If you assume an falsehood you can prove anything.
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
How landcutters are still hurting the mainland |
|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
12-08-2008 08:54
If you assume an falsehood you can prove anything. _____________________
Prim Savers - almost 1000 items of superbly crafted, top quality, very low prim furniture, and all at amazingly low prices.
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Seymour/213/120/251/ |
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
12-08-2008 08:56
You're saying that they cut them up precisely to put more property lines on people's screens? Incidentally, you are the only person I've come across who *must* have property lines permanently on. _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
12-08-2008 09:01
They cut them up to annoy the people around them. Landcutting is an extortion tactic, period. Different people are annoyed for different reasons, but NOBODY is ever going to set up a landcut the way it was described by the OP unless they expect people to be irritated enough to pay extortionate prices. _____________________
Prim Savers - almost 1000 items of superbly crafted, top quality, very low prim furniture, and all at amazingly low prices.
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Seymour/213/120/251/ |
Vania Chaplin
Registered User
Join date: 13 Apr 2007
Posts: 125
|
12-08-2008 09:09
Let me tell you my history.
I had 4608 m² in a sim, where I and 3 friends live in. When I made a group and give the land to the group, in order to facilitate managering the land, I've received 10% grant (460 m²). I used this buying mini plots in a former ad farm in the very centre of the sim. During 6 months I've managed buying these plots for under L$ 500 per 16 m²; many where abandoned and I reclaimed them with LL (about half the new plot, in 4 occasions) and bought almost all the mini plots. Now I have 448 out of the regular 512 m plot. (see the situation now here: http://vaniachaplin.multiply.com/photos/album/4#17 ) There is a thin line of 64 m that would complete it, and I am able to buy it for a low price, but this would put me in a higher fee level. In this case, I would only do it for more land - I would not pay more US$ 15 a month for just 64 m². At the time there where one 2048 m² plot and two 512 m², and one 512 m² abandoned, that I could ask Linden to put on auction. Those would make 3584 m² out of 4096 m² that my jump in the fees would allow. In the two days that I was thinking on the matter, the 2048 m² was sold, the new owner divided it in two plots, removed 16 m² from each, put a vendor in the two 16 m² plots, and put the bigger ones to sell. Now, if I buy all this land I will end with a donut hollowed plot - no, this guy certainly messed again the sim. I spent 6 months buying all the mini plots in the sim, all my neighbours are wonderful people, there is no ugly building; nice people from all over the world (Canada, USA, Britain, Brazil, Japan, Netherlands, and others). We do make there a nice community, but this guy, simply cutting mini plots from his land prevented us to make there a sim that would be an example of what we can make in mainland if we are cooperative. Sorry for my rant, but yes, I'm pissed with it and hate land cutters __________________ Now that I ranted, I think that a possible solution would be prohibition to sell plots less than a minimum size, say 256 m² or 128 m². People can cut his/her plot in smaller pieces, but cannot sell it separately, just abandon it. In order to sell the smaller plots, they have to rejoin it to the major plot before selling it. |
Clubside Granville
Registered Bonehead
![]() Join date: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 478
|
12-08-2008 09:23
I'm repeating myself but here goes:
I just wish we could stick to a call for a minimum land ownership of 512m2 in a region and leave it at that. Extortion and other issues fall under that umbrella any way, and it is a more compelling solution due to the history of First Land, Premiums and minimum billing sizes for precedent for the change. Once again for the uninitiated the Mainland Covenant would state no user or group could own less than 512m2 in a region. Parcels could be carved smaller but in terms of buying or selling, no land transaction could result in an individual or group owning less than 512m2 in a region. To achieve this on the current Mainland Linden Lab would run a simple database query for all regions with parcel owners of less than 512m2. The resulting individuals or group owners would receive an email stating the new policy and giving them two weeks to either sell their land to achieve compliance, buy additional land in the region to meet the new minimum, or their land would forfeited to Gov. Linden. After that deadline all of the Gov. Linden land would be auctioned under the same rules essentially allowing current region land holders to shore up their properties. There you have it, three weeks to eliminate most if not all of the land issues on the current Mainland without zoning, simplifying the Linden's Mainland billing and wiping out extortion under the auspices of simplifying region management and land ownership with a history of billing tiers, memberships and First Land as precedent. Sound good? Let's run this up Jack's flagpole as a reasonable and legitimate policy change rather than attacking obvious but tricky entrenched land abuses. _____________________
Second Life Home Page Forums - slhomepage.com
Second Life Handbook - slhandbook.com Second Life Mainland - slmainland.com |
Elanthius Flagstaff
Registered User
Join date: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,534
|
12-08-2008 09:28
There is a thin line of 64 m that would complete it, and I am able to buy it for a low price, but this would put me in a higher fee level. Just wanted to shamelessly promote a service I offer. If you just need 64sqm of tier I can donate it to a group for just L$16 per week. _____________________
Visit http://ninjaland.net for mainland and covenant rentals or visit our amazing land store at Steamboat (199, 56).
Also, we pay L$0.15/sqm/week for tier donated to our group and we rent pure tier to your group for L$0.25/sqm/week. Free L$ for Everyone - http://ninjaland.net/tools/search-scumming/ |
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
12-08-2008 09:29
I just wish we could stick to a call for a minimum land ownership of 512m2 in a region and leave it at that. What might work would be "no parcel smaller than 512 square meters can be sold for more than L$0". Which will allow transfers between people who mutually trust each other, but extortionists would no longer be able to use Linden Labs as the bagman. _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
12-08-2008 09:31
They can cut them up for whatever they want but, if the parcels blend in nicely, they aren't a problem. _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
12-08-2008 09:40
Since the parcels in a grid can never blend in nicely, you have no point. Whatever. _____________________
Prim Savers - almost 1000 items of superbly crafted, top quality, very low prim furniture, and all at amazingly low prices.
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Seymour/213/120/251/ |
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
![]() Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
|
12-08-2008 09:49
...the Mainland Covenant would state no user or group could own less than 512m2 in a region. Parcels could be carved smaller but in terms of buying or selling, no land transaction could result in an individual or group owning less than 512m2 in a region. To achieve this on the current Mainland Linden Lab would run a simple database query for all regions with parcel owners of less than 512m2. The resulting individuals or group owners would receive an email stating the new policy and giving them two weeks to either sell their land... To whom? In how many sims would it be true that some other landowner had room in their tier to buy the additional land? |
Clubside Granville
Registered Bonehead
![]() Join date: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 478
|
12-08-2008 09:52
Because that would break many legitimate uses of land. That would be acceptable for a new continent (like Nautilus City) but it's unreasonable to impose it on Mainland as a whole. There go "strip center" mall rentals, rez points, home points, and all related uses of microparcels. And Jack knows this and has said it won't happen. What might work would be "no parcel smaller than 512 square meters can be sold for more than L$0". Which will allow transfers between people who mutually trust each other, but extortionists would no longer be able to use Linden Labs as the bagman. Maybe you weren't reading the proposal correctly: people could do whatever they wanted in regard to their own land use, they just couldn't own less than 512m2. You could still carve up the land for different media, advertising or whatever, but all land transactions would be tested to ensure no individual or group owned less than 512m2 (other than zero of course) after the sale. _____________________
Second Life Home Page Forums - slhomepage.com
Second Life Handbook - slhandbook.com Second Life Mainland - slmainland.com |
Talarus Luan
Ancient Archaean Dragon
Join date: 18 Mar 2006
Posts: 4,831
|
12-08-2008 09:58
Are you a plant or someone I've paid to ask fake questions so I can brag about the awesome features of my land trading system? Another feature is that all parcels that we buy for less than L$1/sqm have a notice attached alerting the seller to contact us immediately and the parcel is blocked from going on the market until I get online. I am just reporting on my experience here in an attempt to make some suggestions, so please don't take it personally. When a particularly notorious extortionist dumped his 16sqm donut hole plot in my main mall plot, you picked it up. I was glad, since I knew I could work with you and retrieve the hole before another jerk did (and I knew there was at least one who would try, given half the chance). I noticed the plot a few hours after it was dumped and bought, and the price was definitely still high. I immediately IMed both you and Skye. Skye got back to me in about 30 minutes, but she couldn't help because she was at work, and was responding via email replies to IMs. You weren't online at the time, and she said it may be some time before you were. So I waited. Hours passed; the price on the plot fell rapidly. After 14-15 hours (and still no response from you), it had gotten down under to L$200. There were also a couple other 16sqms the same person dumped that you also had across the street in one of the adfarms I was repairing. I waited as long as I could, and had to do some RL errands for about an hour. When I came back, the jerk who I feared was going to buy it had done so within the previous few minutes. I decided I couldn't wait any more on the rest, and bought the others to make sure he couldn't add them to his "holdings", paying the current price on them. About 30 minutes later, you arrived, and we talked about the situation. You were kind enough to refund me the purchase price on the ones I did buy (and had I known that, I would have gone ahead and purchased the other one, too, to avoid the jerk getting it), and sympathized with me on the loss of the more important plot. I fought with the jerk for several months until LL finally move his hole out by force. Anyway, my point in reciting the story is to point out: 1) There was no part of your system that "blocked the sale" of such plots, at least for me. That may be something new now, but it wasn't in place then (a few months ago now). 2) The price fell on those plots within 24 hours to well within even the most miserly of extortionists' prices. 3) Almost all of your system is automated, and it is most impressive. However, having to wait 18 hours for action on a request, when everything else is near-instantaneous, is a little long, in my opinion. I do hope you have put a timed lockout on the resale of microparcels to give adjacent owners time to notice them. I also certainly would never consider an offer to acquire adjacent land as spam. Not as a single notice. Spam is irrelevant, repeated messages broadcast as widely as possible. Such a single notice would be neither irrelevant, repeated, nor broadcast. You are one of the biggest land resellers in SL. With increased size and influence comes increased responsibility. I think you and Skye have proven that Ninjaland can rise to that calling, so I would expect that you are doing all that you can to help everyone put an end to land harassment, land cutting, and extortion. ![]() |
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
![]() Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
|
12-08-2008 10:02
What might work would be "no parcel smaller than 512 square meters can be sold for more than L$0". Which will allow transfers between people who mutually trust each other, but extortionists would no longer be able to use Linden Labs as the bagman. Think of what this policy, if implemented, would cost LL. No longer would land dealers do the work of buying parcels in the 10K, 20K, 30K, or 40K range---an investment of hundreds of US dollars, remember---and make them accessible to the vast majority of Residents (most of whom, if they decide to buy land, want to start with a no-monthly-tier parcel, NOT a US$900 one that will cost them $195 each month!) Too many such huge parcels are irregular (particularly those that adjoin Roads), and not evenly divisible by 512, to boot. So a few stray 16m bits at the edges are the inevitable result of making the nice rectangular parcels that most people want. To tell those who do this work that they have to simply abandon some percentage of their purchase, will mean that they will no longer do the task for free. LL will have to hire more people to do the work that land dealers are now doing for free. To make an understatement: LL is not going to want to do this. *For all those who say 'why not leave parcels of 37,000m intact, it would lead to a wonderful mainland!'---I say: either you haven't thought that through, or you have thought it through and have an ulterior motive. First, anyone who wants so large a parcel can look for auctions featuring them, or buy one of the many that are up for sale now. Second, as mentioned, the 'leave them all intact' philosophy would shut many potential new Premium members out of the market. Their only option would be rental (instead of ownership). Come to think of it, I wonder what percentage of those calling for an official policy change to 'never cut ANY Mainland parcels--don't just limit the prohibition to small parcels**'.......are landowners hoping for more tenants....?????? **Admittedly, not in this thread. But we've all seen such calls, or at least peevish references to 'landcutters' of even 512's, elsewhere on this board. |
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
12-08-2008 10:07
I think you're reading more into the proposal than was there.
To tell those who do this work that they have to simply abandon some percentage of their purchase, will mean that they will no longer do the task for free. LL will have to hire more people to do the work that land dealers are now doing for free. People won't respond to this in the kind of panic mode you suggest. People liable to that kind of panic mode aren't in the land business in the first place... or at least not successful ones. They'll look at it as "a cost of doing business" and adjust their prices a few percent to match. _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
Talarus Luan
Ancient Archaean Dragon
Join date: 18 Mar 2006
Posts: 4,831
|
12-08-2008 10:10
I look at it this way - so long as my view of the land with property lines off is clear and pretty, I don't care. It could be a field of 16ms, for sale at ridiculous prices, but I don't care. They can screw off and choke on tier. That's my general feeling, too; however, the mainland is peppered with extortion landmines. In most sims, you can't swing a plowline from your parcel without hitting one. Which means, if you ever want to expand, or avoid someone turning that microparcel into an ad terminal (much less a problem now, granted), you will end up paying the extortion tax; especially if it is right next to you, or is a corner out of your plot, or happens to be in the middle of your plot. Unless you actually want to buy more land in the sim, it's not a big deal and the mere presence of a small plot shouldn't get people so irate that they give up on the game. That is just my view. That's actually a fairly common occurrence, and something the extortionists plan for specifically in their strategies. The mere presence of a small plot shouldn't be allowed to make people so irate that they give up and quit. However, when you have hundreds to thousands of dollars invested in your land and development, and some jerkoff 16sqm owner who has no other reason to be in the middle of your land than to charge you a L$30000 extortion tax is left to do his dirty work there and everywhere else on the grid by LL, it sure seems to be telling that they don't care for your money or effort anymore. |
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
![]() Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
|
12-08-2008 10:11
... though that could be automated: "OK, to buy this prim land pay Landbot Low L$100, and then you will be able to buy the land it self for L$0". That will work for legitimate dealers selling land for a reasonable price, but won't work for landcutters trying to sell extortion plots. What would restrict such a practice to 'legitimate dealers'? Not a snarky question---I'm truly not seeing what could possibly distinguish 'legitimate' from 'illegitimate'----unless you are proposing price caps. Are you calling for LL to set price caps? |
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
12-08-2008 10:14
Maybe you weren't reading the proposal correctly: people could do whatever they wanted in regard to their own land use, they just couldn't own less than 512m2. _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
12-08-2008 10:14
What would restrict such a practice to 'legitimate dealers'? _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
Elanthius Flagstaff
Registered User
Join date: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,534
|
12-08-2008 10:15
I am just reporting on my experience here in an attempt to make some suggestions, so please don't take it personally. When a particularly notorious extortionist dumped his 16sqm donut hole plot in my main mall plot, you picked it up. I was glad, since I knew I could work with you and retrieve the hole before another jerk did (and I knew there was at least one who would try, given half the chance). I noticed the plot a few hours after it was dumped and bought, and the price was definitely still high. I immediately IMed both you and Skye. Skye got back to me in about 30 minutes, but she couldn't help because she was at work, and was responding via email replies to IMs. You weren't online at the time, and she said it may be some time before you were. So I waited. Hours passed; the price on the plot fell rapidly. After 14-15 hours (and still no response from you), it had gotten down under to L$200. There were also a couple other 16sqms the same person dumped that you also had across the street in one of the adfarms I was repairing. I waited as long as I could, and had to do some RL errands for about an hour. When I came back, the jerk who I feared was going to buy it had done so within the previous few minutes. I decided I couldn't wait any more on the rest, and bought the others to make sure he couldn't add them to his "holdings", paying the current price on them. About 30 minutes later, you arrived, and we talked about the situation. You were kind enough to refund me the purchase price on the ones I did buy (and had I known that, I would have gone ahead and purchased the other one, too, to avoid the jerk getting it), and sympathized with me on the loss of the more important plot. I fought with the jerk for several months until LL finally move his hole out by force. Anyway, my point in reciting the story is to point out: 1) There was no part of your system that "blocked the sale" of such plots, at least for me. That may be something new now, but it wasn't in place then (a few months ago now). 2) The price fell on those plots within 24 hours to well within even the most miserly of extortionists' prices. 3) Almost all of your system is automated, and it is most impressive. However, having to wait 18 hours for action on a request, when everything else is near-instantaneous, is a little long, in my opinion. I do hope you have put a timed lockout on the resale of microparcels to give adjacent owners time to notice them. I also certainly would never consider an offer to acquire adjacent land as spam. Not as a single notice. Spam is irrelevant, repeated messages broadcast as widely as possible. Such a single notice would be neither irrelevant, repeated, nor broadcast. You are one of the biggest land resellers in SL. With increased size and influence comes increased responsibility. I think you and Skye have proven that Ninjaland can rise to that calling, so I would expect that you are doing all that you can to help everyone put an end to land harassment, land cutting, and extortion. ![]() Well. As for the parcels not being held, I'd assume the original seller didn't sell them for less than L$1/sqm and if he was some kind of savvy griefer sort he probably priced them just below the market so I'd pick them up for the maximum I'm willing to pay. As for the 18 hour wait, it's simple, just convince LL that NinjaLand needs a Detroit style bailout of 15 billion and Skye and I can quit our real jobs and hang around in SL all day for customer requests. Everyone should do this as a matter of urgency! I don't remember precisely what was going on then but my land holdings tend to go in cycles. i.e. one month I'm desperately lowering prices trying to sell land and then next month I'm jacking up prices and keeping land for upto a month trying to avoid selling it. Maybe you caught me in one of the times I was trying to sell land and recover tier. Also, I use a sort of exponential curve so prices drop more rapidly to start with and then slow down as time goes by. I've been thinking of noting on these tiny parcels that people who want them should just buy them and ask for refunds if they are concerned about this sort of thing. No doubt many will mock me for trying to rip them off but presumably a few people will be saved from this sort of nonsense. As for a timed lockout like you and Dave suggested. I think this would be impossible because then I'd be forever running around manually setting land for sale to people. It's more practical to just set it for sale for some price and notify nearby land owners to pick it up if they want it. _____________________
Visit http://ninjaland.net for mainland and covenant rentals or visit our amazing land store at Steamboat (199, 56).
Also, we pay L$0.15/sqm/week for tier donated to our group and we rent pure tier to your group for L$0.25/sqm/week. Free L$ for Everyone - http://ninjaland.net/tools/search-scumming/ |
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
12-08-2008 10:20
I've been thinking of noting on these tiny parcels that people who want them should just buy them and ask for refunds if they are concerned about this sort of thing. No doubt many will mock me for trying to rip them off but presumably a few people will be saved from this sort of nonsense. _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
![]() Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
|
12-08-2008 10:24
The fact that this exchange requires the person buying the land trust the person selling the land. That trust does not exist when the seller is an extortionist. Unless the people know each other in First Life, I don't see how the distinction "legitimate vs. extortionist" could be known to the buyer (except in a tiny handful of cases in which the buyer is aware of the reputation of the seller---a number that would be negligible when measured against all such possible transactions). |
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
![]() Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
|
12-08-2008 10:30
I've been thinking of noting on these tiny parcels that people who want them should just buy them and ask for refunds if they are concerned about this sort of thing. No doubt many will mock me for trying to rip them off but presumably a few people will be saved from this sort of nonsense. I'm a tiny small fry compared to you, but I also face the ethical dilemma of what to do about the tiny parcels that make tier-max-sized parcels possible. So far I do indeed put a note on them offering to sell them to buyers of the adjoining parcel for the same per-meter price, or less (never more). If the buyers don't want them (and many do NOT want to jump up to the next tier level), then I offer them to other neighbors in the sim. All this with the microparcel NOT up for sale, to prevent speculators jumping in---though with LL doing well at eliminating the old 'put a 10 meter spinning neon box on the 16m parcel' trick, this is less of a danger. (I'm sorry but I'm not seeing 'terrorforming' as a genuine threat, funny and clever though the coinage may be.) |
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
![]() Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
|
12-08-2008 10:30
In how many sims would it be true that some other landowner had room in their tier to buy the additional land? _____________________
Archived for Your Protection
|
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
![]() Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
|
12-08-2008 10:32
In sims with microparcels? I'd say, oh lemme see... only all of them. How do you figure? |
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
12-08-2008 10:35
Unless the people know each other in First Life, I don't see how the distinction "legitimate vs. extortionist" could be known to the buyer Therefore the extortionist won't be able to sell parcels for extortionate amounts, and the incentive to engage in landcutting is gone. _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |