not know that, did you?

In other words, he used you to try and take a shot at me. Which is very ironic because in doing so he only insulted you being as how you were the one who initially called someone a troll.

But you are both so desperate in your attempts to grasp at anything that will somehow redeem yourselves, you are both blinded and unable to see that he in fact insulted YOU.

He couldn't help himself though, and neither could you.

Petty and sad I know.
Cheyenne Marquez
Registered User
Join date: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 940
06-17-2008 16:04
From: Ceka Cianci
i suggest you take your own advise in lashing out and in comprehension and me and you would not be going round and round like we are..you nip at me like i don't have a clue or haven't been there before and you are gonna get a long drawn out response because you are asking for one..
i've been in business since i was 10 years old..you are not giving me some kind of wake up call to content theft and who suffers more or who suffered before this..thats nothing but common sense..

i've said it long before you and one of the first to say it..that the only one not getting hurt in all this is the thief..
i'm not here to argue with you but you want to be snippy we can do that..i work for myself and i can pull up anytime i want and have someone take over while we vent hahahaha

like i said i have been doing something about content theft every chance i get and yes i hope this thief is broke for the rest of her life for pulling this crap and laughing at warnings given to him or her..
the people that don't give a crap about content theft and are out there trying to take advantage knowing they are buying black market skins and full perm stuff they have seen in creators stores for 5k then see it in these full perm stores for 100 to 500 ..they know exactly what they are doing when they buy that stuff..
they are just as much the thief..

those are the ones that deserve to have a quick switch thrown..
those are the ones that don't care about content theft..not the ones being loyal to their creators they shop at..
those people that take advantage of the full perm rippoff stores are doing nothing but promoting it..wish for them to be the ones to get hurt in all this..
not the ones buying from good people..
i wish there was a way to flip a switch and only the ones that promote it or steal it were the only ones that get hurt..
you seem to think this is going to make everyone aware of content theft and it's going to help the cause by hurting the bread and butter of these good places.

some of us bitch about it and some of us do something about it but
everyone knows about it

i'm sure not gonna feel good that people feel my pain just so they are aware now..

really i am glade to see LL finally starting to get involved i really am..maybe this was some kind of eye opener to say Hey wake up we are involved now lol

i think they would scare more people with a blog notice and a blue menu and caused less trouble than doing it how they did is all..
maybe i am too my rl and not enough sl when it comes to matters like this..


:confused:
Talarus Luan
Ancient Archaean Dragon
Join date: 18 Mar 2006
Posts: 4,831
06-17-2008 16:22
From: Cheyenne Marquez
Keep laughing. The jokes on you.

You were simply used.


Actually, any "joke" here would, yes, be on you. :P

From: someone
What you are not aware of is that Talarus Luan and I have prior history on this subject. He is one of those aforementioned forum posters that defends thieves through his cry of "there is nothing we can do about content theft so stop trying to do anything about it and just accept it" attitude.


And you're just another "Sky is falling" apologist for paranoia.

I've never defended a thief anywhere, despite your hyperbolic BS.

All I have ever said is that it is *impossible* to PREVENT "content theft" (properly called Copyright Infringement), so stop trying to PREVENT it and accept that fact. I NEVER said ANYONE had to accept it. Fight it. I do. Why is it so hard for you to understand? Can you understand? Oh, wait, riiiight.... *lightbulb goes on*

However, you are one of those of the opinion that you can play God and dictate that the entire technology industry do everything it can to protect one single texture, despite the fact it would COMPLETELY destroy the very thing that Copyright exists to protect: the BALANCE between content creators and the public.

From: someone
In other words, he used you to try and take a shot at me. Which is very ironic because in doing so he only insulted you being as how you were the one who initially called someone a troll.


He called your *posts* a troll. You called *him* a troll. The difference is in the tact used. However, I doubt you will see that for what it is, so why am I bothering?

From: someone
But you are both so desperate in your attempts to grasp at anything that will somehow redeem you, you are both not able to see that he in fact insulted YOU.


Except you are wrong. It is my post, and I will repeat what I said: I agree with his assessment 100%: Obvious troll is obvious. To help you understand that, let me rephrase for him: "Your posts are so obviously incredulous and obtuse that you have to be trolling."

From: someone
He couldn't help himself though, and neither could you.

Petty and sad I know.


Listen to who is talking! :rolleyes:

Pot, meet kettle....
Talarus Luan
Ancient Archaean Dragon
Join date: 18 Mar 2006
Posts: 4,831
06-17-2008 16:23
From: Cel Edman
After a DMCA and another 'big' battle in Jan/Feb 2008 he stopped selling my stuff, but still ripped my general tos, for most of the stolen items he sold! the irony..



Gads, pretty brazen, or pretty clueless. Either way, glad he finally got ganked for it.
Cheyenne Marquez
Registered User
Join date: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 940
06-17-2008 16:25
From: Talarus Luan
Actually, any "joke" here would, yes, be on you. :P



And you're just another "Sky is falling" apologist for paranoia.

I've never defended a thief anywhere, despite your hyperbolic BS.

All I have ever said is that it is *impossible* to PREVENT "content theft" (properly called Copyright Infringement), so stop trying to PREVENT it and accept that fact. I NEVER said ANYONE had to accept it. Fight it. I do. Why is it so hard for you to understand? Can you understand? Oh, wait, riiiight.... *lightbulb goes on*

However, you are one of those of the opinion that you can play God and dictate that the entire technology industry do everything it can to protect one single texture, despite the fact it would COMPLETELY destroy the very thing that Copyright exists to protect: the BALANCE between content creators and the public.



He called your *posts* a troll. You called *him* a troll. The difference is in the tact used. However, I doubt you will see that for what it is, so why am I bothering?



Except you are wrong. It is my post, and I will repeat what I said: I agree with his assessment 100%: Obvious troll is obvious. To help you understand that, let me rephrase for him: "Your posts are so obviously incredulous and obtuse that you have to be trolling."



Listen to who is talking! :rolleyes:

Pot, meet kettle....


Oooh, lookie here. He finally got the nerve to address me directly. As opposed to taking a backstabbing jab through another poster.

Congratulations on your newfound courage.
Talarus Luan
Ancient Archaean Dragon
Join date: 18 Mar 2006
Posts: 4,831
06-17-2008 16:28
From: Cheyenne Marquez
Oooh, lookie here. He finally got the nerve to address me directly. As opposed to taking a backstabbing jab through another poster.

Congratulations on your newfound courage.


I was just cooking up another batch of popcorn, love.

Sorry I didn't get to you sooner, but the adfarmers had me busy elsewhere.

XOXO

:D

BTW, it doesn't take any "courage" to address you, just finding something amusing enough to bother wasting my time over.

Thanks, though! It was entertaining. :)
1 2 3 4 5