When did age play become illegal?

Greetings Kavan,

Certain types of Age Play is illegal in SL. That is what counts. Furthermore, your excuse of legal does not make it right. There are many things legal in the world which are simply wrong. Let us not get drawn into some deep cultural philosophical discussion about what is accepted in certain types of culture, etc in the world.

SL for the most part represents the Western Civilization culture and that includes most of Europe, Australia and other parts of the world.

Please do not compare ageplay to Vampirism because there is a huge difference. For some of us, Vampirism is not Role Play. It has nothing to do with Hollywood. If you want to know more, PM me ingame.

Personally I find sexual age play utterly disgusting. I have no tolerance for it whatsoever. It encourages pedophillia in what we all refer to as "real" life. I think people who need this kind of emotional or physical satisfaction need counseling because it is not natural to desire children.

Cross dressing is not the same as ageplay so please do not make comparisons there either.

BDSM also is not the same.

No, not everything that consenting adults do is ok.


Stamp out age play.


Vryl Valkyrie

Ageplay is a form of regressive roleplay in which a physical adult takes on the role of a child. This may be purely regressive (in order to re-experience childhood in a non-sexual sense), or sexual (the roleplaying of a child/adult relationship in sex, which may be a sexual fetish and is often grouped within BDSM).

Roleplaying adult/child scenarios sexually is controversial as it can arouse concern in many people's minds, due to the sensitive nature of its subject matter. However as with other sexual fantasy it is not, by itself, necessarily a problem, and can be for some, a healthy or healing outlet, and for others like any fantasy an exploration of different roles and feelings.

Sexual Ageplay is a type of sexual roleplay which, because of its dominance and submission aspects, is considered a form of BDSM. It may be referred to as edgeplay because of its level of social acceptability; such roleplay may involve (fictional) incest, and a common reaction is to associate child roleplaying in a sexual situation with pedophilia. Most sexual ageplayers resent any association with pedophilia, and claim that neither party is encouraged to believe there is a real child involved, and that it involves two consenting adults with one expressing the assumed emotional vulnerability of a child.

Is this suppose to impress me?


Vryl Valkyrie

Please do not compare ageplay to Vampirism because there is a huge difference. For some of us, Vampirism is not Role Play. ...

Personally I find sexual age play utterly disgusting. I have no tolerance for it whatsoever. It encourages pedophillia in what we all refer to as "real" life.

Please do not compare ageplay to Vampirism because there is a huge difference. For some of us, Vampirism is not Role Play. It has nothing to do with Hollywood.

Personally I find sexual age play utterly disgusting. I have no tolerance for it whatsoever. It encourages pedophillia in what we all refer to as "real" life.

It encourages pedophillia in what we all refer to as "real" life.

I think people who need this kind of emotional or physical satisfaction need counseling because it is not natural to desire children.

Possessing weapons of mass destruction and shooting people in the face without a license to is illegal, yet we can still shoot people in the face in SL.
This whole thing is leaving me confused as to where to stand on it, but the question is where to draw the line? I mean, sure rape is illegal in real life because it hurts people physically/emotionally, as the word implies, you are FORCING yourself upon them. But you can't do that in SL, so rape groups are just another form of RP, that I may not agree with, but ultimately don't hurt anybody so long as they aren't doing it in public spaces or otherwise getting it in the faces of people who don't want to see it.

Same with bestiality, I'm a furry and I don't for a second condone the abuse of animals, I own a horse and wouldn't know justice complete enough for anyone who abused her. But SL doesn't HAVE any 'real' animals, it's just pretend. Again, so long as people aren't forcing it on others by doing it in public I see no issue with it as ultimately it doesn't hurt anyone either.

Same with age-play, sure I think it's weird and disgusting but that's my opinion of it. Others obviously enjoy it, and again, so long as they aren't doing it in public then it doesn't hurt anyone either.

I mean, we need to draw a line on this because it's one thing to perform a horrific real-life crime such as child or animal abuse or rape, it's another do something that's pretend and just LOOKS like it. It's the same with violent video games, I can buy a game where I shoot the crap out of people, cut off their arms and legs, but it's completely different from me going out and DOING it.
SL is all about "our world" and "our imagination", so long as we don't hurt anyone or cross any truly illegal boundaries (such as importing child-porn, copyright materials and gambling since legislation now covers it in many places) then all we do is imagine, acting out things as pretend. However weird or sick to other people some of these things are, doing it virtually as pretend is a hell of a lot better than going out and doing it, and I don't see why there should be any problem so long as no-one is being hurt by these things and it's kept private with individuals interested in it.

So by all means; ban the crap out of people importing child-porn, or beastiality pictures, or rape photos or whatever. But beyond imported images these crimes don't actually EXIST in SL where everyone is an adult free to CHOOSE so why are we trying to enforce it?! The only thing to enforce is inappropriate behaviour, I for one don't want to see child avatars whoring themselves, or random people shagging a goat in public. But if they do it in private where I can't see them or at a club for that group where it's acceptable behaviour, then I don't mind it at all.

Ugh!! It is so NOT the same. Age-play (I don't care what Wiki or anyone else says) often leads to sexual desires or abuse of children. I think anyone who does this is twisted in their mind. This is my personal opinion which by the way, I am fully entitled to... I don't apologize for it either... I cannot condone any form of sexual age-play because I find it hideous and appalling beyond words. Children must always be protected and this crap doesn't protect them at all.. it's SICK.


Vryl Valkyrie

Ugh!! It is so NOT the same. Age-play (I don't care what Wiki or anyone else says) often leads to sexual desires or abuse of children.

Ugh!! It is so NOT the same. Age-play (I don't care what Wiki or anyone else says) often leads to sexual desires or abuse of children.

I think anyone who does this is twisted in their mind. This is my personal opinion which by the way, I am fully entitled to... I don't apologize for it either... I cannot condone any form of sexual age-play because I find it hideous and appalling beyond words. Children must always be protected and this crap doesn't protect them at all.. it's SICK.

Hi Walker, actually the Wiki is not the expert here..

Please don't think for one second that you can ever sway me to change my views because you cannot. Any personal attacks will bounce off like water because I expect this from giving my opinion in a public format.