|
Nina Stepford
was lied to by LL
Join date: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 3,373
|
04-30-2009 04:36
i dont remember the specifics, but it was an on-going thing. i am thinking the thread may be over the road. initially the guy didnt know why he was banned, it was a quiet, soviet-style banning. i am thinking the child-av revelation was the 'wow' at the end of the forum scrutiny at least. From: Kidd Krasner Did the investigation turn up worse? Otherwise, that's insane. Anyone adult who tried out that kid transmorgrifier thing during the anniversary event last year would be subject to banning - along with their SL partners.
_____________________
SLU - ban em then bash em! ~~GREATEST HITS~~ pro-life? gtfo! slu- banning opposing opinions one at a time http://www.sluniverse.com/php/vb/zomgwtfbbqgtfololcats/15428-disingenuous.html learn to shut up and nod in agreement... or be banned! http://www.sluniverse.com/php/vb/off-topic/1239-americans-not-stupid.html
|
|
Tabliopa Underwood
Registered User
Join date: 6 Aug 2007
Posts: 719
|
04-30-2009 06:10
From: Pserendipity Daniels Pep (Perhaps you should define your terms more closely?) ??? i not no wat u meen
|
|
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
|
04-30-2009 08:40
From: Tabliopa Underwood ??? i not no wat u meen Puhleez!  You of all people don't need to pretend to be unable to type good English.  Pep (I know you are an ESLer; *you* are the one making a fool out of yourself.)
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
|
|
Tabliopa Underwood
Registered User
Join date: 6 Aug 2007
Posts: 719
|
04-30-2009 09:14
From: Pserendipity Daniels Puhleez!  You of all people don't need to pretend to be unable to type good English.  Pep (I know you are an ESLer; *you* are the one making a fool out of yourself.) Pep I made my point. You understood it. You disagree. Thats fine. Is nothing more to be said about the subject as we are not likely to change each others minds on this. Anything further and we just end up repeating ourselves and waste everyones time. So ya, I dont know what you meant with your last line other than maybe you did want me to repeat myself just for its own sake. And you right, txtspk is my 1st language =p But having read lots comments here about comprehension from lots of people (not just you) then I try make an effort for everyones sake. Even when I dont know how to form my sentences very well sometimes. But I getting better at it I think so ya, something is working for me just by hanging out here. So, i just save the txtspk specially 4 u k da wen u say stuf nd i hav no idea wat u relly meen as fuly nd sily as dat mite b =p =)
|
|
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
|
04-30-2009 09:46
From: Tabliopa Underwood Pep I made my point. You understood it. You disagree. Thats fine. Is nothing more to be said about the subject as we are not likely to change each others minds on this. Anything further and we just end up repeating ourselves and waste everyones time. So ya, I dont know what you meant with your last line other than maybe you did want me to repeat myself just for its own sake. And you right, txtspk is my 1st language =p But having read lots comments here about comprehension from lots of people (not just you) then I try make an effort for everyones sake. Even when I dont know how to form my sentences very well sometimes. But I getting better at it I think so ya, something is working for me just by hanging out here. So, i just save the txtspk specially 4 u k da wen u say stuf nd i hav no idea wat u relly meen as fuly nd sily as dat mite b =p =) I couldn't care less what your first language really is, but it is fairly apparent that you are not able to express yourself sufficiently well in English to be able to contribute in a non-confusing way to this thread. I shall now waste a little of my time in an attempt to explain my "last line" in terms that you might understand, since you have asked. I don't do this often because this is supposed to be an English language forum and while others may disagree, I don't think that we should be diluting argument by "typing slower". The trouble is that although you may have thought that you made your point, you didn't in any coherent fashion. You used terms like "SL kid community" and "SL child" which potentially could be interpreted to include all or some of Mari, Immy and Mr P. D. O'Fyle. You use "child avatar" and "underage avatar" and I don't know if you are making some kind of point regarding the difference between them, or just being sloppy. You throw around the term "community" without indicating which community you mean - rl, sl, sl forums? I know from experience that other readers are quite prepared to tolerate the sloppy expression of what may or may not be sloppy thinking - it is impossible to differentiate. The problem is that then you may get people agreeing with somethng you didn't say, or disagreeing with something you didn't mean to say. I have not criticised your English in the past because it is *so* evident that it is not your first language that I have been able to ignore your posts. In this thread you have taken issue with my arguments, and played the fool yourself, so I have responded. Perhaps you think your language has improved sufficiently to be able to do so. I don't. Pep (end of homily)
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
|
|
Briana Dawson
Attach to Mouth
Join date: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,855
|
04-30-2009 10:01
From: Pserendipity Daniels I couldn't care less what your first language really is, but it is fairly apparent that you are not able to express yourself sufficiently well in English to be able to contribute in a non-confusing way to this thread. I shall now waste a little of my time in an attempt to explain my "last line" in terms that you might understand, since you have asked. I don't do this often because this is supposed to be an English language forum and while others may disagree, I don't think that we should be diluting argument by "typing slower". The trouble is that although you may have thought that you made your point, you didn't in any coherent fashion. You used terms like "SL kid community" and "SL child" which potentially could be interpreted to include all or some of Mari, Immy and Mr P. D. O'Fyle. You use "child avatar" and "underage avatar" and I don't know if you are making some kind of point regarding the difference between them, or just being sloppy. You throw around the term "community" without indicating which community you mean - rl, sl, sl forums? I know from experience that other readers are quite prepared to tolerate the sloppy expression of what may or may not be sloppy thinking - it is impossible to differentiate. The problem is that then you may get people agreeing with somethng you didn't say, or disagreeing with something you didn't mean to say. I have not criticised your English in the past because it is *so* evident that it is not your first language that I have been able to ignore your posts. In this thread you have taken issue with my arguments, and played the fool yourself, so I have responded. Perhaps you think your language has improved sufficiently to be able to do so. I don't. Pep (end of homily) tl;dr
|
|
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
|
05-01-2009 01:08
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
|
|
Imnotgoing Sideways
Can't outlaw cute! =^-^=
Join date: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 4,694
|
05-01-2009 05:06
From: Pserendipity Daniels ts
Pep (dc) I resemble that. (=_=)
|