Which avatar would you like to swop with?

In another thread somewhere, Scylla wanted to swop avatar with Pep for a while - if it was possible to do a lifestyle avatar swop, who would you change with and why?

Would you like to be rich and famous - or even infamous? Would you swop with a talented SL builder/creator/performer?

Imagine a Second Lifestyle swop for a week - who would you want to be?

I thought maybe I'd like to be Jumpy for a while, so I could incomprehensibly write about righting wrongs...but then...

I think I'd swop with Brenda, cos she gets all the luck

I'd like to swap with Rhonda

Pep (so she could feel the pain of suffering from cancer.)

Now you're even. She wished it on you and you wished it on her. So drop it now.

I'd swap with a powerful Linden.

1) Knock some Linden heads together
2) Zap the accounts of toxic residents who won't STFU.

This isn't wishing it on her. This is helping her realise what she has wished on me.

Pep (Perhaps you'd volunteer to share the experience with her, given your supportive stance?)

This isn't wishing it on her. This is helping her realise what she has wished on me.

Pep (Perhaps you'd volunteer to share the experience with her, given your supportive stance?)

You wished "the pain of suffering from cancer" on her. You're even. Now drop it.

(I don't know what your 'experience' is, but my mother died of liver cancer not many years ago, and my father died of cancer when I was a boy.)

Btw, your "this isn't" and "this is" is bollocks. This is just you being nasty.

Pep: I've never spoken to you before, and I only get to read what others quote from you - but by the law of averages there are people reading this who are battling cancer and come here for a little light relief.

Please drop it now.

Since you don't seem to realise that telling me to desist is a pointless exercise from your own point of view, and keep repeating yourself (as you did in the other thread) I shall reiterate that I am not wishing pain on Rhonda, and would not do so ever to anyone.

This fantasy thread merely allows me a mechanism for highlighting Rhonda's foulmouthed and poisonous posts by wondering whether she might retract them, or even apologise, if she actually had the tables turned.

Pep (I am even more surprised, given your own experience, that you have seen fit to support Rhonda's totally unacceptable behaviour.)

Dawnee, perhaps you should address Rhonda, since she is the one who wished painful death by cancer on me.

Pep (My point has always been that her disgusting posts would upset the more sensitive participants in the forums and that those who support her should be similarly reviled.)

Which part of:-

don't you understand? *You* wrote it - you ought to understand it. You would like to swap places with Rhonda so that she can feel the pain of cancer, just like she wished on you. You wrote the damned stuff. You would like her to feel what she said she would like you to feel. Rhonda was more descriptive that you, but you both wished the same thing on each othjer. You are even. Drop it.

I'd like a Maserati too, but it ain't gonna happen.

Pep (I'm not wishing pain on her; just musing on the "what ifs" of how she might understand the consequences of her despicable and contemptuous actions.)

You can backpeddle as much as you like, but your own words are there for all to see - you wished the pain of cancer on her. It makes you even. So drop it.

I'd swap with Millie so I could lock this thread!

Once again you are flogging a dead horse perpetually repeating your flawed point of view and providing me with a platform both to negate your viewpoint and to emphasise Rhonda's appalling behaviour. I haven't wished any pain on Rhonda, or anyone else, ever. Deira's OP offered the opportunity to fantasise about impossible situations. I could have posted that I would be interested in taking up Scylla's offer of a swap, so that she could find out what it was like to be potent and logical, but that doesn't mean that I was wishing she *was* potent and logical.

Pep (Please keep posting repetitively though; you will make as big as fool of yourself as you did in that other thread.)

Or you could swap with Phil and just stop posting the same nonsense over and over and over . . .

Pep ( . . . thus depriving me of the opportunity to respond.)

You're a liar. Post #2 in this thread proves it. Worse than that, you're a liar who is nasty to the core. In your own words, you would like another person to suffer the pain of cancer.

And you causing someone to leave this forum offered the opportunity for Rhonda to fantasise about an impossible situation concerning you. There is no difference. You both expressed a truly nasty wish on someone. You have matched Rhonda's outburst so drop it now.

Your admission of being a nasty person, who waits for the opportunities to inject poison into this forum, wasn't necessary - everyone here knows it.

Oh dear. Another predictable attempt at derailment by the petulant, attention-seeking schoolboy who doesn't know when to stop. It's funny how schoolyard bullies are always the first to cry foul when the tables are turned on them - not to mention laughable that the great critic of people from NESB can’t correctly interpret his own writing. I suppose there wasn't time to delete the post before everyone noticed.

On topic, and attempting to get the thread back on track, I think, Deira, that I might like to be the Guv'nah, although maybe only for a day - all that responsibility would probably be overwhelming, but would make me grateful to return to my erstwhile insignificant origins

Then again, Starax - that is, if I could also step inside that brilliantly creative mind and have the skill to make as beautifully as he did.

Readers can interpret my post as they like. If they have a similar chip on their shoulder to you, and choose to twist my small and unfulfillable fantasy about swapping avatars so that Rhonda might be helped to understand the consequences of her warped, expletive filled outburst, then that is their prerogative.

And of course you have chosen to perpetuate the myth that Rhonda's disgusting post was not occasioned by her vanity being pricked by my throwaway comment about her linebacker thighs.

Pep (No-one could *ever* match Rhonda's unjustified outburst, which if you remember was followed up with a cold-blooded reiteration of her appalling wishes.)

I see no such admission.

Pep (Merely pointing out your ineffectuality.)

How is pointing out that you've made your point time and again taking a side in your "battle" against Rhonda?

Perhaps you should look into improving those reading comprehension skills.

You have continually harassed countless threads in the last several days. I see nothing more than a narcissistic troll in your postings.



FIFY

I'm not interpreting anything you wrote, and neither is anyone else who has posted. It's as plain as day - all there in post #2.

There is only person who actually knows what caused the original outburst, and it isn't either of us. She stated that the reason was you causing someone else to quit the forum. She also stated that it was all before your insults concerning her body. Who should we believe? The only one who can possibly know, or the one who has a natural preference?

*You* matched it - in post #2 of this thread. Your words weren't as descriptive, but you wished the same pain. Also, what on earth makes you think that the second outburst was in cold blood? Apart from your wishful thinking, that is. Judging by the cold way that you inject your poison into this forum whenever you see an opportunity, I'm inclined to think that, if you have any emotions at all, they are short-lived, so you won't be able to understand how other people's emotions can last a lot longer than yours.

Have you not read how Phil's stance of support for Rhonda degraded from a general indication that I probably deserved it to one of wholehearted agreement that I should suffer the pains of a cancerous demise?

I have no need; others do, apparently.

I have not harassed any threads. When people have posted questions and comments I have responded appropriately.

Pep (And I see that you are yet another that has an inaccurate understanding of the meaning of "troll". )

Oh, but you *are* interpreting it; and in the way that your demented psyche would *like* to intepret it.

Perhaps the one who would not like to be called out on such a vitriolic response to a simple opinion that "Yes, your ass does look big in that"?

You remind me of Bart Simpson, for whom persistence, rather than accuracy of argument, was his main conversational strength.

Ah, so you are reverting to donning the "Phyllis" persona now, championing the right of over-emotional and irrational women to over-react. How worrying.

Pep (As you persist, so will I.)