meanwhile real live paying premium customers can not log in because their spot is taken up by a bot
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
The official 'grid is borked' thread.. |
|
|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
01-04-2009 16:55
meanwhile real live paying premium customers can not log in because their spot is taken up by a bot _____________________
Prim Savers - almost 1000 items of superbly crafted, top quality, very low prim furniture, and all at amazingly low prices.
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Seymour/213/120/251/ |
|
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
|
01-04-2009 17:04
meanwhile real live paying premium customers can not log in because their spot is taken up by a bot This is difficult to prove, although I have sympathy for the viewpoint. I mean there are no such spots, and it's hard to see what pushes the world over the edge but all bots cause some load, so they do have some impact. The question is, how many more active people would get in if all bots were kicked off? I'd wager it would be far from a 1 to 1 ratio. |
|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
01-04-2009 17:12
The question is, how many more active people would get in if all bots were kicked off? _____________________
Prim Savers - almost 1000 items of superbly crafted, top quality, very low prim furniture, and all at amazingly low prices.
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Seymour/213/120/251/ |
|
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
|
01-04-2009 17:14
Bite your tongue, Ciaran! At least whisper such things so my bots don't hear them and go into a panic. Poor little things. Shouldn't they be asleep at this time of night? ![]() |
|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
01-04-2009 17:41
Shouldn't they be asleep at this time of night? ![]() _____________________
Prim Savers - almost 1000 items of superbly crafted, top quality, very low prim furniture, and all at amazingly low prices.
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Seymour/213/120/251/ |
|
Love Hastings
#66666
Join date: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,094
|
01-04-2009 17:51
meanwhile real live paying premium customers can not log in because their spot is taken up by a bot I really doubt that the minimum load a bot puts on a specific sim (ie, server) and even less load on the infrastructure (network) could be considered equal to a person. In fact, I suspect it's a rather small fraction of the load. Just saying. _____________________
![]() |
|
Toy LaFollette
I eat paintchips
Join date: 11 Feb 2004
Posts: 2,359
|
01-04-2009 18:00
as far as Im concerned any load is to much, however LL doesnt care because SL is about numbers only.
_____________________
"So you see, my loyalty lies with Second Life, not with Linden Lab. Where I perceive the actions of Linden Lab to be in conflict with the best interests of Second Life, I side with Second Life."-Jacek
|
|
Rhaorth Antonelli
Registered User
Join date: 15 Apr 2006
Posts: 7,425
|
01-04-2009 18:24
There are not such spots, Rha. if you and the many others did not have bots on the grid, then those spaces would be empty as it were, thus making the amount of ppl logged in a lot less, therefor not causing a lock out that keeps paying customers out.... so yes, in my opinion there are "spots" as it were... _____________________
Morpheus Linden: But then I change avs pretty often too, so often, I look nothing like my avatar. ![]() They are taking away the forums... it could be worse, they could be taking away the forums AND Second Life... |
|
Rhaorth Antonelli
Registered User
Join date: 15 Apr 2006
Posts: 7,425
|
01-04-2009 18:28
This is difficult to prove, although I have sympathy for the viewpoint. I mean there are no such spots, and it's hard to see what pushes the world over the edge but all bots cause some load, so they do have some impact. The question is, how many more active people would get in if all bots were kicked off? I'd wager it would be far from a 1 to 1 ratio. I have a feeling it would be a 1 to 1 ratio however since none of us know what exact formula LL uses to determine when to shut down logins, it is anyone's guess I am going on the assumption that they hit a specific number of logins and shut off logins for a specific amount of time... so in my uneducated guess, if bots were removed from the grid, then that many live people could log in... before it is shut down but since bot runners and LL will do nothing about it, we will never know (and for the record, this is the only time bots annoy me, because in my opinion, IF the bots were not there, then we (those locked out) could get in... *shrug* as I said we will never know, unless LL does something about bots and bot runners and since SL is running like crap for me today, I am off to play some warhammer... _____________________
Morpheus Linden: But then I change avs pretty often too, so often, I look nothing like my avatar. ![]() They are taking away the forums... it could be worse, they could be taking away the forums AND Second Life... |
|
Sindy Tsure
Will script for shoes
Join date: 18 Sep 2006
Posts: 4,103
|
01-04-2009 19:00
I have a feeling it would be a 1 to 1 ratio I don't like traffic bots. Never have and can't see that I ever will. People who use them are cheats and liars. Phil is on my ignore list because he's a complete twit. But I still don't think it's anywhere near 1:1, unless you're talking about 'live' avatars that have basically 0 inventory, do not move, chat, TP, spend money or belong to many groups. |
|
Lyla Tunwarm
Registered User
Join date: 10 Jul 2008
Posts: 179
|
01-04-2009 21:47
If it wasn't bots it would be real people and the grid would still be capped and people would still complain. Removing bots is not even a bandaide on the real problem.
|
|
Rhaorth Antonelli
Registered User
Join date: 15 Apr 2006
Posts: 7,425
|
01-04-2009 21:49
I don't like traffic bots. Never have and can't see that I ever will. People who use them are cheats and liars. Phil is on my ignore list because he's a complete twit. But I still don't think it's anywhere near 1:1, unless you're talking about 'live' avatars that have basically 0 inventory, do not move, chat, TP, spend money or belong to many groups. I am saying that IF... and that is a big IF... the cut off is a number of avatars logged in... THEN it would be 1 to 1 but since none of us know, either way could be right... or wrong... only the programmers know for sure how they have it set up for all we know, there might be a linden that says... ok time to shut out ppl for a little while, for any or no reason.... _____________________
Morpheus Linden: But then I change avs pretty often too, so often, I look nothing like my avatar. ![]() They are taking away the forums... it could be worse, they could be taking away the forums AND Second Life... |
|
Libby Dollinger
Registered User
Join date: 31 May 2007
Posts: 11
|
01-04-2009 22:48
Is anyone else still having trouble logging on? I've not been successful at all today, since trying this afternoon.
|
|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
01-05-2009 01:39
if you and the many others did not have bots on the grid, then those spaces would be empty as it were, thus making the amount of ppl logged in a lot less, therefor not causing a lock out that keeps paying customers out.... so yes, in my opinion there are "spots" as it were... I have a feeling it would be a 1 to 1 ratio I am going on the assumption that they hit a specific number of logins and shut off logins for a specific amount of time... so in my uneducated guess, if bots were removed from the grid, then that many live people could log in... before it is shut down _____________________
Prim Savers - almost 1000 items of superbly crafted, top quality, very low prim furniture, and all at amazingly low prices.
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Seymour/213/120/251/ |
|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
01-05-2009 01:44
People who use them are cheats and liars. Phil is on my ignore list because he's a complete twit. Is that why I didn't get a Christmas card from you? And there was me thinking what a rotten postal service we have._____________________
Prim Savers - almost 1000 items of superbly crafted, top quality, very low prim furniture, and all at amazingly low prices.
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Seymour/213/120/251/ |
|
Rhaorth Antonelli
Registered User
Join date: 15 Apr 2006
Posts: 7,425
|
01-05-2009 05:39
There are no "spaces" to be empty or filled, Rha. Not even in the same ballpark. Nope. Nope. not gonna argue with you phil, as it is both just based on opinions as neither of us have any way of knowing for sure how it works when they decide to lock out users apparently you do not quite get what I am trying to say, or you are arguing it for the sake of arguing because you are a bot runner and feel the need to defend that... either way not gonna banter it back and forth, I made my comments, and my points as best I can... nothing more to say... _____________________
Morpheus Linden: But then I change avs pretty often too, so often, I look nothing like my avatar. ![]() They are taking away the forums... it could be worse, they could be taking away the forums AND Second Life... |
|
Solomon Devoix
Used Register
Join date: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 496
|
01-05-2009 06:20
OK, I stand corrected. It is the armies of bots that are the problem. But having a nominal fee for non-premium accounts (maybe a 10 dollar one-time charge to set up the account) would perhaps inhibit the unrestrained creation of bots without imposing too much additional cost on non-premium users. There used to be such a fee, way back when. I paid that one-time fee when I created my alt. _____________________
I dont know what the actual answer is.. I just know LLs response was at best...flaccid. That's a very good way to put it, and now I know why we still haven't seen the promised blog entry... ...the Lindens are still waiting for their shipment of Lie-agra to come in to firm up their flaccid reasoning. |
|
Cappy Frantisek
Open Source is the Devil!
Join date: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 400
|
01-05-2009 06:32
OK, I stand corrected. It is the armies of bots that are the problem. But having a nominal fee for non-premium accounts (maybe a 10 dollar one-time charge to set up the account) would perhaps inhibit the unrestrained creation of bots without imposing too much additional cost on non-premium users. No, no, no! That defeats the whole purpose of having so many online to pitch to corporate business on the usefulness of the platform. LL would never allow that to happen. |
|
Raudf Fox
(ra-ow-th)
Join date: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 5,119
|
01-05-2009 06:38
There used to be such a fee, way back when. I paid that one-time fee when I created my alt. Yeah, it was 9.99 USD to create any account and then became free for the first account and all other accounts were 9.99 USD for creation. Then they phased that completely out. Honestly, it was the fee that kept the growth stable, controlled and well within LL's abilities to manage. But, somehow, things were worse for stability back then. We'd get a weekly Wednesday downtime for the -whole- grid and then two days of instability after that that required the -whole- grid to be brought down for repairing. Then they'd have to shut down the -whole- grid to clean up after self-replicating griefer attacks during the weekends. They are a bit better now, in that they don't always have to kick -everyone- off the grid to fix it AND they don't have to have a weekly downtime to do updating/maint. This is not to say it's all roses and sunshine, but at least they don't have to take the grid completely down anymore. That said... I haven't been able to work in SL, because the times I've been home RL side, the grid is fubar'd. Yeah.... _____________________
DiamonX Studios, the place of the Victorian Times series of gowns and dresses - Located at http://slurl.com/secondlife/Fushida/224/176
Want more attachment points for your avatar's wearing pleasure? Then please vote for https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-1065? |