Is Paying for Links in Profile Picks Cheating?

There you go again - assuming that your ideas are the ideas of LL. And worse - you even imagine you know what LL thought about ad farms.

What is "reasonable to assume" to you, in this case, isn't reasonable to assume at all. It's only reasonable to someone with a personal agenda, as you said that you have.

I agree that LL didn't want the way ad farms turned out, and when it reached a point when they didn't want it, they acted. Prior to that, is seems that they wanted it, as you can tell from the new rules. Have they banned ad farming? No. They have taken steps to reduce its impact, that's all.

A morally bankrupt person twists truths to suit their own personal agenda, in an attempt to deceive other people.

Sling seems to argue that Google does it this way, Google doesn't want that, etc. and applies Google's attitudes to LL. She's wrong. When Google finds things in a website that they don't want in their engine, they remove the site from the index. LL knows all about the things that Sling is against, and yet they don't do anything about them. They don't even say that they'd rather they weren't there.

Sling's arguments are all about what Sling wants, and have nothing whatsoever to do with what LL wants, or even what the population wants.

How very childish of you.

This is so so brilliant.!!

This is the best Philogism in all history.
This is why I keep coming back to these threads. It's such a rush to see you post this kind of stuff.

LL have not banned ad farming!! (Just to be clear, that's an 'ipo' as opposed to an 'imo')
ZOMG! They haven't even banned it for a second time!!

Hello?
Earth to Phil... Earth to Phil...

This is so so brilliant.!!

This is the best Philogism in all history.
This is why I keep coming back to these threads. It's such a rush to see you post this kind of stuff.

LL have not banned ad farming!! (Just to be clear, that's an 'ipo' as opposed to an 'imo')
ZOMG! They haven't even banned it for a second time!!

Hello?
Earth to Phil... Earth to Phil...

"She's wrong"
Awwww. You wead my pwofile.
I suppose this means that I don't get to giggle when you address me as "Sling, lad" anymore. Now you'll have to find a replacement path of attempted condescension.

OK. It's official.
Phil has discovered that Search can be used for something other then being gamed in order to promote his store.
Wowsa! You can even search for an avatar name to get some basic information on them before you try to put them down.
AMAZING!!


/me wonders if /me will make my sig into a quote of Phil saying that LL have not banned ad-farmimg

Aww, poor Phil. don't like it when people point out the flaws in your opinion and hypocrisy?

After all, it's a fact you try to use your opinion of what the mass and LL thinks as facts, and get down right upset when told it's your opinion and not fact.

Perhaps someday you'll learn that your opinions are not facts.

If people pointed to my flaws, it would be fine, but you just bounce anything I say to someone right back at me. If I said that Sling is a beautiful woman, you'd boiunce it right back and say so are you. It's really very childish.

your putting words in someone's mouth again Phil, something you've complained about... yet do quite often.

If you complain about X doing Y when you do Y as well, it's going to be pointed out to you.

Your biggest flaw is your inability to see your flaws, such as thinking your opinion is fact.

See what I mean? So very childish.

In your opinion perhaps

But in truth no more childish than pointing out that one politician is complaining about another doing the same things they did.