Which avatar would you like to swop with?
|
|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
11-26-2009 04:01
From: Pserendipity Daniels Readers can interpret my post as they like. If they have a similar chip on their shoulder to you, and choose to twist my small and unfulfillable fantasy about swapping avatars so that Rhonda might be helped to understand the consequences of her warped, expletive filled outburst, then that is their prerogative. I just noticed something in that that made me laugh. So it's all about swapping avatars is it? LOL. You do know that avatars can't feel pain, don't you? So such a swap would be totally pointless. I wonder why you didn't take Rhonda's outburst against you as being a wish for your avatar to go through those things. Oh dear. It must hurt you to squirm so much. LOL!
|
|
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
|
11-26-2009 04:03
From: Phil Deakins I just noticed something in that that made me laugh. So it's all about swapping avatars is it? LOL. You do know that avatars can't feel pain, don't you? So such a swap would be totally pointless. Well done! Pep (You got there in the end.  )
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
|
|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
11-26-2009 04:05
From: Pserendipity Daniels Have you not read how Phil's stance of support for Rhonda degraded from a general indication that I probably deserved it to one of wholehearted agreement that I should suffer the pains of a cancerous demise? Good grief! It seems that *you* haven't read it, because I certainly didn't write that. Allow me to refresh your memory... You kept on wanting to talk about it so, in the end, I decided to talk about it with you, and I even suggested an alternative way for you to depart - being lined against a wall and shot. I asked which you prefered. I said that I prefered the wall for you. But you didn't really want to talk about it at all. You only want to inject poison into this forum.
|
|
Rafe Phoenix
AKA Rafe Zessinthal
Join date: 15 Nov 2004
Posts: 490
|
11-26-2009 04:06
From: Pserendipity Daniels Have you not read how Phil's stance of support for Rhonda degraded from a general indication that I probably deserved it to one of wholehearted agreement that I should suffer the pains of a cancerous demise?
I have no need; others do, apparently. Read the second, third and fifth posts in this thread. From: Pserendipity Daniels I have not harassed any threads. When people have posted questions and comments I have responded appropriately. Pep (And I see that you are yet another that has an inaccurate understanding of the meaning of "troll".  ) Many threads that your arch nemesis posted in were promptly responded to in a hostile manner. Please explain to me how looking for opportunities to voice what many find to be vulgar comments is not trolling.
|
|
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
|
11-26-2009 04:09
From: Phil Deakins Good grief! It seems that *you* haven't read it, because I certainly didn't write that. Allow me to refresh your memory...
You kept on wanting to talk about it so, in the end, I decided to talk about it with you, and I even suggested an alternative way for you to depart - being lined against a wall and shot. I asked which you prefered. I said that I prefered the wall for you. But you didn't really want to talk about it at all. You only want to inject poison into this forum. Your posts, and your descent into the same darkness that shrouds Rhonda's soul, is documented in that thread for all to read. Pep (Offering alternatives for death is *such* a mature attitude isn't it?)
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
|
|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
11-26-2009 04:09
From: Pserendipity Daniels Oh, but you *are* interpreting it; and in the way that your demented psyche would *like* to intepret it.
Perhaps the one who would not like to be called out on such a vitriolic response to a simple opinion that "Yes, your ass does look big in that"?
You remind me of Bart Simpson, for whom persistence, rather than accuracy of argument, was his main conversational strength.
Ah, so you are reverting to donning the "Phyllis" persona now, championing the right of over-emotional and irrational women to over-react. How worrying.
Pep (As you persist, so will I.) It's a shame that you don't have the ability to discuss things. But then I suppose the guilty prefer not to, and prefer to post that sort of rubbish.
|
|
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
|
11-26-2009 04:15
From: Rafe Phoenix Read the second, third and fifth posts in this thread. Been there, done that, don't see your point. See my responses to Phil and his eventual enlightenment. From: Rafe Phoenix Many threads that your arch nemesis posted in were promptly responded to in a hostile manner. Love will be very upset at you describing Rhonda, who is simply someone that sensitive people should be protected from, as my nemesis. And I always respond to the post, not the poster; if I replied to Rhonda in what *you* might consider a "hostile manner", then it would have been because her posts warranted a response that you might interpret as such. From: Rafe Phoenix Please explain to me how looking for opportunities to voice what many find to be vulgar comments is not trolling. No thank you. Why don't you do it yourself, for homework? Pep ("Many"? A quantitative assumption that you are personally not entitled to make, I think.)
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
|
|
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
|
11-26-2009 04:16
From: Phil Deakins It's a shame that you don't have the ability to discuss things. But then I suppose the guilty prefer not to, and prefer to post that sort of rubbish. Yet another content free post from you, Phil. Pep (The parts that are not wholly inaccurate, that is.)
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
|
|
Ceka Cianci
SuperPremiumExcaliburAcc#
Join date: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 4,489
|
11-26-2009 04:19
|
|
Rafe Phoenix
AKA Rafe Zessinthal
Join date: 15 Nov 2004
Posts: 490
|
11-26-2009 04:21
*smiles* Read that last post of yours that is quoting me several times over.
Enjoy your afternoon Pep. (I think its after noon there.)
|
|
Deira Llanfair
Deira to rhyme with Myra
Join date: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 2,315
|
11-26-2009 04:22
From: Dawnee Swansong Pep: I've never spoken to you before, and I only get to read what others quote from you - but by the law of averages there are people reading this who are battling cancer and come here for a little light relief.
Please drop it now. Yes, please drop it guys and gals - my dad died of cancer too, when he was still a comparatively young man. It was dreadful - never wish such suffering on anyone!
_____________________
Deira  Must create animations for head-desk and palm-face!.
|
|
Deira Llanfair
Deira to rhyme with Myra
Join date: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 2,315
|
11-26-2009 04:26
From: Phil Deakins Which part of:-
don't you understand? *You* wrote it - you ought to understand it. You would like to swap places with Rhonda so that she can feel the pain of cancer, just like she wished on you. You wrote the damned stuff. You would like her to feel what she said she would like you to feel. Rhonda was more descriptive that you, but you both wished the same thing on each othjer. You are even. Drop it. Phil, you know what goes round comes around. It takes a strong person to just stop this tit for tat. I know you are strong - so drop it, please.
_____________________
Deira  Must create animations for head-desk and palm-face!.
|
|
Deira Llanfair
Deira to rhyme with Myra
Join date: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 2,315
|
11-26-2009 04:36
From: Sling Trebuchet I'd swap with a powerful Linden.
1) Knock some Linden heads together 2) Zap the accounts of toxic residents who won't STFU. Mmmmm - I see the attraction in that too!
_____________________
Deira  Must create animations for head-desk and palm-face!.
|
|
Deira Llanfair
Deira to rhyme with Myra
Join date: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 2,315
|
11-26-2009 04:38
From: Waterstar Eilde On topic, and attempting to get the thread back on track, I think, Deira, that I might like to be the Guv'nah, although maybe only for a day - all that responsibility would probably be overwhelming, but would make me grateful to return to my erstwhile insignificant origins Then again, Starax - that is, if I could also step inside that brilliantly creative mind and have the skill to make as beautifully as he did. Yes, I thought of Des - and then felt I wouldn't cope for even half an hour!
_____________________
Deira  Must create animations for head-desk and palm-face!.
|
|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
11-26-2009 04:41
From: Pserendipity Daniels Well done! Pep (You got there in the end.  ) Self-delusion on your part does nothing - except to show us how much of a backpeddlar you can be. Pep. You wished the pain of cancer on someone - and obviously not on an avatar. You are even with Rhonda now. Drop the darned crusade.
|
|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
11-26-2009 04:43
From: Pserendipity Daniels Your posts, and your descent into the same darkness that shrouds Rhonda's soul, is documented in that thread for all to read.
Pep (Offering alternatives for death is *such* a mature attitude isn't it?) You kept insisting on talking about it, and I eventually gave you the opportunity - *after* I had tried to get you to stop. As you said, it's all there in that thread.
|
|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
11-26-2009 04:46
From: Deira Llanfair Phil, you know what goes round comes around. It takes a strong person to just stop this tit for tat. I know you are strong - so drop it, please. I understand what you mean, Deira, but it's not as simple as that. I've just started a thread about it if you'd like to have a look. I'm sorry that your thread has suffered because of it. It was derailed on post #2.
|
|
Jig Chippewa
Fine Young Cannibal
Join date: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,150
|
11-26-2009 04:52
From: Pserendipity Daniels This isn't wishing it on her. This is helping her realise what she has wished on me.
Pep (Perhaps you'd volunteer to share the experience with her, given your supportive stance?) Pep, stop now. If your really been heart-hurt then let it go. That kinda thing becomes a cancer in itself eating you up. Dont get bitter, pet. That happens to old and so-called "wise" men. And your not that old - or "wise" yet. 
_____________________
Fine Young Cannibal
|
|
Jig Chippewa
Fine Young Cannibal
Join date: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,150
|
11-26-2009 04:58
From: Phil Deakins I understand what you mean, Deira, but it's not as simple as that. I've just started a thread about it if you'd like to have a look. I'd like to be Deira for a few days. Or Laurin. But I think Deira has real kids and I'd like a go at raizing a kid for a few days and then give them back. And on sl, I'd be rally kind and warm liek Deira is. Then I think Laurin may have a kid or two somehwre in real but if not I reckon she has a kinda neat but scruffy life - kinda shabby-chic. My real life is so swagged up with commitments and hour-by-hour whatchadoins and I get no time to smell daisies. Or laugh free. I always have to be aware of everything I say or do. Laurin isnt I reckon liek that. So in sl I'd shag a lot of men being Laurin and really surprise myself. Pep would be fun - but only for a few minutes so I could mess up his real desk (and tell his wife "I love you!!!!!" 
_____________________
Fine Young Cannibal
|
|
Maureen Boccaccio
TWJKFA
Join date: 28 Feb 2008
Posts: 14,484
|
11-26-2009 05:04
When I swap with the other avatar...does that mean for the time I'll have his/her/its knowledge? I'd love to see what it's like to be a really cool builder or scripter. lol...else I'd have to put out a "caveat emptor" notecard for any new products purchased after my time as that content creator. 
|
|
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
|
11-26-2009 06:23
From: Phil Deakins Self-delusion on your part does nothing - except to show us how much of a backpeddlar you can be.
Pep. You wished the pain of cancer on someone - and obviously not on an avatar. You are even with Rhonda now. Drop the darned crusade. You have completely lost it again, haven't you. I have never wished pain on anyone, ever. Pep (It's your own delusion that you have to resolve.)
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
|
|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
11-26-2009 06:25
From: Pserendipity Daniels You have completely lost it again, haven't you. I have never wished pain on anyone, ever.
Pep (It's your own delusion that you have to resolve.) I refer you to your first post in this thread (post #2), for which you have been reported - for the continued harrassment of a forum user.
|
|
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
|
11-26-2009 06:26
From: Phil Deakins You kept insisting on talking about it, and I eventually gave you the opportunity - *after* I had tried to get you to stop. As you said, it's all there in that thread. I am afraid that *you* were the one who kept insisting on posting. You could have ceased at any time. I merely respond to wild accusations which have no substance in fact since I want to highlight the dangers to other more sensitive souls of dscussion with others who are so deranged that they might wish death on you if you disagree with them. Pep (And you are doing it again; pointless posting, that is.)
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
|
|
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
|
11-26-2009 06:28
From: Phil Deakins I understand what you mean, Deira, but it's not as simple as that. I've just started a thread about it if you'd like to have a look.
I'm sorry that your thread has suffered because of it. It was derailed on post #2. How can specifically answering the question the OP asked be considered derailing a thread? Pep (It was *you* that derailed it by dragging up old enmities.)
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
|
|
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
|
11-26-2009 06:30
From: Jig Chippewa Pep, stop now. If your really been heart-hurt then let it go. That kinda thing becomes a cancer in itself eating you up. Dont get bitter, pet. That happens to old and so-called "wise" men. And your not that old - or "wise" yet.  Oh, I'm not at all hurt. Pep (As Phil has argued, I am emotionless.  )
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
|