Are some people really so stupid as to expect privacy in SL?
|
|
Milla Janick
Empress Of The Universe
Join date: 2 Jan 2008
Posts: 3,075
|
08-18-2009 12:31
From: Alexander Harbrough Ban lines do not stop the roads from existing. They do not prevent people from walking down them. I admit I have never felt the need to drive down one but if I did and was going off road all the time I would stop doing so. Ban lines can and do extend into roadways and waterways because of the way parcels are laid out.
|
|
RockAndRoll Michigan
Registered User
Join date: 23 Mar 2009
Posts: 589
|
08-18-2009 12:34
From: Argent Stonecutter I'm not placing blame, I'm asking for courtesy and consideration. I'm not opposed to that. Courtesy and consideration are great. But just like in RL there is a point at which they stop. I cannot sit on my front porch and yell at you for walking down the sidewalk and claim to be courteous. In fact if anything I'm breaking the law because you have a right to be there, unless I have taken out a restraining order specifically against you. However, your ability to walk down that sidewalk does not mean that you can leave that sidewalk and enter my private property with impunity. I can put up a "no trespassing" sign and expect you to comply. In SL that no trespassing sign is ban lines. They have the added benefit of being easily enforcable because it's physically impossible for you to pass them. No discourtesy is intended there, it's merely a means to remind the passing person that this is private property and should be respected as such. Some of us don't have any problem with you being able to see the property but you don't belong on it. Since there are people who refuse to recognize this simple fact, they have made it necessary to pre-emptively force them to stay out. There is only one way to do so. Blacklist everybody and whitelist the people you want to be there. From: someone They bought the land along linden roads because they wanted land along Linden roads. One of the things that you get when you buy land next to the road is traffic. If you don't want traffic, why did you buy there? And people DO want land on Linden roads, they pay a premium for it. Traffic isn't the only benefit of owning land alongside a Linden road. Perhaps they're a driving enthusiast who merely wants to drive from their land straight onto the roadway and go out motoring. Seems to me like something worth paying a premium for if they want it bad enough. Hardly something which trumps their desire to keep the general public off their own property. From: someone If the effects of lag bother you that much, why are you in SL? If the effects of lag bother you that much while you're driving on Linden roads, then why are you on the roads?
|
|
Alexander Harbrough
Registered User
Join date: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 601
|
08-18-2009 12:39
From: Milla Janick Ban lines can and do extend into roadways and waterways because of the way parcels are laid out. That should be fixed... if there is a JIRA on that (or someone starts one) I'll happily vote on it (for whatever that's worth).
|
|
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
|
08-18-2009 12:45
From: RockAndRoll Michigan Traffic isn't the only benefit of owning land alongside a Linden road. Perhaps they're a driving enthusiast who merely wants to drive from their land straight onto the roadway and go out motoring. Seems to me like something worth paying a premium for if they want it bad enough. Hardly something which trumps their desire to keep the general public off their own property. I bet you could count on one hand the number of driving enthusiasts in SL who put up banlines on a parcel next to a road. It really is that awful for drivers.
_____________________
Archived for Your Protection
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
08-18-2009 12:46
From: RockAndRoll Michigan I'm not opposed to that. Courtesy and consideration are great. But just like in RL there is a point at which they stop. I cannot sit on my front porch and yell at you for walking down the sidewalk and claim to be courteous. Where have I done anything even vaguely analogous? From: someone In SL that no trespassing sign is ban lines. In SL the no trespassing sign is a no trespassing sign. I respect those. I respect the sanctity of houses. I respect locked doors in theme builds that otherwise would not seem private. Anyone who is willing to grant you privacy in SL will do the same. Ban lines go beyond "no trespassing" signs. They are combination electric fence and anti-aircraft guns and tank traps and "severe tire damage" spikes. They are massive overkill, and yet ironically they don't actually do anything to protect you from people who ARE interested in violating your privacy. So the analogy, "ban lines are no trespassing signs" falls down. From: someone No discourtesy is intended there If you put them up innocent of the effects, no, there's no discourtesy. Even when they're set up around an empty parcel that's never used, which is the most common situation, if the person didn't realize what they were doing that's simply naivete. From: someone Traffic isn't the only benefit of owning land alongside a Linden road. Perhaps they're a driving enthusiast who merely wants to drive from their land straight onto the roadway and go out motoring. Then they're benefiting from traffic... in fact they ARE traffic. I'm not referring to traffic statistics here, I'm referring to actual traffic. People traveling along the road. I'm speaking English, not geek. In fact the game-specific meaning of traffic never occurred to me because THAT kind of traffic isn't something you get much of from being on a Linden road.
|
|
Mickey McLuhan
She of the SwissArmy Tail
Join date: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1,032
|
08-18-2009 12:55
From: Argent Stonecutter I said *I* have land next to a Linden Road. I can do something about whether *I* have obstructions on the road, or banlines adjacent to it. That's what's under *my* control.
I am also *asking* that people who are in a similar position do what *they* can to help the problem.
That's as far as I'm going. That's as far as I've *ever* gone. When you come back and tell me I'm DEMANDING things,over and over again, I drop that topic. When you tell me that just doing *my* part is *also* demanding things, I stop talking to you at all. Okay, okay! Sheesh! I apologized for the misunderstanding. Sorry. What more do you want? Blood? I didn't understand exactly what you wrote. My bad. I retract the statement I made in response to the post I misunderstood. Can we go back to the "you trying to land your plan and it getting blown up" thing?
_____________________
*0.0*
 Where there's smoke, there isn't always fire. It might just be a particle display.  -Mari-
|
|
Mickey McLuhan
She of the SwissArmy Tail
Join date: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1,032
|
08-18-2009 12:57
From: Argent Stonecutter Ban lines go beyond "no trespassing" signs. They are combination electric fence and anti-aircraft guns and tank traps and "severe tire damage" spikes. They are massive overkill, and yet ironically they don't actually do anything to protect you from people who ARE interested in violating your privacy.
You are absolutely right with this. Banlines are exactly that. And they're still legal.
_____________________
*0.0*
 Where there's smoke, there isn't always fire. It might just be a particle display.  -Mari-
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
08-18-2009 12:59
From: Mickey McLuhan Can we go back to the "you trying to land your plan and it getting blown up" thing? It's the same thing as the "ban lines on Linden roads" thing, and the "drifting across a ban line from my own land and getting orbited" thing. Its' the "You can't avoid running into ban lines and getting screwed over, so they cause problems for innocent avatars, OK" thing. It's all the same thing. And please don't tell me "they're legal" again, because that's irrelevant to anything I've actually said.
|
|
Mickey McLuhan
She of the SwissArmy Tail
Join date: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1,032
|
08-18-2009 13:02
See, I see it differently.
You trying to land your plane and getting blown up when you hit a banline is YOUR actions causing you to go somewhere you're not allowed. Lag, drifting, stuff that ISN'T your intention? That's something different.
_____________________
*0.0*
 Where there's smoke, there isn't always fire. It might just be a particle display.  -Mari-
|
|
Sling Trebuchet
Deleted User
Join date: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 4,548
|
08-18-2009 13:25
From: RockAndRoll Michigan I'm not opposed to that. Courtesy and consideration are great. But just like in RL there is a point at which they stop. I cannot sit on my front porch and yell at you for walking down the sidewalk and claim to be courteous. In fact if anything I'm breaking the law because you have a right to be there, unless I have taken out a restraining order specifically against you. However, your ability to walk down that sidewalk does not mean that you can leave that sidewalk and enter my private property with impunity. I can put up a "no trespassing" sign and expect you to comply. In SL that no trespassing sign is ban lines. ..... In RL, those ban lines would be a fence that electrocuted an innocent passerby on the sidewalk who happened to stumble and fall against your boundary. That's somewhat OTT compared to a sign. In SL, you can rezz a sign. In RL, if you put up an electric fence right up along the sidewalk, you would be required to remove it - although, maybe in your jurisdiction the authorities and courts are a bit more laid back about public safety.
_____________________
Maggie: We give our residents a lot of tools, to build, create, and manage their lands and objects. That flexibility also requires people to exercise judgment about when things should be used. http://www.ace-exchange.com/home/story/BDVR/589
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
08-18-2009 13:26
From: Mickey McLuhan You trying to land your plane and getting blown up when you hit a banline is YOUR actions causing you to go somewhere you're not allowed. Because the controls in SL are flakey, because my plane drifts, because of lag, because there's no way to tell if I need to be on 270 or 272. I'm landing on MY LAND, and clipping the edge (just the edge) of someone else's ban box because there's no indication it's there. It may not have BEEN there yesterday, and even if I know it's there it's still hard to avoid. No trespass. No intention to trespass. No potential for harm.
|
|
Sling Trebuchet
Deleted User
Join date: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 4,548
|
08-18-2009 13:30
From: Mickey McLuhan From: Argent Stonecutter Ban lines go beyond "no trespassing" signs. They are combination electric fence and anti-aircraft guns and tank traps and "severe tire damage" spikes. They are massive overkill, and yet ironically they don't actually do anything to protect you from people who ARE interested in violating your privacy.
You are absolutely right with this. Banlines are exactly that. And they're still legal. Because I can. Because they are legal. These were the justifications for ad-farming and traffic-bot running. What has being legal ever had to do with doing the worthy or right thing? "It's not against the law" is the refuge of the scoundrel. Add: For the benefit of those who have turned of viewing of Forum sigs, here's mine: ------ Maggie: We give our residents a lot of tools, to build, create, and manage their lands and objects. That flexibility also requires people to exercise judgment about when things should be used. http://www.ace-exchange.com/home/story/BDVR/589 -------
_____________________
Maggie: We give our residents a lot of tools, to build, create, and manage their lands and objects. That flexibility also requires people to exercise judgment about when things should be used. http://www.ace-exchange.com/home/story/BDVR/589
|
|
Gabriele Graves
Always and Forever, FULL
Join date: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 6,205
|
08-18-2009 13:53
From: Ian Nider Yeh, but you never can quite beat that one, can ya. If the only justification something has is itself then it is already beaten.
_____________________
 Trout Rating: I'm giving you an 8.2 on the Troutchter Earth-Movement Slut Scale. You are an amazing, enchanting woman, and, when the situation calls for it, a slut of the very best sort. Congratulations and shame on you!
|
|
Marcush Nemeth
Registered User
Join date: 3 Apr 2007
Posts: 402
|
08-18-2009 14:13
From: Sling Trebuchet In RL, those ban lines would be a fence that electrocuted an innocent passerby on the sidewalk who happened to stumble and fall against your boundary. That's somewhat OTT compared to a sign. In SL, you can rezz a sign. In RL, if you put up an electric fence right up along the sidewalk, you would be required to remove it - although, maybe in your jurisdiction the authorities and courts are a bit more laid back about public safety. Simply ask for a fix so banlines don't make your vehicle crash while sending you across 10 sims. Simply ask for banlines to work like a NORMAL PRIM WALL when vehicles are involved, instead of sending people home. Is that so bloody hard to ask for? Ask for banlines to be FIXED and act more "friendly"instead of demanding for their REMOVAL. If Banlines acted more like a hard fence instead of an electric wall when flying into them, this constant whining about them wouldn't exist. However, as much as you dislike the simple fact, banlines do suit a purpose. Not optimally, but they are "as good as it gets". Though I must admit, I don't mind for some people to experience the electrocution routine instead of the bouncy wall one that would be more ideal overall. Especially those who insist they have RIGHTS over OTHER PEOPLES PROPERTIES. You don't, grow up, stop whining. If you're looking for a solution, then look for a bloody solution that is acceptable to ALL involved, not just egotastic you. And SUPPORT that solution, VOTE for the JIRA. Don't take for granted that someone else created it, and that Linden Labs will look at it. Don't even take for granted that others will vote "for you". Expect others to be as sorry lazy arses as you are, so expect no votes, no matter how perfect the idea is. Unless you start to change yourself. Oh, and for the "electric fence" analogy: RL doesn't have a start new game / TP home option after the Game Over part. SL does.
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
08-18-2009 14:21
From: Marcush Nemeth Simply ask for a fix so banlines don't make your vehicle crash while sending you across 10 sims. Simply ask for banlines to work like a NORMAL PRIM WALL when vehicles are involved, instead of sending people home. Why? Wouldn't it be better to ask for something better than ban lines instead? If you're going to wish for the impossible, why not wish for something that works? Something that includes actual privacy? You stil won't get it, but it'll be less of a wasted wish. From: someone RL doesn't have a start new game / TP home option after the Game Over part. SL does. I can tell you've never felt an electric fence.
|
|
Dana Hickman
Leather & Laceā¢
Join date: 10 Oct 2006
Posts: 1,515
|
08-18-2009 17:10
From: Marcush Nemeth Ask for banlines to be FIXED and act more "friendly"instead of demanding for their REMOVAL. That's been suggested a thousand times.. always falls on deaf ears. Any solution that fixes their concerns while retaining landowners rights to keep random people out is simply not giving them what they want. They dont want to be kept out at all, don't want to have to go around for any reason, think they have some right to view other peoples stuff at close range, and expect it all for free on someone elses dime. That is IMO the crux of it all, and it's a real eye-opener. The last big debate on this over a year ago got me to drop all the banlines on all my lands. It was an acceptance on my part that perhaps I shouldn't be restricting people from passing through, and so they've remained down ever since. Reading this latest iteration of it though, and after hearing the justifications and unreasonably selfish attitudes of the very people I sympathized with last time, the banlines are going back up. All the way to 768m this time using a rotating black list ban, possibly with angry orbs above that if I, as landowner, so choose. Please ensure seatbacks and traytables are in the upright position, and enjoy your flight! 
_____________________
~Friendship is like peeing your pants... ~ ~Everyone can see it, but only you can feel its true warmth~
|
|
Clarissa Lowell
Gone. G'bye.
Join date: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 3,020
|
08-18-2009 17:18
From: Argent Stonecutter Planes land and take off. Cars don't fly at all, they drive down Linden roads and a quarter second's lag can toss them into limbo when they hit a banline on a border. Boats don't fly in most cases, and they are routinely trashed by banlines.
Because people keep saying things like "we need to restrict aircraft to designated air corridors", or "everyone should be able to ban everyone to an infinite altitude". Here's the thing. Planes don't "land and take off" in populated areas, in real life. They use a landing strip. You want to use people's houses and yards for your landing strip?
|
|
Gabriele Graves
Always and Forever, FULL
Join date: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 6,205
|
08-18-2009 17:22
Good grief, I would hate to have some of these people as neighbours in RL.
Them: "Your child just threw her ball on to my lawn" You: "Sorry, it was just an accident, she was playing catch and it went awry" Them: "I don't care for your excuses. I am now going to erect a 20m wall around my property to ensure that this terrible thing cannot happen again" You: "Umm why?" Them: "Because I have the God damn right to do so!" You: "Ummm K"
_____________________
 Trout Rating: I'm giving you an 8.2 on the Troutchter Earth-Movement Slut Scale. You are an amazing, enchanting woman, and, when the situation calls for it, a slut of the very best sort. Congratulations and shame on you!
|
|
Clarissa Lowell
Gone. G'bye.
Join date: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 3,020
|
08-18-2009 17:24
But the thing is, there ARE neighbors like that - in RL and in SL.
Arguing back and forth won't change it a bit. What is it, 50 pages now?
I guess my hope is that we can all look a little closer at our own motivations when seen through others' eyes, but, people only seem to be digging their heels in more, instead. Even people who are usually unemotional.
|
|
Gabriele Graves
Always and Forever, FULL
Join date: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 6,205
|
08-18-2009 17:27
From: Clarissa Lowell Arguing back and forth won't change it a bit. What is it, 50 pages now? When has that stopped us? Or anyone else in the human race for that matter?
_____________________
 Trout Rating: I'm giving you an 8.2 on the Troutchter Earth-Movement Slut Scale. You are an amazing, enchanting woman, and, when the situation calls for it, a slut of the very best sort. Congratulations and shame on you!
|
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
08-18-2009 17:28
Why don't we start another thread on it?
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
|
|
Clarissa Lowell
Gone. G'bye.
Join date: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 3,020
|
08-18-2009 17:30
From: Brenda Connolly Why don't we start another thread on it? YAYYYYYYYYY! Lol. From: Gabriele Graves When has that stopped us? Or anyone else in the human race for that matter? Neeever. But it does keep our mind off our/the World's REAL problems.
|
|
Gabriele Graves
Always and Forever, FULL
Join date: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 6,205
|
08-18-2009 17:57
From: Clarissa Lowell But it does keep our mind off our/the World's REAL problems. BINGO, we have a winner! 
_____________________
 Trout Rating: I'm giving you an 8.2 on the Troutchter Earth-Movement Slut Scale. You are an amazing, enchanting woman, and, when the situation calls for it, a slut of the very best sort. Congratulations and shame on you!
|
|
Clarissa Lowell
Gone. G'bye.
Join date: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 3,020
|
08-18-2009 17:58
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
08-18-2009 18:02
From: Clarissa Lowell Planes don't "land and take off" in populated areas, in real life. They use a landing strip. 1. Many landing strips, in real life, are in populated areas. I used to live under the glide path. 2. I bought about 1/6th of a sim for my landing strip. 3. If nobody could ever get hurt by a falling plane in RL, people would be taking off from their driveways and gliding down to land at their neighbors all the time.
|