Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

What is "Offensive Material"?

Casey Seifert
No faith in humanity
Join date: 7 Nov 2005
Posts: 50
08-13-2007 07:19
From: Morwen Bunin
Hmmm.... there are lot of things I dare to show or tell my mother, but which she will call without any doubt very offensive.... And yes, my relation with my mother is not the best one.

Morwen.


That's a reason why I didn't comment on the post directly, as that view is full of holes and inconsistencies.

But they seemed to react to my indirect comment, which would suggest that they know they're not doing as they're supposed to.


I guess you have to expect it from a forum.
Morwen Bunin
Everybody needs a hero!
Join date: 8 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,743
08-13-2007 07:21
From: Casey Seifert
I guess you have to expect it from a forum.


I would call it the charm of a forum *smiles*

Morwen.
Nika Talaj
now you see her ...
Join date: 2 Jan 2007
Posts: 5,449
08-13-2007 07:24
From: Pratyeka Muromachi
Ok, pick the one that seem most appropriate to you:

case #1
Anything you would be ashamed to show your daughter.

So unless your daughter is a drug addicted kiddy porn selling whore, that should give you a good yardstick to evaluate what is offensive or not.

.... Or if those cases don't fit into your moral standards, then ask yourself this: do you really want to peddle offensive material? Why?


Pratyeka, sincerely, I am offended by your statement. You are trivializing a very important civil liberties question. In addition, in a bizarrely confrontive and offensive leap, you seem to be implying that the OP (or anyone who asks this question) raised it because s/he wishes to sell porn or something.

Personally I find attempts to stifle free expression infiintely more offensive than nude pictures ala Maplethorpe. And, frankly, from your posting I have no idea whether you would find Maplethorpe offensive. So, in addition, I think you have not clarified the issue.

I am bothering to post because, on first coming into SL, I found the flowering of D/S activities astounding. Then, on exploring those parts of SL further, I learned much about the psychology of D/S and its fascination for many. Apparantly, many more than I had ever suspected. And I learned to regard that corner of the human psyche as not sick, but as just one more facet to human experience ... and not one to be feared. Tho no longer in it, as D/S usually simply doesn't suit me, I emerged from the experience with a sense of relief that the vast majority of participants are not closet sickos, but just people like me with different tastes. Would I escort my daughter around Bondage Playground? No. But it is infinitely tamer than much of the internet, and I am glad such places were around when I joined, and would be sad to see them go. I learned something there, and to me learning is SLs biggest pleasure.

SL, to me, is a place where I can be an armchair sociologist ... a place that allows me to swiftly explore the infinite varieties of other peoples' cultures, needs, experience. To stifle the place in order to enforce a lowest-common-denominator definition of decency would, I think, squash the tone of freedom that has allowed diffferent subcultures to flourish in SL.

So please, confine YOUR morality to YOUR subculture.
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
08-13-2007 07:27
From: Casey Seifert
That's a reason why I didn't comment on the post directly, as that view is full of holes and inconsistencies.

But they seemed to react to my indirect comment, which would suggest that they know they're not doing as they're supposed to.


I guess you have to expect it from a forum.


You arent going to get a straight answer on this one becuase the simple fact is Linden Labs is not consistant on this topic.

Thats why I said "No One knows."

------------------------------

For example you are supposed to be allowed nudity, and violent and other "Broadly Offensive Content" on Mature land --- Per the Indecency clause of the Community Standards.

Written by Dan L (supposedly according to his interveiw) way back

However in the Blog Post Dan L said that:

"The diversity of things to see and do within Second Life is almost unimaginable, but our community has made it clear to us that certain types of content and activity are simply not acceptable in any form. Real-life images, avatar portrayals, and other depiction of sexual or lewd acts involving or appearing to involve children or minors; real-life images, avatar portrayals, and other depictions of sexual violence including rape, real-life images, avatar portrayals, and other depictions of extreme or graphic violence, and other broadly offensive content are never allowed or tolerated within Second Life."


Thus using the same Blanket term to say things that are never allowed.

The same person using the same term leads you to think the terms mean the same thing - but obviously they cant.


---------------------

So the final answer is "No one knows" as far as I can tell.
Day Oh
Registered User
Join date: 3 Feb 2007
Posts: 1,257
08-13-2007 07:30
If a certain religious group took over and banning depictions of violence would be the most smart economical thing to do, the vagueness of the "offensive material" rule allows for that. "Offensive material" is the stuff you get rid of in order to maintain the best possible image, avoid bad press and stuff.
Alex Fitzsimmons
Resu Deretsiger
Join date: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 1,605
08-13-2007 07:38
The beautiful thing about deliberately vague wording is that the meaning can always change to suit the moment.

Coincidentally, if you wanted to eradicate a number of different "offensive elements" from the community, it would probably be more effective to target each group you intended to remove individually rather than all at once as a whole in order to prevent them from uniting, counting on the fact that people will never intervene where their own self-interests aren't directly impacted. Sort of a "divide and conquer" approach.

"When they came for me ..."
_____________________
"Whatever the astronomers finally decide, I think Xena should be considered the enemy planet." - io Kukalcan
Casey Seifert
No faith in humanity
Join date: 7 Nov 2005
Posts: 50
08-13-2007 07:48
From: Day Oh
If a certain religious group took over and banning depictions of violence would be the most smart economical thing to do, the vagueness of the "offensive material" rule allows for that. "Offensive material" is the stuff you get rid of in order to maintain the best possible image, avoid bad press and stuff.


A political move.

And politics is full of lies and deceit. Illusionists mastering the art of manipulation through words and pictures to gain an advantage.
stpaulsub Clio
Fear the Bubblegum Gurl!
Join date: 2 Sep 2004
Posts: 607
08-13-2007 07:49
From: Colette Meiji
You arent going to get a straight answer on this one becuase the simple fact is Linden Labs is not consistant on this topic.


Ok i believe that LL is very intentionally vague about this so that they do not have to act every time somebody see's something that personally offends them.

and personally i prefer it being vague to it being specific. Simply put, if they do NOT make a very detailed rule, they can ignore 99% of the things that go on

Me personally i find hypocrisy MUCH more offensive than anything sexual i have seen in SL
_____________________
From: someone
David Valentino: I think I just like to play with the balls
Har Fairweather
Registered User
Join date: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 2,320
08-13-2007 09:33
From: Casey Seifert
Could someone please elaborate "Offensive Material" in terms of Second Life please?


The answer is: Everything.

Absolutely everything in SL is offensive to someone, somewhere.

So forget about it. Be civil, play nice, when in Rome do as the Romans do, and don't worry.
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
08-13-2007 09:35
From: Har Fairweather
The answer is: Everything.

Absolutely everything in SL is offensive to someone, somewhere.

So forget about it. Be civil, play nice, when in Rome do as the Romans do, and don't worry.

You want us to slaughter lots of animals (and a few people) and throw up a lot?
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Oryx Tempel
Registered User
Join date: 8 Nov 2006
Posts: 7,663
08-13-2007 09:40
From: Mickey James
Well it depends on what you think about the Lindens. Some people imagine them as a group of axe-weilding moral crusaders led by Carrie Nation Linden, running around this world they've created attempting to stamp out every vestige of anything that is not Disney-fied family-friendly wholesome goodness.

Others see them as a group trying to keep the SL world as free as possible, making rules that restrict things only when necessary (primarily for adherence to the law), and that only after first trying less restrictive measures and having them not work.

The difficulty in specifying ahead of time what falls under the definition is that all it does is create loopholes for literalists to try to exploit. For example, if they say "depictions of sex acts involving an adult and a minor" are not permitted, someone will respond "aha! Well that says nothing about depictions of minors engaged in sex acts if the adults are just watching and not taking part." Then LL has to come back and say that's also forbidden, and then this forum fills up with threads in which people whine "They didn't say that to start with. They're just harassing me!"


*cheers* Well-written and well-said!
_____________________
Trout Recreant
Public Enemy No. 1
Join date: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 4,873
08-13-2007 09:42
From: Morwen Bunin
Define when breasts are to big...
Define thin body compared to earlier mentioned breasts
Define slutware

Please all definitions so that no error can be made about them...

Morwen.


This is going to take significant study and an indepth investigation. I have sat around without contributing anything to SL long enough, and I hereby announce my intention to pull my weight from here on out by volunteering to study this matter fully and thoroughly. If everyone could please IM me in world so that I can examine you. I will need quite a few people, since this study is worthless without a statistically significant sample. In order to incentivze participants, every woman who submits...er...volunteers for an examination will receive a free limited edition biplane, which may or may not actually fly, since I still haven't bothered to unpack it.

Thank you for this opportunity to serve the people of SL who do not want to be subjected to offensive breasts and thin people.
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
08-13-2007 09:44
From: Mickey James
Well it depends on what you think about the Lindens. Some people imagine them as a group of axe-weilding moral crusaders led by Carrie Nation Linden, running around this world they've created attempting to stamp out every vestige of anything that is not Disney-fied family-friendly wholesome goodness.

Others see them as a group trying to keep the SL world as free as possible, making rules that restrict things only when necessary (primarily for adherence to the law), and that only after first trying less restrictive measures and having them not work.

The difficulty in specifying ahead of time what falls under the definition is that all it does is create loopholes for literalists to try to exploit. For example, if they say "depictions of sex acts involving an adult and a minor" are not permitted, someone will respond "aha! Well that says nothing about depictions of minors engaged in sex acts if the adults are just watching and not taking part." Then LL has to come back and say that's also forbidden, and then this forum fills up with threads in which people whine "They didn't say that to start with. They're just harassing me!"

Carrie Nation had a set agenda at least. Sometimes I think Freddie Krueger Linden is in charge of this bunch.......
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Alex Fitzsimmons
Resu Deretsiger
Join date: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 1,605
08-13-2007 09:49
From: Trout Recreant
This is going to take significant study and an indepth investigation. I have sat around without contributing anything to SL long enough, and I hereby announce my intention to pull my weight from here on out by volunteering to study this matter fully and thoroughly. If everyone could please IM me in world so that I can examine you. I will need quite a few people, since this study is worthless without a statistically significant sample. In order to incentivze participants, every woman who submits...er...volunteers for an examination will receive a free limited edition biplane, which may or may not actually fly, since I still haven't bothered to unpack it.

Thank you for this opportunity to serve the people of SL who do not want to be subjected to offensive breasts and thin people.


How good of you to shoulder this terrible burden. :rolleyes: :p
_____________________
"Whatever the astronomers finally decide, I think Xena should be considered the enemy planet." - io Kukalcan
SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
08-13-2007 09:50
From: Casey Seifert
Could someone please elaborate "Offensive Material" in terms of Second Life please?


What do you find offensive?

Whatever your response is THAT'S your answer! ;)
_____________________
Semper Fly
-S1. Pow

"Violence is Art by another means"

Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
Jarred Tammas
Registered Something
Join date: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 87
08-13-2007 09:51
From: Morwen Bunin
Bingo... we have a price winner. That was exactly what I was pointing at..... There is no way to put down clearly what is "Offensive material", because it can differ from person to person...
If LL would determine for us what "Offensive material" is, I am sure that many people will disagree with their definitions.

:)
Morwen.


Could also be different depending where you live at too as each country has different standards and how they would apply it to online services in general.
_____________________
Jarred
Jarred Tammas
Registered Something
Join date: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 87
08-13-2007 09:52
From: Stephanie Misfit
Bling. Female avatars with enormous breasts on stick thin bodies. Oh, and slutwear.


If they're TOO big, they would be counted as sploders! :D
_____________________
Jarred
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
08-13-2007 09:53
From: SqueezeOne Pow
What do you find offensive?

Whatever your response is THAT'S your answer! ;)


Why must you insist that people think for themselves?
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
08-13-2007 09:54
From: Brenda Connolly
Why must you insist that people think for themselves?


Why do you think? ;)
_____________________
Semper Fly
-S1. Pow

"Violence is Art by another means"

Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
Oryx Tempel
Registered User
Join date: 8 Nov 2006
Posts: 7,663
08-13-2007 09:54
From: Alex Fitzsimmons
How good of you to shoulder this terrible burden.



Nah it's the stick thin women with huge boobs who have to "shoulder the burden." Can anyone say back problems and massive support bras?
_____________________
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
08-13-2007 09:58
From: SqueezeOne Pow
Why do you think? ;)


Oh, now you're gonna make me do it. :mad:
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
08-13-2007 10:01
In terms of violence it's apparently the sort of stuff you'd find on rotten.com. You don't need to go there, trust me on this one.
Alex Fitzsimmons
Resu Deretsiger
Join date: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 1,605
08-13-2007 10:01
From: Oryx Tempel
Nah it's the stick thin women with huge boobs who have to "shoulder the burden." Can anyone say back problems and massive support bras?


Touche. :p

But then, this is SL, where we get to live out our fantasies. Seriously, I can find more people with astonishing figures in just one sim than I'll see all day in real life. I'm guilty of it myself. ;)
_____________________
"Whatever the astronomers finally decide, I think Xena should be considered the enemy planet." - io Kukalcan
Chris Norse
Loud Arrogant Redneck
Join date: 1 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,735
08-13-2007 10:05
From: Brenda Connolly
You want us to slaughter lots of animals (and a few people) and throw up a lot?


I think he is wanting us to crucify those we don't agree with.
_____________________
I'm going to pick a fight
William Wallace, Braveheart

“Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind”
Douglas MacArthur

FULL
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
08-13-2007 10:09
From: Chris Norse
I think he is wanting us to crucify those we don't agree with.

I bet you hope it has something to do with Orgies......
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
1 2 3 4 5 6