Phillip Linden is so cute, oh yea..and a great video!!

An innocent soul sees nothing wrong in a verse, but the diseased mind sees all as perverse

But perverse in a good way.

I read the whole thing. I quoted the part that was relevant to my reply. This is standard editing practice. It keeps things focused and keeps people from having to read pages of quoted text to find the one sentence that matters. It is not "sensorship" (or even censorship).



I don't offer an "appology" or even an apology. I think you have a sick mind that reads things like lust and infidelity into innocent comments and banter. I also think you are one of those people who want to ban all other people's fun, simply because their idea of fun isn't your own. I bet you would have voted for Prohibition.



You're welcome. Truthfully, this is one accusation I'll actually admit to, with a slightly red face. Yes, I love to post on the forums. I don't think every thread needs my attention, but yes, I do have something to say about a lot of them, either seriously or in jest. I don't often confront someone directly, and I've kept my mouth shut while watching a lot of your drivel scroll by...but not any more.

You, my dear, are a nutter. Welcome to my Ignore list.

There is so much here, and in the other post, I'll just have to pick out the major points.

You did attack in your first post. The ladies who were talking about Phillip were doing so in a lighthearted, fun way, and for some odd reason, you took offense to that and attacked them. I can use pop psychology myself and surmise reasons why that might have upset you. I would guess, that you are repressed and like your women that way as well, and that it seems you're a bit jealous of Phillip, and any handsome man most likely.

You also said, although your English leaves much to be desired, that you were just steering (do you mean stirring?) up conversation. That would make you a troll.

I also have a hard time taking seriously one talking about psychological tests, but cannot spell the word psychological.

Your post reeks of hostility towards women and a very repressed view of sex. I think you would be much better served by seeing a therapist yourself rather than spewing moronic theories about women who have done nothing harmful to you, but are merely having fun discussing the attributes of a male they find attractive. I seriously doubt any of them will be upset that they don't "get their prize." You, however, seem very upset by this, and that is obvious by the tone of your posts, and your responses, which get weirder and more hostile with each reply.

I know that in my life, when something upsets me, I have to ask myself a question: What am I afraid of? I suggest you ask that of yourself, but I highly doubt you will be self-aware enough to honestly answer it. My guess is that either you're jealous or you're projecting their feelings on to yourself, which leads to our next question:

Do YOU find yourself oddly attracted to Phillip Rosedale? Now we're getting somewhere.....

Cheers! I never thought of anything sexual until Moo brought it up.
Its not like we were talking about ravaging Phillip, or seeing him in a g-string, or dancing on one of SL's dance poles. /me wipes her forhead.

Well, Im glad you posted here, why shouldnt we have a bit of fun, no harm done!

I decided I am going with serious case of language barrier and just ignore the rest...

Very well said, do you take appointments? I have this nagging feeling I'm being watched..nah, just kidding. But you've made some excellent points.

Most Hollywood guys are not so nice? And you know this how? Perhaps from reading the National Enquirer. I can't speak about Tom or Hugh because I've never met them, however, the vast majority of Hollywood insiders I've met are courteous, friendly and usually a little bit shy.

That was great- you definitely need to post more.

Even Phillip admitted in the video that he was shy. I really havent heard of any a$$hole stars, anyway. Yea Tom did a couch dance, and has a religious belief that apparently Moo doesnt agree with. But look at Johnny Depp, the locals where he lives say he's the nicest guy ever, leaves great tips at the restaurants. They're just people like us, anyway, with lots more money and exposure.

What he said.

Oh yay, a forum troll. Does it know this forum is rated PG? Before it attacks others about their "language"?

"Lighten up Francis" has me laughing so hard my stomach hurts though. So some good did come out of it. Lol

Does forum troll go to museums and accost people for admiring paintings when they could be outside looking at "a real tree"? Why is forum troll not busy with its self described captivating "real life".

Yawn.

All i know that if i posted as a female name (nickname) non of you ladies, would ever replied like this to me. That i know for sure.
Since women to women is more accepted, in this case, then a mixed crowd. Especially if women are talking about appearances of men. (delicate subject so it all seems)

I did not attack women directly in my first post. READ IT WORD BY WORD. I did not mention names, nor calling names.
It was a comment in general (as to why is this ?)

My english, well, that is not of any importance here, as long as we understand the words or context. Bit weak for an argument to throw at me. Most people in chat/sms/forums make grammatical errors. it's common practice (quickly responding, abbrivations etc etc)

To be clear, i did not dramatize, many of you ladies did yourself. Making it more aggressive then needed. (read back all posts in an organised manner, and you can see for yourself)

I mentioned time after time "she who fits the shoe". Meaning, not geared towards all the women here. sheesh.. reading is difficult so it seems, when in anger or stress.

And no i'm not attracted to Phillip Rosendale's appearance at all.
infact i don't see what you ladies see in him.. just an avarage joe to me.

maybe you should ask yourselves:
Has it to do with status? accomplishments in life? that makes him more standing out then others? (appearance wise)
cos to me that has to do with it too.. not him as person alone.

anyway...

I'm happy with who i am, and look and do.
so do peeps who know me deeply.

"Your post reeks of hostility towards women and a very repressed view of sex. I think you would be much better served by seeing a therapist yourself "

No need too, as you say so yourself REEKS. REEKS is NOT the same as IS. But tending to. In your view anyway (and some dramatizing other ladies here, let's face the facts.)

the hostile fems here, incl you, can't take it when a man enters a women only thread full of gossip, and projects another theory or scenario. Noo, instead this man is being verbally lynched.
HOW DARE HE?! The nerve, ooh! He is sick, retarded, otherwise he would not dare to use the freedom of replying with a vision/comment that is not exactly "in the same box of gossip" as your party was..
well excuse me for entering..

TIP:
Use a "FEMALE ONLY" wording in your next forum thread... saves you a whole lot of drama..

I think I am in love. Crighton, are you by any chance a fan of Spider Robinson? He makes this very good point repeatedly in his stories.

Its first post seems very hostile *and* aimed at women, to me. Not to mention homophobic, and offensive in many ways. Presumptive in the extreme. And using foul language, which is against forum TOS.

It also seems to ignore reality since there are and were a lot of men in the thread.

Projection seems to be its hobby. (PS its screen name is neither male or female, that I can tell.) First post in complete and original form:

If you would have posted with a female name it would have been readily apparent that you were a guy with a sick, twisted mind posting with a female name.

You came here to psychoanalyze us and you don't much like when it was turned back on you. You really do need to take a break from here and go get some help, because point blank: you have a seriously fu**ed up view of women, as in serial killer screwed up.

no.. i said:

Why must mainly women in a certain age/mental situation

It's right there in typeface.

"either one of YOU"

Even if you meant (to claim later that you did not aim your post at) "specific forum posters" as opposed to "directly at women" - the use of the word "you" or even more so, "either one of you" immediately following forum posts, means you are aiming your post at people in this thread. Since you seem to love picking apart posts and being pedantic, despite your own erroneous and/or vague use of language.

You haven't realised yet that even if the person doesn't think it was aimed at *them* they may be offended that you are attacking anyone here, merely for admiring someone's looks.

Let alone throwing out insults based upon age or sexual orientation, or presumptions about how seriously things are being thought about, or even what people are doing behind the screen - which says more about *you* frankly since it isn't based upon anything in the thread. In short, it reads like your own sexual fantasy, of what "women do", *not that of anyone else here*.

Your original post and those after it as well, but mainly your original one you now protest as 'innocent' - is offensive in too many ways to count. That's *my* opinion.

Why do you even care, if someone out there likes the Linden Lab CEO? Enough to try to insult people about it repeatedly in a forum. Do you feel you are the appointed arbiter of morality here?

in a word

troll


in more words than one
because they knew it would garner a reaction, and it did, now they are sitting back, giggling like a school girl, knowing they are stirring the pot

do you think they really left?

Not me. It seems as if this is a person with too much time and too little negative attention to suit themselves, who chose to spend time and find negative attention here. I also think this is an alt of someone currently posting in this forum, but who knows.

The adage about not wrestling with a pig comes to mind, so I'm bowing out now.

So very true. Anyone who thinks they can't resist responding back to the idiot should just put him on block. Last thing you want to do is keep feeding the troll.

agreed

and I love how they said that someone judged them based on what they said in a forum, yet they did the exact same thing based on the words from a few people in this very thread


oh and I posted my reply before reading the rest of the thread, so yeah, guess I was right, they never really left, even after closing the door, and the window...

wonder how they got back in if the door and window were closed... ah, they forgot to lock them I bet!

*grins*

*hands out some popcorn*

Whatever..

The word you is also used as a pointing towards a crowd, instead of a solo human. Nothing erroneous about that. IT'S CALLED CONTEXT.

But since somehow, i get violated personally each post.. while i already explained a gazillion times what i ment.. you ladies keep on going.... Ignoring my explanations and keep hammering on old posts along with it.

fine..

I will delete all (except this one) posts here.. and leave you "ladies" be..

Girrrrlll power, i hear from some now..
victory is ours.. gone with the troll.. hoorraay!

Well not exactly, it's called counter tactics.

Retreating before it's getting REALLY VIOLENT/MESSED UP from both sides.)

This "troll" is waving goodbye to the "tinkerbells" here..

I dont know if they left, I had to run to Sonic and grab a coney dog, half price..lol

Well, I was offended by his/her posts and Im assuming it's male because they say GF in one of their posts, and use the parentheses around gay, as if its a horrible thing.
It really reminds me of the guy on Pink Floyd's , The Wall, video. "IF you dont eat your meat, you cant have any pudding"! Us girls were all giggly and having fun and in comes the monster and throws all our barbie dolls in the fire!