These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
What's your screen width (poll) |
|
What is the width (in pixels) of your monitor?640 pixels or less
2 (2.4%)
More than 640 pixels, but not more than 800 pixels
1 (1.2%)
More than 800 pixels, but not more than 1024 pixels
15 (17.9%)
More than 1024 pixels
66 (78.6%)
Total votes: 84
|
|
|
Lee Ludd
Scripted doors & windows
Join date: 16 May 2005
Posts: 243
|
03-28-2008 09:48
I want my web site to fit in in most screens used by residents of Second Life™. Please tell me the width of the screen you use:
|
|
Desmond Shang
Guvnah of Caledon
Join date: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 5,250
|
03-28-2008 09:52
Cheapie dell widescreen here, one of the small ones, 1650 x 1080.
_____________________
![]() Steampunk Victorian, Well-Mannered Caledon! |
|
Prawnyloks Parker
"Prim Fiddler"
Join date: 6 Oct 2006
Posts: 420
|
03-28-2008 09:52
Mine's 20" (1680x1050). How big's yours
![]() _____________________
PP Designs - The Home of Low Prim Designs - low prim prefabs & furniture
![]() http://slurl.com/secondlife/nuclear/236/240/21 (main store) or http://slurl.com/secondlife/huntsman/162/112/115 |
|
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
|
03-28-2008 09:53
1920 x 1280
|
|
Carolyn Crosley
Born from the Mind
Join date: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 332
|
03-28-2008 09:55
I have the Dell 30". What a difference in the SL experience!!!!
|
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
03-28-2008 09:57
1024x768.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com |
|
Love Hastings
#66666
Join date: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,094
|
03-28-2008 09:58
1680 for the laptop, and 1920 for the desktop.
But, I surf in windows that aren't full screen. I would reasonably say that most times browser windows are between 800 and 1000 pixels wide. _____________________
![]() |
|
Isabeau Imako
P'tite Poulette
Join date: 13 Sep 2007
Posts: 2,335
|
03-28-2008 09:59
Here's a site with good suggestions on choosing a 'size' for your web site. I would also keep in mind that handheld surfing is becoming more common, (don't know what your site will be about and if people will be accessing it while away from home).
http://www.websitebytes.com/articles/viewarticle.php?id=screenresolution |
|
Atashi Toshihiko
Frequently Befuddled
Join date: 7 Dec 2006
Posts: 1,423
|
03-28-2008 10:00
I run my system with two screens arranged in a side-by-side format, so my maximum width is 2720 pixels (depth is only 1024 though).
However I keep my browser set to no more than 3/4 the width of one screen, as I often want to have access to the icons and stuff down the edge of the desktop. Unless I am mistaken, what you are asking isn't really what the specs of the hardware is, but how much screen real-estate is available for web browsing. So I voted for 'more than 800 but less than 1024'. -Atashi _____________________
Visit Atashi's Art and Oddities Store and the Waikiti Motor Works at beautiful Waikiti.
|
|
Weston Graves
Werebeagle
Join date: 24 Mar 2007
Posts: 2,059
|
03-28-2008 10:04
Mine is set at 1024x768. I suspect most people are at a lot higher setting than that. This is a good compromise for me between image quality and my ability to read around the big floater thing in my eye that, I'm told, will move out of the way in a few years.
But I think web sites are also compromised by our browser settings. When I can't read a web page, I can always hit CTRL+ in Firefox to make the font bigger, which sometimes rearranges the web designer's carefully planned layout. Sorry. |
|
Hugsy Penguin
Sky Junkie
Join date: 20 Jun 2005
Posts: 851
|
03-28-2008 10:04
Two things I hate about web sites:
1 - It's designed for a certain screen resolution so I have run my browser maximized. Not everybody has a high resolution monitor. Not everybody who has a high resolution monitor wants to run their browser "big". Design your web site to look good at various sizes. 2 - Micro-font, especially when the designer purposefully makes it impossible to use Ctrl-Plus to enlarge the font. It's as if they're purposefully trying to piss people off. --Hugsy _____________________
--
Hugsy Penguin |
|
Daniel Regenbogen
Registered User
Join date: 9 Nov 2006
Posts: 684
|
03-28-2008 10:21
1600x1200 here.
|
|
Chip Midnight
ate my baby!
Join date: 1 May 2003
Posts: 10,231
|
03-28-2008 10:24
3200x1200 (1600x1200 dual monitor)
_____________________
My other hobby: www.live365.com/stations/chip_midnight |
|
2k Suisei
Registered User
Join date: 9 Nov 2006
Posts: 2,150
|
03-28-2008 10:25
1920x1080p
on a VERY big screen |
|
Brann Georgia
Spits infinitives
Join date: 12 Dec 2007
Posts: 1,441
|
03-28-2008 10:37
Hugsy's point is well made.
You should not design your web site to suit a specific resolution (physical size in inches is irrelevant to your question) even if that is the majority. 10% of 100,000 visitors is still a huge number if they get ticked by your design. Your best bet is to use a fluid design, where your content resizes and rearranges itself depending on the size of the window used for viewing it. Plenty of people with huge monitors do not use up their full screen real estate with their browser and, for best practices, your site should work in all cases. That doesn't mean it will look identical on all screens, nor is that the point. There are different ways of achieving this fluid design, depending on your coding skills. If it IS, in fact, very important that your design looks the same in all instances (i.e. you are relying on tables and graphics to form the structure of your design), then you should use a width of about 750 pixels for your design and let the rest of the space just stay empty. 750 is about reasonable for the smallest area of content as it fits into 800x600 resolution and still leave space for the scrollbar. (That said, a lot of people who are into graphic-rich online environments tend to run at high resolution. But it's amazing how many people I see around here (in an office type situation) with their perfectly capable monitors set to 800x600) Also keep in mind that some people with large monitors, perhaps because of visual impairments, have lowered their resolution or (heaven forbid) increased their font size. Some browsers lets people muck about with the style sheet (shudder). In other words, you have no control over how your web page displays in the end, anyway. Might as well make sure it display correctly, if not exactly as you see it, on as many different screens as possible. Just my two cents _____________________
*
* ![]() |
|
Nika Talaj
now you see her ...
Join date: 2 Jan 2007
Posts: 5,449
|
03-28-2008 10:41
1152x864
|
|
Alyx Sands
Mental Mentor Linguist
Join date: 17 Feb 2007
Posts: 2,432
|
03-28-2008 10:47
1024x768. Ditto here. Good old 15" screen. _____________________
~~I'm a linguist. RL sucks, but right now it's decided to be a little less nasty to me - you can still be nice to me if you want! ~~
->Potestatem obscuri lateris nescitis.<- |
|
FD Spark
Prim & Texture Doodler
Join date: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 4,697
|
03-28-2008 10:49
I got no clue I have very very small screen.
_____________________
Look for my alt Dagon Xanith on Youtube.com
Newest video is Loneliness by Duo Zikr DX's Alts & SL Art Death of Avatar |
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
03-28-2008 10:51
Ditto here. Good old 15" screen. Ouch! I have a 19" at least _____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com |
|
LittleMe Jewell
...........
Join date: 8 Oct 2007
Posts: 11,319
|
03-28-2008 11:29
1680x1050 on my widescreen where I display SL.
1280x1024 on my second monitor where I usually, but not always, have my browser running. That said, Hugsy and Brann are right - I absolutely hate websites that are specifically coded to a set size because I quite often do not run with my browser at full screen and I resize it a lot depending on what else I'm doing at the time. Also, please make sure you code it so that it works properly under other browsers beside IE. _____________________
♥♥♥
-Lil Why do you sit there looking like an envelope without any address on it? ~Mark Twain~ Optimism is denial, so face the facts and move on. ♥♥♥ Lil's Yard Sale / Inventory Cleanout: http://slurl.com/secondlife/Triggerfish/52/27/22 . http://www.flickr.com/photos/littleme_jewell |
|
poopmaster Oh
The Best Person On Earth
Join date: 9 Mar 2007
Posts: 917
|
03-28-2008 11:42
22 inches of pure digital fun
640x480 ftw _____________________
InSL u find every kind of no-life retard you could possibly imagine as well as a few even Tim Burton couldnt imagine u find 12yr-olds claiming to be 40 men claiming 2 be women, women claiming 2 make sense and every1 claiming 2 have ideas that are actually worth a damn if only someone would just listen to their unique innovative and exceptionally important idea
|
|
Imnotgoing Sideways
Can't outlaw cute! =^-^=
Join date: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 4,694
|
03-28-2008 11:44
1600x1200 20" and I used the 50" for new years at 1920x1080. Windlight Ultra all the way. \(^_^)/
_____________________
Somewhere in this world; there is someone having some good clean fun doing the one thing you hate the most. (^_^)y
![]() http://slurl.com/secondlife/Ferguson/54/237/94 |
|
Milla Alexandre
Milla Alexandre
Join date: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,759
|
03-28-2008 12:38
Um...dunno, but I have a 24" moniter and it rocks with SL. So, a lot I'm sure. lol
|
|
Parker McTeague
dubious
Join date: 28 Sep 2004
Posts: 198
|
03-28-2008 12:56
I run my system with two screens arranged in a side-by-side format, so my maximum width is 2720 pixels (depth is only 1024 though). However I keep my browser set to no more than 3/4 the width of one screen, as I often want to have access to the icons and stuff down the edge of the desktop. Unless I am mistaken, what you are asking isn't really what the specs of the hardware is, but how much screen real-estate is available for web browsing. So I voted for 'more than 800 but less than 1024'. -Atashi yeah, that. i have a number of smaller windows open, so it's easier to switch around between apps. best bet is to use a liquid layout, which can flex and look good in various sizes. for example, use percentages for horizontal layout. it won't look best on the extremes but it should at least be readable at them, but optimized to around 1024 or whatever you feel is your audience's average. _____________________
low prim, modern houses from Park Life!
visit my store at Deco 148, 148 blog: http://parklife.5pointstudio.com/ |
|
Darien Caldwell
Registered User
Join date: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 3,127
|
03-28-2008 13:00
1920x1080
_____________________
|