What Is The Best..umm..Male Bit

My sweetie uses either the Realasm product or the "Real Penis" from Dark Delights.

Both can be Matched to your skin tone and edited for size and fit. Both have very limited talkiness, and even that can be muted. Good thing too...I want to talk to YOU, not to your Trout, Jr.

Neither one responds to your partner's touch, the way XCite does. I much prefer that...I never know when I'm going to caress Robo Cock one too many times and set it off. If he likes what I'm doing, my partner will tell me so.

Max...why not take your GF shopping with you? I mean, the thing is as much for her enjoyment as yours, and the testing process should be a lot of fun for both of you.

No GF? Then you don't need that particular item, now do you?

Don't really have any product recommendations. Most of the popular brands are tintable, sizable, and such.

But I will say this: skin tone matching is a bear! I would LOVE to see creators of the bits give presets for some of the more popular skins. Or skin makers give tinting help for the popular bits.

It seems to me this is a cross-marketing match made in heaven.

How is this partnership NOT already there for Laqroki, Redgrave, and other popular skin makers?

hey i want to get in and out fast !!!! taking pants of would just slow a person down

Nonsense. I can take my pants off in two seconds, and I bet mine are a lot tighter than yours. Heck, I can even take 'em off while leaving my very sexxy stiletto boots in place.

If you can't take two seconds to take your pants off, you're not gettin' in mine.

That *is* a big plus.

Just as in RL, using it properly is more important than what you have. Really. But, it helps to have something that isn't ludicrous in the first place.

My favorite, and that of the women who matter to me, is Realasm. Above someone criticized it for the head color, but it's user-adjustable so it's the wearer's fault if it's the wrong color.

Realasm is realistic looking -- looks amazingly like my own, actually, though a bit larger. Has a nice curve to it that many women say they like, but which does make it a bit more challenging to look right in certain poses. As mentioned above, it generally doesn't chat, though you can set it to chat when you come. It ejaculates and urinates. Get the Gold edition, with the HUD to allow tilt & color control. The HUD is stupid; takes up too much room on my screen. They also have a useless "mini HUD", which is nearly as big and missing crucial features like tilt control. Looks natural in all stages of erection, from "just got out of a cold shower" to fully woody.

XCite is better than the freebies I've seen. Many women like to play with the menus. However, many people get tired of seeing the same phrases over and over, and prefer imagination to button-play, and I tend to prefer that crowd, but it's a matter of taste. You can turn the chatting features off. It ejaculates, after which it shrinks, a bit of realism that often interferes. Again, the HUD is very important so you can control the level of excitement, so your partner doesn't have to keep clicking for example ("hold" feature is helpful here). But, compared with Realasm, it's artificial looking. Also, facelights make it pasty white. (I was publicly derided by some idiot for a poorly mismatched cock, when it was their facelight that was causing the problem. Thank goodness for the MUTE feature.)

XCite is also compatible with a number of products, which stimulate you or your partner automatically, if you're into that sort of thing.

Both XCite and Realasm can rez poseballs. With Xcite, you buy "Combos". With Realasm, I'm not sure -- I got an update that was supposed to add this feature but it didn't work. Not an issue for me; and I'm sure if I pursued it with them they'd sort me out.

I haven't seen Midnight Lotus. I'll have to check it out.

Now, back to what I said about USING it.

If visuals are important (and I assume they are; otherwise just cyber in chat and to hell with the poseballs and attached cock), one should be skillful at adjusting his or her shaft during play to suit the partner. This includes adjusting tilt, and vertical position. Sometimes the tilt control is sufficient, but other times it's necessary to right-click-edit and rotate it. For Realasm, the next time you use the tilt control it re-orients it for any tilt you've done along the X axis. I'm not sure about the other axes, which I don't adjust.

Agreed, the phrases are silly. The fun of the menu is seeing the thing shudder or tremble, or go from soft to hard.

LOL...Jig you made me choke on my drink

"kissed by a gopher" hahaha

Oooh to have been a pixel fly on the wall. I would have loved to have seen that. Any response from him at all, or did he just log off never to return?

Body Politik skins offer matching skin textures for Xcite models.
The nice thing about the Xcite is it does require some interaction by the partner. Lots of clicking to keep her busy I suppose while I’m fussing with menu’s.
That said, DaQbet still has the old v2 Xsite non-sculpty version but seldom uses it since I would rather concentrate on what’s being said in the IM window and NOT what menu options to fuss with.
If the moods right, why even bother leaving the dance floor. Well other then I’ve spent a slight fortune on Kama Sutra HUDs
btw does anyone remember the Dr. Austin and its nasty habit of spewing after a teleport.?

Kinda. As Lear mentioned, some of the scripts talk to each other, but not in a way you can see them. I don't know Xcite in detail, but the Sensations scripts are pretty cleverly done, if you can find other scripted items that interact with them. The Sensations product also looks slightly less fake than Xcite, but it has a vast number of prims corresponding to every piercing imaginable (with a lot of imagination), replicated in multiple stages of arousal.

While I agree that chatty genitals is an invention of dubious merit, some of us are sometimes... uh... "generous with our affections" to partners who expect some scripted response when they click; one hates to disappoint.

But I think all the "talkies" have an option to turn that off, so I'm not sure the chat feature has to be a negative.

Yes, and a surreptitious arousal from an unexpected party can be fun too. I also like the coming animation.

So, um, should we presume that person's face was located in very close proximity to your member at the time of this incident?

I am a bit surprised this thread hasn't been locked down yet, as it is quite non-PG!

I think we've all been pretty good about not being explicit. Haven't we?

Let's hope I don't cross the line to be banished due to this thread..HA

Depends on the individual taste.
Remembers being a noob and thought WoW! a Woody!!..thats got to be a cool c***.
It actually moves up and down and look!! comes with hair or not I gotta get one of those!!
Now for some thats what satisfies them. I don't know what the woman or..male in their SLLL says but.. If going to a nude beach walking and approaching people with what amounts to a finely sanded erect pretzel is what turns you on go for it. (shrugs).

I would have to say REALASM for the time being. Self-contained poseballs and chat if needed is pretty good. The color palette could use some improvement for the darker tones though. But one thing that can't be understated, no matter what Brand someone has, if you have true passion within, have an understanding of her, and can articulate those things that will make her care less about a over hyped pencil c***, your be well ahead. Cyber sex has saves many a relationship..and makes some damn good ones too!

Sounds like my REALASM to me

Darn! What a day to have left quality control!