Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Are some people really so stupid as to expect privacy in SL?

Sling Trebuchet
Deleted User
Join date: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 4,548
08-19-2009 12:08
From: Marcush Nemeth
First you like to introduce some RL analogy.

Nope. What you quoted was me responding to an RL analogy that someone else introduced.

From: Marcush Nemeth
Next, you conveniently hide behind the "it's only a game" excuse.

Nope. It was a serious question - aimed at exploring the "not an inch" attitude.


From: Marcush Nemeth

So there's a lack of consistency in this matter, on both sides of what we could call SL's own "Iron Curtain". The solution doesn't lay in insisting you're right, the solution lays with convincing LL to fix things, that while the tools provided look good on paper, that their implementation leaves room for a lot of improvement and fixing.

Granted, there are a LOT of things in SL that require fixing. Occasionally, some get handled in client and server updates. But we just don't know how high fixing this is on LL's priority list. We don't even know whether the things discussed in this thread can be fixed at all, and LL doesn't seem interrested in giving out information about their priorities or the limitations of the system. We rarely see developers or even forum moderators answering questions. The only way we know that they're occasionally here is when a thread gets locked. Come to think of it, this almost sounds like the WoW-Europe forums, lol.
Actively using official site forums doesn't seem like standard practice in customer relations. It's more like something to spend some 30 minutes on, about twice a week, to lock down the more embarrassing threads.


Something that Michael Linden once said to me implied that more senior Lindens do actually scan the forums.

And recently..
From: Jack Linden in [url=/327/98/334331/2.html
/327/98/334331/2.html
...We do want to keep opening up routes for boating though, so keep the ideas coming. Where we can help the boating community we certainly will.
[/url]

Anyhoo, it wouldn't really matter if no Linden ever read the forums.
The to and fro here puts up information that may be illuminating for all stakeholders. It's an opportunity for those who never considered the factors to understand them.
That can only help in the standard of proposals that are put to LL via more formal channels.
_____________________
Maggie: We give our residents a lot of tools, to build, create, and manage their lands and objects. That flexibility also requires people to exercise judgment about when things should be used.
http://www.ace-exchange.com/home/story/BDVR/589
Alexander Harbrough
Registered User
Join date: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 601
08-19-2009 13:25
From: Sling Trebuchet
What if his crossing the corner of your lawn left no trace of his passage whatsoever - not so much as a blade of grass moved?
Would it still warrant punctures in his hood?

What if he could fly, and his landing glide just happened to pass over the corner of your lawn?
Would that warrant shooting him down?


If it was conveniently only across the corner of the property, the driving or flight never disturbed the use of my property, and there was no other reason to keep ban lines up (such as being interrupted at an untimely momment by someone lagging off course through a non-yet-rezzed wall), then for my part, it probably wouldn't bother me to let them through.

It is that list of qualifications that is the issue....
1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34