Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Should LL Enact a Sales / Transfer Tax to Fund Events?

Jamie Bergman
SL's Largest Distributor
Join date: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,752
12-02-2005 12:25
The Lindens could fund events again without causing inflation if they would enact a tax on all transfers / purchases / sales of L$ between Avatars.

The tax would effectively remove X% of each transactions to the state coffers, which could then be used to pay for event hosting.

Has the dawn of taxation to support social programs come of age in SL? Or should there [still] be no taxation without representation?

Its an emerging issue.
FlipperPA Peregrine
Magically Delicious!
Join date: 14 Nov 2003
Posts: 3,703
12-02-2005 12:26
NO NO NO! No taxes. I couldn't stomach the Welcome Area again if that were to happen!
_____________________
Peregrine Salon: www.PeregrineSalon.com - my consulting company
Second Blogger: www.SecondBlogger.com - free, fully integrated Second Life blogging for all avatars!
Noel Marlowe
Victim of Occam's Razor
Join date: 18 Apr 2005
Posts: 275
12-02-2005 12:32
From: Jamie Bergman
The Lindens could fund events again without causing inflation if they would enact a tax on all transfers / purchases / sales of L$ between Avatars.

The tax would effectively remove X% of each transactions to the state coffers, which could then be used to pay for event hosting.

Has the dawn of taxation to support social programs come of age in SL? Or should there [still] be no taxation without representation?

Its an emerging issue.


The world famous capitalist promoting taxes? *falls over in shock*
Lecktor Hannibal
YOUR MOM
Join date: 1 Jul 2004
Posts: 6,734
12-02-2005 12:33
Hmmmm, how much is the tax on a freebie when it is sold ?
_____________________
YOUR MOM says, 'Come visit us at SC MKII http://secondcitizen.net '

From: Khamon Fate
Oh, Lecktor, you're terrible.

Bikers have more fun than people !
Jamie Bergman
SL's Largest Distributor
Join date: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,752
12-02-2005 12:33
From: Noel Marlowe
The world famous capitalist promoting taxes? *falls over in shock*


LoL... well, I didnt really take a stand on the issue. But if taxes could enhance the experience of the player and encourage him/her to stay longer and spend more RL money IW than taxed, it coule make a compelling argument for taxation.
Jamie Bergman
SL's Largest Distributor
Join date: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,752
12-02-2005 12:34
From: Lecktor Hannibal
Hmmmm, how much is the tax on a freebie when it is sold ?


An item set for sale at L$0 in world would pay no tax.
Gabe Lippmann
"Phone's ringing, Dude."
Join date: 14 Jun 2004
Posts: 4,219
12-02-2005 12:35
From: Jamie Bergman
Its an emerging issue.


Is it really? Well, push it back down and seal the sewer cap tightly.
_____________________
go to Nocturnal Threads :mad:
Elex Dusk
Bunneh
Join date: 19 Oct 2004
Posts: 800
12-02-2005 12:38
Err, Earth calling Jamie... You're a CAPITALIST, remember? If you're a capitalist then:

1) You're opposed to transactional taxation, subsidies, and wealth redistribution.

2) You don't promote new forms of taxation, subsidies, or wealth redistribution.

So... what are you, really? Some sort of COMMUNIST?
Jamie Bergman
SL's Largest Distributor
Join date: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,752
12-02-2005 12:42
From: Elex Dusk
Err, Earth calling Jamie... You're a CAPITALIST, remember? If you're a capitalist then:

1) You're opposed to transactional taxation, subsidies, and wealth redistribution.

2) You don't promote new forms of taxation, subsidies, or wealth redistribution.

So... what are you, really? Some sort of COMMUNIST?


LoL... I dont know about that.

In the United States, the vanguard of world capitalism, taxes do exist. They pay for things such as the primary schools, the police, the roads, and spreading democracy throughout the world.

Its not necessarily against capitalism to support a taxation system when the monetary gains would offset the expenses or when it supports the national interest.
Moopf Murray
Moopfmerising
Join date: 7 Jan 2004
Posts: 2,448
12-02-2005 12:43
From: Jamie Bergman
An item set for sale at L$0 in world would pay no tax.


Yes but what about the people who sell those freebies for more than L$0. Surely you've heard of them? The talentless, parasitic, money-grubbing scum that just like to take what's been given to the community and cynically make their own buck off it? I mean, surely you've heard of it happening.

What should the tax on those be? In fact, why not let's just tax those! Then they could be doing some good for the community, rather than leeching off it.
_____________________
Jamie Bergman
SL's Largest Distributor
Join date: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,752
12-02-2005 12:44
From: Moopf Murray
Yes but what about the people who sell those freebies for more than L$0. Surely you've heard of them? The talentless, parasitic, money-grubbing scum that just like to take what's been given to the community and cynically make their own buck off it? I mean, surely you've heard of it happening.

What should the tax on those be? In fact, why not let's just tax those! Then they could be doing some good for the community, rather than leeching off it.


Moopf, the way taxes work is that a rate is applied to the base amount. So, if an item was selling at L$100, that would be its base.

Say the tax rate was 10%, the tax would be the Rate x Base or L$100 x 10% = L$10.

Freebies would incurr no tax because the base would equal Zero, and 0 times any rate is zero.
Lecktor Hannibal
YOUR MOM
Join date: 1 Jul 2004
Posts: 6,734
12-02-2005 12:45
Is obtusity a word ?
_____________________
YOUR MOM says, 'Come visit us at SC MKII http://secondcitizen.net '

From: Khamon Fate
Oh, Lecktor, you're terrible.

Bikers have more fun than people !
Newfie Pendragon
Crusty and proud of it
Join date: 19 Dec 2003
Posts: 1,025
12-02-2005 12:46
From: Jamie Bergman
Has the dawn of taxation to support social programs come of age in SL? Or should there [still] be no taxation without representation?

Its an emerging issue.



If it's an emerging issue, then it's emerging really slowly. This question has been raised countless times for practically as long as SL has existed.

As for the "taxation without representation", try looking up "SL tea party" in the archives. I'm not sure if it's still there, but there was quite the organized little revolt back in the pre-1.0 days about this same issue.


- Newfie
_____________________
Jacqueline Trudeau
Nogoodnik
Join date: 9 Jul 2005
Posts: 171
12-02-2005 12:46
From: Jamie Bergman
The Lindens could fund events again without causing inflation if they would enact a tax on all transfers / purchases / sales of L$ between Avatars.

The tax would effectively remove X% of each transactions to the state coffers, which could then be used to pay for event hosting.

Has the dawn of taxation to support social programs come of age in SL? Or should there [still] be no taxation without representation?

Its an emerging issue.
or charge admission to said events. you know, the "usage fee" that is so revered by fiscal libertarians/capitalists.

what exactly are these "social programs" that are emerging as issues? please elaborate.
_____________________
http://trudeauyachts.wordpress.com
Ordinal Malaprop
really very ordinary
Join date: 9 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,607
12-02-2005 12:47
From: Jamie Bergman
LoL... I dont know about that.

In the United States, the vanguard of world capitalism, taxes do exist. They pay for things such as the primary schools, the police, the roads, and spreading democracy throughout the world.

Its not necessarily against capitalism to support a taxation system when the monetary gains would offset the expenses or when it supports the national interest.

Gooood, gooooood... this one shows promise... she will soon join us on the dark side, comrades.
Moopf Murray
Moopfmerising
Join date: 7 Jan 2004
Posts: 2,448
12-02-2005 12:47
From: Jamie Bergman
Freebies would incurr no tax because the base would equal Zero, and 0 times any rate is zero.


Yes, if the freebie is being re-sold for L$0. But we all know that isn't always the case, don't we Jamie :)

So, why not let's just tax the parasitic fuckers? Force them to give something back to the community. What do you say to that, eh?
_____________________
Jamie Bergman
SL's Largest Distributor
Join date: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,752
12-02-2005 12:48
From: Jacqueline Trudeau
or charge admission to said events. you know, the "usage fee" that is so revered by fiscal libertarians/capitalists.

what exactly are these "social programs" that are emerging as issues? please elaborate.


One of the social programs is the use of taxation to support events.
Jamie Bergman
SL's Largest Distributor
Join date: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,752
12-02-2005 12:49
From: Moopf Murray
Yes, if the freebie is being re-sold for L$0. But we all know that isn't always the case, don't we Jamie :)

So, why not let's just tax the parasitic fuckers? Force them to give something back to the community. What do you say to that, eh?


Moopf, the tax would charge everybody. It would be unfair to tax only selective portions of the population, not to mention cumbersome to administer - and the Lindens have indicated they do not want to become involved in cumbersome processes.
Moopf Murray
Moopfmerising
Join date: 7 Jan 2004
Posts: 2,448
12-02-2005 12:52
From: Jamie Bergman
Moopf, the tax would charge everybody. It would be unfair to tax only selective portions of the population, not to mention cumbersome to administer - and the Lindens have indicated they do not want to become involved in cumbersome processes.


Yes, but don't you feel it's also unfair to take somebody's freebie, that they've given to the community, and re-sell that at a profit, simply because they're greedy, self-centered, self-absorbed assholes?
_____________________
Jacqueline Trudeau
Nogoodnik
Join date: 9 Jul 2005
Posts: 171
12-02-2005 12:52
From: Jamie Bergman
One of the social programs is the use of taxation to support events.
:confused: events? linden sponsored events? like what?

you don't think the lindens (who actually own *all* of your "wealth", you know) have the wherewithal to fund their own events???

bah. welfare for the rich - typical capitalism in practice.
_____________________
http://trudeauyachts.wordpress.com
Jamie Bergman
SL's Largest Distributor
Join date: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,752
12-02-2005 13:02
From: Jacqueline Trudeau
:confused: events? linden sponsored events? like what?

you don't think the lindens (who actually own *all* of your "wealth", you know) have the wherewithal to fund their own events???

bah. welfare for the rich - typical capitalism in practice.


Oh no they do, but they don't because they dont want to start rampid inflation.

Yes, Linden sponsored events. Like the old times.
Shadow Garden
Just horsin' around
Join date: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 226
12-02-2005 13:06
From: Jamie Bergman
Moopf, the tax would charge everybody. It would be unfair to tax only selective portions of the population, not to mention cumbersome to administer - and the Lindens have indicated they do not want to become involved in cumbersome processes.


Really? Why do you think that most American businesses pay relatively low tax rates? Not because the population enjoys supporting the government? PHHBBTT. The rich keep their money because they can shelter it in ways that are not taxed as heavily, and can afford consultants who do nothing but find those loopholes. The poor get poorer, because SOMEONE has to pay the bills and if the rich aren't, well then guess what.

I think it should be based on USE tax. If you are actively involved in running a business, and you have several transactions a day, you should pay a higher tax rate. You are costing more resources then the person who might shop once a week for something on stipend day.
_____________________
"Ah, ignorance and stupidity all in the same package ... How efficient of you!" - Londo Molari, Babylon V.
Juro Kothari
Like a dog on a bone
Join date: 4 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,418
12-02-2005 13:06
I'm for a sales tax, but slightly different than what Jamie mentions. I think there should be a sales tax on items that are being sold by someone other than the creator.
_____________________
Jacqueline Trudeau
Nogoodnik
Join date: 9 Jul 2005
Posts: 171
12-02-2005 13:09
From: Jamie Bergman
Oh no they do, but they don't because they dont want to start rampid inflation.

Yes, Linden sponsored events. Like the old times.
:confused:

I haven't been in world as long as some so I don't know what kinds of events you are referring to. And help me here... I am still at a loss as to why you propose that us giving *more* of our money to LL will somehow be instrumental in resurrecting these events.
_____________________
http://trudeauyachts.wordpress.com
Ordinal Malaprop
really very ordinary
Join date: 9 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,607
12-02-2005 13:10
Linden sponsorship for events based on taxation would be Lindens redistributing L$ rather than giving individual input and support for specific events. That might be an easier thing to manage. The thing is, though, events don't need the same sort of L$ that IRL events need in $. There are lots of things that a dedicated group of SLers can do that nobody could ever do in RL - no matter how dedicated, you can't magic stages, sculptures and studios out of nothing. L$ would help to... well, I'm guessing, hire a particular area for the event itself, and that's something the Lindens can provide far more efficiently by themselves than by relying on the SL land market.

A "tax" on freebie sellers would really be more of a fine. I'd be all for that, though, even if the money didn't go anywhere.
1 2 3