Needless to say, logins are disabled.
Has anyone ever seen the number go this high before?
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
'Online now: 80,266' |
|
|
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
|
01-11-2009 13:56
Needless to say, logins are disabled.
Has anyone ever seen the number go this high before? |
|
Destiny Niles
Registered User
Join date: 23 Aug 2006
Posts: 949
|
01-11-2009 13:57
I crashed and when I tried to get it it was 80,566. I wonder how many of that number of those that have crashed and the system haven't cleared out yet.. i.e. ME!!
|
|
Rusalka Writer
Registered User
Join date: 12 Jun 2007
Posts: 314
|
01-11-2009 13:57
No wonder the whole thing melted down.
|
|
Weston Graves
Werebeagle
Join date: 24 Mar 2007
Posts: 2,059
|
01-11-2009 13:58
80,265. I just logged off.
|
|
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
|
01-11-2009 13:59
It would appear that reports of SL losing popularity are...premature.
|
|
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
|
01-11-2009 14:01
It would appear that reports of SL losing popularity are...premature. This would be dependent upon whether it's popular amongst users or bots ![]() |
|
Prue Dejavu
^-^
Join date: 11 Dec 2006
Posts: 16
|
01-11-2009 14:01
I crashed too..after been online a few hours and now can't get back in !
|
|
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
|
01-11-2009 14:02
This would be dependent upon whether it's popular amongst users or bots ![]() Someday SL may become popular enough that LL will actually release figures on how many logins ARE bots. |
|
Jean Swashbuckler
Registered User
Join date: 15 Aug 2008
Posts: 194
|
01-11-2009 14:06
It would appear that reports of SL losing popularity are...premature. Yep, and even allowing for bots, this is a pretty high number. Given the time of day and time zones, I would love to have stats on where people are geographically logging in during these peak periods. In Tokyo it's 7:02 am, Brisbane its 8:02 am, Moscow 1:02 am, Berlin 11:02 pm, London 10:02 pm, NYC 5:02 pm, Austin, 4:02 pm, and San Francisco 2:02 pm. |
|
LittleMe Jewell
...........
Join date: 8 Oct 2007
Posts: 11,319
|
01-11-2009 14:08
I crashed but got right back in.
_____________________
♥♥♥
-Lil Why do you sit there looking like an envelope without any address on it? ~Mark Twain~ Optimism is denial, so face the facts and move on. ♥♥♥ Lil's Yard Sale / Inventory Cleanout: http://slurl.com/secondlife/Triggerfish/52/27/22 . http://www.flickr.com/photos/littleme_jewell |
|
Baloo Uriza
Debian Linux Helper
Join date: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 895
|
01-11-2009 14:13
Someday SL may become popular enough that LL will actually release figures on how many logins ARE bots. Some day SL may become so popular that LR will actually do the right thing and stop allowing alts. |
|
Ghosty Kips
Elora's Llama
Join date: 2 May 2008
Posts: 2,386
|
01-11-2009 14:19
Some day SL may become so popular that LR will actually do the right thing and stop allowing alts. This isn't an alt problem. It's a traffic bot problem. If they ended anonymous accounts and limited everyone to, oh, 2 or 3 alts? I think that would be sufficient. _____________________
--
Why aren't you doing something more useful, like playing WoW? |
|
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
|
01-11-2009 14:21
Yep, and even allowing for bots, this is a pretty high number. Given the time of day and time zones, I would love to have stats on where people are geographically logging in during these peak periods. In Tokyo it's 7:02 am, Brisbane its 8:02 am, Moscow 1:02 am, Berlin 11:02 pm, London 10:02 pm, NYC 5:02 pm, Austin, 4:02 pm, and San Francisco 2:02 pm. I agree, that information would be fascinating. (You always have the best stats! ^_^) |
|
Gordon Wendt
404 - User not found
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 1,024
|
01-11-2009 14:21
According to Pathfinder it's a new record for concurrency.
_____________________
|
|
Kornscope Komachi
Transitional human
Join date: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 1,041
|
01-11-2009 14:26
I saw the sun one day, it had 1,000,000 on it. That's 1Million accounts.
The day we see that again it will be 1million concurrent. A long way to go yet. And it's probably not the amount of users on but the erroneous state of servers which, going by the complaint number of threads, is rising. _____________________
SCOPE Homes, Bangu
----------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
Arielyn Docherty
I DO Believe in Santa!
Join date: 3 Jul 2007
Posts: 625
|
01-11-2009 14:32
Where ARE they all, and why aren't they at our stores buying???
![]() |
|
Jean Swashbuckler
Registered User
Join date: 15 Aug 2008
Posts: 194
|
01-11-2009 14:33
I agree, that information would be fascinating. (You always have the best stats! ^_^) Ahh, shucks I have to admit, as soon as you posted, I tried to get in and after a few attempts was able to log in on our island. I pulled up the map to see the SL distribution and was surprised how many are actually on the Mainland. I assumed the private estates would be high. I have one screenshot and will try to get another. As you would expect, the green dots appear and the outline of mainland and some of the estates but a lot of blue. |
|
Rusalka Writer
Registered User
Join date: 12 Jun 2007
Posts: 314
|
01-11-2009 14:34
I was inworld shopping and buying, but my purchases were failing-- timed out. How encouraging.
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
01-11-2009 14:48
Some day SL may become so popular that LR will actually do the right thing and stop allowing alts. The right solution is to properly support and track alts formally in the user interface. We should have an account we log in to, and have one or more agents or avatars that belong to that account. And then limit people to one account and limit the account to enough concurrent logins for reasonable use. That will allow legitimate use of alts without leting people create armies of bots. _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
|
Baloo Uriza
Debian Linux Helper
Join date: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 895
|
01-11-2009 14:49
This isn't an alt problem. It's a traffic bot problem. If they ended anonymous accounts and limited everyone to, oh, 2 or 3 alts? I think that would be sufficient. 1 alt. Most alts are used for traffic bots, camping bots or ban evasion anyway: All you need is one. |
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
01-11-2009 14:53
I need more than two just to be in all the groups I need to be in. AND I'm not having to hide from stalkers.
_____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
|
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
|
01-11-2009 15:01
We should have an account we log in to, and have one or more agents or avatars that belong to that account. And then limit people to one account and limit the account to enough concurrent logins for reasonable use. That will allow legitimate use of alts without leting people create armies of bots. That seems blindingly sensible. So I suppose.....no chance!?!?!? ![]() |
|
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
|
01-11-2009 15:01
According to Pathfinder it's a new record for concurrency. Ah. Thanks---very interesting! |
|
Dytska Vieria
+/- .00004™
Join date: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 768
|
01-11-2009 15:25
This isn't an alt problem. It's a traffic bot problem. If they ended anonymous accounts and limited everyone to, oh, 2 or 3 alts? I think that would be sufficient. I don't think it is an Alt or Bot 'problem'. (Leave it alone whether they are good or bad!) The ~real~ problem is SL core systems cannot handle the concurrency. Even if Alts and/or Bots were not allowed, and concurrency dropped to a number that the core SL systems could handle, eventually, concurrency will creep up again and hit a level at which problems start happening again. LL made a blog that they were going to improve the db systems, but so far, not much has happened. Worse, one of the attempted improvements resulted in peoples' inventory items not being allowed to rez if they were over a certain age! They (LL) need to stop trying to remove the instances that are 'hurting' the system and make the system more resilient. Just my thoughts! _____________________
+/- 0.00004
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
01-11-2009 15:34
They're doing that with things like the new dedicated network linking their data centers.
_____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |