Age Verification and Europe
|
Morwen Bunin
Everybody needs a hero!
Join date: 8 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,743
|
05-17-2007 22:44
From: Ciaran Laval I disagree somewhat, it has everything to do with the level of account I have. If they're offering me extra support, if they're taking payments from me, if they're saying I am a premium account member then they are very much saying that I am verified.
How is the old system less robust? If I was not me, my credit card company would have been in touch with LL regarding unauthorised payments. The new system will just be bad/good (from which side you like see it) as the old system. Very clear point is (and many confirmed this) for someone (a minor) who wants to cheat it will be easier to get access to a passport/driving license or SSN of a paremt then to a credit card. Morwen.
|
Bodger Brooks
Registered User
Join date: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 73
|
05-17-2007 23:05
From: Ciaran Laval How is the old system less robust? If I was not me, my credit card company would have been in touch with LL regarding unauthorised payments. It is not just about fraud, the KYC guidelines are part of the anti-laundering laws in most countries. Identify verification is seen as an important tool in the fight against money laundering.
|
Bodger Brooks
Registered User
Join date: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 73
|
05-17-2007 23:06
From: Paul Llewelyn Unless I missed an annoucement somewhere....this is still voluntary and is still voluntary for newbs as well. Voluntary measures often don't last voluntary for long.
|
Paul Llewelyn
Registered User
Join date: 9 Jul 2004
Posts: 86
|
05-17-2007 23:59
From: Bodger Brooks Voluntary measures often don't last voluntary for long. LOl I been saying that...no ones been listening. But at this exact point in time it is still voluntary.
|
Ace Albion
Registered User
Join date: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 866
|
05-18-2007 01:56
Logging in at all is voluntary. I will probably get verified, at least on my main account. My building alts don't need it, but then if I've given over a passport number or whatever already then why not. As well hanged for a sheep as a lamb. I think the policy is messed up and poorly thought out, but it will definitely help them to change the default culture of SL to a "can't do" place from a "can do" place when it comes to personal expression. People often complain that SL is just full of kink sex and gambling. This move will marginalise everyone who engages in those pursuits, all under the handy banner of protecting the children (who shouldn't be even on a PG sim on the main grid) and Philip from angry belgian cops or whatever. It will also, in a handy way, clean up SL, because it can be clear that the perverts are a minority. Of course with the majority of people in SL being here to get virtually hooked up, there's going to be a lot more room for the rest, real soon, when those people all leave for online sites like RLC or whatever, who only want a credit card, not a cavity search to log on. It'll ease the minds of big businesses to know the risk of their island landing close to a pony fisting farm on the map has been cut by 75% or whatever though 
_____________________
Ace's Spaces! at Deco (147, 148, 24) ace.5pointstudio.com
|
bilbo99 Emu
Garrett's No.1 fan
Join date: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 3,468
|
05-18-2007 03:51
From: Ace Albion Logging in at all is voluntary. Absolutely correct. From: Ace Albion Of course with the majority of people in SL being here to get virtually hooked up, there's going to be a lot more room for the rest, real soon, when those people all leave for online sites like RLC or whatever, who only want a credit card, not a cavity search to log on. I may be misinterpreting this but your majority of people here to get virtually hooked up is I think an exageration. I'm certain a vast number of people who delve into the adult recreation here are not doing it exclusively. Many I'm sure (and I said this yesterday somewhere) buy and rent content hence supporting the economy mebbe a little less than those who 'aren't interested in pixel sex' but nevertheless they are as much a part of this wide ranging population as anyone. From: Ace Albion It'll ease the minds of big businesses to know the risk of their island landing close to a pony fisting farm on the map has been cut by 75% or whatever though  See above. I'm ok with zoning. I'm ok with age verification but I'm getting a bit tired of elitism. As I said, I may have misinterpreted and if so I apologise now but I don't see age verification making a huge reduction on population .. despite all the flag-waving soap-boxing going on just now. Verification for all and let's kill this stigma!
|
White Hyacinth
Registered User
Join date: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 353
|
05-18-2007 04:04
Someone wrote the full social security number can be derived from the final four digits. That is an interesting thought: 4 digits contain 13.29 bits of information. A full 9 digit number contains 29.90 bits of information. Where do the missing 16.61 bits of information come from then?
|
Niles Nemeth
Registered User
Join date: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 5
|
05-18-2007 04:46
From: Broccoli Curry I do. Our home region is "M" rated, and we chose it because it was a good plot of land with great neighbours rather than it's region rating. Under your idea, I'd have to verify just to access home. As I previously stated, verifying I am over 18 is not a problem to me except for what it implies I am interested in, and I certainly don't want every hormonally challenged teen (who is probably unverified and shouldn't be here in the first place) thinking I'll be 'easy'.
If they'd never got rid of signup verification... most of these discussions wouldn't have been happening.
I still reckon all this verification lark is connected with the forthcoming Playboy Island ... although I remember the "Suicide Girls" coming in with similar trumpeting, and where did they all disappear to?
Broccoli But since you have no problem verifying I don't see your problem. By restricting unverifieds to PG the stigma of verifying is reduced. You are no longer verifying to simply acces porn or whatever because there would be everything else that was on mature land to consider too. I also find it funny that the ones worried about be unfairly labelled as looking for porn are also the ones that identify verification soley with that aspect. Tarring with one's own brush? I agree verification should never have been done away with in the first place. But LL made the bed and now we have to all lie in it (minus pose balls of course!  ).
|
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
|
05-18-2007 05:06
From: White Hyacinth Someone wrote the full social security number can be derived from the final four digits. That is an interesting thought: 4 digits contain 13.29 bits of information. A full 9 digit number contains 29.90 bits of information. Where do the missing 16.61 bits of information come from then? I may have got this back to front but someone said that in some states certain parts of a SSN contain the same number (they represent the state and town or something like that). Whereas that doesn't make much sense to me it must be to a degree true or they would be asking for full numbers, if Integrity can work out the full number from those last four digits then they must be the identifying component. I've confused myself here!
|
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
|
05-18-2007 05:10
From: Bodger Brooks It is not just about fraud, the KYC guidelines are part of the anti-laundering laws in most countries. Identify verification is seen as an important tool in the fight against money laundering. So if it's to do with money laundering why can't they do a transaction with my bank account like paypal does? I had to show the bank id for opening another savings account with them because of the money laundering issue? I know you won't know why, I'm just thinking out loud here 
|
White Hyacinth
Registered User
Join date: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 353
|
05-18-2007 05:39
Why don't we just take "payment info on file" to mean "verified to be 18+" as it was until 6/6/2006?
|