Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Users getting other Users IP adresses

Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
11-26-2008 08:23
From: Desmond Shang
Bottom line, nothing can beat social engineering. It's all too easy to make an alt, befriend the target, get gobs of info or whatever. But at the end of the day, it's a colossal waste of time. Sort of like arguing with a crazy person. You 'win' but so what? In the end, they won more than you did. They got all sorts of personal attention (negative though it may be), your time, your attention, and felt important! Better to just ignore and keep moving forward.

This may sound really boring to those with an itch to scratch, but the true 'win' is eject/ban/mute. The less minutes of your life spent dealing with stupidity is the true victory. If there were any #1 secret to success I'd share - first or second life - it's this. Don't waste time fighting idiots. Just choose your best options and act on them. Pretty soon the idiots will be a small dot in your rear view mirror as you are on to bigger and better things.


Just ignore them, and let them die.
Morgaine Alter
dreamer
Join date: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 1,204
11-26-2008 08:28
The stalking is a serious issue thou, what head trips the other ppl are on while doing so.
The IP is useless, its letting the stalker get in your head and there alts. Trust me I know.
If she needs to talk tell her to IM me.
~reformed prey.
_____________________
https://www.xstreetsl.com/modules.php?name=Marketplace&MerchantID=125705

From: Phil Deakins
My zip gun stays right where it belongs - in my pants!
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
11-26-2008 08:56
From: Gabby Handrick
Declaring that this somehow makes SL insecure is just not correct in my opinion, if it were you would have to say the same for every web browser or program capable of playing streaming audio or video as well. Do you believe that people who own the servers that provide content should not have the ability to log the ip addresses of people that connect to them?
It doesn't automatically make SL "insecure", however it does provide certain capabilities to the person who has your IP address that are not normally relevant with normal Internet access.

1. Your presence in SL is associated with a non-volatile non-deniable identity: your SL account. This means that someone tracking people by IP address get a "web bug" to track you with that you can't turn off.

2. If you have multiple accounts, or multiple people are using the same IP address (eg, a place of business, a family with multiple users, or a shared apartment) they can determine this fact. This is being actively used by property owners to "IP ban" griefers... and while this may be a beneficial purpose it seems unlikely that griefers are not also taking advantage of this capability.

3. Because SL uses UDP extensively, there is no session-level mechanism to detect or prevent forged packets being inserted into a stream... even to the extent of TCP sequence number randomization. This means that if there is a vulnerability in the client it may be easier to take advantage of it, if you know their IP address. If you know the IP address of the region they are in the potential for exploits is further increased. The recent mandatory client update was done to close a hole of this type.

Because of this kind of consideration, I have always recommended only using streaming music or video on parcels where you know the people who have the right to set the video and audio stream, and to think twice before following requests to view web pages from in-world content. I am also concerned about the potential of even broader exposure through features like displaying web content on arbitrary prims (ie, beyond the current tricks with the parcel media stream).
_____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/

"And now I'm going to show you something really cool."

Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23
Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore
Raudf Fox
(ra-ow-th)
Join date: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 5,119
11-26-2008 09:21
I think it would be better to say that SL is no more or no less secure than browsing the web in general.
_____________________
DiamonX Studios, the place of the Victorian Times series of gowns and dresses - Located at http://slurl.com/secondlife/Fushida/224/176

Want more attachment points for your avatar's wearing pleasure? Then please vote for

https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-1065?
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
11-26-2008 09:29
From: Raudf Fox
I think it would be better to say that SL is no more or no less secure than browsing the web in general.
I don't think that it would be better to say that, because I don't believe it to be true.

In some ways SL is more secure, in that Linden Labs acts as an anonymizing proxy and application level firewall between residents... even those who provide services that would on "the web in general" be handled by separate websites.

In other ways SL is less secure, because in SL you have a specific singular location and identity within the grid, and this provides a universal and non-deniable identity that web-bug companies like DoubleClick would sell their grandmothers for.

This mans that the behaviors you need to retain such privacy as is possible in SL are different from the behaviors that you need for "the web in general"... and apparently not obvious to the average resident.
_____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/

"And now I'm going to show you something really cool."

Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23
Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore
Toy LaFollette
I eat paintchips
Join date: 11 Feb 2004
Posts: 2,359
11-26-2008 10:00
gotta love paranoia ;)
_____________________
"So you see, my loyalty lies with Second Life, not with Linden Lab. Where I perceive the actions of Linden Lab to be in conflict with the best interests of Second Life, I side with Second Life."-Jacek
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
11-26-2008 10:20
From: Toy LaFollette
gotta love paranoia ;)
I don't have to love people who are insufficiently paranoid. I've been a network and system administrator long enough that it's amazing I have any sympathy with people who fail to take basic precautions, let alone those who describe them as "paranoia"... but, alas, I'm too nice for my own good.

Which is one reason I'm no longer in that job... uncompensated overtime spent recovering files for my boss the second time they've been bit by the same virus is not a good way to spend an evening.
_____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/

"And now I'm going to show you something really cool."

Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23
Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore
Marianne McCann
Feted Inner Child
Join date: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 7,145
11-26-2008 10:20
From: 4318723350112047 String
have you tried being a 1000ft monster and typing on a little keyboard?

it's just sooo obvious!


He-loooo... 1000 ft keyboard! Why do ya tink they make 'em, after all?
_____________________


"There's nothing objectionable nor illegal in having a child-like avatar in itself and we must assume innocence until proof of the contrary." - Lewis PR Linden
"If you find children offensive, you're gonna have trouble in this world :)" - Prospero Linden
Yosef Okelly
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 2,692
11-26-2008 10:46
From: Raudf Fox
Huh, my IP is a LAAARRRGE and very rural area, including two smallish towns. Good luck getting more specific.

I have a friend who met his wife through such a challange. It took him two hours to knock on her door. 90 minutes was driving time.

YMMV.
Crystal Falcon
Registered Silly User
Join date: 9 Aug 2006
Posts: 631
11-26-2008 14:15
Of greater risk is info you share!

A friend included a quote in their profile a few years ago I couldn't translate, in my attempts to do so, googling for parts of the phrase, I found only 3 results during one search. They were all forum posts from the same person and included this apparently unique quote. :confused:

One forum post was in another MMO they enjoyed. Another forum post included an email address and their real name. Part of that email address led to their personal website with pictures and schedules and things. :eek:

They had shared their profession and where they lived in chat (a hugely populated state), so one more search provided their home address and phone number. A search of their name and industry provided their workplace and schedule and employee picture and coworkers.

I was totally astonished all this came from what seemed to be an innocuous quote in their profile and simple web searching curiosity but what they say is true, the system isn't the big risk but how we use it!
_____________________
TP to Crystal's Facets in world:
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Kress/120/5/146/

Shop my natural AO poses, clothing, tools with XStreet:
Dana Hickman
Leather & Lace™
Join date: 10 Oct 2006
Posts: 1,515
11-26-2008 14:19
From: Argent Stonecutter
1. Your presence in SL is associated with a non-volatile non-deniable identity: your SL account. This means that someone tracking people by IP address get a "web bug" to track you with that you can't turn off.

Obtaining someones IP address in SL is meaningless. Even matching your account name to your IP is meaningless for the purpose of following someones movements. In the context of your SL "identity" statement, someone trying to track someone by IP would HAVE to have hacked inside LL's main login/presence servers (or have hardware on the inside like NebuAD or Phorm) to accomplish any of that.
Also, it's not like DoubleClick at all, which uses mass site coverage and persistant cookies to glean websurfing habits. Sounds like what you're referring to is "profiling". Common practice on the web, yes.. but a benefit for a stalker in SL? Not likely... Even if you could, what purpose would trending the names of sims the victim visited in the past serve? It wouldn't be live data, OR very useful for the stalker who lives in the now. I can't imagine a stalker using "I know you went shopping at Sn@tch THREE times last month! Be Ph3@r3d 0f Me !!!" to try to be intimidating... the victim might die from laughter :rolleyes:
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
11-26-2008 14:54
From: Dana Hickman
Obtaining someones IP address in SL is meaningless. Even matching your account name to your IP is meaningless for the purpose of following someones movements.
I didn't say anything about "following someone's movements".

Someone collecting IP addresses can cross-reference IP address information and identify your alts (if you're trying to avoid them that way), identify other members of your family or roommates, and so on.

There are people already collecting databases like this to track griefers by IP - they even complained on the blog about the change in streaming video because it makes it harder to collect that information. If there's nobody building up a similar database for less beneficial purposes I would be very much surprised.
_____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/

"And now I'm going to show you something really cool."

Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23
Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore
Gordon Wendt
404 - User not found
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 1,024
11-26-2008 15:16
My apologies if it's been said before but it should be noted that the only way to even find out a specific person's IP from a hacked up media stream that they are listening to definitively is for them to be the only person on the parcel since you can't tell who's listening to music and who's not short of social engineering people into admitting it and/or cross referencing multiple instances of people listening to streams to see who's on the parcel and who's not in each instance and using process of elimination.
_____________________
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/GWendt
Plurk: http://www.plurk.com/GordonWendt

GW Designs: XStreetSL

Tod69 Talamasca
The Human Tripod ;)
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,107
11-26-2008 16:12
From: Marianne McCann
Oh no! People will know I live in a large suburb of a major metropolitan city!


Vee Know Vere You Are! :p
_____________________
really pissy & mean right now and NOT happy with Life.
Dana Hickman
Leather & Lace™
Join date: 10 Oct 2006
Posts: 1,515
11-26-2008 16:19
From: Argent Stonecutter
I didn't say anything about "following someone's movements".

Someone collecting IP addresses can cross-reference IP address information and identify your alts (if you're trying to avoid them that way), identify other members of your family or roommates, and so on.

There are people already collecting databases like this to track griefers by IP - they even complained on the blog about the change in streaming video because it makes it harder to collect that information. If there's nobody building up a similar database for less beneficial purposes I would be very much surprised.

Cross comparing IP's to identify alts.. yes definately. It was your referrence to "tracking" in the second line of the part I quoted that totally sounds like you meant following someones movements to me.. especially in a thread about stalking *shrugs*
Jesse Barnett
500,000 scoville units
Join date: 21 May 2006
Posts: 4,160
11-26-2008 16:25
From: Tod69 Talamasca
Vee Know Vere You Are! :p

1313 Mockingbird Lane
_____________________
I (who is a she not a he) reserve the right to exercise selective comprehension of the OP's question at anytime.
From: someone
I am still around, just no longer here. See you across the aisle. Hope LL burns in hell for archiving this forum
Tod69 Talamasca
The Human Tripod ;)
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,107
11-26-2008 16:44
From: Toy LaFollette
gotta love paranoia ;)


Just cuz yer not Paranoid doesnt mean they're not out to get you!! :D
_____________________
really pissy & mean right now and NOT happy with Life.
Kidd Krasner
Registered User
Join date: 1 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,938
11-26-2008 16:50
From: Gordon Wendt
My apologies if it's been said before but it should be noted that the only way to even find out a specific person's IP from a hacked up media stream that they are listening to definitively is for them to be the only person on the parcel since you can't tell who's listening to music and who's not short of social engineering people into admitting it and/or cross referencing multiple instances of people listening to streams to see who's on the parcel and who's not in each instance and using process of elimination.

It doesn't have to be definitive. It only has to be fairly reliable.

Suppose you have a scanner on a parcel that logs avatars, and you can get the log from a stream server. If you see an entry at each on or about the same time, there's a good chance, but not 100% chance, that it's the same person. It also depends on how many connections there are to the server, and who else is on the parcel. If you see the pattern repeating itself over a few weeks, then the chances of it being right go up (in a subjective, not statistical sense).

As people have said, so what? It's not useful for that much, in most cases - unless someone wants to seriously attach that IP address. That means keeping your firewall up to date and properly configured.
SuezanneC Baskerville
Forums Rock!
Join date: 22 Dec 2003
Posts: 14,229
11-26-2008 17:04
You can send different streams to different avatars, can't you?
_____________________
-

So long to these forums, the vBulletin forums that used to be at forums.secondlife.com. I will miss them.

I can be found on the web by searching for "SuezanneC Baskerville", or go to

http://www.google.com/profiles/suezanne

-

http://lindenlab.tribe.net/ created on 11/19/03.

Members: Ben, Catherine, Colin, Cory, Dan, Doug, Jim, Philip, Phoenix, Richard,
Robin, and Ryan

-
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
11-27-2008 08:09
From: Gordon Wendt
My apologies if it's been said before but it should be noted that the only way to even find out a specific person's IP from a hacked up media stream that they are listening to definitively is for them to be the only person on the parcel
You can correlate when people enter the parcel (llOverMyLand()) and when they connect to the stream. You can collect information about who's on the parcel and who's listening over time. And, finally, you don't NEED to be certain, you just need to be sure enough for your purposes.

This technique does work, and it is being actively used by people working to identify alts of griefers and ban them.
_____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/

"And now I'm going to show you something really cool."

Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23
Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
11-27-2008 08:13
From: Kidd Krasner
As people have said, so what? It's not useful for that much, in most cases - unless someone wants to seriously attach that IP address. That means keeping your firewall up to date and properly configured.
SL uses a UDP-based protocol. If you know the sim someone is in and their IP address there are a number of potential attacks that would at the very least DOS them, and that no firewall will ever be able to detect or block unless it's extended too understand the SL protocol at a very deep level. I'm not going to go into details but anyone who's worked on IP security and can read the protocol docs can think of candidates.
_____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/

"And now I'm going to show you something really cool."

Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23
Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore
1 2