Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Is it goodbye to Aussies?

Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
01-11-2008 10:52
From: Jumpman Lane
uh actually you did colosto pardon me :) ...uh...crap i dont get to mention turds in this post...only allude to them...ah well...swell! :(


think you might be stuck in your psychological development Jumpman

From: http://allpsych.com/psychology101/sexual_development.html


Anal Stage (18 months to three years). The child’s focus of pleasure in this stage is on eliminating and retaining feces. Through society’s pressure, mainly via parents, the child has to learn to control anal stimulation. In terms of personality, after effects of an anal fixation during this stage can result in an obsession with cleanliness, perfection, and control (anal retentive). On the opposite end of the spectrum, they may become messy and disorganized (anal expulsive).
Har Fairweather
Registered User
Join date: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 2,320
01-11-2008 10:53
From: Tygarys Soyinka
Actually, they will. All thats needed is to choose the right kind of gun and ammo combination.


For close-in work, I've heard the best choice is a repeating-action, sawed-off shotgun with double-O buckshot for anything up to and including blowing holes in walls. Is that what they use in Australia on their gun-control laws?
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
01-11-2008 10:54
From: Colette Meiji
Even in an Emergency government power is limited by law in the US.

As well as the various seperations of powers that create the checks and balances. Even if one man were to consolidate power as President, the States themselves would be a roadblock to any effective dictatorial control.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Jumpman Lane
JUMPY!!!
Join date: 7 May 2007
Posts: 2,114
01-11-2008 11:11
From: Colette Meiji
think you might be stuck in your psychological development Jumpman
more turd wisdom from colosto meiji i love it and her too!
_____________________
Ya girlfriend says she loves meh! But it's just the jewlreh! Multicolored carots got ya girlfriend kinda curious!
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
01-11-2008 11:43
From: Colette Meiji
Even in an Emergency government power is limited by law in the US.


I thought the president could more or less become a dictator if he (or she) wanted in an emergency. Something about the constitution providing all the powers neccesary to preserve its existence.
Jumpman Lane
JUMPY!!!
Join date: 7 May 2007
Posts: 2,114
01-11-2008 11:44
From: Ciaran Laval
I thought the president could more or less become a dictator if he (or she) wanted in an emergency. Something about the constitution providing all the powers neccesary to preserve its existence.
oh hell no not in the united states. you are mistaken
_____________________
Ya girlfriend says she loves meh! But it's just the jewlreh! Multicolored carots got ya girlfriend kinda curious!
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
01-11-2008 11:49
From: Ciaran Laval
I thought the president could more or less become a dictator if he (or she) wanted in an emergency. Something about the constitution providing all the powers neccesary to preserve its existence.

The National Emergencies Act was passed in the 1970's to prevent abuse of the Powers of Emergency. It limits a declaration of National Emergency to 2 years and also has a Mechanism for Congress to override a Presidential Emergency Declaration
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
01-11-2008 11:53
From: Brenda Connolly
The National Emergencies Act was passed in the 1970's to prevent abuse of the Powers of Emergency. It limits a declaration of National Emergency to 2 years and also has a Mechanism for Congress to override a Presidential Emergency Declaration


Right, so if congress didn't object then the president could become a dictator for two years then.
Bradley Bracken
Goodbye, Farewell, Amen
Join date: 2 Apr 2007
Posts: 3,856
01-11-2008 11:56
From: Oryx Tempel
Our asshat politicians actually had the gall to try and make flag-burning illegal via a Constitutional amendment (which is so not what the Constitution is for.)


I love how my uncle, a veteran who served at Pearl Harbor, use to put it:

"I didn't fight for the flag. I fought for what it stands for."
_____________________
My interest in SL has simply died. Thanks for all the laughs
Carli Dancer
Registered User
Join date: 15 Aug 2006
Posts: 411
01-11-2008 11:57
From: Ciaran Laval
Right, so if congress didn't object then the president could become a dictator for two years then.


If congress didn't object the president wouldn't be a dictator by definition.

Their ability to object over-rule and cut funding is a check on power.

There were always some limits on the emergency power but Brenda correctly points that Act makes them very clear and defined.
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
01-11-2008 11:59
From: Carli Dancer
If congress didn't object the president wouldn't be a dictator by definition.



Well come on, dictators don't work on their own! The president can close everything down as long as he promises at the end of it there will be a constitutional government.
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
01-11-2008 12:08
From: Ciaran Laval
Right, so if congress didn't object then the president could become a dictator for two years then.

Not really, there are still limits to what can be done, even with a totally complicit Congress. And even IF a President were to truly seize power, thanks to the 4th Amendment and the Well Regulated State Militias, it could never truly be consolidated, Civil War would ensue, and The Aspiring Dictator would be faced with using nuclear weapons on his own country.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Carli Dancer
Registered User
Join date: 15 Aug 2006
Posts: 411
01-11-2008 12:14
From: Ciaran Laval
Well come on, dictators don't work on their own! The president can close everything down as long as he promises at the end of it there will be a constitutional government.


Quite a difference in a government doing what its told and a government choosing not to object.
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
01-11-2008 12:18
The fact that there has never remotely been a dictator during the entire history of US Constitutional Government might be a testament to how well that portion of the system works.
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
01-11-2008 12:28
From: Ciaran Laval
Well come on, dictators don't work on their own! The president can close everything down as long as he promises at the end of it there will be a constitutional government.

In theory perhaps, but there are too many wildcards. It would be impossible to consolidate power. There would be elements in the federal Government, The Military, that would not go along. The fact that our government is so bloated and beareaucratic may be a blessing. There would be entire States that would rebel, governors would take control of National Guard units and State Police. In many parts of the country, the Fed is not looked upon too kindly as it is.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
01-11-2008 12:34
From: Colette Meiji
The fact that there has never remotely been a dictator during the entire history of US Constitutional Government might be a testament to how well that portion of the system works.


It's not our way. Born of revolution yes, but our way is to peacefully transform power, ensuring no one has too much power alone. Even after assisnations, there has always been an orderly sucession, and no president has tried to overstay his term of office forcefully. Our electoral system, whil far from flawless is for the nost part free of the violence that happens with regularity in many parts of the world. That's why it is impossible, in my opinion for there ever to be a dictator here, or despite Oliver Stone's entertaining paranoia, a Coup D' Etat.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
01-11-2008 12:38
From: Brenda Connolly
It's not our way. Born of revolution yes, but our way is to peacefully transform power, ensuring no one has too much power alone. Even after assisnations, there has always been an orderly sucession, and no president has tried to overstay his term of office forcefully. Our electoral system, whil far from flawless is for the nost part free of the violence that happens with regularity in many parts of the world. That's why it is impossible, in my opinion for there ever to be a dictator here, or despite Oliver Stone's entertaining paranoia, a Coup D' Etat.


True, also

Even the most famous abuses of presidential power

Jackson, Lincoln, and FDR -

have been pretty small-time compared to what actual Dictators do.
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
01-11-2008 12:39
From: Carli Dancer
Quite a difference in a government doing what its told and a government choosing not to object.


Yeah but we're talking extremes, Hitler (shit does that count as a Godwin?) was part of democracy at one point.
Kronos Avro
Under Construction!
Join date: 15 Dec 2007
Posts: 25
01-11-2008 12:43
G'Day to All.

There has always been some hype or rumors that the Government will do something to prevent us Aussies from accessing the outside world. Truth is, they cannot control us as they believe they can, and their feeble attempts always blow away with the wind. This may be just another scare tactic such as when they tried to introduce the Smart-Card.

All in all, I believe this Firewall is for the their own in-house services to prevent these Politicians from being caught out with porn material on their computers as we so often see in the media.

I don't feel that this will be implemented to the general public as we don't really care for much of that crap anyway, but I do feel the schools and internal Governing bodies do require some protection from the temptations of such media.

These are just my personal views on this matter and should not be considered anything more.

Cheers.
Shep Planer
Registered User
Join date: 9 Apr 2007
Posts: 153
01-11-2008 13:24
From: Chris Norse
No thanks, controlling speech is the same as controlling thought. We don't need or want the thought police in the USA.



And Har, why would this upset them, they rolled over and let the government take most of their guns.



Well I guess thats two of the major differences between America and Australia. You have people freely going around inciting hatred and violence towards gay people ,we dont. You have very high level of gun violence including regular massacres, we dont.
Hmmm something tells me that some control is needed.

I believe at some point in time when the rest of society has progressed and learnt from past mistakes and become more educated and less ignorant about certain things that people who try to take things backward because of their own bigotry and prejudice etc should be made to shut up. Its not stopping freedom of speech, its just stopping hatred, bigotry, prejudice, discrimination and destruction of and towards innocent people. Any sane person can see that.
How would Americans feel if some asshole started trying to take you back to the slave trade? Im pretty sure freedom of speech would not be welcome then.
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
01-11-2008 13:29
From: Ciaran Laval
Yeah but we're talking extremes, Hitler (shit does that count as a Godwin?) was part of democracy at one point.

A small , war ravaged, beaten down nation, whose poulation was demoralized, whose economy was stagnated and government that was weak. Totally differernt circumstances.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
01-11-2008 13:30
From: Colette Meiji
True, also

Even the most famous abuses of presidential power

Jackson, Lincoln, and FDR -

have been pretty small-time compared to what actual Dictators do.

Actually I don't see those 3 as abusing their powers, but that's a discussion for another place.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
01-11-2008 13:31
From: Brenda Connolly
A small , war ravaged, beaten down nation, whose poulation was demoralized, whose economy was stagnated and government that was weak. Totally differernt circumstances.


Forget circumstances, I'm talking hypothetically. I'm not suggesting it's gonna happen tomorrow!
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
01-11-2008 13:37
From: Ciaran Laval
Forget circumstances, I'm talking hypothetically. I'm not suggesting it's gonna happen tomorrow!

Even Hypothetically, I don't see it happening.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
01-11-2008 13:38
From: Brenda Connolly
Actually I don't see those 3 as abusing their powers, but that's a discussion for another place.


I was referring to

Jackson's forced relocating the Cherokee against a Supreme Court ruling in their favor

Lincoln's imprisonment of suspected southern collaborators without due process.

-and-

FDR's forced internment of US citizens of Japanese Ancestry.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7