Don't like a thread? Lindens will now lock them, if you post a request to the hotline.
/invalid_link.html
~Ulrika~
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Running to Mommy |
|
Ulrika Zugzwang
Magnanimous in Victory
![]() Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 6,382
|
11-01-2005 13:12
Don't like a thread? Lindens will now lock them, if you post a request to the hotline.
/invalid_link.html ~Ulrika~ _____________________
Chik-chik-chika-ahh
|
Spooky Caligari
Registered User
![]() Join date: 10 May 2005
Posts: 145
|
11-01-2005 13:22
No offense, but that thread was pretty inflammatory, as if you were just looking for contraversy.
_____________________
My webcomics:
Perki Goth/Candi Raver http://mutt.purrsia.com/main.php My Private Little Hell http://mutt.purrsia.com/mplh |
Ulrika Zugzwang
Magnanimous in Victory
![]() Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 6,382
|
11-01-2005 13:25
No offense, but that thread was pretty inflammatory, as if you were just looking for contraversy. ![]() ~Ulrika~ _____________________
Chik-chik-chika-ahh
|
Lecktor Hannibal
YOUR MOM
![]() Join date: 1 Jul 2004
Posts: 6,734
|
11-01-2005 13:27
Oh please. That thread was no where near inflammatory nor intolerantly hate inciting as the one you started. You know exactly what you are doing and here of late it is lame.
_____________________
YOUR MOM says, 'Come visit us at SC MKII http://secondcitizen.net '
Oh, Lecktor, you're terrible. Bikers have more fun than people ! |
Cristiano Midnight
Evil Snapshot Baron
![]() Join date: 17 May 2003
Posts: 8,616
|
11-01-2005 13:31
Of course but how is it different from this thread? On what grounds are we selectively locking controversial threads. ![]() ~Ulrika~ It is not so much the controversial topic, but the call to others to deface property and symbolism that is important to the religious faith of others. That is a different thing than just discussing a controversial topic. Your key an SUV thread was already borderline in its calling for others to commit a crime. _____________________
Cristiano
ANOmations - huge selection of high quality, low priced animations all $100L or less. ~SLUniverse.com~ SL's oldest and largest community site, featuring Snapzilla image sharing, forums, and much more. ![]() |
Ulrika Zugzwang
Magnanimous in Victory
![]() Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 6,382
|
11-01-2005 13:34
It is not so much the controversial topic, but the call to others to deface property and symbolism that is important to the religious faith of others. That is a different thing than just discussing a controversial topic. Your key an SUV thread was already borderline in its calling for others to commit a crime. ~Ulrika~ _____________________
Chik-chik-chika-ahh
|
Liona Clio
Angel in Disguise
![]() Join date: 30 Aug 2004
Posts: 1,500
|
11-01-2005 13:36
Of course but how is it different from this thread? On what grounds are we selectively locking controversial threads. ![]() ~Ulrika~ Well, no one was suggesting that we burn George W Bush... (Hi, Nice FBI agent!!!) Seriously, Ulrika, what's up with yer anti-religion streak? Are the Jehovah's Witnesses storming your door lately? We faith based folk are actually pretty nice people, on the balance. ![]() _____________________
"Well, my days of not taking you seriously have certainly come to a middle."
|
Cristiano Midnight
Evil Snapshot Baron
![]() Join date: 17 May 2003
Posts: 8,616
|
11-01-2005 13:38
Would it have been a problem if I had asked folks to destroy a phone book or a non-Christian religious text? Should I respawn the thread and phrase it such that theft is no longer an issue? ~Ulrika~ I imagine that would change it, but then it wouldn't have your intended shock value. _____________________
Cristiano
ANOmations - huge selection of high quality, low priced animations all $100L or less. ~SLUniverse.com~ SL's oldest and largest community site, featuring Snapzilla image sharing, forums, and much more. ![]() |
Jamie Bergman
SL's Largest Distributor
![]() Join date: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,752
|
11-01-2005 13:40
Of course but how is it different from this thread? On what grounds are we selectively locking controversial threads. ![]() ~Ulrika~ Excuse me, but my thread wasn't encouraging people to do ANYTHING illegal, thank you very much. |
Kurgan Asturias
Apologist
Join date: 9 Oct 2005
Posts: 347
|
11-01-2005 13:40
Of course but how is it different from this thread? On what grounds are we selectively locking controversial threads. ![]() ~Ulrika~ 'Destroy a Bible' or 'Some Good Things George W Bush Has Done Domestically' One focuses on someones personal faith, the other on political preference. Can you honestly say that there is no difference between the two Ulrika? One is tearing down, one is building up. Again, can you honestly say that there is no difference between the two Ulrika? While it may be true, they may both be meant to troll, the latter certainly did not start off as such. It stated some facts (albiet debatable facts) and then some opinion. The latter made no mention of slandering / detroying anyone / anything. And again, can you honestly say that there is no difference between the two Ulrika? |
ZsuZsanna Raven
~:+: Supah Kitteh :+:~
Join date: 19 Dec 2004
Posts: 2,361
|
11-01-2005 13:44
I find it comical when certain people create threads for the sole purpose of inducing drama and people complain, but keep feeding it...
_____________________
~Mewz!~
![]() |
Ulrika Zugzwang
Magnanimous in Victory
![]() Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 6,382
|
11-01-2005 13:46
Seriously, Ulrika, what's up with yer anti-religion streak? Are the Jehovah's Witnesses storming your door lately? We faith based folk are actually pretty nice people, on the balance. ![]() ![]() Regarding religion, I revel in our modern-day freedom to say what we will, as just a few hundred years ago, one would have been murdered by the church for suggesting one destroy a bible. Nowadays, to reach a similar level of controversy, one must augment the call to action with the violation of more conventional norms such as supporting that vandalism and theft are acceptable forms of protest. In the end, I peacefully coexist with my religious relatives (even if from time to time they lose a page or two out of their bible). ![]() ~Ulrika~ _____________________
Chik-chik-chika-ahh
|
Ulrika Zugzwang
Magnanimous in Victory
![]() Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 6,382
|
11-01-2005 13:47
Excuse me, but my thread wasn't encouraging people to do ANYTHING illegal, thank you very much. ~Ulrika~ _____________________
Chik-chik-chika-ahh
|
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
![]() Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
|
11-01-2005 13:49
Excuse me, but my thread wasn't encouraging people to do ANYTHING illegal, thank you very much. Sure it was. It encourages support of a war-criminal. _____________________
|
Jamie Bergman
SL's Largest Distributor
![]() Join date: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,752
|
11-01-2005 13:50
Well, stupidity should be against the law. ~Ulrika~ Stupidity, as you put it, is merely a matter of personal judgement. |
Jamie Bergman
SL's Largest Distributor
![]() Join date: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,752
|
11-01-2005 13:50
Sure it was. It encourages support of a war-criminal. War criminal? You gotta be shitting me. |
Rose Karuna
Lizard Doctor
![]() Join date: 5 Jun 2004
Posts: 3,772
|
11-01-2005 13:51
I try and respect peoples beliefs and symbols. I don't say much when people tell me that they believe in something that I don't unless they cross a line with me.
Line --------------------------------------------- A) They try to convince me to believe what they do. B) They try to convice one of my family members to believe what they do. C) They attempt to leglislate or judicate their beliefs and it directly impacts me. D) Their leglislation stands in the way of medical or scientific procedures that could save me or someone I love or make me or my loved one more comfortable in their end of days. E) They attempt to take my property, my children or any other item that I have worked for. Once the line has been crossed, it's difficult to remain objective and depending upon how intrusive someone has become with their "beliefs", depends on how disrespectful I feel about their belief structure and the symbols of their religion I guess. So I sort of understand some of the anger because when you feel like someone's religious beliefs are directly responsible for D and E, it's difficult to have respect for their belief structure and their symbols. . _____________________
I Do Whatever My Rice Krispies Tell Me To
![]() |
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
![]() Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
|
11-01-2005 13:52
War criminal? You gotta be shitting me. I shit you not. George W. Bush is a war-criminal, and arguably the world's premier terrorist. _____________________
|
Margaret Mfume
I.C.
![]() Join date: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 2,492
|
11-01-2005 13:52
Would it have been a problem if I had asked folks to destroy a phone book or a non-Christian religious text? Should I respawn the thread and phrase it such that theft is no longer an issue? ~Ulrika~ Respawning sounds like an attempt to avoid calling it reposting a locked thread. Similar to pretending that this thread is intended to provide instructions on what to do if you do not like a thread topic. |
Taco Rubio
also quite creepy
![]() Join date: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 3,349
|
11-01-2005 13:53
I do find the "That thread is intolerent, and I support tolerence, so lock that thread" logic a lil hard to swallow, to be honest, but mainly I want to post this picture.
![]() |
Cristiano Midnight
Evil Snapshot Baron
![]() Join date: 17 May 2003
Posts: 8,616
|
11-01-2005 13:54
Stupidity, as you put it, is merely a matter of personal judgement. Or lack thereof. _____________________
Cristiano
ANOmations - huge selection of high quality, low priced animations all $100L or less. ~SLUniverse.com~ SL's oldest and largest community site, featuring Snapzilla image sharing, forums, and much more. ![]() |
Taco Rubio
also quite creepy
![]() Join date: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 3,349
|
11-01-2005 13:54
War criminal? You gotta be shitting me. Wait - you think, legally, he's not? |
Jamie Bergman
SL's Largest Distributor
![]() Join date: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,752
|
11-01-2005 13:55
I shit you not. George W. Bush is a war-criminal, and arguably the world's premier terrorist. George W. Bush is a Hero and a Defender of Freedom and will go down in history as one of the greatest presidents ever. |
Ingrid Ingersoll
Archived
![]() Join date: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,601
|
11-01-2005 13:56
![]() _____________________
|
Willow Zander
Having Blahgasms
![]() Join date: 22 May 2004
Posts: 9,935
|
11-01-2005 13:56
Ok someone tell me wtf the point is of clogging up the forums with threads that are quite obviously gunna be locked cos they are just pure and utter shite?
WHEN DID I LOSE MY JOB _____________________
*I'm not ready for the world outside...I keep pretending, but I just can't hide...* <3 Giddeon's <3 |