so who wants to go ballroom dancing?
look at this dude!
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
You gotta be kiddin me! |
|
Jumpman Lane
JUMPY!!!
![]() Join date: 7 May 2007
Posts: 2,114
|
07-19-2007 16:50
so who wants to go ballroom dancing?
look at this dude! _____________________
Ya girlfriend says she loves meh! But it's just the jewlreh! Multicolored carots got ya girlfriend kinda curious!
|
Tegg Bode
FrootLoop Roo Overlord
Join date: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 5,707
|
07-20-2007 01:39
If you don't post some crap that's at least remotely interesting I'm afraid it's time to mute you
![]() _____________________
Level 38 Builder [Roo Clan]
Free Waterside & Roadside Vehicle Rez Platform, Desire (88, 17, 107) Avatars & Roadside Seaview shops and vendorspace for rent, $2.00/prim/week, Desire (175,48,107) |
Jumpman Lane
JUMPY!!!
![]() Join date: 7 May 2007
Posts: 2,114
|
07-20-2007 09:37
If you don't post some crap that's at least remotely interesting I'm afraid it's time to mute you ![]() ![]() _____________________
Ya girlfriend says she loves meh! But it's just the jewlreh! Multicolored carots got ya girlfriend kinda curious!
|
RobbyRacoon Olmstead
Red warrior is hungry!
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 1,821
|
07-20-2007 09:43
YOU don't think that's interesting Not terribly ![]() . _____________________
|
Jumpman Lane
JUMPY!!!
![]() Join date: 7 May 2007
Posts: 2,114
|
07-20-2007 10:01
Not terribly ![]() . _____________________
Ya girlfriend says she loves meh! But it's just the jewlreh! Multicolored carots got ya girlfriend kinda curious!
|
Ann Launay
Neko-licious™
![]() Join date: 8 Aug 2006
Posts: 7,893
|
07-20-2007 14:02
I find it interesting - well, sort of - that you seem to care so much about what other MEN are wearing. Always assuming we can actually classify you as a 'man,' which I doubt.
And not like you're exactly the height of fashion there yourself, boyo. ![]() _____________________
~Now Trout Re-Re-Re-Certified!~
I am bumping you to an 8.5 on the Official Trout Measuring Instrument of Sluttiness. You are an enigma - on the one hand a sweet, gentle, intelligent woman who we would like to wrap up in our arms and protect, and on the other, a temptress to whom we would like to do all sorts of unmentionable things. Congratulations and shame on you! You are a bit of a slut. |
RobbyRacoon Olmstead
Red warrior is hungry!
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 1,821
|
07-20-2007 15:27
cause you dress like that...or want to bad! and I find THAT immensly interesting! And not like you're exactly the height of fashion there yourself, boyo. ![]() . _____________________
|
Jumpman Lane
JUMPY!!!
![]() Join date: 7 May 2007
Posts: 2,114
|
07-20-2007 18:09
Sorry, I don't roll that way, didn't mean to get your hopes up. Not exactly the epitome of wit, either, is he? . I'm laoughin at YOU, you the enterttinment fool! _____________________
Ya girlfriend says she loves meh! But it's just the jewlreh! Multicolored carots got ya girlfriend kinda curious!
|
Jumpman Lane
JUMPY!!!
![]() Join date: 7 May 2007
Posts: 2,114
|
07-20-2007 18:10
I find it interesting - well, sort of - that you seem to care so much about what other MEN are wearing. Always assuming we can actually classify you as a 'man,' which I doubt. And not like you're exactly the height of fashion there yourself, boyo. ![]() _____________________
Ya girlfriend says she loves meh! But it's just the jewlreh! Multicolored carots got ya girlfriend kinda curious!
|
RobbyRacoon Olmstead
Red warrior is hungry!
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 1,821
|
07-20-2007 18:39
I'm laoughin at YOU, you the enterttinment fool! Oh, thanks!!! That is a great compliment coming from someone as funny as you!* _____________________
|
Ann Launay
Neko-licious™
![]() Join date: 8 Aug 2006
Posts: 7,893
|
07-20-2007 18:44
You the one find that clown sexy...why ya fending him! i din't know hookers liked the circus! Keep trickin, trick! I believe hookers like anyone who can pay, but since I've never been one, I suppose I can't be sure of that. And I never voiced an actual opinion on his outfit, I just find it peculiar that YOU seem to care so much. _____________________
~Now Trout Re-Re-Re-Certified!~
I am bumping you to an 8.5 on the Official Trout Measuring Instrument of Sluttiness. You are an enigma - on the one hand a sweet, gentle, intelligent woman who we would like to wrap up in our arms and protect, and on the other, a temptress to whom we would like to do all sorts of unmentionable things. Congratulations and shame on you! You are a bit of a slut. |
Indigo Morigi
Registered User
Join date: 12 Jun 2007
Posts: 14
|
07-20-2007 20:05
I frequent this gallery more than any other part of these forums, and as painful as it is to see this obnoxious thread always at the top of the list, I think there are some interesting points to be made here. And, while I doubt the maturity and age validity of a few of the above posters, I will venture to inject some substance into this wreck...
Has the game of Second Life become such a pervasive element in some of our lives that we are beginning to experience an uncanny dip in self esteem regarding our own digital selves - our pile of pixels and polygons that we crafted to be the near perfect representation of our inner selves? Mr. Lane (whom we can thank for this nonsense) is absurdly mocking a computer game character. What followed was a childish argument over whether computer game characters are homosexuals. And we thought that those hypersexual furry creatures needed counseling... Some of us are nearly obsessed with "sexy" female avatars. We post process screenshots to touch up digital blemishes (like the occasional misaligned texture). There is a distinct belief that the more money you spend on your avatar, the better he or she will appear. There are Second Life pornographic artists (like Mr. Lane apparently). We have sculpted more perfect 3D nipples and genitals for our characters. I've seen male avatars with such muscular chests that they appear to have gone in for breast augmentation. Our "newbie" status is relinquished once we begin to customize our avatars' appearance beyond the default settings. I know a friend who purposefully altered her digital appearance to become a pale overweight female with freckles, a plaid shirt, short shorts, and a nearly bald head (with some bits of neon blue fuzz). I wish I could recall how many people approached her to offer advice on appearance settings and where to find some nice fashionable stores. Isn't this all bizarre for a game that promises us a new life free of the troubles of our real lives? Yet it must just be human nature to infuse the concept of self worth even into a computer game. Which life is invading which? There's a question for you. When we sit in front of our monitors drooling, snacking, and god know what else, at least we're spending our time wisely by making our avatars truly glamorous, right? Maybe we're trying to take our real life problems and thrust them into a medium that appears to be welcoming and benign. As research has shown, we of the digital age may suck at face-to-face communication, but at least we shine when conversing over the internet! Hmmm...then why do topics like these get brought up? Why does Mr. Lane believe that his actual shortcomings may be ideally masked by masquerading as a Second Life pimp? Maybe this post does belong in the Gallery section. Isn't SL a game which relies on community? Why can't a gallery showcase character studies? Why can't it address the stories which make us "human?" I am very frightened for the Second Life community. It is actively writing new chapters in the American Psychiatric Association's mental illness handbook. |
Tod69 Talamasca
The Human Tripod ;)
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,107
|
07-20-2007 20:31
I wholly agree with you on that one, Indigo.
I myself go for the "not-so-pretty" avatars. Dont care if folks think its wrong or not. _____________________
really pissy & mean right now and NOT happy with Life.
|
Ann Launay
Neko-licious™
![]() Join date: 8 Aug 2006
Posts: 7,893
|
07-20-2007 20:48
I think someone is taking SL waaaayyyy too seriously. My av looks the way she does because that's the way *I* want her to look...I'm not trying to impress anyone except me. I assume the same is true for most everyone, whether they choose to be 'human hot,' furry, lumpen, robotic, cube-shaped, whatever. Suggesting people may have mental issues just because they want to be 'pretty' by their own standards is presumptuous, to say the least...
...which is NOT to say that Jumpboy may not be compensating for his own inadequacies by attempting to make others the focus of derision. ![]() _____________________
~Now Trout Re-Re-Re-Certified!~
I am bumping you to an 8.5 on the Official Trout Measuring Instrument of Sluttiness. You are an enigma - on the one hand a sweet, gentle, intelligent woman who we would like to wrap up in our arms and protect, and on the other, a temptress to whom we would like to do all sorts of unmentionable things. Congratulations and shame on you! You are a bit of a slut. |
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
![]() Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
|
07-20-2007 21:07
Careful with your sweeping generalizations there, Mr. Shrink.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
|
Indigo Morigi
Registered User
Join date: 12 Jun 2007
Posts: 14
|
07-20-2007 21:11
Ann, I take offense to your suggestion that I am being too serious about SL. My post is an examination of human habits. It interests me to study Second Life users and their perspectives. I guess that's what a college education does to a person.
My comment is not specific to Second Life. It pertains to the growing interest in virtual worlds that we are currently experiencing. I just happen to be playing around with Second Life at the moment. I think it's great that you have the confidence to stand up for yourself and your Second Life appearance, but the very need for a person to do that further proves my point. We used to only care about 'being true to ourselves and loving ourselves' in real life. But now this philosophy must transfer into cyberspace. The thing is... In real life we are born and stuck with a physical appearance. So we must grow to love it. However, in a virtual world with no need for physical representation, why do we emphasize avatars if not to impress others? It is some sort of existential riddle. And I'm not trying to make inappropriate sweeping generalizations (though I can understand why it may seem that way). I am not trying to accuse people of these things. I would call myself an average user. I'm just commenting on my experiences with the more visible subcultures of this game. I'm actually not a shrink of any sort. ![]() This topic may become a major subject in research papers over the next few years. Indeed, Second Life and its users are being shoved under a microscope in university classrooms across the country. Isn't it interesting to see how a community reacts when the implications of research break through its walls of fantasy? And you might be surprised at some of the disorders listed in the APA's handbook... A wink ( ![]() In any case, thanks for reading the original post and thanks for an invigorating discussion! I know it's long and probably dreadfully boring for any average user. |
Jumpman Lane
JUMPY!!!
![]() Join date: 7 May 2007
Posts: 2,114
|
07-21-2007 01:01
Oh, thanks!!! That is a great compliment coming from someone as funny as you!* _____________________
Ya girlfriend says she loves meh! But it's just the jewlreh! Multicolored carots got ya girlfriend kinda curious!
|
Jumpman Lane
JUMPY!!!
![]() Join date: 7 May 2007
Posts: 2,114
|
07-21-2007 01:04
I believe hookers like anyone who can pay, but since I've never been one, I suppose I can't be sure of that. And I never voiced an actual opinion on his outfit, I just find it peculiar that YOU seem to care so much. ![]() _____________________
Ya girlfriend says she loves meh! But it's just the jewlreh! Multicolored carots got ya girlfriend kinda curious!
|
Jumpman Lane
JUMPY!!!
![]() Join date: 7 May 2007
Posts: 2,114
|
07-21-2007 01:06
I frequent this gallery more than any other part of these forums, and as painful as it is to see this obnoxious thread always at the top of the list, I think there are some interesting points to be made here. And, while I doubt the maturity and age validity of a few of the above posters, I will venture to inject some substance into this wreck... Has the game of Second Life become such a pervasive element in some of our lives that we are beginning to experience an uncanny dip in self esteem regarding our own digital selves - our pile of pixels and polygons that we crafted to be the near perfect representation of our inner selves? Mr. Lane (whom we can thank for this nonsense) is absurdly mocking a computer game character. What followed was a childish argument over whether computer game characters are homosexuals. And we thought that those hypersexual furry creatures needed counseling... Some of us are nearly obsessed with "sexy" female avatars. We post process screenshots to touch up digital blemishes (like the occasional misaligned texture). There is a distinct belief that the more money you spend on your avatar, the better he or she will appear. There are Second Life pornographic artists (like Mr. Lane apparently). We have sculpted more perfect 3D nipples and genitals for our characters. I've seen male avatars with such muscular chests that they appear to have gone in for breast augmentation. Our "newbie" status is relinquished once we begin to customize our avatars' appearance beyond the default settings. I know a friend who purposefully altered her digital appearance to become a pale overweight female with freckles, a plaid shirt, short shorts, and a nearly bald head (with some bits of neon blue fuzz). I wish I could recall how many people approached her to offer advice on appearance settings and where to find some nice fashionable stores. Isn't this all bizarre for a game that promises us a new life free of the troubles of our real lives? Yet it must just be human nature to infuse the concept of self worth even into a computer game. Which life is invading which? There's a question for you. When we sit in front of our monitors drooling, snacking, and god know what else, at least we're spending our time wisely by making our avatars truly glamorous, right? Maybe we're trying to take our real life problems and thrust them into a medium that appears to be welcoming and benign. As research has shown, we of the digital age may suck at face-to-face communication, but at least we shine when conversing over the internet! Hmmm...then why do topics like these get brought up? Why does Mr. Lane believe that his actual shortcomings may be ideally masked by masquerading as a Second Life pimp? Maybe this post does belong in the Gallery section. Isn't SL a game which relies on community? Why can't a gallery showcase character studies? Why can't it address the stories which make us "human?" I am very frightened for the Second Life community. It is actively writing new chapters in the American Psychiatric Association's mental illness handbook. _____________________
Ya girlfriend says she loves meh! But it's just the jewlreh! Multicolored carots got ya girlfriend kinda curious!
|
Jumpman Lane
JUMPY!!!
![]() Join date: 7 May 2007
Posts: 2,114
|
07-21-2007 01:13
I wholly agree with you on that one, Indigo. I myself go for the "not-so-pretty" avatars. Dont care if folks think its wrong or not. _____________________
Ya girlfriend says she loves meh! But it's just the jewlreh! Multicolored carots got ya girlfriend kinda curious!
|
Jumpman Lane
JUMPY!!!
![]() Join date: 7 May 2007
Posts: 2,114
|
07-21-2007 01:19
I think someone is taking SL waaaayyyy too seriously. My av looks the way she does because that's the way *I* want her to look...I'm not trying to impress anyone except me. I assume the same is true for most everyone, whether they choose to be 'human hot,' furry, lumpen, robotic, cube-shaped, whatever. Suggesting people may have mental issues just because they want to be 'pretty' by their own standards is presumptuous, to say the least... ...which is NOT to say that Jumpboy may not be compensating for his own inadequacies by attempting to make others the focus of derision. ![]() ![]() _____________________
Ya girlfriend says she loves meh! But it's just the jewlreh! Multicolored carots got ya girlfriend kinda curious!
|
Jumpman Lane
JUMPY!!!
![]() Join date: 7 May 2007
Posts: 2,114
|
07-21-2007 01:28
Careful with your sweeping generalizations there, Mr. Shrink. _____________________
Ya girlfriend says she loves meh! But it's just the jewlreh! Multicolored carots got ya girlfriend kinda curious!
|
Jumpman Lane
JUMPY!!!
![]() Join date: 7 May 2007
Posts: 2,114
|
07-21-2007 01:32
Ann, I take offense to your suggestion that I am being too serious about SL. My post is an examination of human habits. It interests me to study Second Life users and their perspectives. I guess that's what a college education does to a person. My comment is not specific to Second Life. It pertains to the growing interest in virtual worlds that we are currently experiencing. I just happen to be playing around with Second Life at the moment. I think it's great that you have the confidence to stand up for yourself and your Second Life appearance, but the very need for a person to do that further proves my point. We used to only care about 'being true to ourselves and loving ourselves' in real life. But now this philosophy must transfer into cyberspace. The thing is... In real life we are born and stuck with a physical appearance. So we must grow to love it. However, in a virtual world with no need for physical representation, why do we emphasize avatars if not to impress others? It is some sort of existential riddle. And I'm not trying to make inappropriate sweeping generalizations (though I can understand why it may seem that way). I am not trying to accuse people of these things. I would call myself an average user. I'm just commenting on my experiences with the more visible subcultures of this game. I'm actually not a shrink of any sort. ![]() This topic may become a major subject in research papers over the next few years. Indeed, Second Life and its users are being shoved under a microscope in university classrooms across the country. Isn't it interesting to see how a community reacts when the implications of research break through its walls of fantasy? And you might be surprised at some of the disorders listed in the APA's handbook... A wink ( ![]() In any case, thanks for reading the original post and thanks for an invigorating discussion! I know it's long and probably dreadfully boring for any average user. _____________________
Ya girlfriend says she loves meh! But it's just the jewlreh! Multicolored carots got ya girlfriend kinda curious!
|
Tod69 Talamasca
The Human Tripod ;)
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,107
|
07-21-2007 02:34
You lyin you didn't read all that...i mean it's THE GALLeRY..he could have added a pic or to! but tell me did i come out shinig and sparkling and glowin in booky the bookworms estimation? If so he RAWKS...if not he is toe-jam on the curled up left big toe of a one-footed crack-head! Bet that...square biz! LOL! You make me laugh! ![]() And yes- I did read it all. ![]() _____________________
really pissy & mean right now and NOT happy with Life.
|
Jumpman Lane
JUMPY!!!
![]() Join date: 7 May 2007
Posts: 2,114
|
07-21-2007 08:21
LOL! You make me laugh! ![]() And yes- I did read it all. ![]() _____________________
Ya girlfriend says she loves meh! But it's just the jewlreh! Multicolored carots got ya girlfriend kinda curious!
|